A Comprehensive Breakdown of the Medicaid ABI Waiver WAITLIST, Its Impact on Families, and Taxpayers.
Connecticut’s Medicaid ABI Waiver Program Crisis: A Comprehensive Breakdown of the Waitlist, Its Impact on Families, and Taxpayers
Republican Senator Lisa Seminara has raised serious concerns about the ongoing Medicaid ABI Waiver Program waitlist crisis, with individuals waiting for services as far back as 2019. Despite years of acknowledging this issue, no real solutions have been provided. The absence of DSS Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves from a recent critical legislative hearing has only intensified concerns about the leadership and lack of accountability within the Department of Social Services (DSS).
During the hearing, Christine Weston, Director of the Community Options Unit (COU), was unable to provide accurate data regarding how many individuals are stuck on the waitlist. This points to deeper issues within DSS and raises alarms about mismanagement. Simply acknowledging the problem without implementing solutions has left families in a state of limbo, while those in power, such as Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves, have failed to address the core of the crisis.
For years, Connecticut’s Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program has provided critical services to individuals living with brain injuries. These services include rehabilitation, home care, and daily support aimed at improving the quality of life for survivors. Unfortunately, the program is now facing a growing crisis, with some individuals waiting since 2019 for care. Despite acknowledgment of the issue by Governor Ned Lamont, the Department of Social Services (DSS), and key officials like Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves, no substantial solutions have been implemented. As the waitlist grows, so do the consequences for families and taxpayers.
The ABI Waiver Program: A Lifeline Being Denied
The ABI Waiver Program is designed to allow individuals with acquired brain injuries to live more independently in their communities. It covers essential services such as:
Rehabilitation therapy
In-home care
Behavioral support services
Respite care for caregivers
Case management
However, the growing waitlist, which has left individuals waiting for over five years, is preventing brain injury survivors from accessing the care they need. For these individuals and their families, this isn’t just a delay—it’s a life-altering obstacle to recovery.
How This Crisis Impacts Individuals and Families
For families of brain injury survivors, the long wait times for Medicaid ABI Waiver services have a devastating impact on every aspect of their lives:
Deteriorating Health:
Many survivors are living with deteriorating physical and mental health due to the delay in accessing appropriate care. Without timely rehabilitation and support services, their conditions often worsen, leading to more frequent hospitalizations and emergency room visits. These are costly and ineffective solutions compared to the long-term care that Medicaid provides.
Emotional Strain:
The emotional toll of waiting for years for care is overwhelming. Uncertainty about whether their loved one will ever receive the care they need adds significant mental stress to families. The failure of DSS to provide clear information about their position on the waitlist only deepens the feeling of being forgotten by the system.
Financial Burden on Caregivers:
In the absence of Medicaid services, family members often become full-time caregivers, leading to financial strain. Many caregivers must leave their jobs to provide care, resulting in a loss of household income. This further destabilizes families, leaving them financially vulnerable while they wait indefinitely for services.
How This Crisis Impacts Taxpayers
While the direct impact on families is severe, taxpayers also bear the consequences of the mismanagement of the ABI Waiver Program:
Wasted Taxpayer Dollars:
The delay in providing essential services through the ABI Waiver forces individuals to rely on emergency services, which are far more expensive than the long-term care they need. Taxpayer dollars are being used inefficiently, with funds directed toward short-term, crisis care instead of preventive, cost-effective services that the waiver provides.
Federal Funding at Risk:
The ongoing mismanagement of the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program could jeopardize Connecticut’s compliance with federal Medicaid regulations. This risks a loss of federal funding, which would further strain the state budget and reduce available services for those in need.
Increased Healthcare Costs:
By delaying access to necessary care, the state is creating a system where individuals' health conditions worsen over time, leading to higher healthcare costs. Preventive care is far more affordable than treating preventable complications that arise from lack of timely care. Taxpayers end up shouldering the costs of this inefficiency.
Acknowledgment Isn’t Enough: The Need for Action
For years, the ABI Waiver Program waitlist has been acknowledged, but acknowledgment alone is insufficient. Simply recognizing the problem doesn’t resolve the issue, and families are still waiting in limbo. Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves has not actively participated in critical discussions, raising concerns about the lack of leadership in fixing the problem. The absence of leadership and transparency has caused a growing crisis, leaving families and taxpayers alike to suffer the consequences.
A Call for Reform: Immediate Actions Required
To address the ABI Waiver waitlist crisis, several reforms must be prioritized:
Transparency in Waitlist Management:
DSS must provide clear, accurate data about the waitlist and regularly update families on their status. Transparency is critical to rebuilding trust between families and the agency.
Reduction of Wait Times:
The state must increase staffing and streamline administrative processes to ensure individuals don’t have to wait years for services. Addressing these bottlenecks will be key to clearing the backlog.
Federal Audits:
Independent federal audits are needed to ensure the program is in compliance with Medicaid regulations and that funds are being used effectively. Audits will help identify where the system is failing and bring accountability to the program.
Accountability from Leadership:
Leaders such as Governor Ned Lamont and Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves must be held accountable for the ongoing mismanagement of the program. Concrete steps are needed to reduce the waitlist and improve service delivery.
Whistleblower Protections:
Strengthening whistleblower protections will encourage staff to report instances of mismanagement or inefficiency within DSS without fear of retaliation. This will help identify and resolve issues more quickly.
The Time for Action Is Now
The Medicaid ABI Waiver Program waitlist crisis is a failure of leadership, transparency, and compassion. It affects not only the brain injury survivors who depend on these services but also their families and Connecticut taxpayers. Real reform is needed, not just acknowledgment of the problem.
At ABI Resources, we stand with the families and advocates pushing for immediate solutions. We call on Governor Ned Lamont, Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves, and the federal government to implement the necessary changes to ensure that brain injury survivors receive the care they deserve.
It’s time to ensure that Connecticut’s most vulnerable populations are no longer left behind. The time for action is now. Together, we can fix this as it is so desperately needed.
The Medicaid ABI Waiver Waitlist Crisis: A Call for Transparency and Reform
In Connecticut, brain injury survivors and their families have faced an ongoing crisis. For more than five years, individuals in desperate need of care have been stuck on a waitlist for the Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program. This delay in services has far-reaching consequences, including worsening health conditions, emotional and financial strain on families, and a profound lack of accountability within the Department of Social Services (DSS). It is time for immediate reform, transparency, and federal oversight to address these critical issues.
The ABI Waiver Program: A Lifeline Being Denied
The ABI Waiver Program is designed to provide vital services to individuals with acquired brain injuries, including rehabilitation, home care, and support services that help survivors regain independence and live fulfilling lives. However, many people in need of these services are left on a waitlist for years, unable to access the care they desperately require. For these individuals, the wait is not just a delay—it is a life-altering obstacle to recovery.
Prolonged Wait Times and Systemic Mismanagement
Despite the urgency, many individuals have been waiting over five years for critical services. Families and caregivers are left in limbo, without clear information about when—or if—their loved ones will receive the help they need. This prolonged wait is a sign of systemic mismanagement within the DSS. During a recent legislative exchange, Christine Weston, Director of the Community Options Unit (COU) within DSS, could not provide the number of individuals on the waitlist, raising serious concerns about the oversight and integrity of the program.
Lack of Transparency
The absence of clear communication is one of the most frustrating aspects for families on the waitlist. Many are not even aware of their position on the list, and the DSS has not been transparent in providing this information. This lack of accountability raises concerns that there may be efforts to discourage access to Medicaid services, particularly for the most vulnerable populations.
Senator Lisa Seminara, a Republican representing Connecticut’s 8th Senate District, has been a vocal advocate for addressing the mismanagement of the ABI Waiver Program. During the recent hearing, Governor Ned Lamont’s administration, along with Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves (who was notably absent from the hearing), faced scrutiny for failing to provide answers and implement necessary reforms.
The Burden on Families
For families waiting for services, the emotional, physical, and financial toll is immense. Without the necessary Medicaid services, family members often become full-time caregivers, leading to burnout and financial strain. Many caregivers are forced to leave their jobs to provide care, which further exacerbates financial instability. The mental exhaustion caused by uncertainty and the responsibility of caregiving creates a cycle of stress that affects entire households.
Deteriorating Health for Those on the Waitlist
For individuals with brain injuries, the delays in accessing care can be detrimental to their health. Without timely intervention, many patients see their conditions worsen, leading to more hospital visits and increased reliance on emergency care—a costly and inefficient alternative to long-term, proactive treatment. These emergency treatments often fail to address the underlying health issues, creating a revolving door of healthcare that does little to improve the quality of life for brain injury survivors.
The Taxpayer Impact
The financial inefficiencies of the ABI Waiver Program are not just a burden on families—they also affect taxpayers. Delays in services lead to more expensive emergency interventions, which are covered by Medicaid. Had these individuals received timely and appropriate care, these costly emergency services could have been avoided. This represents a misallocation of taxpayer dollars and underscores the need for improved program management and transparency.
The Risk of Losing Federal Funding
The delays and mismanagement of the ABI Waiver Program could have even broader consequences for Connecticut. Non-compliance with federal Medicaid regulations could result in the loss of federal funding, which would further strain the state’s budget and reduce services for those most in need. This would be a devastating blow to the program and the vulnerable populations it is supposed to serve.
Immediate Solutions: A Call for Federal and State-Level Reform
The current state of the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program is untenable. Families, advocates, and policymakers must come together to demand immediate federal oversight and state-level reform. This situation demands action on several fronts:
Transparency in Waitlist Management: DSS must provide families with clear and accurate information about their position on the waitlist. Full transparency will restore trust and allow families to plan for the future.
Reduction of Wait Times: The state must address staff shortages, funding gaps, and procedural inefficiencies within the DSS that contribute to long delays in service delivery.
Federal Audits: Independent federal audits are necessary to ensure compliance with Medicaid regulations and to identify areas of financial mismanagement. These audits will ensure that taxpayer dollars are being used efficiently and that services are being provided to those who need them most.
Whistleblower Protections: Strengthening protections for whistleblowers within DSS will encourage more individuals to come forward with information about potential mismanagement or corruption without fear of retaliation.
Accountability from Leadership: Governor Ned Lamont and Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves must ensure that the leadership within DSS is committed to supporting vulnerable populations and is held accountable for the program's performance.
A Call for Advocacy and Action
The Medicaid ABI Waiver Program is a lifeline for individuals with brain injuries, but the current mismanagement of the waitlist and services is failing those who need it most. Immediate reforms are necessary to restore trust, improve efficiency, and provide life-saving services to Connecticut’s most vulnerable populations. ABI Resources stands with families, caregivers, and advocates in demanding the transparency, accountability, and action needed to fix this broken system.
It’s time to stand together and push for the reforms that Connecticut’s brain injury survivors deserve.
Outrage Now, Injustice Exposed, Public Outrage, Demand Accountability, Broken System, Fix This Now, Enough Is Enough, Unacceptable, We Deserve Better, No More Delays, Action Needed Now, Transparency Now, Justice Denied, System Failing, Urgent Reform, Accountability Now, Mismanagement Exposed, Voices Silenced, Act Now For Change, Fed Up With Injustice
Hidden Medicaid Agency Provider List: Connecticut Department of Social Services / CT DSS COU CGA
Exposing Medicaid Secrets: How Connecticut's Violations Hurt Taxpayers & Vulnerable Populations" CGA
Connecticut DSS Faces Scrutiny Over Concealed Provider List in Medicaid ABI Waiver Program
In a recent legislative exchange, Connecticut State Representative Kathleen McCarty questioned Christine Weston, Director of the Community Options Unit (COU) within the Connecticut Department of Social Services (DSS), about the availability of the Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program Agency Provider List. The list is not publicly accessible and COU would need to consult with DSS legal counsel—has triggered concerns about transparency and potential violations of federal Medicaid regulations.
The concealment of the Provider List directly undermines federal requirements for transparency, consumer choice, and public accountability in Medicaid-funded programs. Under the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(23)), Medicaid beneficiaries are guaranteed the right to choose from any qualified provider participating in the program. By withholding the list of providers, DSS is effectively limiting beneficiaries' ability to make informed choices about their care, a clear violation of this federal statute.
More than a mere bureaucratic oversight, this lack of transparency obstructs the fundamental rights of Medicaid recipients, particularly vulnerable populations like brain injury survivors who depend on specialized care. These individuals and their families rely on accessible information to choose the most appropriate care providers based on quality, expertise, and geographic location. The absence of this information not only deprives them of their legal rights but also risks funneling beneficiaries toward limited, state-favored providers, potentially compromising the quality of care they receive.
This issue with the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program could indicate a systemic problem in Connecticut’s administration of federally funded programs. If the DSS is withholding information in this program, similar practices may be occurring in other state-managed, federally funded programs. With billions of taxpayer dollars flowing through Medicaid, this raises significant concerns about mismanagement, financial oversight, and the state’s broader compliance with federal transparency requirements.
Beyond violating Medicaid regulations, this failure to provide access to public information also erodes trust in the integrity of state-run health services. When critical details about provider options are concealed, it creates a veil of secrecy that limits public accountability. Moreover, it raises the specter of conflicts of interest—where specific providers may be favored by state agencies for reasons unrelated to the quality of care or beneficiary needs. Such practices, if left unchecked, can lead to monopolistic conditions where certain agencies dominate the landscape, to the detriment of consumer choice and healthcare quality.
Medicaid is designed to serve some of the most vulnerable populations in the country, including individuals with disabilities, low-income families, and elderly individuals requiring long-term care. The intentional withholding of vital information such as provider lists violates not only federal laws but also the ethical obligation to ensure that these populations have equal access to healthcare services.
This situation calls for immediate action from federal oversight agencies, such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), to conduct a thorough audit of Connecticut’s Medicaid program administration. Federal intervention is necessary to ensure that the state complies with transparency regulations and provides Medicaid beneficiaries with the information they are entitled to by law. If these practices are found to extend to other federally funded programs, it could signal widespread non-compliance, mismanagement of federal funds, and a failure to uphold the rights of vulnerable individuals across the state.
As the investigation into this issue unfolds, it is critical that the DSS take immediate steps to rectify these transparency failures. The state must make the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program Agency Provider List publicly accessible and ensure that beneficiaries’ rights to choose their providers are fully restored. Anything less would continue to jeopardize the integrity of Connecticut’s Medicaid program and the health and well-being of those it is meant to serve.
We’re sharing an important message about systemic issues within Medicaid programs that may be impacting both vulnerable populations and every U.S. taxpayer. These challenges could have nationwide implications, affecting how federal dollars are spent and how services reach those who rely on Medicaid.
This is not about assigning blame—it’s about finding solutions that ensure taxpayer dollars are used wisely and that vulnerable individuals get the care they need. By working together, we can help create a more transparent, accountable, and effective Medicaid system that benefits everyone.
Key Problems and Solutions:
Misuse of Taxpayer Funds
Problem: Federal Medicaid funds are being inefficiently used, which can increase costs for taxpayers while reducing the quality of services for vulnerable individuals.
Solution: Conduct regular audits of Medicaid spending to ensure that every dollar is used efficiently to support essential services and avoid waste or misallocation.
Lack of Transparency
Problem: Essential information about Medicaid services—such as provider directories and funding allocations—is not easily accessible to the public. This lack of transparency prevents people from understanding how funds are being used and how care decisions are made.
Solution: Ensure greater transparency by making Medicaid-related information, including provider directories and spending reports, publicly accessible. This will allow taxpayers, caregivers, and advocates to see where resources are going and hold the system accountable.
Unethical Business Practices
Problem: Some providers may be engaging in conflicts of interest or kickback schemes, where services are being recommended for financial gain rather than the needs of individuals. This drives up costs and reduces the quality of care.
Solution: Implement strict ethical oversight to ensure that Medicaid services are provided based on the needs of individuals, without conflicts of interest or unnecessary services that increase costs for taxpayers.
Discriminatory Business Practices in Medicaid Referrals
Problem: Certain providers may be favored in Medicaid referrals, limiting access to care for individuals and creating an unequal playing field for providers. This impacts the freedom of individuals to choose the care that best fits their needs.
Solution: Establish a fair and transparent referral system that treats all providers equally and ensures that individuals have access to a wide range of care options, promoting both choice and competition.
Impact on Disabled Workers
Problem: Disabled workers involved in the Medicaid system are not always being paid fairly, which violates federal labor laws and creates further economic challenges for an already vulnerable group.
Solution: Ensure compliance with federal labor laws by guaranteeing that all disabled workers are paid fairly and treated with respect, helping create a more supportive and ethical Medicaid system.
Limited Consumer Choice
Problem: Some individuals are limited in their ability to choose services or housing arrangements, being tied to specific providers through restrictive agreements. This reduces their freedom to select the care and services that best suit their needs.
Solution: Expand consumer choice by revising policies that restrict beneficiaries to certain providers or housing options, allowing individuals more freedom to select the services and care arrangements that work best for them.
FOIA Violations and Stonewalling
Problem: Public records requests related to Medicaid services and spending are being blocked or delayed, limiting public oversight and reducing accountability within the system.
Solution: Enforce full compliance with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to ensure that the public has access to important Medicaid information. This will allow for greater transparency and ensure that taxpayer dollars are being used properly.
Unauthorized Care Management Services
Problem: Some individuals are receiving services that have not been authorized or properly managed, leading to confusion and potential misuse of Medicaid funds.
Solution: Ensure proper oversight and clear guidelines for care management services, preventing unauthorized services and ensuring that individuals receive only the care that is necessary and beneficial to them.
Unfair Rental Agreements Linked to Medicaid Services
Problem: Some beneficiaries are tied to specific housing arrangements through rental agreements that are linked to their Medicaid service providers, reducing their ability to change providers or housing without risking their care.
Solution: Revise rental agreements and housing policies to ensure greater consumer freedom and allow individuals to change providers or housing arrangements without being penalized or risking their care.
How These Issues Affect All of Us:
These problems extend beyond any one state—they have national implications for how Medicaid funds are spent and how care is provided. Every taxpayer contributes to Medicaid, and it’s essential that these funds are used efficiently and transparently. At the same time, vulnerable populations—including individuals with disabilities and those relying on Medicaid services—deserve a system that works for them.
By addressing these systemic challenges, we can ensure that taxpayer dollars are used wisely and that those who need support get access to the care and services they deserve.
What You Can Do:
Share this post to raise awareness and encourage others to understand how these issues might be affecting them and their communities.
Support greater transparency and ethical oversight in Medicaid services by engaging with policymakers.
Advocate for positive reform to ensure taxpayer dollars are used effectively and that vulnerable individuals get the care they need.
Together, we can help create a Medicaid system that benefits everyone—by ensuring accountability, promoting transparency, and protecting taxpayer resources while supporting those who rely on these essential services.
What Happens When You Lose Medicaid Insurance?
Medicaid is essential for many families. If it’s taken away or you lose it, it can lead to serious problems for you, your family, and even your entire community. Here’s what happens:
You Can’t See the Doctor When You Need To
You Delay Care: You might put off going to the doctor because you can’t afford it. Small problems can turn into big ones.
No More Preventive Check-ups: Without Medicaid, you might skip regular check-ups that help catch problems early.
You Can’t Afford Medications
Stopping Medication: People stop taking important medications (for conditions like diabetes, mental health issues, or high blood pressure) because they can’t pay for them.
Getting Worse: Without those meds, your health can get worse quickly, leading to hospital visits or even life-threatening conditions.
Mental Health Suffers
Stopping Therapy: Mental health services, like therapy or counseling, can get too expensive, meaning people can no longer get help for anxiety, depression, or other issues.
Emotional Stress: Without professional help, mental health issues can become overwhelming, leading to stress, breakdowns, and even suicidal thoughts.
Risk of Homelessness Increases
Losing Your Job: If your health gets worse, you may not be able to work, leading to job loss and financial problems.
Can’t Pay for Housing: Medical bills pile up, and without income, you might not be able to pay rent or the mortgage, which can lead to losing your home.
Families Can Be Affected: It’s not just individuals who suffer—entire families can end up in shelters or homeless because of high medical costs.
Emergency Rooms Get Overcrowded
Using ER as a Doctor’s Office: People without insurance often wait until they are very sick and then go to the ER, which is much more expensive than regular care.
More Stress on Hospitals: Hospitals can get overwhelmed, and this affects everyone. It means longer wait times and less attention for those who really need emergency care.
Crime Can Increase
Desperation Leads to Survival Crimes: When people are financially desperate due to health issues, some may turn to petty crime just to survive.
Substance Abuse: Losing mental health care can lead to drug or alcohol use to cope, and this often leads to trouble with the law.
Homelessness and Crime Connection: When people lose their homes and can’t get help, they may be more likely to get involved in crime just to meet basic needs.
Your Community Suffers
Spread of Illness: Without insurance, people may not get vaccinated or treated for contagious diseases, which can make the entire community sick.
Public Services Overloaded: Charities, shelters, and food banks may get overwhelmed by more people needing help, making it harder to serve everyone.
Fewer Resources for Everyone: When hospitals, clinics, and public health services are stretched too thin, everyone gets worse care.
Children Are Affected
Missed Vaccines and Checkups: Kids without Medicaid miss important vaccines and doctor visits, putting their health and development at risk.
Struggling in School: Without proper healthcare, children may fall behind in school because of untreated health problems or stress at home due to financial instability.
Long-Term Poverty
Medical Debt: Without Medicaid, medical bills pile up, and families can end up with huge debt, making it hard to afford basic needs like food and housing.
Generational Impact: Families in debt or struggling with health issues have a harder time getting out of poverty, and this can affect future generations.
Losing Medicaid isn’t just about losing insurance; it’s about losing stability in your life. Without access to healthcare, everything starts to break down—your health, your ability to work, your family’s security, and the community’s well-being. It can even lead to more crime and homelessness as people struggle just to survive.
What Can You Do?
Stay Informed: Know your options and stay connected to advocacy groups that support for healthcare rights.
Ask for Help: Reach out to community health centers, legal aid, and nonprofits that offer support.
Get Involved: Support policies that ensure everyone has access to affordable healthcare.
When people lose Medicaid insurance, the effects also significantly impact taxpayers and the overall economy. Here’s a breakdown of how this burden shifts onto taxpayers and why it's important for everyone, even those with insurance, to understand these consequences.
Increased Emergency Room Costs (Taxpayer-Funded)
ER Becomes the First Stop: When people without insurance get sick or injured, they often wait until it’s serious and go to the emergency room (ER), which is far more expensive than regular doctor visits.
Higher Costs Passed to Taxpayers: ER visits are one of the most expensive ways to treat medical issues, and when uninsured patients can't pay their bills, the hospital absorbs the costs. These costs are often passed on to taxpayers through increased funding needs for hospitals and public healthcare programs.
Higher Local and State Taxes for Public Services
Overloaded Public Health Systems: Local and state governments are forced to provide more funding for free clinics, public health programs, shelters, and emergency services when there’s an increase in uninsured people. This leads to higher taxes to cover these services.
Community Resources Stretched Thin: When uninsured people need more help from publicly funded services like shelters, food banks, and healthcare clinics, these services require more taxpayer dollars to stay operational. As more people rely on these programs, the costs to taxpayers grow.
Higher Insurance Premiums for Everyone
Cost-Shifting in Healthcare: Hospitals often shift the unpaid medical costs of uninsured patients onto private insurers. This drives up the overall cost of healthcare for those who do have insurance.
Rising Insurance Premiums: As healthcare providers raise prices to compensate for uninsured patients, taxpayers who buy insurance in the private market may see their premiums go up. This makes healthcare more expensive for everyone, even those who already pay for private insurance.
Increased Government Spending on Medicaid Expansion and Safety Nets
Government Must Step In: When people lose Medicaid, they still often need some form of public assistance. Governments may have to increase spending on Medicaid expansion, safety net programs, or even adjust the Medicaid qualifications to help more people. This means more public spending, which comes from taxpayer money.
Taxpayer-Funded Subsidies: In some cases, state and federal governments have to provide subsidies for health insurance, and when more people qualify due to losing Medicaid, these costs come from taxpayer funds.
Higher Costs for the Criminal Justice System
More People in Jail: As explained earlier, loss of health insurance can lead to an increase in crime, especially as people turn to petty crimes for survival or get involved in substance abuse. This puts more strain on the criminal justice system, which is heavily funded by taxpayer dollars.
Mental Health and Substance Abuse in Jail: Many people end up in jail because they don’t have access to mental health or substance abuse treatment. Once in jail, taxpayers must cover the costs of healthcare, housing, and legal processing for these individuals. It’s far more expensive to treat someone in jail than it is to provide preventive care in the community.
Increased Unemployment and Welfare Costs
Job Loss Leads to Public Assistance Needs: Without insurance, people’s health often deteriorates, making it hard for them to work. This can lead to job loss and more people relying on welfare programs like unemployment benefits, food stamps, and housing assistance—all of which are funded by taxpayers.
Economic Downturn in Communities: When many people lose their jobs due to poor health and medical debt, the local economy suffers. This can reduce tax revenue from income and sales taxes, while increasing the demand for public support programs.
Public Health Crises Require Taxpayer Funding
Spread of Diseases: When people don’t have insurance, they often skip vaccinations and preventive care, which can lead to outbreaks of preventable diseases. Taxpayers end up footing the bill for public health campaigns, disease control efforts, and emergency healthcare interventions during these outbreaks.
Community Health Declines: A sicker population puts more strain on public health resources, requiring more public health spending, which comes from local, state, and federal taxpayer funds.
Increased Medical Debt Burden on the Economy
Economic Instability for Families: When families accumulate medical debt, they have less money to spend in the local economy. This reduces consumer spending and harms businesses, leading to lower tax revenue from sales taxes.
Long-Term Poverty and Dependence on Government Support: As more families fall into long-term poverty due to medical debt, they become dependent on government assistance programs. Taxpayers must contribute more to welfare programs, public housing, and food assistance.
Loss of Workforce Productivity and Tax Revenue
Reduced Workforce Participation: As people become sicker without access to healthcare, they are less able to work, leading to a reduction in workforce productivity.
Lower Tax Revenues: When fewer people are able to work due to poor health or job loss, there’s a drop in income tax revenues. This means fewer funds are available for important public services, which can lead to higher taxes for everyone else to cover the shortfall.
Losing Medicaid doesn’t just hurt the people directly affected—it shifts the burden onto taxpayers in many ways. The costs of emergency healthcare, public services, criminal justice, welfare programs, and economic downturns all end up being paid for by you, the taxpayer. By ensuring that people maintain access to Medicaid, we can prevent these problems from spiraling out of control and costing everyone more in the long run.
Here are the best federal websites to report issues related to delays, denial of assistance, or mismanagement by your state:
1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
Website: https://tips.oig.hhs.gov/
Purpose: HHS oversees health-related federal programs like Medicaid. If you’re facing issues with healthcare or other support services, you can report concerns directly here.
Whistleblower Protection Information: HHS Whistleblower Protection Program
2. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
Purpose: CMS oversees the Medicaid program and can be contacted if you're having trouble receiving Medicaid-related services.
Complaint Submission: CMS Contact Form
3. Office of the Inspector General (OIG) – U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Purpose: The OIG investigates waste, fraud, and abuse in HHS programs, including Medicaid and state-administered programs. You can report any suspected state-level mismanagement of federal funds here.
Report Fraud or Abuse: OIG Hotline
4. U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO)
Purpose: GAO audits and investigates how taxpayer dollars are being spent, including state-level programs funded by federal money. You can report concerns related to mismanagement of federal funds here.
Report Fraud, Waste, or Abuse: GAO FraudNet
5. U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) – Civil Rights Division
Purpose: If you believe you’re facing discrimination, such as being denied services because of your race, disability, or other protected categories, you can report it to the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division.
Submit a Complaint: DOJ Civil Rights Online Complaint Form
6. THE WHITE HOUSE
REPORT MEDICAID PROBLEMS, TROUBLE GETTING MEDICAID HELP, HOW TO REPORT BAD HEALTHCARE, WHERE TO COMPLAIN ABOUT GOVERNMENT HELP, REPORT UNFAIR TREATMENT FOR MEDICAID, HELP WITH MEDICAID DELAYS, HOW TO REPORT MEDICAID FRAUD, REPORT PROBLEMS WITH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, HOW TO COMPLAIN ABOUT MEDICAID DENIAL, WHO TO CONTACT FOR HEALTHCARE ISSUES, REPORT UNFAIR MEDICAID SERVICES, WHERE TO REPORT MEDICAID ABUSE, MEDICAID SERVICE COMPLAINTS, REPORT GOVERNMENT HELP ISSUES INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON MEDICAID, PROBLEMAS PARA OBTENER AYUDA DE MEDICAID, CÓMO INFORMAR SOBRE MAL SERVICIO MÉDICO, DÓNDE QUEJARSE SOBRE AYUDA GUBERNAMENTAL, INFORMAR TRATO INJUSTO EN MEDICAID, AYUDA CON RETRASOS EN MEDICAID, CÓMO INFORMAR FRAUDE EN MEDICAID, INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON SERVICIOS DE SALUD, CÓMO QUEJARSE POR DENEGACIÓN DE MEDICAID, A QUIÉN CONTACTAR PARA PROBLEMAS MÉDICOS, INFORMAR SERVICIOS INJUSTOS DE MEDICAID, DÓNDE INFORMAR ABUSO EN MEDICAID, QUEJAS SOBRE SERVICIOS DE MEDICAID, INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON LA AYUDA GUBERNAMENTAL
A Plea to Connecticut’s Leaders: Unite and Fix This Now
To the trusted leaders, representatives, and officials across Connecticut's 169 towns:
We stand at a crossroads. The challenges we face as a state—whether in healthcare, infrastructure, education, or systemic inequality—demand immediate, decisive action. These are not problems that can be delayed or passed on to future generations. The time to act is now, and we are depending on you.
Our communities are looking to you—those in positions of power and influence—as the only ones capable of driving the changes needed. The trust we have placed in you is not just an honor; it is a responsibility. You are the voices and hands that can deliver the solutions we so desperately need.
This is a moment for unity. Regardless of political affiliations, town borders, or differing opinions, we must come together. The people of Connecticut are depending on you to bridge divides and collaborate for the greater good. The divisions that once held back progress must be set aside in favor of a shared commitment to a brighter future.
We implore you: unite in your purpose, work across every boundary, and implement immediate solutions. Your leadership, dedication, and vision are what will make the difference. There is no room for inaction or delay. Together, you have the power to fix this—to uplift Connecticut, to strengthen our communities, and to restore faith in our future.
The path forward begins now, with your decision to act. We trust in your leadership and we stand behind you as you take these necessary steps.
For the good of all people in Connecticut, for the generations to come—let’s fix this together.
Connecticut State Senate:
John Fonfara - Incumbent, Democratic, District 1
Luis Delgado - Green, District 1
Douglas McCrory - Incumbent, Democratic, District 2
Kristin Hoffman - Republican, District 2
Saud Anwar - Incumbent, Democratic, District 3
Matt Siracusa - Republican, District 3
MD Rahman - Incumbent, Democratic, District 4
Stephen King - Republican, District 4
Derek Slap - Incumbent, Democratic, District 5
Kyla Zimmermann - Republican, District 5
Rick Lopes - Incumbent, Democratic, District 6
Tremell Collins - Republican, District 6
John Kissel - Incumbent, Republican, District 7
Cynthia Mangini - Democratic, District 7
Lisa Seminara - Incumbent, Republican, District 8
Paul Honig - Democratic, District 8
Matthew L. Lesser - Incumbent, Democratic, District 9
Gary Winfield - Incumbent, Democratic, District 10
Nyrell Moore - Republican, District 10
Martin Looney - Incumbent, Democratic, District 11
Steve Orosco - Republican, District 11
Christine Cohen - Incumbent, Democratic, District 12
Paul Crisci - Republican, District 12
Jan Hochadel - Incumbent, Democratic, District 13
Elain Cariati - Republican, District 13
James Maroney - Incumbent, Democratic, District 14
Steven Johnstone - Republican, District 14
Joan Hartley - Incumbent, Democratic, District 15
Robert C. Sampson - Incumbent, Republican, District 16
Christopher Robertson - Democratic, District 16
Jorge Cabrera - Incumbent, Democratic, District 17
Heather Somers - Incumbent, Republican, District 18
Andrew Parrella - Democratic, District 18
Catherine Osten - Incumbent, Democratic, District 19
Jason Guidone - Republican, District 19
Martha Marx - Incumbent, Democratic, District 20
Shaun Mastroianni - Republican, District 20
Kevin C. Kelly - Incumbent, Republican, District 21
Chris Carrena - Republican, District 22
Sujata Gadkar-Wilcox - Democratic, District 22
Robert E. Halstead - Independent, District 22
Herron Gaston - Incumbent, Democratic, District 23
Brian Banacowski - Republican, District 23
Julie Kushner - Incumbent, Democratic, District 24
Michelle Coelho - Republican, District 24
Bob Duff - Incumbent, Democratic, District 25
Martin Tagliaferro - Republican, District 25
Ceci Maher - Incumbent, Democratic, District 26
Kami Evans - Republican, District 26
Patricia Miller - Incumbent, Democratic, District 27
Nicola Tarzia - Republican, District 27
Tony Hwang - Incumbent, Republican, District 28
Rob Blanchard - Democratic, District 28
Mae Flexer - Incumbent, Democratic, District 29
Chris Reddy - Republican, District 29
Stephen Harding, Jr. - Incumbent, Republican, District 30
Justin Potter - Democratic, District 30
Henri Martin - Incumbent, Republican, District 31
Eric Berthel - Incumbent, Republican, District 32
Jeff Desmarais - Democratic, District 32
Norm Needleman - Incumbent, Democratic, District 33
Jeff Duigou - Republican, District 33
Paul Cicarella, Jr. - Incumbent, Republican, District 34
Brandi Mandato - Democratic, District 34
David Bedell - Green, District 34
Jeff Gordon - Incumbent, Republican, District 35
Merry Garrett - Democratic, District 35
Ryan Fazio - Incumbent, Republican, District 36
Nick Simmons - Democratic, District 36
Connecticut House of Representatives:
Matthew Ritter - Incumbent, Democratic, District 1
Raghib Allie-Brennan - Incumbent, Democratic, District 2
Bradley Koltz - Republican, District 2
Minnie Gonzalez - Incumbent, Democratic, District 3
Julio Concepcion - Incumbent, Democratic, District 4
Maryam Khan - Incumbent, Democratic, District 5
James B. Sánchez - Incumbent, Democratic, District 6
Alyssa Peterson - Independent, District 6
Joshua Malik Hall - Incumbent, Democratic, District 7
Tim Ackert - Incumbent, Republican, District 8
Nancy Hammarstrom - Democratic, District 8
Jason Rojas - Incumbent, Democratic, District 9
Henry Genga - Incumbent, Democratic, District 10
Chris Tierinni - Republican, District 10
Salema Davis - Republican, District 11
Patrick Biggins - Democratic, District 11
Geoff Luxenberg - Incumbent, Democratic, District 12
Robert Cormier - Republican, District 12
Joseph Young - Independent, District 12
Jason Doucette - Incumbent, Democratic, District 13
Donna Meier - Republican, District 13
Tom Delnicki - Incumbent, Republican, District 14
Steven King Jr. - Democratic, District 14
Marek Kozikowski - United Community Party, District 14
Bobby Gibson - Incumbent, Democratic, District 15
Quentin Johnson - Republican, District 15
Melissa E. Osborne - Incumbent, Democratic, District 16
Michael Schulitz - Republican, District 16
Eleni Kavros DeGraw - Incumbent, Democratic, District 17
Manju Gerber - Republican, District 17
Jillian Gilchrest - Incumbent, Democratic, District 18
Tammy Exum - Incumbent, Democratic, District 19
Kate Farrar - Incumbent, Democratic, District 20
Mike Demicco - Incumbent, Democratic, District 21
Johnny Carrier - Republican, District 21
Francis Rexford Cooley - Incumbent, Republican, District 22
Rebecca Martinez - Democratic, District 22
Devin Carney - Incumbent, Republican, District 23
Jane Wisialowski - Democratic, District 23
Manny Sanchez - Incumbent, Democratic, District 24
Alden Russell - Republican, District 24
Alfred Mayo - Independent, District 24
Bobby Sanchez - Incumbent, Democratic, District 25
Jamie Vaughan - Republican, District 25
Barbara Marino - Republican, District 26
David DeFronzo - Democratic, District 26
Gary Turco - Incumbent, Democratic, District 27
Stephen Ellis - Independent, District 27
Amy Morrin Bello - Incumbent, Democratic, District 28
William Davidson - Republican, District 28
Kerry Szeps Wood - Incumbent, Democratic, District 29
Ed Charamut - Republican, District 29
Donna Veach - Incumbent, Republican, District 30
Jill Barry - Incumbent, Democratic, District 31
Kevin Nursick - Republican, District 31
Christie Carpino - Incumbent, Republican, District 32
Brandon Chafee - Incumbent, Democratic, District 33
Christine Rebstock - Independent, District 33
Irene Haines - Incumbent, Republican, District 34
Richard Knotek - Democratic, District 34
Chris Aniskovich - Incumbent, Republican, District 35
Cinzia Lettieri - Democratic, District 35
Kathryn Russell - Republican, District 36
Renee Muir - Democratic, District 36
Holly Cheeseman - Incumbent, Republican, District 37
Nick Menapace - Democratic, District 37
Kathleen McCarty - Incumbent, Republican, District 38
Nick Gauthier - Democratic, District 38
Anthony Nolan - Incumbent, Democratic, District 39
Beloved Carter - Republican, District 39
Christine Conley - Incumbent, Democratic, District 40
Susan Deane-Shinbrot - Republican, District 40
Aundré Bumgardner - Incumbent, Democratic, District 41
Kim Healy - Republican, District 42
Savet Constantine - Democratic, District 42
Greg Howard - Incumbent, Republican, District 43
Ty Lamb - Democratic, District 43
Anne Dauphinais - Incumbent, Republican, District 44
Samantha Derenthal - Democratic, District 44
Brian Lanoue - Incumbent, Republican, District 45
Kayla Thompson - Democratic, District 45
Derell Wilson - Incumbent, Democratic, District 46
Nick Casiano - Republican, District 46
Doug Dubitsky - Incumbent, Republican, District 47
Aaron Spruance - Democratic, District 47
Mark DeCaprio - Incumbent, Republican, District 48
Christopher Rivers - Democratic, District 48
Lance Lusignan - Independent, District 48
Susan Johnson - Incumbent, Democratic, District 49
Pat Boyd - Incumbent, Democratic, District 50
Chris Stewart - Republican, District 51
Renee Waldron - Democratic, District 51
Kurt Vail - Incumbent, Republican, District 52
Ethan Werstler - Democratic, District 52
Tammy Nuccio - Incumbent, Republican, District 53
Ann Bonney - Democratic, District 53
Gregory Haddad - Incumbent, Democratic, District 54
Aaron Bowman - Republican, District 54
Steve Weir - Incumbent, Republican, District 55
Amanda Veneziano - Democratic, District 55
Kevin Brown - Incumbent, Democratic, District 56
Brian Motola - Republican, District 56
Jaime Foster - Incumbent, Democratic, District 57
Jennifer Dzen - Republican, District 57
Robert Hendrickson - Republican, District 58
John Santanella - Democratic, District 58
Carol Hall - Incumbent, Republican, District 59
Rick LeBorious - Democratic, District 59
Jane Garibay - Incumbent, Democratic, District 60
Len Walker - Republican, District 60
Tami Zawistowski - Incumbent, Republican, District 61
Michael Malloy - Democratic, District 61
Mark Anderson - Incumbent, Republican, District 62
Kim Becker - Democratic, District 62
Jay Case - Incumbent, Republican, District 63
Maria Horn - Incumbent, Democratic, District 64
Barbara Breor - Republican, District 64
Michelle Cook - Incumbent, Democratic, District 65
Joe Canino - Republican, District 65
Karen Reddington-Hughes - Incumbent, Republican, District 66
Sharon Sherman - Democratic, District 66
William Buckbee - Incumbent, Republican, District 67
Alexandra Thomas - Democratic, District 67
Joe Polletta - Incumbent, Republican, District 68
Jason Buchsbaum - Republican, District 69
Ed Edelson - Democratic, District 69
Seth Bronko - Incumbent, Republican, District 70
Jeff Litke - Democratic, District 70
William Pizzuto - Incumbent, Republican, District 71
Larry Butler - Incumbent, Democratic, District 72
Ronald Napoli Jr. - Incumbent, Democratic, District 73
Abigail Diaz Pizarro - Republican, District 73
Michael DiGiovancarlo - Incumbent, Democratic, District 74
Geraldo Reyes - Incumbent, Democratic, District 75
John Piscopo - Incumbent, Republican, District 76
Stephen Simonin - Democratic, District 76
Cara Pavalock-D'Amato - Incumbent, Republican, District 77
Mary Rydingsward - Working Families Party, District 77
Joe Hoxha - Incumbent, Republican, District 78
Mary Fortier - Incumbent, Democratic, District 79
David Schrager - Republican, District 79
Gale Mastrofrancesco - Incumbent, Republican, District 80
Christopher Poulos - Incumbent, Democratic, District 81
James Morelli Jr. - Republican, District 81
Michael Quinn - Incumbent, Democratic, District 82
Lamar Terrell - Republican, District 82
Jonathan Fazzino - Incumbent, Democratic, District 83
Joseph Vollano - Republican, District 83
Hilda Santiago - Incumbent, Democratic, District 84
Mary Mushinsky - Incumbent, Democratic, District 85
Jerry Farrell - Republican, District 85
Vincent Candelora - Incumbent, Republican, District 86
Dave Yaccarino Sr. - Incumbent, Republican, District 87
Kieran Ahern - Democratic, District 87
Joshua Elliott - Incumbent, Democratic, District 88
Lezlye Zupkus - Incumbent, Republican, District 89
Craig Fishbein - Incumbent, Republican, District 90
Rebecca Hyland - Democratic, District 90
Laurie Sweet - Democratic, District 91
Patricia Dillon - Incumbent, Democratic, District 92
Morris Sumpter - Republican, District 92
Toni Walker - Incumbent, Democratic, District 93
Steven Winter - Incumbent, Democratic, District 94
Juan Candelaria - Incumbent, Democratic, District 95
Roland J. Lemar - Incumbent, Democratic, District 96
Alphonse Paolillo - Incumbent, Democratic, District 97
Moira Rader - Incumbent, Democratic, District 98
Joseph Zullo - Incumbent, Republican, District 99
Kai Juanna Belton - Incumbent, Democratic, District 100
Nigel Macon-Wilson - Republican, District 100
John-Michael Parker - Incumbent, Democratic, District 101
Lisa Deane - Republican, District 101
Robin Comey - Incumbent, Democratic, District 102
Ray Ingraham - Republican, District 102
Liz Linehan - Incumbent, Democratic, District 103
Kara Rochelle - Incumbent, Democratic, District 104
David Cassetti - Republican, District 104
Nicole Klarides-Ditria - Incumbent, Republican, District 105
Mitch Bolinsky - Incumbent, Republican, District 106
Michelle Embree Ku - Democratic, District 106
Marty Foncello - Incumbent, Republican, District 107
Aaron Zimmer - Democratic, District 107
Pat Callahan - Incumbent, Republican, District 108
Anne Weisberg - Democratic, District 108
Farley Santos - Incumbent, Democratic, District 109
Brenda Santopolo Hefferon - Republican, District 109
Bob Godfrey - Incumbent, Democratic, District 110
Austin Monteiro - Republican, District 110
Aimee Berger-Girvalo - Incumbent, Democratic, District 111
Colette Kabasakalian - Republican, District 111
Tony Scott - Incumbent, Republican, District 112
Beth Cliff - Democratic, District 112
Jason Perillo - Incumbent, Republican, District 113
Mary Welander - Incumbent, Democratic, District 114
William Heffernan III - Democratic, District 115
Silvana Apicella - Republican, District 115
Treneé McGee - Incumbent, Democratic, District 116
Raymond Collins III - Republican, District 117
MJ Shannon - Democratic, District 117
Frank Smith - Incumbent, Democratic, District 118
Mark Macchio - Republican, District 118
Kathy Kennedy - Incumbent, Republican, District 119
Etan Hirsch - Democratic, District 119
Laura Dancho - Incumbent, Republican, District 120
Kaitlyn Shake - Democratic, District 120
Joe Gresko - Incumbent, Democratic, District 121
Rafael Irizarry - Republican, District 121
Ben McGorty - Incumbent, Republican, District 122
Dorothy Lerner - Democratic, District 122
David Rutigliano - Incumbent, Republican, District 123
Tom Tesoro - Democratic, District 123
Andre Baker - Incumbent, Democratic, District 124
Yoshiyahu Yisrael - Republican, District 124
Tom O'Dea - Incumbent, Republican, District 125
Jason Bennett - Democratic, District 125
Fred Gee Jr. - Incumbent, Democratic, District 126
David Herz - Republican, District 126
Marcus Brown - Incumbent, Democratic, District 127
Christopher Rosario - Incumbent, Democratic, District 128
Ramona Marquez - Republican, District 128
Angel Gonzalez - Independent, District 128
Steven Stafstrom - Incumbent, Democratic, District 129
Francis Kalangala - Republican, District 129
Antonio Felipe - Incumbent, Democratic, District 130
Terry Sullivan - Republican, District 130
Arnold Jensen - Republican, District 131
Ellen Fox - Democratic, District 131
Jennifer Leeper - Incumbent, Democratic, District 132
Alexis Harrison - Republican, District 132
Cristin Vahey - Incumbent, Democratic, District 133
Chris Verras - Republican, District 133
Sarah Keitt - Incumbent, Democratic, District 134
Melissa Longo - Republican, District 134
Anne Hughes - Incumbent, Democratic, District 135
Christopher Peritore - Republican, District 135
Jonathan Steinberg - Incumbent, Democratic, District 136
John Bolton - Republican, District 136
Kadeem Roberts - Incumbent, Democratic, District 137
Pietro Rotondo - Republican, District 137
Rachel Chaleski - Incumbent, Republican, District 138
Kenneth Gucker - Democratic, District 138
Kevin Ryan - Incumbent, Democratic, District 139
Mark Adams - Republican, District 139
Travis Simms - Incumbent, Democratic, District 140
Enrique Santiago - Republican, District 140
Carleton Giles - Democratic, District 140 (Lost in Primary)
Tracy Marra - Incumbent, Republican, District 141
Sheila Quinn - Democratic, District 141
Lucy Dathan - Incumbent, Democratic, District 142
Tricia Massucco - Republican, District 142 (Withdrew)
Dominique Johnson - Incumbent, Democratic, District 143
Peter Bang - Republican, District 143
Hubert Delany - Incumbent, Democratic, District 144
Layne Rodney - Republican, District 144
Corey Paris - Incumbent, Democratic, District 145
Fritz Blau - Republican, District 145
Jim Malerba - Republican, District 146
Eilish Collins Main - Democratic, District 146
Matt Blumenthal - Incumbent, Democratic, District 147
Rudy Settimi - Republican, District 147
Olga Anastos - Republican, District 148
Jonathan Jacobson - Democratic, District 148
Anabel Figueroa - Democratic, District 148 (Lost in Primary)
Rachel Khanna - Incumbent, Democratic, District 149
Tina Courpas - Republican, District 149
Steve Meskers - Incumbent, Democratic, District 150
Paul Cappiali - Republican, District 150
Hector Arzeno - Incumbent, Democratic, District 151
Tod Laudonia - Republican, District 151
Steve Meskers - Incumbent, Democratic, District 150
Paul Cappiali - Republican, District 150
Hector Arzeno - Incumbent, Democratic, District 151
Tod Laudonia - Republican, District 151
Matt Blumenthal - Incumbent, Democratic, District 147
Rudy Settimi - Republican, District 147
Olga Anastos - Republican, District 148
Jonathan Jacobson - Democratic, District 148
Anabel Figueroa - Democratic, District 148 (Lost in Primary)
Rachel Khanna - Incumbent, Democratic, District 149
Tina Courpas - Republican, District 149
Corey Paris - Incumbent, Democratic, District 145
Fritz Blau - Republican, District 145
Hubert Delany - Incumbent, Democratic, District 144
Layne Rodney - Republican, District 144
Peter Bang - Republican, District 143
Dominique Johnson - Incumbent, Democratic, District 143
Tricia Massucco - Republican, District 142 (Withdrew)
Lucy Dathan - Incumbent, Democratic, District 142
Sheila Quinn - Democratic, District 141
Tracy Marra - Incumbent, Republican, District 141
Carleton Giles - Democratic, District 140 (Lost in Primary)
Enrique Santiago - Republican, District 140
Travis Simms - Incumbent, Democratic, District 140
Mark Adams - Republican, District 139
Kevin Ryan - Incumbent, Democratic, District 139
Kenneth Gucker - Democratic, District 138
Rachel Chaleski - Incumbent, Republican, District 138
Pietro Rotondo - Republican, District 137
Kadeem Roberts - Incumbent, Democratic, District 137
John-Michael Parker - Incumbent, Democratic, District 101
Lisa Deane - Republican, District 101
Robin Comey - Incumbent, Democratic, District 102
Ray Ingraham - Republican, District 102
Liz Linehan - Incumbent, Democratic, District 103
Kara Rochelle - Incumbent, Democratic, District 104
David Cassetti - Republican, District 104
Nicole Klarides-Ditria - Incumbent, Republican, District 105
Mitch Bolinsky - Incumbent, Republican, District 106
Michelle Embree Ku - Democratic, District 106
Marty Foncello - Incumbent, Republican, District 107
Aaron Zimmer - Democratic, District 107
Pat Callahan - Incumbent, Republican, District 108
Anne Weisberg - Democratic, District 108
Farley Santos - Incumbent, Democratic, District 109
Brenda Santopolo Hefferon - Republican, District 109
Bob Godfrey - Incumbent, Democratic, District 110
Austin Monteiro - Republican, District 110
Aimee Berger-Girvalo - Incumbent, Democratic, District 111
Colette Kabasakalian - Republican, District 111
Tony Scott - Incumbent, Republican, District 112
Beth Cliff - Democratic, District 112
Jason Perillo - Incumbent, Republican, District 113
Mary Welander - Incumbent, Democratic, District 114
William Heffernan III - Democratic, District 115
Silvana Apicella - Republican, District 115
Treneé McGee - Incumbent, Democratic, District 116
Raymond Collins III - Republican, District 117
MJ Shannon - Democratic, District 117
Frank Smith - Incumbent, Democratic, District 118
Mark Macchio - Republican, District 118
Kathy Kennedy - Incumbent, Republican, District 119
Etan Hirsch - Democratic, District 119
Laura Dancho - Incumbent, Republican, District 120
Kaitlyn Shake - Democratic, District 120
Joe Gresko - Incumbent, Democratic, District 121
Rafael Irizarry - Republican, District 121
Ben McGorty - Incumbent, Republican, District 122
Dorothy Lerner - Democratic, District 122
David Rutigliano - Incumbent, Republican, District 123
Tom Tesoro - Democratic, District 123
Andre Baker - Incumbent, Democratic, District 124
Yoshiyahu Yisrael - Republican, District 124
Joe Biden – President of the United States
The president holds the highest office and has significant executive power, including signing legislation, issuing executive orders, and shaping both domestic and foreign policy.
Kamala Harris – Vice President of the United States
The vice president serves as the president of the Senate and has the power to cast tie-breaking votes in the Senate.
Antony Blinken – Secretary of State
As the nation's top diplomat, Blinken influences U.S. foreign policy and global relations.
Janet Yellen – Secretary of the Treasury
Yellen leads the Treasury Department, overseeing the U.S. economy, including financial regulation, federal spending, and monetary policy.
Merrick Garland – Attorney General
Garland heads the U.S. Department of Justice and plays a crucial role in enforcing federal laws, including civil rights and criminal law.
Lloyd Austin – Secretary of Defense
Austin oversees the U.S. military and is responsible for national defense policies and military operations worldwide.
Xavier Becerra – Secretary of Health and Human Services
Becerra directs federal health policies and oversees key health-related agencies, including Medicare and Medicaid.
Alejandro Mayorkas – Secretary of Homeland Security
Mayorkas leads efforts to safeguard the U.S. from internal and external threats, including cybersecurity, border security, and disaster response.
Jerome Powell – Chairman of the Federal Reserve
Powell influences U.S. monetary policy, including interest rates and economic stability, through his leadership at the Federal Reserve.
Chuck Schumer – Senate Majority Leader
Schumer sets the legislative agenda in the Senate and plays a key role in guiding bills to passage.
Mitch McConnell – Senate Minority Leader
As the leader of the minority party in the Senate, McConnell influences legislative strategy and opposition.
Kevin McCarthy – Speaker of the House of Representatives
The Speaker is the presiding officer of the House and influences which bills come to the floor for a vote.
Hakeem Jeffries – House Minority Leader
Jeffries leads the Democratic caucus in the House and works to shape legislative priorities for his party.
Nancy Pelosi – Former Speaker of the House
Although no longer Speaker, Pelosi continues to wield significant influence in the House as a senior Democratic leader.
Ron Klain – White House Chief of Staff
As the president’s top advisor, Klain plays a crucial role in shaping policy and managing the executive branch.
Pete Buttigieg – Secretary of Transportation
Buttigieg oversees national transportation policy, infrastructure projects, and initiatives related to sustainability and innovation.
Gina Raimondo – Secretary of Commerce
Raimondo plays a key role in promoting economic growth, job creation, and regulating commerce and trade.
Rochelle Walensky – Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Walensky leads public health efforts, including managing responses to health crises like the COVID-19 pandemic.
John Roberts – Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court
Roberts leads the judiciary and presides over major cases that can shape U.S. laws for generations.
Lina Khan – Chair of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
Khan has significant influence over antitrust enforcement, consumer protection, and regulating large tech companies.
Andover, Ansonia, Ashford, Avon, Barkhamsted, Beacon Falls, Berlin, Bethany, Bethel, Bethlehem, Bloomfield, Bolton, Bozrah, Branford, Bridgeport, Bridgewater, Bristol, Brookfield, Brooklyn, Burlington, Canaan, Canterbury, Canton, Chaplin, Cheshire, Chester, Clinton, Colchester, Colebrook, Columbia, Cornwall, Coventry, Cromwell, Danbury, Darien, Deep River, Derby, Durham, Eastford, East Granby, East Haddam, East Hampton, East Hartford, East Haven, East Lyme, Easton, East Windsor, Ellington, Enfield, Essex, Fairfield, Farmington, Franklin, Glastonbury, Goshen, Granby, Greenwich, Griswold, Groton, Guilford, Haddam, Hamden, Hampton, Hartford, Hartland, Harwinton, Hebron, Kent, Killingly, Killingworth, Lebanon, Ledyard, Lisbon, Litchfield, Lyme, Madison, Manchester, Mansfield, Marlborough, Meriden, Middlebury, Middlefield, Middletown, Milford, Monroe, Montville, Morris, Naugatuck, New Britain, New Canaan, New Fairfield, New Hartford, New Haven, Newington, New London, New Milford, Newtown, Norfolk, North Branford, North Canaan, North Haven, North Stonington, Norwalk, Norwich, Old Lyme, Old Saybrook, Orange, Oxford, Plainfield, Plainville, Plymouth, Pomfret, Portland, Preston, Prospect, Putnam, Redding, Ridgefield, Rocky Hill, Roxbury, Salem, Salisbury, Scotland, Seymour, Sharon, Shelton, Sherman, Simsbury, Somers, Southbury, Southington, South Windsor, Sprague, Stafford, Stamford, Sterling, Stonington, Stratford, Suffield, Thomaston, Thompson, Tolland, Torrington, Trumbull, Union, Vernon, Voluntown, Wallingford, Warren, Washington, Waterbury, Waterford, Watertown, Westbrook, West Hartford, West Haven, Weston, Westport, Wethersfield, Willington, Wilton, Winchester, Windham, Windsor, Windsor Locks, Wolcott, Woodbridge, Woodbury, Woodstock. Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming.