Rep. Kathleen McCarty: A Unifying Force for Quality Care in Connecticut’s ABI Waiver Program CGA DSS COU Medicaid
DB.42.131.Inf.
Rep. Kathleen McCarty Leads Call for Accountability, Transparency, and Quality in Connecticut’s DSS Programs
Hartford, CT — State Representative Kathleen McCarty (R-38) is taking a stand for Connecticut’s vulnerable populations by demanding transparency, quality care, and accountability within the state’s Department of Social Services (DSS). As the Ranking Member of the Education Committee and a prominent member of both the Appropriations and Public Health Committees, Rep. McCarty is using her leadership roles to address growing concerns about DSS-managed programs, including the Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program.
For years, Connecticut residents have struggled with excessive wait times, declining care standards, and a perceived lack of responsiveness from DSS leadership. In recent legislative hearings, Rep. McCarty has called on DSS Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves, Governor Ned Lamont, and Christine Weston of the Community Options Unit to provide answers and solutions for issues that affect thousands of families, advocates, and taxpayers statewide.
A Critical Issue: Wait Times and Access to Care
At the heart of these challenges is the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program, designed to provide essential services to individuals with brain injuries. Unfortunately, as Rep. McCarty and her fellow advocates have highlighted, wait times for these services have now exceeded five years, leaving individuals without the critical support they need to lead independent, dignified lives.
Families, advocates, and social workers are raising pressing questions: Why are Connecticut’s most vulnerable residents facing such delays? Why haven’t effective solutions been implemented to streamline the program and ensure timely access to care? For many families, these delays are not just numbers; they represent lost opportunities for rehabilitation, increased health risks, and an immense emotional toll on caregivers who often step in without adequate support.
Rep. McCarty’s advocacy focuses on addressing these delays head-on, pressing DSS for a comprehensive plan to reduce wait times and uphold the standards promised by the ABI Waiver Program.
Concerns from Families, Taxpayers, and Licensed Clinical Social Workers (LCSWs)
A major point of contention has been DSS’s proposed amendments to the staffing standards within the ABI Waiver Program. Historically, these roles have been filled by Licensed Clinical Social Workers (LCSWs), who possess advanced training in brain injury, trauma, and mental health. Their expertise ensures that complex cases receive the skilled, compassionate care they need. However, DSS’s recent amendments suggest replacing these highly qualified professionals with less-experienced care managers—a change that advocates believe prioritizes cost-cutting over patient care.
Families and advocates argue that such a shift could compromise the quality of care and increase risks for patients. LCSWs fear that DSS’s proposals are driven by financial motives, benefiting private subcontracted care management companies at the expense of quality. These subcontracted companies, according to advocates, have struggled to meet their contractual obligations in the past, further exacerbating concerns about DSS’s proposed changes.
Political and Financial Motivations: A Call for Transparency
Rep. McCarty supporters have voiced concerns over whether financial motivations and political strategy are influencing DSS’s decisions. The proposed amendments are being presented by DSS as a means to improve efficiency, but many see them as a way to minimize costs by allowing subcontracted companies to increase profits through reduced staffing expenses.
Advocates note that this strategy has political implications. By framing these amendments as “efficiency improvements,” DSS can potentially avoid public scrutiny and opposition, presenting the changes as beneficial to the system overall. However, Rep. McCarty’s advocacy challenges this narrative, demanding transparency and calling for DSS to disclose how these changes align with the agency’s commitment to providing high-quality, ethical care.
Leadership Accountability: The Absence of DSS Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves
Another factor heightening the urgency of these concerns is the perceived lack of direct accountability within DSS leadership. DSS Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves, appointed by Governor Ned Lamont, has come under criticism for her absence in recent hearings on these issues. Advocates and families argue that her presence would provide necessary insight and a commitment to address these concerns publicly. The absence of top-level leadership has left many families feeling ignored and worried that DSS is not prioritizing the needs of Connecticut’s most vulnerable residents.
By holding DSS accountable and demanding that Commissioner Reeves engage directly with these issues, Rep. McCarty is advocating for a more transparent and responsible approach to managing programs that impact countless lives across the state.
A Growing Community of Support for Rep. McCarty’s Advocacy
Families, advocates, and taxpayers are rallying behind Rep. McCarty’s efforts, expressing gratitude for her compassionate, solutions-oriented approach. By taking on these issues, Rep. McCarty is standing up for individuals and families who feel overlooked in the healthcare system, providing them with a voice that resonates within Connecticut’s legislative arena.
Her commitment to nurturing relationships and bringing diverse stakeholders together is an essential part of her strategy. Through these connections, Rep. McCarty is helping to foster unity and create a path forward that prioritizes quality care, transparency, and accountability. She exemplifies how compassionate, informed leadership can bring about real change in public policy, highlighting the power of collaboration in tackling the most complex challenges.
The Road Ahead: How You Can Support the Call for Quality Care
Rep. McCarty’s work emphasizes the importance of public participation and advocacy in driving positive change. For those affected by DSS programs or those who support the call for transparency and accountability, there are several ways to get involved:
Share the Message: Help raise awareness about these issues by sharing this article with your community. Transparency is key to ensuring accountability.
Contact Your Legislators: Reach out to local representatives and express support for Rep. McCarty’s efforts to maintain high standards in DSS programs.
Follow Rep. McCarty’s Updates: Stay informed on developments in this advocacy by following Rep. McCarty on social media. Engage with her updates and share your experiences if these issues have impacted you or your family.
Rep. Kathleen McCarty’s dedication to Connecticut’s most vulnerable populations is a powerful reminder that public programs should prioritize people over profit. Her work serves as a beacon of integrity, pushing for quality care and ethical standards in the face of financial and political pressures. As families, advocates, and taxpayers join her call for accountability, there is hope that DSS programs will become more transparent, compassionate, and responsive to those they are meant to serve.
Thank you, Rep. McCarty, for your leadership and advocacy. Your efforts are creating a legacy of care and accountability that will benefit Connecticut’s communities for generations to come.
State Rep. Tammy Nuccio Stands Up for Connecticut’s ABI Waiver Program
State Representative Tammy Nuccio recently brought much-needed attention to the growing crisis within Connecticut’s Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program. With wait times for critical services now extending over five years, Nuccio’s pointed questions to the Department of Social Services (DSS) reflect the frustrations of families, advocates, and licensed clinical social workers (LCSWs) who have been pushing for solutions for years.
The stakes couldn’t be higher: as delays persist, advocates are increasingly concerned about the motives behind DSS’s handling of the program and are questioning if financial interests are being prioritized over patient care. Rep. Nuccio’s bold stand provides renewed hope for a program that desperately needs reform.
The Growing Waitlist and Demand for Accountability
For individuals with brain injuries, the ABI Waiver Program offers essential support services that allow them to live with dignity and independence. But for thousands of Connecticut residents, the program’s long waitlist has become an insurmountable barrier to the care they need. In recent hearings, Rep. Nuccio pressed DSS and the Community Options Unit (COU) for answers: Why has the waitlist continued to grow, and why haven’t effective solutions been implemented?
Rep. Nuccio’s questions resonate with the ABI community, who have watched the Connecticut General Assembly’s Appropriations Committee acknowledge these challenges for years without taking meaningful action. By bringing this issue to the forefront, she highlights a critical concern for advocates and families alike: What are the motives behind DSS’s ongoing inaction?
Red Flags Raised by Licensed Clinical Social Workers (LCSWs)
An especially concerning development within the Connecticut Medicaid ABI Waiver Program is DSS’s recent attempts to adjust care management standards through proposed amendments. Traditionally, these care management roles have been filled by Licensed Clinical Social Workers (LCSWs), whose advanced education and expertise in brain injury support, trauma, and mental health are vital to delivering high-quality care. However, DSS’s proposed amendments indicate a shift that would allow less-qualified individuals to fill these roles, a move that advocates argue could have severe consequences for the ABI community.
Advocates stress that these amendments reflect an effort by DSS to reduce operational costs in a way that could prioritize financial efficiency over patient well-being. By amending requirements, DSS could enable subcontracted care management companies to increase profits while minimizing staffing expenses. These companies, according to advocates, have already struggled to meet their contractual obligations to provide consistent, effective care, raising concerns that the proposed changes would worsen this issue.
Political Strategies and Financial Incentives
Advocates further argue that this push for amendments is politically motivated. DSS’s attempts to adjust standards appear to reflect a pattern of leveraging policy changes to align with financial interests—specifically those of subcontracted companies managing care. Observers believe that DSS may be relying on well-honed strategies to secure these amendments, employing tactics such as selective information sharing, minimizing transparency, and framing cost-cutting measures as necessary for “efficiency.”
These tactics underscore a broader strategy in which the proposed amendments are presented as improvements or adaptations, while the underlying motivation may be political alignment with subcontracted interests. This approach allows DSS to navigate potential backlash by casting these amendments as beneficial to the broader system, even if they may diminish the quality of care received by Connecticut’s brain injury community.
Community Response and Advocacy for Transparency
Families and advocates are closely monitoring these developments, expressing a strong commitment to resisting any policy changes that could compromise care quality. With Rep. Tammy Nuccio’s focus on preserving high standards, advocates are hopeful that greater transparency and accountability will guide future discussions. Through advocacy, the ABI community continues to emphasize that financial incentives should never outweigh the imperative to provide skilled, compassionate care for vulnerable individuals.
Rep. Nuccio’s efforts are a reminder that actions impacting public health should be transparent, accountable, and always prioritize patient well-being over political or financial considerations.
For Licensed Clinical Social Workers (LCSWs) within Connecticut's Medicaid ABI Waiver Program, recent proposed amendments by the Department of Social Services (DSS) have raised concerns about job security and the future of high-quality care management roles. Historically, LCSWs have held these positions due to their specialized expertise in brain injury, trauma, and clinical care. However, DSS’s proposed amendments may allow less-qualified individuals to fill these roles, putting LCSWs at risk of losing their positions to less-experienced care managers.
Why LCSWs are Concerned
Shift to Cost-Cutting Over Quality: DSS’s amendments seem geared towards financial efficiency, which often translates to hiring less-expensive personnel. LCSWs, with their advanced degrees and experience, come at a higher cost, leading to concerns that these changes could phase out their roles to cut expenses.
Impact on Patient Care: Many LCSWs argue that their clinical training and comprehensive understanding of brain injury make them uniquely suited to this work. Losing their positions could lead to reduced care quality, as less-experienced individuals may lack the skills necessary to manage complex cases effectively.
Uncertain Future for Social Work Standards: Advocates fear that this trend, if successful, could set a precedent across other care management areas, reducing standards for social work roles in favor of financial savings. This not only risks job losses for LCSWs but could lead to a broader reduction in clinical quality across similar programs.
Political and Financial Motivations: Some in the advocacy community feel that DSS’s approach is politically driven, prioritizing contractual profits for private care management companies over consistent quality care. Subcontracted companies may benefit financially from reduced standards, leading to greater concern among LCSWs that the amendments are not aligned with patient or professional interests.
The potential for LCSWs to lose their roles due to these proposed amendments underscores the importance of sustained advocacy for both quality care and professional standards. LCSWs and supporters are encouraged to engage in discussions, share their expertise on the value of high-quality social work, and push back against changes that could undercut their roles and impact patient outcomes.
The Absence of DSS Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves
One point that resonated strongly during the hearing was the absence of DSS Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves. Appointed by Governor Ned Lamont, Commissioner Reeves holds significant responsibility in overseeing the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program, and her presence could have offered insight and accountability on these issues. Her absence only added to advocates’ frustrations and highlighted the perceived lack of prioritization within DSS for this critical program.
A Grateful Community Supports Rep. Nuccio’s Stand for Change
Amid these challenges, families and advocates have expressed their gratitude to Rep. Nuccio for taking a stand and pushing DSS to answer hard questions about the ABI Waiver Program’s delays and quality standards. Her leadership exemplifies the kind of advocacy that families and individuals affected by brain injuries have been waiting for. Nuccio’s actions have sparked renewed hope that DSS and the Connecticut General Assembly will address these systemic issues with urgency and integrity.
In Rep. Nuccio, the ABI community has a compassionate, dedicated advocate who understands the value of qualified care and is committed to holding the program accountable. Her work provides a crucial reminder that public officials can and should prioritize the needs of the communities they serve.
How You Can Help
Want to support Rep. Nuccio’s push for accountability and quality care in the ABI Waiver Program? Here’s how you can make a difference:
Spread Awareness: Share this post and other information to keep these issues at the forefront.
Contact Your Local Representatives: Emphasize the importance of accountability and qualified care in the ABI Waiver Program.
Follow Advocacy Updates: Stay informed on actions Rep. Nuccio and advocacy groups are taking, and join them in calling for positive change.
Thank you, Rep. Nuccio, for fighting for transparency, accountability, and quality standards in Connecticut’s Medicaid ABI Waiver Program. Your leadership and compassion are inspiring, and we look forward to the changes your advocacy will help bring about.
#ABIWaiver #ConnecticutMedicaid #QualityCare #RepTammyNuccio #HealthcareAdvocacy #Transparency #Accountability #BrainInjuryAwareness
Connecticut General Assembly Appropriations Committee Link
What You Can Do: The Time for Solutions is Now
Unfortunately, these problems within Connecticut’s Department of Social Services (DSS) and the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program have been acknowledged for years, yet little has changed. The time for acknowledgment is over—the time for real solutions is now. If we want to see actual improvements, we need to raise these issues to a higher level. One powerful way to do this is to report these ongoing failures to federal agencies that oversee healthcare, civil rights, and government accountability.
By submitting concerns to federal agencies, we can ensure that the systemic issues are addressed, and that the state is held accountable for providing timely and adequate services to vulnerable populations. Below is a list of federal agencies where you can report concerns regarding Connecticut’s DSS, including the Medicaid ABI Waiver and other critical programs:
At ABI Resources, we are deeply committed to supporting individuals with brain injuries, ensuring that they receive the care and services they deserve. One of the key programs designed to assist these individuals is Connecticut’s Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program. However, the program is currently facing significant challenges, leaving many families in a state of distress. In this post, we will explore the ongoing crisis with the ABI Waiver waitlist, its impact on families, and the pressing need for action.
Understanding the Crisis: A 5-Year Wait for Critical Services
Connecticut’s Medicaid ABI Waiver Program provides essential services to brain injury survivors, including rehabilitation and home care that support their recovery and daily living. However, families are currently facing prolonged delays in accessing these services. Shockingly, individuals who applied as far back as 2019 are still waiting for care.
Despite awareness of the problem, the Department of Social Services (DSS) has struggled to provide clear answers or solutions. Advocates, including State Representative Toni E. Walker, are now demanding urgent action to address this backlog, questioning how the system has allowed such delays to persist for so long.
The Human Cost of Delay
The consequences of the waitlist crisis are profound. Brain injury survivors rely on timely access to services to maintain their health and independence. Without these supports, their condition often deteriorates, leading to preventable hospitalizations and further health complications.
For families, the emotional and financial toll is overwhelming. Many caregivers are forced to leave their jobs to provide full-time care for their loved ones, leading to significant financial strain. Worse still, these families are left in limbo, uncertain about when—or if—they will ever receive the services their loved ones need.
The Financial Burden on Taxpayers
Beyond the human impact, the mismanagement of the ABI Waiver Program is a financial issue. Without access to preventive care, brain injury survivors are often forced to seek emergency services, which are much more expensive for the state. This inefficient use of resources not only wastes taxpayer dollars but also puts Connecticut at risk of losing federal Medicaid funding due to non-compliance with program requirements.
Lack of Leadership and Transparency
A major concern raised by advocates and families is the lack of transparency and leadership within the DSS. During a recent legislative hearing, Christine Weston, Director of the Community Options Unit, was unable to provide accurate data on how many individuals remain stuck on the waitlist. To make matters worse, Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves was notably absent from this hearing, further fueling concerns that leadership is not prioritizing this issue.
The absence of clear data and leadership only deepens the crisis. Families need transparency to understand when they can expect services, and the state needs strong leadership to ensure the program is managed effectively. Without these elements, the backlog will continue to grow, and more families will be left without the support they need.
The Path Forward: Immediate Action Required
The solution to this crisis requires immediate, coordinated action. Acknowledgment of the problem is not enough; we need meaningful reforms to ensure that brain injury survivors receive timely care. There are several key steps that must be taken to resolve the backlog and restore trust in the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program:
Accurate Data and Transparency:DSS must provide clear, up-to-date information on the number of individuals on the waitlist and the projected timeline for receiving services. Transparency is essential for families to plan and understand their options.
Leadership Accountability:Strong leadership within DSS is critical. The absence of key figures during legislative hearings raises concerns about commitment to the program’s success. Leaders must be actively engaged in addressing the backlog and finding long-term solutions.
Timely Access to Services:The most urgent priority is ensuring that individuals who have been waiting since 2019 are granted access to the care they need. This includes rehabilitation, home care, and other services that are essential for maintaining health and quality of life.
Federal Oversight and Compliance:Given the ongoing issues with the ABI Waiver Program, federal oversight may be necessary to ensure that taxpayer dollars are being used efficiently and that the state complies with Medicaid regulations. Audits and compliance reviews could provide a roadmap for improving program management and reducing the waitlist.
Why This Matters to You
At ABI Resources, we are not only advocates for those with brain injuries, but we are also a resource for families navigating complex systems. This crisis affects real people—our neighbors, friends, and loved ones. The delays in the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program are not just numbers on a report; they represent families who are struggling to provide care, survivors who are fighting for their health, and a system that is failing to meet their needs.
The need for action is clear. Families deserve answers, and brain injury survivors deserve care. By working together—advocates, policymakers, and community leaders—we can ensure that the ABI Waiver Program is restored to its original purpose: providing timely, life-changing services to those who need them most.
How You Can Help
If you or a loved one is impacted by the Medicaid ABI Waiver waitlist crisis, or if you simply want to support the cause, there are several ways to get involved:
Contact your legislators: Reach out to State Representative Toni E. Walker and other policymakers to express your concerns and advocate for immediate action.
Share your story: Personal stories have the power to drive change. If your family has been affected by the ABI Waiver Program delays, consider sharing your experiences with the media or through advocacy organizations.
Stay informed: Follow updates on the ABI Waiver Program and related legislative actions. Staying informed will help you understand how to best advocate for change.
Contact Information for State Rep. Toni Walker:
Legislative Office Building, Room 2702, Hartford, CT 06106-1591
Phone: 800-842-8267 | 860-240-8585
Email: Toni.Walker@cga.ct.gov
At ABI Resources, our mission is to ensure that all brain injury survivors receive the care and support they deserve. We are dedicated to advocating for solutions and reforms that will improve the lives of those affected by this crisis. Together, we can push for the changes that are so desperately needed.
ABI Resources – Supporting brain injury survivors, advocating for justice, and working towards a system that serves everyone.
#MedicaidReform #TransparencyNow #ABIWaiver #BrainInjurySupport #FixTheWaitlist #HealthcareAccountability #FederalOversight #DSSConnecticut #LeadershipMatters
Federal Agencies to Submit Concerns To:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
Purpose: Oversees Medicaid programs and ensures compliance with federal regulations.
Submit a Concern:
CMS Contact Form
Phone: 1-800-MEDICARE (1-800-633-4227)
Mail:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
7500 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, MD 21244
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) - Office for Civil Rights (OCR)
Purpose: Ensures equal access to healthcare and protects civil rights in healthcare settings.
Submit a Complaint:
OCR Complaint Portal
Phone: 1-800-368-1019
Mail:
Office for Civil Rights
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
200 Independence Avenue, SW
Room 509F, HHH Building
Washington, D.C. 20201
U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) - Civil Rights Division
Purpose: Enforces federal statutes prohibiting discrimination in healthcare and social services.
Submit a Complaint:
DOJ Civil Rights Complaint Form
Phone: 1-888-736-5551
Mail:
U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Rights Division
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20530-0001
U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO)
Purpose: Investigates government mismanagement and waste of taxpayer dollars in federal and state programs.
Submit a Concern:
GAO FraudNet Reporting
Phone: 1-800-424-5454
Mail:
Government Accountability Office
441 G Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20548
Office of Inspector General (OIG) - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Purpose: Conducts audits and investigates fraud, waste, and abuse in Medicaid programs.
Submit a Complaint:
OIG Hotline Form
Phone: 1-800-HHS-TIPS (1-800-447-8477)
Mail:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Office of Inspector General
330 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, D.C. 20201
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) - Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (FHEO)
Purpose: Oversees fair housing laws, which can include issues related to housing assistance for those with disabilities.
Submit a Complaint:
FHEO Complaint Form
Phone: 1-800-669-9777
Mail:
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
451 7th Street, SW
Washington, D.C. 20410
Why Reporting Matters
By reporting the mismanagement of Connecticut’s Medicaid ABI Waiver Program and DSS to these federal agencies, you are helping to ensure that these critical programs are properly funded, managed, and delivered. Your voice can make a difference in the lives of those who have been waiting far too long for care. Federal oversight is essential to holding state agencies accountable and ensuring that the needs of vulnerable populations are met.
Take Action Now
Each of these agencies has the power to investigate and enforce changes that can ensure DSS programs are run more efficiently and fairly. Please take the time to submit your concerns—whether about long waitlists, lack of services, or failure to comply with federal Medicaid requirements. With enough attention, we can ensure these programs are fixed, not just for the ABI Waiver but for all who depend on DSS services in Connecticut.
The time for solutions is now. Your report can help make a lasting impact.
What is the Appropriations Committee and Why Does It Matter?
Think of the Appropriations Committee as the group of people in Connecticut’s government who decide where the state’s money goes. They look at how much money the state has, and then they decide which programs, like healthcare, education, and other important services, should get funding. For people with brain injuries, one of the key programs they manage is the Medicaid ABI Waiver, which provides crucial services like rehabilitation and home care.
This committee, made up of representatives from across the state, reviews the state’s budget and makes sure that services people rely on are properly funded. If they don’t give enough money to a program like the ABI Waiver, people who need care end up waiting months or even years for the services that can change their lives.
The decisions made by this committee directly affect real people—families, caregivers, and especially those with disabilities—who depend on state services to survive and improve their quality of life.
Osten, Catherine A. – Co-Chair
Walker, Toni E. – Member
Hartley, Joan V. – Vice Chair
Nuccio, Tammy – Vice Chair
Exum, Tammy R. – Vice Chair
Anwar, Saud – Member
McCrory, Douglas – Member
Flexer, Mae – Member
Lesser, Matthew L. – Member
Kushner, Julie – Member
Winfield, Gary A. – Member
Marx, Martha – Member
Somers, Heather S. – Member
Berthel, Eric C. – Ranking Member
Zawistowski, Tami – Ranking Member
Bolinsky, Mitch – Member
Callahan, Patrick E. – Member
Candelaria, Juan R. – Member
Chaleski, Rachel – Member
Currey, Jeff – Member
Dathan, Lucy – Member
DeCaprio, Mark – Member
Delany, Hubert D. – Member
Delnicki, Tom – Member
Dillon, Patricia A. – Member
Felipe, Antonio – Member
Foncello, Martin – Member
Garibay, Jane M. – Member
Gibson, Bobby G. – Member
Gilchrest, Jillian – Member
Gonzalez, Minnie – Member
Gordon, Jeff – Member
Haddad, Gregory – Member
Hall, Joshua M. – Member
Harrison, Cindy – Member
Hoxha, Joe – Member
Johnson, Susan M. – Member
Khanna, Rachel – Member
Kennedy, Kathy – Member
McCarty, Kathleen M. – Member
Nolan, Anthony L. – Member
Porter, Robyn A. – Member
Osborne, Melissa – Member
Reyes, Geraldo C. – Member
Rosario, Christopher – Member
Rutigliano, David – Member
Ryan, Kevin – Member
Sanchez, Emmanuel – Member
Slap, Derek – Member
Simms, Travis – Member
Tercyak, Peter A. – Member
Paris, Corey P. – Member
Connecticut’s Medicaid ABI Waiver Program Crisis: A Comprehensive Breakdown of the Waitlist, Its Impact on Families, and Taxpayers
Republican Senator Lisa Seminara has raised serious concerns about the ongoing Medicaid ABI Waiver Program waitlist crisis, with individuals waiting for services as far back as 2019. Despite years of acknowledging this issue, no real solutions have been provided. The absence of DSS Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves from a recent critical legislative hearing has only intensified concerns about the leadership and lack of accountability within the Department of Social Services (DSS).
During the hearing, Christine Weston, Director of the Community Options Unit (COU), was unable to provide accurate data regarding how many individuals are stuck on the waitlist. This points to deeper issues within DSS and raises alarms about mismanagement. Simply acknowledging the problem without implementing solutions has left families in a state of limbo, while those in power, such as Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves, have failed to address the core of the crisis.
For years, Connecticut’s Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program has provided critical services to individuals living with brain injuries. These services include rehabilitation, home care, and daily support aimed at improving the quality of life for survivors. Unfortunately, the program is now facing a growing crisis, with some individuals waiting since 2019 for care. Despite acknowledgment of the issue by Governor Ned Lamont, the Department of Social Services (DSS), and key officials like Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves, no substantial solutions have been implemented. As the waitlist grows, so do the consequences for families and taxpayers.
The ABI Waiver Program: A Lifeline Being Denied
The ABI Waiver Program is designed to allow individuals with acquired brain injuries to live more independently in their communities. It covers essential services such as:
Rehabilitation therapy
In-home care
Behavioral support services
Respite care for caregivers
Case management
However, the growing waitlist, which has left individuals waiting for over five years, is preventing brain injury survivors from accessing the care they need. For these individuals and their families, this isn’t just a delay—it’s a life-altering obstacle to recovery.
How This Crisis Impacts Individuals and Families
For families of brain injury survivors, the long wait times for Medicaid ABI Waiver services have a devastating impact on every aspect of their lives:
Deteriorating Health:
Many survivors are living with deteriorating physical and mental health due to the delay in accessing appropriate care. Without timely rehabilitation and support services, their conditions often worsen, leading to more frequent hospitalizations and emergency room visits. These are costly and ineffective solutions compared to the long-term care that Medicaid provides.
Emotional Strain:
The emotional toll of waiting for years for care is overwhelming. Uncertainty about whether their loved one will ever receive the care they need adds significant mental stress to families. The failure of DSS to provide clear information about their position on the waitlist only deepens the feeling of being forgotten by the system.
Financial Burden on Caregivers:
In the absence of Medicaid services, family members often become full-time caregivers, leading to financial strain. Many caregivers must leave their jobs to provide care, resulting in a loss of household income. This further destabilizes families, leaving them financially vulnerable while they wait indefinitely for services.
How This Crisis Impacts Taxpayers
While the direct impact on families is severe, taxpayers also bear the consequences of the mismanagement of the ABI Waiver Program:
Wasted Taxpayer Dollars:
The delay in providing essential services through the ABI Waiver forces individuals to rely on emergency services, which are far more expensive than the long-term care they need. Taxpayer dollars are being used inefficiently, with funds directed toward short-term, crisis care instead of preventive, cost-effective services that the waiver provides.
Federal Funding at Risk:
The ongoing mismanagement of the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program could jeopardize Connecticut’s compliance with federal Medicaid regulations. This risks a loss of federal funding, which would further strain the state budget and reduce available services for those in need.
Increased Healthcare Costs:
By delaying access to necessary care, the state is creating a system where individuals' health conditions worsen over time, leading to higher healthcare costs. Preventive care is far more affordable than treating preventable complications that arise from lack of timely care. Taxpayers end up shouldering the costs of this inefficiency.
Acknowledgment Isn’t Enough: The Need for Action
For years, the ABI Waiver Program waitlist has been acknowledged, but acknowledgment alone is insufficient. Simply recognizing the problem doesn’t resolve the issue, and families are still waiting in limbo. Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves has not actively participated in critical discussions, raising concerns about the lack of leadership in fixing the problem. The absence of leadership and transparency has caused a growing crisis, leaving families and taxpayers alike to suffer the consequences.
A Call for Reform: Immediate Actions Required
To address the ABI Waiver waitlist crisis, several reforms must be prioritized:
Transparency in Waitlist Management:
DSS must provide clear, accurate data about the waitlist and regularly update families on their status. Transparency is critical to rebuilding trust between families and the agency.
Reduction of Wait Times:
The state must increase staffing and streamline administrative processes to ensure individuals don’t have to wait years for services. Addressing these bottlenecks will be key to clearing the backlog.
Federal Audits:
Independent federal audits are needed to ensure the program is in compliance with Medicaid regulations and that funds are being used effectively. Audits will help identify where the system is failing and bring accountability to the program.
Accountability from Leadership:
Leaders such as Governor Ned Lamont and Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves must be held accountable for the ongoing mismanagement of the program. Concrete steps are needed to reduce the waitlist and improve service delivery.
Whistleblower Protections:
Strengthening whistleblower protections will encourage staff to report instances of mismanagement or inefficiency within DSS without fear of retaliation. This will help identify and resolve issues more quickly.
The Time for Action Is Now
The Medicaid ABI Waiver Program waitlist crisis is a failure of leadership, transparency, and compassion. It affects not only the brain injury survivors who depend on these services but also their families and Connecticut taxpayers. Real reform is needed, not just acknowledgment of the problem.
At ABI Resources, we stand with the families and advocates pushing for immediate solutions. We call on Governor Ned Lamont, Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves, and the federal government to implement the necessary changes to ensure that brain injury survivors receive the care they deserve.
It’s time to ensure that Connecticut’s most vulnerable populations are no longer left behind. The time for action is now. Together, we can fix this as it is so desperately needed.
The Medicaid ABI Waiver Waitlist Crisis: A Call for Transparency and Reform
In Connecticut, brain injury survivors and their families have faced an ongoing crisis. For more than five years, individuals in desperate need of care have been stuck on a waitlist for the Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program. This delay in services has far-reaching consequences, including worsening health conditions, emotional and financial strain on families, and a profound lack of accountability within the Department of Social Services (DSS). It is time for immediate reform, transparency, and federal oversight to address these critical issues.
The ABI Waiver Program: A Lifeline Being Denied
The ABI Waiver Program is designed to provide vital services to individuals with acquired brain injuries, including rehabilitation, home care, and support services that help survivors regain independence and live fulfilling lives. However, many people in need of these services are left on a waitlist for years, unable to access the care they desperately require. For these individuals, the wait is not just a delay—it is a life-altering obstacle to recovery.
Prolonged Wait Times and Systemic Mismanagement
Despite the urgency, many individuals have been waiting over five years for critical services. Families and caregivers are left in limbo, without clear information about when—or if—their loved ones will receive the help they need. This prolonged wait is a sign of systemic mismanagement within the DSS. During a recent legislative exchange, Christine Weston, Director of the Community Options Unit (COU) within DSS, could not provide the number of individuals on the waitlist, raising serious concerns about the oversight and integrity of the program.
Lack of Transparency
The absence of clear communication is one of the most frustrating aspects for families on the waitlist. Many are not even aware of their position on the list, and the DSS has not been transparent in providing this information. This lack of accountability raises concerns that there may be efforts to discourage access to Medicaid services, particularly for the most vulnerable populations.
Senator Lisa Seminara, a Republican representing Connecticut’s 8th Senate District, has been a vocal advocate for addressing the mismanagement of the ABI Waiver Program. During the recent hearing, Governor Ned Lamont’s administration, along with Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves (who was notably absent from the hearing), faced scrutiny for failing to provide answers and implement necessary reforms.
The Burden on Families
For families waiting for services, the emotional, physical, and financial toll is immense. Without the necessary Medicaid services, family members often become full-time caregivers, leading to burnout and financial strain. Many caregivers are forced to leave their jobs to provide care, which further exacerbates financial instability. The mental exhaustion caused by uncertainty and the responsibility of caregiving creates a cycle of stress that affects entire households.
Deteriorating Health for Those on the Waitlist
For individuals with brain injuries, the delays in accessing care can be detrimental to their health. Without timely intervention, many patients see their conditions worsen, leading to more hospital visits and increased reliance on emergency care—a costly and inefficient alternative to long-term, proactive treatment. These emergency treatments often fail to address the underlying health issues, creating a revolving door of healthcare that does little to improve the quality of life for brain injury survivors.
The Taxpayer Impact
The financial inefficiencies of the ABI Waiver Program are not just a burden on families—they also affect taxpayers. Delays in services lead to more expensive emergency interventions, which are covered by Medicaid. Had these individuals received timely and appropriate care, these costly emergency services could have been avoided. This represents a misallocation of taxpayer dollars and underscores the need for improved program management and transparency.
The Risk of Losing Federal Funding
The delays and mismanagement of the ABI Waiver Program could have even broader consequences for Connecticut. Non-compliance with federal Medicaid regulations could result in the loss of federal funding, which would further strain the state’s budget and reduce services for those most in need. This would be a devastating blow to the program and the vulnerable populations it is supposed to serve.
Immediate Solutions: A Call for Federal and State-Level Reform
The current state of the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program is untenable. Families, advocates, and policymakers must come together to demand immediate federal oversight and state-level reform. This situation demands action on several fronts:
Transparency in Waitlist Management: DSS must provide families with clear and accurate information about their position on the waitlist. Full transparency will restore trust and allow families to plan for the future.
Reduction of Wait Times: The state must address staff shortages, funding gaps, and procedural inefficiencies within the DSS that contribute to long delays in service delivery.
Federal Audits: Independent federal audits are necessary to ensure compliance with Medicaid regulations and to identify areas of financial mismanagement. These audits will ensure that taxpayer dollars are being used efficiently and that services are being provided to those who need them most.
Whistleblower Protections: Strengthening protections for whistleblowers within DSS will encourage more individuals to come forward with information about potential mismanagement or corruption without fear of retaliation.
Accountability from Leadership: Governor Ned Lamont and Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves must ensure that the leadership within DSS is committed to supporting vulnerable populations and is held accountable for the program's performance.
A Call for Advocacy and Action
The Medicaid ABI Waiver Program is a lifeline for individuals with brain injuries, but the current mismanagement of the waitlist and services is failing those who need it most. Immediate reforms are necessary to restore trust, improve efficiency, and provide life-saving services to Connecticut’s most vulnerable populations. ABI Resources stands with families, caregivers, and advocates in demanding the transparency, accountability, and action needed to fix this broken system.
It’s time to stand together and push for the reforms that Connecticut’s brain injury survivors deserve.
Outrage Now, Injustice Exposed, Public Outrage, Demand Accountability, Broken System, Fix This Now, Enough Is Enough, Unacceptable, We Deserve Better, No More Delays, Action Needed Now, Transparency Now, Justice Denied, System Failing, Urgent Reform, Accountability Now, Mismanagement Exposed, Voices Silenced, Act Now For Change, Fed Up With Injustice
Hidden Medicaid Agency Provider List: Connecticut Department of Social Services / CT DSS COU CGA
Exposing Medicaid Secrets: How Connecticut's Violations Hurt Taxpayers & Vulnerable Populations" CGA
Connecticut DSS Faces Scrutiny Over Concealed Provider List in Medicaid ABI Waiver Program
In a recent legislative exchange, Connecticut State Representative Kathleen McCarty questioned Christine Weston, Director of the Community Options Unit (COU) within the Connecticut Department of Social Services (DSS), about the availability of the Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program Agency Provider List. The list is not publicly accessible and COU would need to consult with DSS legal counsel—has triggered concerns about transparency and potential violations of federal Medicaid regulations.
The concealment of the Provider List directly undermines federal requirements for transparency, consumer choice, and public accountability in Medicaid-funded programs. Under the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(23)), Medicaid beneficiaries are guaranteed the right to choose from any qualified provider participating in the program. By withholding the list of providers, DSS is effectively limiting beneficiaries' ability to make informed choices about their care, a clear violation of this federal statute.
More than a mere bureaucratic oversight, this lack of transparency obstructs the fundamental rights of Medicaid recipients, particularly vulnerable populations like brain injury survivors who depend on specialized care. These individuals and their families rely on accessible information to choose the most appropriate care providers based on quality, expertise, and geographic location. The absence of this information not only deprives them of their legal rights but also risks funneling beneficiaries toward limited, state-favored providers, potentially compromising the quality of care they receive.
This issue with the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program could indicate a systemic problem in Connecticut’s administration of federally funded programs. If the DSS is withholding information in this program, similar practices may be occurring in other state-managed, federally funded programs. With billions of taxpayer dollars flowing through Medicaid, this raises significant concerns about mismanagement, financial oversight, and the state’s broader compliance with federal transparency requirements.
Beyond violating Medicaid regulations, this failure to provide access to public information also erodes trust in the integrity of state-run health services. When critical details about provider options are concealed, it creates a veil of secrecy that limits public accountability. Moreover, it raises the specter of conflicts of interest—where specific providers may be favored by state agencies for reasons unrelated to the quality of care or beneficiary needs. Such practices, if left unchecked, can lead to monopolistic conditions where certain agencies dominate the landscape, to the detriment of consumer choice and healthcare quality.
Medicaid is designed to serve some of the most vulnerable populations in the country, including individuals with disabilities, low-income families, and elderly individuals requiring long-term care. The intentional withholding of vital information such as provider lists violates not only federal laws but also the ethical obligation to ensure that these populations have equal access to healthcare services.
This situation calls for immediate action from federal oversight agencies, such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), to conduct a thorough audit of Connecticut’s Medicaid program administration. Federal intervention is necessary to ensure that the state complies with transparency regulations and provides Medicaid beneficiaries with the information they are entitled to by law. If these practices are found to extend to other federally funded programs, it could signal widespread non-compliance, mismanagement of federal funds, and a failure to uphold the rights of vulnerable individuals across the state.
As the investigation into this issue unfolds, it is critical that the DSS take immediate steps to rectify these transparency failures. The state must make the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program Agency Provider List publicly accessible and ensure that beneficiaries’ rights to choose their providers are fully restored. Anything less would continue to jeopardize the integrity of Connecticut’s Medicaid program and the health and well-being of those it is meant to serve.
We’re sharing an important message about systemic issues within Medicaid programs that may be impacting both vulnerable populations and every U.S. taxpayer. These challenges could have nationwide implications, affecting how federal dollars are spent and how services reach those who rely on Medicaid.
This is not about assigning blame—it’s about finding solutions that ensure taxpayer dollars are used wisely and that vulnerable individuals get the care they need. By working together, we can help create a more transparent, accountable, and effective Medicaid system that benefits everyone.
Key Problems and Solutions:
Misuse of Taxpayer Funds
Problem: Federal Medicaid funds are being inefficiently used, which can increase costs for taxpayers while reducing the quality of services for vulnerable individuals.
Solution: Conduct regular audits of Medicaid spending to ensure that every dollar is used efficiently to support essential services and avoid waste or misallocation.
Lack of Transparency
Problem: Essential information about Medicaid services—such as provider directories and funding allocations—is not easily accessible to the public. This lack of transparency prevents people from understanding how funds are being used and how care decisions are made.
Solution: Ensure greater transparency by making Medicaid-related information, including provider directories and spending reports, publicly accessible. This will allow taxpayers, caregivers, and advocates to see where resources are going and hold the system accountable.
Unethical Business Practices
Problem: Some providers may be engaging in conflicts of interest or kickback schemes, where services are being recommended for financial gain rather than the needs of individuals. This drives up costs and reduces the quality of care.
Solution: Implement strict ethical oversight to ensure that Medicaid services are provided based on the needs of individuals, without conflicts of interest or unnecessary services that increase costs for taxpayers.
Discriminatory Business Practices in Medicaid Referrals
Problem: Certain providers may be favored in Medicaid referrals, limiting access to care for individuals and creating an unequal playing field for providers. This impacts the freedom of individuals to choose the care that best fits their needs.
Solution: Establish a fair and transparent referral system that treats all providers equally and ensures that individuals have access to a wide range of care options, promoting both choice and competition.
Impact on Disabled Workers
Problem: Disabled workers involved in the Medicaid system are not always being paid fairly, which violates federal labor laws and creates further economic challenges for an already vulnerable group.
Solution: Ensure compliance with federal labor laws by guaranteeing that all disabled workers are paid fairly and treated with respect, helping create a more supportive and ethical Medicaid system.
Limited Consumer Choice
Problem: Some individuals are limited in their ability to choose services or housing arrangements, being tied to specific providers through restrictive agreements. This reduces their freedom to select the care and services that best suit their needs.
Solution: Expand consumer choice by revising policies that restrict beneficiaries to certain providers or housing options, allowing individuals more freedom to select the services and care arrangements that work best for them.
FOIA Violations and Stonewalling
Problem: Public records requests related to Medicaid services and spending are being blocked or delayed, limiting public oversight and reducing accountability within the system.
Solution: Enforce full compliance with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to ensure that the public has access to important Medicaid information. This will allow for greater transparency and ensure that taxpayer dollars are being used properly.
Unauthorized Care Management Services
Problem: Some individuals are receiving services that have not been authorized or properly managed, leading to confusion and potential misuse of Medicaid funds.
Solution: Ensure proper oversight and clear guidelines for care management services, preventing unauthorized services and ensuring that individuals receive only the care that is necessary and beneficial to them.
Unfair Rental Agreements Linked to Medicaid Services
Problem: Some beneficiaries are tied to specific housing arrangements through rental agreements that are linked to their Medicaid service providers, reducing their ability to change providers or housing without risking their care.
Solution: Revise rental agreements and housing policies to ensure greater consumer freedom and allow individuals to change providers or housing arrangements without being penalized or risking their care.
How These Issues Affect All of Us:
These problems extend beyond any one state—they have national implications for how Medicaid funds are spent and how care is provided. Every taxpayer contributes to Medicaid, and it’s essential that these funds are used efficiently and transparently. At the same time, vulnerable populations—including individuals with disabilities and those relying on Medicaid services—deserve a system that works for them.
By addressing these systemic challenges, we can ensure that taxpayer dollars are used wisely and that those who need support get access to the care and services they deserve.
What You Can Do:
Share this post to raise awareness and encourage others to understand how these issues might be affecting them and their communities.
Support greater transparency and ethical oversight in Medicaid services by engaging with policymakers.
Advocate for positive reform to ensure taxpayer dollars are used effectively and that vulnerable individuals get the care they need.
Together, we can help create a Medicaid system that benefits everyone—by ensuring accountability, promoting transparency, and protecting taxpayer resources while supporting those who rely on these essential services.
What Happens When You Lose Medicaid Insurance?
Medicaid is essential for many families. If it’s taken away or you lose it, it can lead to serious problems for you, your family, and even your entire community. Here’s what happens:
You Can’t See the Doctor When You Need To
You Delay Care: You might put off going to the doctor because you can’t afford it. Small problems can turn into big ones.
No More Preventive Check-ups: Without Medicaid, you might skip regular check-ups that help catch problems early.
You Can’t Afford Medications
Stopping Medication: People stop taking important medications (for conditions like diabetes, mental health issues, or high blood pressure) because they can’t pay for them.
Getting Worse: Without those meds, your health can get worse quickly, leading to hospital visits or even life-threatening conditions.
Mental Health Suffers
Stopping Therapy: Mental health services, like therapy or counseling, can get too expensive, meaning people can no longer get help for anxiety, depression, or other issues.
Emotional Stress: Without professional help, mental health issues can become overwhelming, leading to stress, breakdowns, and even suicidal thoughts.
Risk of Homelessness Increases
Losing Your Job: If your health gets worse, you may not be able to work, leading to job loss and financial problems.
Can’t Pay for Housing: Medical bills pile up, and without income, you might not be able to pay rent or the mortgage, which can lead to losing your home.
Families Can Be Affected: It’s not just individuals who suffer—entire families can end up in shelters or homeless because of high medical costs.
Emergency Rooms Get Overcrowded
Using ER as a Doctor’s Office: People without insurance often wait until they are very sick and then go to the ER, which is much more expensive than regular care.
More Stress on Hospitals: Hospitals can get overwhelmed, and this affects everyone. It means longer wait times and less attention for those who really need emergency care.
Crime Can Increase
Desperation Leads to Survival Crimes: When people are financially desperate due to health issues, some may turn to petty crime just to survive.
Substance Abuse: Losing mental health care can lead to drug or alcohol use to cope, and this often leads to trouble with the law.
Homelessness and Crime Connection: When people lose their homes and can’t get help, they may be more likely to get involved in crime just to meet basic needs.
Your Community Suffers
Spread of Illness: Without insurance, people may not get vaccinated or treated for contagious diseases, which can make the entire community sick.
Public Services Overloaded: Charities, shelters, and food banks may get overwhelmed by more people needing help, making it harder to serve everyone.
Fewer Resources for Everyone: When hospitals, clinics, and public health services are stretched too thin, everyone gets worse care.
Children Are Affected
Missed Vaccines and Checkups: Kids without Medicaid miss important vaccines and doctor visits, putting their health and development at risk.
Struggling in School: Without proper healthcare, children may fall behind in school because of untreated health problems or stress at home due to financial instability.
Long-Term Poverty
Medical Debt: Without Medicaid, medical bills pile up, and families can end up with huge debt, making it hard to afford basic needs like food and housing.
Generational Impact: Families in debt or struggling with health issues have a harder time getting out of poverty, and this can affect future generations.
Losing Medicaid isn’t just about losing insurance; it’s about losing stability in your life. Without access to healthcare, everything starts to break down—your health, your ability to work, your family’s security, and the community’s well-being. It can even lead to more crime and homelessness as people struggle just to survive.
What Can You Do?
Stay Informed: Know your options and stay connected to advocacy groups that support for healthcare rights.
Ask for Help: Reach out to community health centers, legal aid, and nonprofits that offer support.
Get Involved: Support policies that ensure everyone has access to affordable healthcare.
When people lose Medicaid insurance, the effects also significantly impact taxpayers and the overall economy. Here’s a breakdown of how this burden shifts onto taxpayers and why it's important for everyone, even those with insurance, to understand these consequences.
Increased Emergency Room Costs (Taxpayer-Funded)
ER Becomes the First Stop: When people without insurance get sick or injured, they often wait until it’s serious and go to the emergency room (ER), which is far more expensive than regular doctor visits.
Higher Costs Passed to Taxpayers: ER visits are one of the most expensive ways to treat medical issues, and when uninsured patients can't pay their bills, the hospital absorbs the costs. These costs are often passed on to taxpayers through increased funding needs for hospitals and public healthcare programs.
Higher Local and State Taxes for Public Services
Overloaded Public Health Systems: Local and state governments are forced to provide more funding for free clinics, public health programs, shelters, and emergency services when there’s an increase in uninsured people. This leads to higher taxes to cover these services.
Community Resources Stretched Thin: When uninsured people need more help from publicly funded services like shelters, food banks, and healthcare clinics, these services require more taxpayer dollars to stay operational. As more people rely on these programs, the costs to taxpayers grow.
Higher Insurance Premiums for Everyone
Cost-Shifting in Healthcare: Hospitals often shift the unpaid medical costs of uninsured patients onto private insurers. This drives up the overall cost of healthcare for those who do have insurance.
Rising Insurance Premiums: As healthcare providers raise prices to compensate for uninsured patients, taxpayers who buy insurance in the private market may see their premiums go up. This makes healthcare more expensive for everyone, even those who already pay for private insurance.
Increased Government Spending on Medicaid Expansion and Safety Nets
Government Must Step In: When people lose Medicaid, they still often need some form of public assistance. Governments may have to increase spending on Medicaid expansion, safety net programs, or even adjust the Medicaid qualifications to help more people. This means more public spending, which comes from taxpayer money.
Taxpayer-Funded Subsidies: In some cases, state and federal governments have to provide subsidies for health insurance, and when more people qualify due to losing Medicaid, these costs come from taxpayer funds.
Higher Costs for the Criminal Justice System
More People in Jail: As explained earlier, loss of health insurance can lead to an increase in crime, especially as people turn to petty crimes for survival or get involved in substance abuse. This puts more strain on the criminal justice system, which is heavily funded by taxpayer dollars.
Mental Health and Substance Abuse in Jail: Many people end up in jail because they don’t have access to mental health or substance abuse treatment. Once in jail, taxpayers must cover the costs of healthcare, housing, and legal processing for these individuals. It’s far more expensive to treat someone in jail than it is to provide preventive care in the community.
Increased Unemployment and Welfare Costs
Job Loss Leads to Public Assistance Needs: Without insurance, people’s health often deteriorates, making it hard for them to work. This can lead to job loss and more people relying on welfare programs like unemployment benefits, food stamps, and housing assistance—all of which are funded by taxpayers.
Economic Downturn in Communities: When many people lose their jobs due to poor health and medical debt, the local economy suffers. This can reduce tax revenue from income and sales taxes, while increasing the demand for public support programs.
Public Health Crises Require Taxpayer Funding
Spread of Diseases: When people don’t have insurance, they often skip vaccinations and preventive care, which can lead to outbreaks of preventable diseases. Taxpayers end up footing the bill for public health campaigns, disease control efforts, and emergency healthcare interventions during these outbreaks.
Community Health Declines: A sicker population puts more strain on public health resources, requiring more public health spending, which comes from local, state, and federal taxpayer funds.
Increased Medical Debt Burden on the Economy
Economic Instability for Families: When families accumulate medical debt, they have less money to spend in the local economy. This reduces consumer spending and harms businesses, leading to lower tax revenue from sales taxes.
Long-Term Poverty and Dependence on Government Support: As more families fall into long-term poverty due to medical debt, they become dependent on government assistance programs. Taxpayers must contribute more to welfare programs, public housing, and food assistance.
Loss of Workforce Productivity and Tax Revenue
Reduced Workforce Participation: As people become sicker without access to healthcare, they are less able to work, leading to a reduction in workforce productivity.
Lower Tax Revenues: When fewer people are able to work due to poor health or job loss, there’s a drop in income tax revenues. This means fewer funds are available for important public services, which can lead to higher taxes for everyone else to cover the shortfall.
Losing Medicaid doesn’t just hurt the people directly affected—it shifts the burden onto taxpayers in many ways. The costs of emergency healthcare, public services, criminal justice, welfare programs, and economic downturns all end up being paid for by you, the taxpayer. By ensuring that people maintain access to Medicaid, we can prevent these problems from spiraling out of control and costing everyone more in the long run.
Here are the best federal websites to report issues related to delays, denial of assistance, or mismanagement by your state:
1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
Website: https://tips.oig.hhs.gov/
Purpose: HHS oversees health-related federal programs like Medicaid. If you’re facing issues with healthcare or other support services, you can report concerns directly here.
Whistleblower Protection Information: HHS Whistleblower Protection Program
2. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
Purpose: CMS oversees the Medicaid program and can be contacted if you're having trouble receiving Medicaid-related services.
Complaint Submission: CMS Contact Form
3. Office of the Inspector General (OIG) – U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Purpose: The OIG investigates waste, fraud, and abuse in HHS programs, including Medicaid and state-administered programs. You can report any suspected state-level mismanagement of federal funds here.
Report Fraud or Abuse: OIG Hotline
4. U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO)
Purpose: GAO audits and investigates how taxpayer dollars are being spent, including state-level programs funded by federal money. You can report concerns related to mismanagement of federal funds here.
Report Fraud, Waste, or Abuse: GAO FraudNet
5. U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) – Civil Rights Division
Purpose: If you believe you’re facing discrimination, such as being denied services because of your race, disability, or other protected categories, you can report it to the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division.
Submit a Complaint: DOJ Civil Rights Online Complaint Form
6. THE WHITE HOUSE
REPORT MEDICAID PROBLEMS, TROUBLE GETTING MEDICAID HELP, HOW TO REPORT BAD HEALTHCARE, WHERE TO COMPLAIN ABOUT GOVERNMENT HELP, REPORT UNFAIR TREATMENT FOR MEDICAID, HELP WITH MEDICAID DELAYS, HOW TO REPORT MEDICAID FRAUD, REPORT PROBLEMS WITH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, HOW TO COMPLAIN ABOUT MEDICAID DENIAL, WHO TO CONTACT FOR HEALTHCARE ISSUES, REPORT UNFAIR MEDICAID SERVICES, WHERE TO REPORT MEDICAID ABUSE, MEDICAID SERVICE COMPLAINTS, REPORT GOVERNMENT HELP ISSUES INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON MEDICAID, PROBLEMAS PARA OBTENER AYUDA DE MEDICAID, CÓMO INFORMAR SOBRE MAL SERVICIO MÉDICO, DÓNDE QUEJARSE SOBRE AYUDA GUBERNAMENTAL, INFORMAR TRATO INJUSTO EN MEDICAID, AYUDA CON RETRASOS EN MEDICAID, CÓMO INFORMAR FRAUDE EN MEDICAID, INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON SERVICIOS DE SALUD, CÓMO QUEJARSE POR DENEGACIÓN DE MEDICAID, A QUIÉN CONTACTAR PARA PROBLEMAS MÉDICOS, INFORMAR SERVICIOS INJUSTOS DE MEDICAID, DÓNDE INFORMAR ABUSO EN MEDICAID, QUEJAS SOBRE SERVICIOS DE MEDICAID, INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON LA AYUDA GUBERNAMENTAL
A Plea to Connecticut’s Leaders: Unite and Fix This Now
To the trusted leaders, representatives, and officials across Connecticut's 169 towns:
We stand at a crossroads. The challenges we face as a state—whether in healthcare, infrastructure, education, or systemic inequality—demand immediate, decisive action. These are not problems that can be delayed or passed on to future generations. The time to act is now, and we are depending on you.
Our communities are looking to you—those in positions of power and influence—as the only ones capable of driving the changes needed. The trust we have placed in you is not just an honor; it is a responsibility. You are the voices and hands that can deliver the solutions we so desperately need.
This is a moment for unity. Regardless of political affiliations, town borders, or differing opinions, we must come together. The people of Connecticut are depending on you to bridge divides and collaborate for the greater good. The divisions that once held back progress must be set aside in favor of a shared commitment to a brighter future.
We implore you: unite in your purpose, work across every boundary, and implement immediate solutions. Your leadership, dedication, and vision are what will make the difference. There is no room for inaction or delay. Together, you have the power to fix this—to uplift Connecticut, to strengthen our communities, and to restore faith in our future.
The path forward begins now, with your decision to act. We trust in your leadership and we stand behind you as you take these necessary steps.
For the good of all people in Connecticut, for the generations to come—let’s fix this together.
Andover, Ansonia, Ashford, Avon, Barkhamsted, Beacon Falls, Berlin, Bethany, Bethel, Bethlehem, Bloomfield, Bolton, Bozrah, Branford, Bridgeport, Bridgewater, Bristol, Brookfield, Brooklyn, Burlington, Canaan, Canterbury, Canton, Chaplin, Cheshire, Chester, Clinton, Colchester, Colebrook, Columbia, Cornwall, Coventry, Cromwell, Danbury, Darien, Deep River, Derby, Durham, Eastford, East Granby, East Haddam, East Hampton, East Hartford, East Haven, East Lyme, Easton, East Windsor, Ellington, Enfield, Essex, Fairfield, Farmington, Franklin, Glastonbury, Goshen, Granby, Greenwich, Griswold, Groton, Guilford, Haddam, Hamden, Hampton, Hartford, Hartland, Harwinton, Hebron, Kent, Killingly, Killingworth, Lebanon, Ledyard, Lisbon, Litchfield, Lyme, Madison, Manchester, Mansfield, Marlborough, Meriden, Middlebury, Middlefield, Middletown, Milford, Monroe, Montville, Morris, Naugatuck, New Britain, New Canaan, New Fairfield, New Hartford, New Haven, Newington, New London, New Milford, Newtown, Norfolk, North Branford, North Canaan, North Haven, North Stonington, Norwalk, Norwich, Old Lyme, Old Saybrook, Orange, Oxford, Plainfield, Plainville, Plymouth, Pomfret, Portland, Preston, Prospect, Putnam, Redding, Ridgefield, Rocky Hill, Roxbury, Salem, Salisbury, Scotland, Seymour, Sharon, Shelton, Sherman, Simsbury, Somers, Southbury, Southington, South Windsor, Sprague, Stafford, Stamford, Sterling, Stonington, Stratford, Suffield, Thomaston, Thompson, Tolland, Torrington, Trumbull, Union, Vernon, Voluntown, Wallingford, Warren, Washington, Waterbury, Waterford, Watertown, Westbrook, West Hartford, West Haven, Weston, Westport, Wethersfield, Willington, Wilton, Winchester, Windham, Windsor, Windsor Locks, Wolcott, Woodbridge, Woodbury, Woodstock. Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming.