DB.42.131.Inf. The Medicaid ABI Waiver Waitlist Crisis: A Call for Transparency and Reform In Connecticut, brain injury survivors and their families have faced an ongoing crisis. For more than five years , individuals in desperate need of care have been stuck on a waitlist  for the Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program . This delay in services has far-reaching consequences, including worsening health conditions, emotional and financial strain on families, and a profound lack of accountability within the Department of Social Services (DSS). It is time for immediate reform, transparency, and federal oversight to address these critical issues. The ABI Waiver Program: A Lifeline Being Denied The ABI Waiver Program is designed to provide vital services to individuals with acquired brain injuries, including rehabilitation, home care, and support services that help survivors regain independence and live fulfilling lives. However, many people in need of these services are left on a waitlist for years, unable to access the care they desperately require. For these individuals, the wait is not just a delay—it is a life-altering obstacle to recovery. Prolonged Wait Times and Systemic Mismanagement Despite the urgency, many individuals have been waiting over five years  for critical services. Families and caregivers are left in limbo, without clear information about when—or if—their loved ones will receive the help they need. This prolonged wait is a sign of systemic mismanagement  within the DSS. During a recent legislative exchange, Christine Weston , Director of the Community Options Unit (COU) within DSS, could not provide the number of individuals on the waitlist, raising serious concerns  about the oversight and integrity of the program. Lack of Transparency The absence of clear communication is one of the most frustrating aspects for families on the waitlist. Many are not even aware of their position on the list, and the DSS has not been transparent in providing this information. This lack of accountability raises concerns that there may be efforts to discourage access  to Medicaid services, particularly for the most vulnerable populations. Senator Lisa Seminara , a Republican representing Connecticut’s 8th Senate District, has been a vocal advocate for addressing the mismanagement  of the ABI Waiver Program. During the recent hearing, Governor Ned Lamont’s administration , along with Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves  (who was notably absent from the hearing), faced scrutiny for failing to provide answers and implement necessary reforms. The Burden on Families For families waiting for services, the emotional, physical, and financial toll is immense. Without the necessary Medicaid services, family members often become full-time caregivers, leading to burnout and financial strain. Many caregivers are forced to leave their jobs to provide care, which further exacerbates financial instability. The mental exhaustion caused by uncertainty and the responsibility of caregiving creates a cycle of stress that affects entire households. Deteriorating Health for Those on the Waitlist For individuals with brain injuries, the delays in accessing care can be detrimental to their health. Without timely intervention, many patients see their conditions worsen, leading to more hospital visits and increased reliance on emergency care —a costly and inefficient alternative to long-term, proactive treatment. These emergency treatments often fail to address the underlying health issues, creating a revolving door of healthcare that does little to improve the quality of life for brain injury survivors. The Taxpayer Impact The financial inefficiencies of the ABI Waiver Program are not just a burden on families—they also affect taxpayers . Delays in services lead to more expensive emergency interventions, which are covered by Medicaid. Had these individuals received timely and appropriate care, these costly emergency services could have been avoided. This represents a misallocation of taxpayer dollars  and underscores the need for improved program management and transparency. The Risk of Losing Federal Funding The delays and mismanagement  of the ABI Waiver Program could have even broader consequences for Connecticut. Non-compliance with federal Medicaid regulations could result in the loss of federal funding , which would further strain the state’s budget and reduce services for those most in need. This would be a devastating blow to the program and the vulnerable populations it is supposed to serve. Immediate Solutions: A Call for Federal and State-Level Reform The current state of the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program is untenable. Families, advocates, and policymakers must come together to demand immediate federal oversight  and state-level reform. This situation demands action on several fronts: Transparency in Waitlist Management : DSS must provide families with clear and accurate information about their position on the waitlist. Full transparency will restore trust and allow families to plan for the future. Reduction of Wait Times : The state must address staff shortages, funding gaps, and procedural inefficiencies within the DSS that contribute to long delays in service delivery. Federal Audits : Independent federal audits are necessary to ensure compliance with Medicaid regulations and to identify areas of financial mismanagement. These audits will ensure that taxpayer dollars are being used efficiently and that services are being provided to those who need them most. Whistleblower Protections : Strengthening protections for whistleblowers within DSS will encourage more individuals to come forward with information about potential mismanagement or corruption without fear of retaliation. Accountability from Leadership : Governor Ned Lamont  and Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves  must ensure that the leadership within DSS is committed to supporting vulnerable populations and is held accountable for the program's performance. A Call for Advocacy and Action The Medicaid ABI Waiver Program is a lifeline for individuals with brain injuries, but the current mismanagement of the waitlist and services is failing those who need it most. Immediate reforms are necessary to restore trust, improve efficiency, and provide life-saving services to Connecticut’s most vulnerable populations. ABI Resources  stands with families, caregivers, and advocates in demanding the transparency, accountability, and action needed to fix this broken system. It’s time to stand together and push for the reforms that Connecticut’s brain injury survivors deserve. Outrage Now, Injustice Exposed, Public Outrage, Demand Accountability, Broken System, Fix This Now, Enough Is Enough, Unacceptable, We Deserve Better, No More Delays, Action Needed Now, Transparency Now, Justice Denied, System Failing, Urgent Reform, Accountability Now, Mismanagement Exposed, Voices Silenced, Act Now For Change, Fed Up With Injustice Hidden Medicaid Agency Provider List: Connecticut Department of Social Services / CT DSS COU CGA Exposing Medicaid Secrets: How Connecticut's Violations Hurt Taxpayers & Vulnerable Populations" CGA Connecticut DSS Faces Scrutiny Over Concealed Provider List in Medicaid ABI Waiver Program In a recent legislative exchange, Connecticut State Representative Kathleen McCarty questioned Christine Weston, Director of the Community Options Unit (COU) within the Connecticut Department of Social Services (DSS), about the availability of the Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program Agency Provider List. The list is not publicly accessible and COU would need to consult with DSS legal counsel—has triggered concerns about transparency and potential violations of federal Medicaid regulations. The concealment of the Provider List directly undermines federal requirements for transparency, consumer choice, and public accountability in Medicaid-funded programs. Under the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(23)), Medicaid beneficiaries are guaranteed the right to choose from any qualified provider participating in the program. By withholding the list of providers, DSS is effectively limiting beneficiaries' ability to make informed choices about their care, a clear violation of this federal statute. More than a mere bureaucratic oversight, this lack of transparency obstructs the fundamental rights of Medicaid recipients, particularly vulnerable populations like brain injury survivors who depend on specialized care. These individuals and their families rely on accessible information to choose the most appropriate care providers based on quality, expertise, and geographic location. The absence of this information not only deprives them of their legal rights but also risks funneling beneficiaries toward limited, state-favored providers, potentially compromising the quality of care they receive. This issue with the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program could indicate a systemic problem in Connecticut’s administration of federally funded programs. If the DSS is withholding information in this program, similar practices may be occurring in other state-managed, federally funded programs. With billions of taxpayer dollars flowing through Medicaid, this raises significant concerns about mismanagement, financial oversight, and the state’s broader compliance with federal transparency requirements. Beyond violating Medicaid regulations, this failure to provide access to public information also erodes trust in the integrity of state-run health services. When critical details about provider options are concealed, it creates a veil of secrecy that limits public accountability. Moreover, it raises the specter of conflicts of interest—where specific providers may be favored by state agencies for reasons unrelated to the quality of care or beneficiary needs. Such practices, if left unchecked, can lead to monopolistic conditions where certain agencies dominate the landscape, to the detriment of consumer choice and healthcare quality. Medicaid is designed to serve some of the most vulnerable populations in the country, including individuals with disabilities, low-income families, and elderly individuals requiring long-term care. The intentional withholding of vital information such as provider lists violates not only federal laws but also the ethical obligation to ensure that these populations have equal access to healthcare services. This situation calls for immediate action from federal oversight agencies, such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), to conduct a thorough audit of Connecticut’s Medicaid program administration. Federal intervention is necessary to ensure that the state complies with transparency regulations and provides Medicaid beneficiaries with the information they are entitled to by law. If these practices are found to extend to other federally funded programs, it could signal widespread non-compliance, mismanagement of federal funds, and a failure to uphold the rights of vulnerable individuals across the state. As the investigation into this issue unfolds, it is critical that the DSS take immediate steps to rectify these transparency failures. The state must make the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program Agency Provider List publicly accessible and ensure that beneficiaries’ rights to choose their providers are fully restored. Anything less would continue to jeopardize the integrity of Connecticut’s Medicaid program and the health and well-being of those it is meant to serve. We’re sharing an important message about systemic issues within Medicaid programs that may be impacting both vulnerable populations and every U.S. taxpayer. These challenges could have nationwide implications, affecting how federal dollars are spent and how services reach those who rely on Medicaid. This is not about assigning blame —it’s about finding solutions that ensure taxpayer dollars are used wisely and that vulnerable individuals get the care they need. By working together, we can help create a more transparent, accountable, and effective Medicaid system that benefits everyone. Key Problems and Solutions: Misuse of Taxpayer Funds Problem: Federal Medicaid funds are being inefficiently used, which can increase costs for taxpayers while reducing the quality of services for vulnerable individuals. Solution: Conduct regular audits of Medicaid spending to ensure that every dollar is used efficiently to support essential services and avoid waste or misallocation. Lack of Transparency Problem: Essential information about Medicaid services—such as provider directories and funding allocations—is not easily accessible to the public. This lack of transparency prevents people from understanding how funds are being used and how care decisions are made. Solution: Ensure greater transparency by making Medicaid-related information, including provider directories and spending reports, publicly accessible. This will allow taxpayers, caregivers, and advocates to see where resources are going and hold the system accountable. Unethical Business Practices Problem: Some providers may be engaging in conflicts of interest or kickback schemes, where services are being recommended for financial gain rather than the needs of individuals. This drives up costs and reduces the quality of care. Solution: Implement strict ethical oversight to ensure that Medicaid services are provided based on the needs of individuals, without conflicts of interest or unnecessary services that increase costs for taxpayers. Discriminatory Business Practices in Medicaid Referrals Problem: Certain providers may be favored in Medicaid referrals, limiting access to care for individuals and creating an unequal playing field for providers. This impacts the freedom of individuals to choose the care that best fits their needs. Solution: Establish a fair and transparent referral system that treats all providers equally and ensures that individuals have access to a wide range of care options, promoting both choice and competition. Impact on Disabled Workers Problem: Disabled workers involved in the Medicaid system are not always being paid fairly, which violates federal labor laws and creates further economic challenges for an already vulnerable group. Solution: Ensure compliance with federal labor laws by guaranteeing that all disabled workers are paid fairly and treated with respect, helping create a more supportive and ethical Medicaid system. Limited Consumer Choice Problem: Some individuals are limited in their ability to choose services or housing arrangements, being tied to specific providers through restrictive agreements. This reduces their freedom to select the care and services that best suit their needs. Solution: Expand consumer choice by revising policies that restrict beneficiaries to certain providers or housing options, allowing individuals more freedom to select the services and care arrangements that work best for them. FOIA Violations and Stonewalling Problem: Public records requests related to Medicaid services and spending are being blocked or delayed, limiting public oversight and reducing accountability within the system. Solution: Enforce full compliance with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to ensure that the public has access to important Medicaid information. This will allow for greater transparency and ensure that taxpayer dollars are being used properly. Unauthorized Care Management Services Problem: Some individuals are receiving services that have not been authorized or properly managed, leading to confusion and potential misuse of Medicaid funds. Solution: Ensure proper oversight and clear guidelines for care management services, preventing unauthorized services and ensuring that individuals receive only the care that is necessary and beneficial to them. Unfair Rental Agreements Linked to Medicaid Services Problem: Some beneficiaries are tied to specific housing arrangements through rental agreements that are linked to their Medicaid service providers, reducing their ability to change providers or housing without risking their care. Solution: Revise rental agreements and housing policies to ensure greater consumer freedom and allow individuals to change providers or housing arrangements without being penalized or risking their care. How These Issues Affect All of Us: These problems extend beyond any one state—they have national implications for how Medicaid funds are spent and how care is provided. Every taxpayer contributes to Medicaid, and it’s essential that these funds are used efficiently and transparently. At the same time, vulnerable populations—including individuals with disabilities and those relying on Medicaid services—deserve a system that works for them. By addressing these systemic challenges, we can ensure that taxpayer dollars are used wisely and that those who need support get access to the care and services they deserve. What You Can Do: Share this post to raise awareness and encourage others to understand how these issues might be affecting them and their communities. Support greater transparency and ethical oversight in Medicaid services by engaging with policymakers. Advocate for positive reform to ensure taxpayer dollars are used effectively and that vulnerable individuals get the care they need. Together, we can help create a Medicaid system that benefits everyone—by ensuring accountability, promoting transparency, and protecting taxpayer resources while supporting those who rely on these essential services. What Happens When You Lose Medicaid Insurance? Medicaid is essential for many families. If it’s taken away or you lose it, it can lead to serious problems for you, your family, and even your entire community. Here’s what happens: You Can’t See the Doctor When You Need To You Delay Care : You might put off going to the doctor because you can’t afford it. Small problems can turn into big ones. No More Preventive Check-ups : Without Medicaid, you might skip regular check-ups that help catch problems early. You Can’t Afford Medications Stopping Medication : People stop taking important medications (for conditions like diabetes, mental health issues, or high blood pressure) because they can’t pay for them. Getting Worse : Without those meds, your health can get worse quickly, leading to hospital visits or even life-threatening conditions. Mental Health Suffers Stopping Therapy : Mental health services, like therapy or counseling, can get too expensive, meaning people can no longer get help for anxiety, depression, or other issues. Emotional Stress : Without professional help, mental health issues can become overwhelming, leading to stress, breakdowns, and even suicidal thoughts. Risk of Homelessness Increases Losing Your Job : If your health gets worse, you may not be able to work, leading to job loss and financial problems. Can’t Pay for Housing : Medical bills pile up, and without income, you might not be able to pay rent or the mortgage, which can lead to losing your home. Families Can Be Affected : It’s not just individuals who suffer—entire families can end up in shelters or homeless because of high medical costs. Emergency Rooms Get Overcrowded Using ER as a Doctor’s Office : People without insurance often wait until they are very sick and then go to the ER, which is much more expensive than regular care. More Stress on Hospitals : Hospitals can get overwhelmed, and this affects everyone. It means longer wait times and less attention for those who really need emergency care. Crime Can Increase Desperation Leads to Survival Crimes : When people are financially desperate due to health issues, some may turn to petty crime just to survive. Substance Abuse : Losing mental health care can lead to drug or alcohol use to cope, and this often leads to trouble with the law. Homelessness and Crime Connection : When people lose their homes and can’t get help, they may be more likely to get involved in crime just to meet basic needs. Your Community Suffers Spread of Illness : Without insurance, people may not get vaccinated or treated for contagious diseases, which can make the entire community sick. Public Services Overloaded : Charities, shelters, and food banks may get overwhelmed by more people needing help, making it harder to serve everyone. Fewer Resources for Everyone : When hospitals, clinics, and public health services are stretched too thin, everyone gets worse care. Children Are Affected Missed Vaccines and Checkups : Kids without Medicaid miss important vaccines and doctor visits, putting their health and development at risk. Struggling in School : Without proper healthcare, children may fall behind in school because of untreated health problems or stress at home due to financial instability. Long-Term Poverty Medical Debt : Without Medicaid, medical bills pile up, and families can end up with huge debt, making it hard to afford basic needs like food and housing. Generational Impact : Families in debt or struggling with health issues have a harder time getting out of poverty, and this can affect future generations. Losing Medicaid isn’t just about losing insurance; it’s about losing stability in your life. Without access to healthcare, everything starts to break down—your health, your ability to work, your family’s security, and the community’s well-being. It can even lead to more crime and homelessness as people struggle just to survive. What Can You Do? Stay Informed : Know your options and stay connected to advocacy groups that support for healthcare rights. Ask for Help : Reach out to community health centers, legal aid, and nonprofits that offer support. Get Involved : Support policies that ensure everyone has access to affordable healthcare. When people lose Medicaid insurance, the effects also significantly impact taxpayers  and the overall economy. Here’s a breakdown of how this burden shifts onto taxpayers and why it's important for everyone, even those with insurance, to understand these consequences. Increased Emergency Room Costs (Taxpayer-Funded) ER Becomes the First Stop:  When people without insurance get sick or injured, they often wait until it’s serious and go to the emergency room (ER), which is far more expensive than regular doctor visits. Higher Costs Passed to Taxpayers:  ER visits are one of the most expensive ways to treat medical issues, and when uninsured patients can't pay their bills, the hospital absorbs the costs. These costs are often passed on to taxpayers  through increased funding needs for hospitals and public healthcare programs. Higher Local and State Taxes for Public Services Overloaded Public Health Systems:  Local and state governments are forced to provide more funding for free clinics, public health programs, shelters, and emergency services when there’s an increase in uninsured people. This leads to higher taxes to cover these services. Community Resources Stretched Thin:  When uninsured people need more help from publicly funded services like shelters, food banks, and healthcare clinics, these services require more taxpayer dollars to stay operational. As more people rely on these programs, the costs to taxpayers grow. Higher Insurance Premiums for Everyone Cost-Shifting in Healthcare:  Hospitals often shift the unpaid medical costs of uninsured patients onto private insurers. This drives up the overall cost of healthcare for those who do have insurance. Rising Insurance Premiums:  As healthcare providers raise prices to compensate for uninsured patients, taxpayers  who buy insurance in the private market may see their premiums go up. This makes healthcare more expensive for everyone, even those who already pay for private insurance. Increased Government Spending on Medicaid Expansion and Safety Nets Government Must Step In:  When people lose Medicaid, they still often need some form of public assistance. Governments may have to increase spending on Medicaid expansion, safety net programs, or even adjust the Medicaid qualifications to help more people. This means more public spending, which comes from taxpayer money. Taxpayer-Funded Subsidies:  In some cases, state and federal governments have to provide subsidies for health insurance, and when more people qualify due to losing Medicaid, these costs come from taxpayer funds. Higher Costs for the Criminal Justice System More People in Jail:  As explained earlier, loss of health insurance can lead to an increase in crime, especially as people turn to petty crimes for survival or get involved in substance abuse. This puts more strain on the criminal justice system, which is heavily funded by taxpayer dollars . Mental Health and Substance Abuse in Jail:  Many people end up in jail because they don’t have access to mental health or substance abuse treatment. Once in jail, taxpayers must cover the costs of healthcare, housing, and legal processing for these individuals. It’s far more expensive to treat someone in jail than it is to provide preventive care in the community. Increased Unemployment and Welfare Costs Job Loss Leads to Public Assistance Needs:  Without insurance, people’s health often deteriorates, making it hard for them to work. This can lead to job loss and more people relying on welfare programs like unemployment benefits, food stamps, and housing assistance—all of which are funded by taxpayers . Economic Downturn in Communities:  When many people lose their jobs due to poor health and medical debt, the local economy suffers. This can reduce tax revenue from income and sales taxes, while increasing the demand for public support programs. Public Health Crises Require Taxpayer Funding Spread of Diseases : When people don’t have insurance, they often skip vaccinations and preventive care, which can lead to outbreaks of preventable diseases. Taxpayers  end up footing the bill for public health campaigns, disease control efforts, and emergency healthcare interventions during these outbreaks. Community Health Declines : A sicker population puts more strain on public health resources, requiring more public health spending, which comes from local, state, and federal taxpayer funds. Increased Medical Debt Burden on the Economy Economic Instability for Families:  When families accumulate medical debt, they have less money to spend in the local economy. This reduces consumer spending and harms businesses, leading to lower tax revenue from sales taxes. Long-Term Poverty and Dependence on Government Support:  As more families fall into long-term poverty due to medical debt, they become dependent on government assistance programs. Taxpayers  must contribute more to welfare programs, public housing, and food assistance. Loss of Workforce Productivity and Tax Revenue Reduced Workforce Participation:  As people become sicker without access to healthcare, they are less able to work, leading to a reduction in workforce productivity. Lower Tax Revenues:  When fewer people are able to work due to poor health or job loss, there’s a drop in income tax revenues. This means fewer funds are available for important public services, which can lead to higher taxes for everyone else to cover the shortfall. Losing Medicaid doesn’t just hurt the people directly affected—it shifts the burden onto taxpayers  in many ways. The costs of emergency healthcare, public services, criminal justice, welfare programs, and economic downturns all end up being paid for by you , the taxpayer. By ensuring that people maintain access to Medicaid, we can prevent these problems from spiraling out of control and costing everyone more in the long run. Here are the best federal websites to report issues related to delays, denial of assistance, or mismanagement by your state: 1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Website: https://tips.oig.hhs.gov/ Purpose: HHS oversees health-related federal programs like Medicaid. If you’re facing issues with healthcare or other support services, you can report concerns directly here. Whistleblower Protection Information: HHS Whistleblower Protection Program 2. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Website: https://tips.oig.hhs.gov/?_gl=1*1t3nyl*_ga*MTg0NjgyNTgyNS4xNzI3Nzg5NTkw*_ga_W5DCJS81Y5*MTcyNzc5MDA5Ny4xLjEuMTcyNzc5MDY5NS4wLjAuMA Purpose: CMS oversees the Medicaid program and can be contacted if you're having trouble receiving Medicaid-related services. Complaint Submission: CMS Contact Form 3. Office of the Inspector General (OIG) – U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Website: https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/report-fraud/ Purpose: The OIG investigates waste, fraud, and abuse in HHS programs, including Medicaid and state-administered programs. You can report any suspected state-level mismanagement of federal funds here. Report Fraud or Abuse: OIG Hotline 4. U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Website: https://gao.gov/about/what-gao-does/fraud Purpose: GAO audits and investigates how taxpayer dollars are being spent, including state-level programs funded by federal money. You can report concerns related to mismanagement of federal funds here. Report Fraud, Waste, or Abuse: GAO FraudNet 5. U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) – Civil Rights Division Website: https://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ Purpose: If you believe you’re facing discrimination, such as being denied services because of your race, disability, or other protected categories, you can report it to the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division. Submit a Complaint: DOJ Civil Rights Online Complaint Form 6. THE WHITE HOUSE https://whitehouse.gov/contact/ Los mejores sitios web federales para reportar problemas relacionados con retrasos, denegación de asistencia o mala gestión por parte de tu estado: Departamento de Salud y Servicios Humanos de los EE. UU. (HHS) Sitio web: https://tips.oig.hhs.gov/ Propósito: El HHS supervisa programas federales relacionados con la salud, como Medicaid. Si tienes problemas con los servicios de salud u otros servicios de apoyo, puedes reportar tus inquietudes directamente aquí. Información sobre Protección de Denunciantes: Programa de Protección de Denunciantes del HHS. Centros de Servicios de Medicare y Medicaid (CMS) Sitio web: https://tips.oig.hhs.gov/?_gl=11t3nyl_gaMTg0NjgyNTgyNS4xNzI3Nzg5NTkw_ga_W5DCJS81Y5*MTcyNzc5MDA5Ny4xLjEuMTcyNzc5MDY5NS4wLjAuMA Propósito: CMS supervisa el programa Medicaid y puede ser contactado si tienes dificultades para recibir servicios relacionados con Medicaid. Envío de Quejas: Formulario de Contacto de CMS. Oficina del Inspector General (OIG) – Departamento de Salud y Servicios Humanos de EE. UU. Sitio web: https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/report-fraud/ Propósito: La OIG investiga el desperdicio, fraude y abuso en los programas del HHS, incluidos Medicaid y los programas administrados por los estados. Puedes reportar cualquier sospecha de mala gestión de fondos federales a nivel estatal aquí. Reportar Fraude o Abuso: Línea Directa de la OIG. Oficina de Responsabilidad Gubernamental de EE. UU. (GAO) Sitio web: https://gao.gov/about/what-gao-does/fraud Propósito: La GAO audita e investiga cómo se gastan los fondos de los contribuyentes, incluidos los programas a nivel estatal financiados con dinero federal. Puedes reportar inquietudes relacionadas con la mala gestión de fondos federales aquí. Reportar Fraude, Despilfarro o Abuso: GAO FraudNet. Departamento de Justicia de los EE. UU. (DOJ) – División de Derechos Civiles Sitio web: https://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ Propósito: Si crees que estás enfrentando discriminación, como ser denegado de servicios por tu raza, discapacidad u otras categorías protegidas, puedes reportarlo a la División de Derechos Civiles del DOJ. Presentar una Queja: Formulario de Queja en Línea de Derechos Civiles del DOJ. LA CASA BLANCA Sitio web: https://whitehouse.gov/contact/ REPORT MEDICAID PROBLEMS, TROUBLE GETTING MEDICAID HELP, HOW TO REPORT BAD HEALTHCARE, WHERE TO COMPLAIN ABOUT GOVERNMENT HELP, REPORT UNFAIR TREATMENT FOR MEDICAID, HELP WITH MEDICAID DELAYS, HOW TO REPORT MEDICAID FRAUD, REPORT PROBLEMS WITH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, HOW TO COMPLAIN ABOUT MEDICAID DENIAL, WHO TO CONTACT FOR HEALTHCARE ISSUES, REPORT UNFAIR MEDICAID SERVICES, WHERE TO REPORT MEDICAID ABUSE, MEDICAID SERVICE COMPLAINTS, REPORT GOVERNMENT HELP ISSUES INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON MEDICAID, PROBLEMAS PARA OBTENER AYUDA DE MEDICAID, CÓMO INFORMAR SOBRE MAL SERVICIO MÉDICO, DÓNDE QUEJARSE SOBRE AYUDA GUBERNAMENTAL, INFORMAR TRATO INJUSTO EN MEDICAID, AYUDA CON RETRASOS EN MEDICAID, CÓMO INFORMAR FRAUDE EN MEDICAID, INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON SERVICIOS DE SALUD, CÓMO QUEJARSE POR DENEGACIÓN DE MEDICAID, A QUIÉN CONTACTAR PARA PROBLEMAS MÉDICOS, INFORMAR SERVICIOS INJUSTOS DE MEDICAID, DÓNDE INFORMAR ABUSO EN MEDICAID, QUEJAS SOBRE SERVICIOS DE MEDICAID, INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON LA AYUDA GUBERNAMENTAL About the availability of the Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program Agency Provider List. A Plea to Connecticut’s Leaders: Unite and Fix This Now To the trusted leaders, representatives, and officials across Connecticut's 169 towns: We stand at a crossroads. The challenges we face as a state—whether in healthcare, infrastructure, education, or systemic inequality—demand immediate, decisive action. These are not problems that can be delayed or passed on to future generations. The time to act is now, and we are depending on you. Our communities are looking to you—those in positions of power and influence—as the only ones capable of driving the changes needed. The trust we have placed in you is not just an honor; it is a responsibility. You are the voices and hands that can deliver the solutions we so desperately need. This is a moment for unity. Regardless of political affiliations, town borders, or differing opinions, we must come together. The people of Connecticut are depending on you to bridge divides  and collaborate  for the greater good. The divisions that once held back progress must be set aside in favor of a shared commitment to a brighter future. We implore you: unite  in your purpose, work across every boundary, and implement immediate solutions. Your leadership, dedication, and vision are what will make the difference. There is no room for inaction or delay. Together, you have the power to fix this—to uplift Connecticut, to strengthen our communities, and to restore faith in our future. The path forward begins now, with your decision to act. We trust in your leadership  and we stand behind you as you take these necessary steps. For the good of all people in Connecticut, for the generations to come— let’s fix this together. Connecticut State Senate: John Fonfara  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 1 Luis Delgado  - Green, District 1 Douglas McCrory  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 2 Kristin Hoffman  - Republican, District 2 Saud Anwar  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 3 Matt Siracusa  - Republican, District 3 MD Rahman  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 4 Stephen King  - Republican, District 4 Derek Slap  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 5 Kyla Zimmermann  - Republican, District 5 Rick Lopes  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 6 Tremell Collins  - Republican, District 6 John Kissel  - Incumbent, Republican, District 7 Cynthia Mangini  - Democratic, District 7 Lisa Seminara  - Incumbent, Republican, District 8 Paul Honig  - Democratic, District 8 Matthew L. Lesser  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 9 Gary Winfield  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 10 Nyrell Moore  - Republican, District 10 Martin Looney  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 11 Steve Orosco  - Republican, District 11 Christine Cohen  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 12 Paul Crisci  - Republican, District 12 Jan Hochadel  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 13 Elain Cariati  - Republican, District 13 James Maroney  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 14 Steven Johnstone  - Republican, District 14 Joan Hartley  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 15 Robert C. Sampson  - Incumbent, Republican, District 16 Christopher Robertson  - Democratic, District 16 Jorge Cabrera  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 17 Heather Somers  - Incumbent, Republican, District 18 Andrew Parrella  - Democratic, District 18 Catherine Osten  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 19 Jason Guidone  - Republican, District 19 Martha Marx  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 20 Shaun Mastroianni  - Republican, District 20 Kevin C. Kelly  - Incumbent, Republican, District 21 Chris Carrena  - Republican, District 22 Sujata Gadkar-Wilcox  - Democratic, District 22 Robert E. Halstead  - Independent, District 22 Herron Gaston  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 23 Brian Banacowski  - Republican, District 23 Julie Kushner  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 24 Michelle Coelho  - Republican, District 24 Bob Duff  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 25 Martin Tagliaferro  - Republican, District 25 Ceci Maher  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 26 Kami Evans  - Republican, District 26 Patricia Miller  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 27 Nicola Tarzia  - Republican, District 27 Tony Hwang  - Incumbent, Republican, District 28 Rob Blanchard  - Democratic, District 28 Mae Flexer  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 29 Chris Reddy  - Republican, District 29 Stephen Harding, Jr.  - Incumbent, Republican, District 30 Justin Potter  - Democratic, District 30 Henri Martin  - Incumbent, Republican, District 31 Eric Berthel  - Incumbent, Republican, District 32 Jeff Desmarais  - Democratic, District 32 Norm Needleman  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 33 Jeff Duigou  - Republican, District 33 Paul Cicarella, Jr.  - Incumbent, Republican, District 34 Brandi Mandato  - Democratic, District 34 David Bedell  - Green, District 34 Jeff Gordon  - Incumbent, Republican, District 35 Merry Garrett  - Democratic, District 35 Ryan Fazio  - Incumbent, Republican, District 36 Nick Simmons  - Democratic, District 36 Connecticut House of Representatives: Matthew Ritter  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 1 Raghib Allie-Brennan  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 2 Bradley Koltz  - Republican, District 2 Minnie Gonzalez  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 3 Julio Concepcion  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 4 Maryam Khan  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 5 James B. Sánchez  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 6 Alyssa Peterson  - Independent, District 6 Joshua Malik Hall  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 7 Tim Ackert  - Incumbent, Republican, District 8 Nancy Hammarstrom  - Democratic, District 8 Jason Rojas  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 9 Henry Genga  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 10 Chris Tierinni  - Republican, District 10 Salema Davis  - Republican, District 11 Patrick Biggins  - Democratic, District 11 Geoff Luxenberg  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 12 Robert Cormier  - Republican, District 12 Joseph Young  - Independent, District 12 Jason Doucette  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 13 Donna Meier  - Republican, District 13 Tom Delnicki  - Incumbent, Republican, District 14 Steven King Jr.  - Democratic, District 14 Marek Kozikowski  - United Community Party, District 14 Bobby Gibson  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 15 Quentin Johnson  - Republican, District 15 Melissa E. Osborne  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 16 Michael Schulitz  - Republican, District 16 Eleni Kavros DeGraw  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 17 Manju Gerber  - Republican, District 17 Jillian Gilchrest  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 18 Tammy Exum  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 19 Kate Farrar  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 20 Mike Demicco  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 21 Johnny Carrier  - Republican, District 21 Francis Rexford Cooley  - Incumbent, Republican, District 22 Rebecca Martinez  - Democratic, District 22 Devin Carney  - Incumbent, Republican, District 23 Jane Wisialowski  - Democratic, District 23 Manny Sanchez  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 24 Alden Russell  - Republican, District 24 Alfred Mayo  - Independent, District 24 Bobby Sanchez  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 25 Jamie Vaughan  - Republican, District 25 Barbara Marino  - Republican, District 26 David DeFronzo  - Democratic, District 26 Gary Turco  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 27 Stephen Ellis  - Independent, District 27 Amy Morrin Bello  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 28 William Davidson  - Republican, District 28 Kerry Szeps Wood  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 29 Ed Charamut  - Republican, District 29 Donna Veach  - Incumbent, Republican, District 30 Jill Barry  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 31 Kevin Nursick  - Republican, District 31 Christie Carpino  - Incumbent, Republican, District 32 Brandon Chafee  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 33 Christine Rebstock  - Independent, District 33 Irene Haines  - Incumbent, Republican, District 34 Richard Knotek  - Democratic, District 34 Chris Aniskovich  - Incumbent, Republican, District 35 Cinzia Lettieri  - Democratic, District 35 Kathryn Russell  - Republican, District 36 Renee Muir  - Democratic, District 36 Holly Cheeseman  - Incumbent, Republican, District 37 Nick Menapace  - Democratic, District 37 Kathleen McCarty  - Incumbent, Republican, District 38 Nick Gauthier  - Democratic, District 38 Anthony Nolan  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 39 Beloved Carter  - Republican, District 39 Christine Conley  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 40 Susan Deane-Shinbrot  - Republican, District 40 Aundré Bumgardner  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 41 Kim Healy  - Republican, District 42 Savet Constantine  - Democratic, District 42 Greg Howard  - Incumbent, Republican, District 43 Ty Lamb  - Democratic, District 43 Anne Dauphinais  - Incumbent, Republican, District 44 Samantha Derenthal  - Democratic, District 44 Brian Lanoue  - Incumbent, Republican, District 45 Kayla Thompson  - Democratic, District 45 Derell Wilson  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 46 Nick Casiano  - Republican, District 46 Doug Dubitsky  - Incumbent, Republican, District 47 Aaron Spruance  - Democratic, District 47 Mark DeCaprio  - Incumbent, Republican, District 48 Christopher Rivers  - Democratic, District 48 Lance Lusignan  - Independent, District 48 Susan Johnson  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 49 Pat Boyd  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 50 Chris Stewart  - Republican, District 51 Renee Waldron  - Democratic, District 51 Kurt Vail  - Incumbent, Republican, District 52 Ethan Werstler  - Democratic, District 52 Tammy Nuccio  - Incumbent, Republican, District 53 Ann Bonney  - Democratic, District 53 Gregory Haddad  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 54 Aaron Bowman  - Republican, District 54 Steve Weir  - Incumbent, Republican, District 55 Amanda Veneziano  - Democratic, District 55 Kevin Brown  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 56 Brian Motola  - Republican, District 56 Jaime Foster  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 57 Jennifer Dzen  - Republican, District 57 Robert Hendrickson  - Republican, District 58 John Santanella  - Democratic, District 58 Carol Hall  - Incumbent, Republican, District 59 Rick LeBorious  - Democratic, District 59 Jane Garibay  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 60 Len Walker  - Republican, District 60 Tami Zawistowski  - Incumbent, Republican, District 61 Michael Malloy  - Democratic, District 61 Mark Anderson  - Incumbent, Republican, District 62 Kim Becker  - Democratic, District 62 Jay Case  - Incumbent, Republican, District 63 Maria Horn  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 64 Barbara Breor  - Republican, District 64 Michelle Cook  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 65 Joe Canino  - Republican, District 65 Karen Reddington-Hughes  - Incumbent, Republican, District 66 Sharon Sherman  - Democratic, District 66 William Buckbee  - Incumbent, Republican, District 67 Alexandra Thomas  - Democratic, District 67 Joe Polletta  - Incumbent, Republican, District 68 Jason Buchsbaum  - Republican, District 69 Ed Edelson  - Democratic, District 69 Seth Bronko  - Incumbent, Republican, District 70 Jeff Litke  - Democratic, District 70 William Pizzuto  - Incumbent, Republican, District 71 Larry Butler  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 72 Ronald Napoli Jr.  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 73 Abigail Diaz Pizarro  - Republican, District 73 Michael DiGiovancarlo  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 74 Geraldo Reyes  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 75 John Piscopo  - Incumbent, Republican, District 76 Stephen Simonin  - Democratic, District 76 Cara Pavalock-D'Amato  - Incumbent, Republican, District 77 Mary Rydingsward  - Working Families Party, District 77 Joe Hoxha  - Incumbent, Republican, District 78 Mary Fortier  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 79 David Schrager  - Republican, District 79 Gale Mastrofrancesco  - Incumbent, Republican, District 80 Christopher Poulos  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 81 James Morelli Jr.  - Republican, District 81 Michael Quinn  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 82 Lamar Terrell  - Republican, District 82 Jonathan Fazzino  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 83 Joseph Vollano  - Republican, District 83 Hilda Santiago  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 84 Mary Mushinsky  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 85 Jerry Farrell  - Republican, District 85 Vincent Candelora  - Incumbent, Republican, District 86 Dave Yaccarino Sr.  - Incumbent, Republican, District 87 Kieran Ahern  - Democratic, District 87 Joshua Elliott  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 88 Lezlye Zupkus  - Incumbent, Republican, District 89 Craig Fishbein  - Incumbent, Republican, District 90 Rebecca Hyland  - Democratic, District 90 Laurie Sweet  - Democratic, District 91 Patricia Dillon  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 92 Morris Sumpter  - Republican, District 92 Toni Walker  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 93 Steven Winter  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 94 Juan Candelaria  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 95 Roland J. Lemar  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 96 Alphonse Paolillo  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 97 Moira Rader  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 98 Joseph Zullo  - Incumbent, Republican, District 99 Kai Juanna Belton  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 100 Nigel Macon-Wilson  - Republican, District 100 John-Michael Parker  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 101 Lisa Deane  - Republican, District 101 Robin Comey  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 102 Ray Ingraham  - Republican, District 102 Liz Linehan  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 103 Kara Rochelle  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 104 David Cassetti  - Republican, District 104 Nicole Klarides-Ditria  - Incumbent, Republican, District 105 Mitch Bolinsky  - Incumbent, Republican, District 106 Michelle Embree Ku  - Democratic, District 106 Marty Foncello  - Incumbent, Republican, District 107 Aaron Zimmer  - Democratic, District 107 Pat Callahan  - Incumbent, Republican, District 108 Anne Weisberg  - Democratic, District 108 Farley Santos  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 109 Brenda Santopolo Hefferon  - Republican, District 109 Bob Godfrey  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 110 Austin Monteiro  - Republican, District 110 Aimee Berger-Girvalo  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 111 Colette Kabasakalian  - Republican, District 111 Tony Scott  - Incumbent, Republican, District 112 Beth Cliff  - Democratic, District 112 Jason Perillo  - Incumbent, Republican, District 113 Mary Welander  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 114 William Heffernan III  - Democratic, District 115 Silvana Apicella  - Republican, District 115 Treneé McGee  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 116 Raymond Collins III  - Republican, District 117 MJ Shannon  - Democratic, District 117 Frank Smith  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 118 Mark Macchio  - Republican, District 118 Kathy Kennedy  - Incumbent, Republican, District 119 Etan Hirsch  - Democratic, District 119 Laura Dancho  - Incumbent, Republican, District 120 Kaitlyn Shake  - Democratic, District 120 Joe Gresko  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 121 Rafael Irizarry  - Republican, District 121 Ben McGorty  - Incumbent, Republican, District 122 Dorothy Lerner  - Democratic, District 122 David Rutigliano  - Incumbent, Republican, District 123 Tom Tesoro  - Democratic, District 123 Andre Baker  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 124 Yoshiyahu Yisrael  - Republican, District 124 Tom O'Dea  - Incumbent, Republican, District 125 Jason Bennett  - Democratic, District 125 Fred Gee Jr.  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 126 David Herz  - Republican, District 126 Marcus Brown  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 127 Christopher Rosario  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 128 Ramona Marquez  - Republican, District 128 Angel Gonzalez  - Independent, District 128 Steven Stafstrom  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 129 Francis Kalangala  - Republican, District 129 Antonio Felipe  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 130 Terry Sullivan  - Republican, District 130 Arnold Jensen  - Republican, District 131 Ellen Fox  - Democratic, District 131 Jennifer Leeper  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 132 Alexis Harrison  - Republican, District 132 Cristin Vahey  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 133 Chris Verras  - Republican, District 133 Sarah Keitt  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 134 Melissa Longo  - Republican, District 134 Anne Hughes  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 135 Christopher Peritore  - Republican, District 135 Jonathan Steinberg  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 136 John Bolton  - Republican, District 136 Kadeem Roberts  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 137 Pietro Rotondo  - Republican, District 137 Rachel Chaleski  - Incumbent, Republican, District 138 Kenneth Gucker  - Democratic, District 138 Kevin Ryan  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 139 Mark Adams  - Republican, District 139 Travis Simms  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 140 Enrique Santiago  - Republican, District 140 Carleton Giles  - Democratic, District 140 (Lost in Primary) Tracy Marra  - Incumbent, Republican, District 141 Sheila Quinn  - Democratic, District 141 Lucy Dathan  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 142 Tricia Massucco  - Republican, District 142 (Withdrew) Dominique Johnson  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 143 Peter Bang  - Republican, District 143 Hubert Delany  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 144 Layne Rodney  - Republican, District 144 Corey Paris  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 145 Fritz Blau  - Republican, District 145 Jim Malerba  - Republican, District 146 Eilish Collins Main  - Democratic, District 146 Matt Blumenthal  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 147 Rudy Settimi  - Republican, District 147 Olga Anastos  - Republican, District 148 Jonathan Jacobson  - Democratic, District 148 Anabel Figueroa  - Democratic, District 148 (Lost in Primary) Rachel Khanna  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 149 Tina Courpas  - Republican, District 149 Steve Meskers  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 150 Paul Cappiali  - Republican, District 150 Hector Arzeno  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 151 Tod Laudonia  - Republican, District 151 Steve Meskers  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 150 Paul Cappiali  - Republican, District 150 Hector Arzeno  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 151 Tod Laudonia  - Republican, District 151 Matt Blumenthal  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 147 Rudy Settimi  - Republican, District 147 Olga Anastos  - Republican, District 148 Jonathan Jacobson  - Democratic, District 148 Anabel Figueroa  - Democratic, District 148 (Lost in Primary) Rachel Khanna  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 149 Tina Courpas  - Republican, District 149 Corey Paris  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 145 Fritz Blau  - Republican, District 145 Hubert Delany  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 144 Layne Rodney  - Republican, District 144 Peter Bang  - Republican, District 143 Dominique Johnson  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 143 Tricia Massucco  - Republican, District 142 (Withdrew) Lucy Dathan  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 142 Sheila Quinn  - Democratic, District 141 Tracy Marra  - Incumbent, Republican, District 141 Carleton Giles  - Democratic, District 140 (Lost in Primary) Enrique Santiago  - Republican, District 140 Travis Simms  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 140 Mark Adams  - Republican, District 139 Kevin Ryan  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 139 Kenneth Gucker  - Democratic, District 138 Rachel Chaleski  - Incumbent, Republican, District 138 Pietro Rotondo  - Republican, District 137 Kadeem Roberts  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 137 John-Michael Parker  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 101 Lisa Deane  - Republican, District 101 Robin Comey  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 102 Ray Ingraham  - Republican, District 102 Liz Linehan  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 103 Kara Rochelle  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 104 David Cassetti  - Republican, District 104 Nicole Klarides-Ditria  - Incumbent, Republican, District 105 Mitch Bolinsky  - Incumbent, Republican, District 106 Michelle Embree Ku  - Democratic, District 106 Marty Foncello  - Incumbent, Republican, District 107 Aaron Zimmer  - Democratic, District 107 Pat Callahan  - Incumbent, Republican, District 108 Anne Weisberg  - Democratic, District 108 Farley Santos  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 109 Brenda Santopolo Hefferon  - Republican, District 109 Bob Godfrey  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 110 Austin Monteiro  - Republican, District 110 Aimee Berger-Girvalo  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 111 Colette Kabasakalian  - Republican, District 111 Tony Scott  - Incumbent, Republican, District 112 Beth Cliff  - Democratic, District 112 Jason Perillo  - Incumbent, Republican, District 113 Mary Welander  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 114 William Heffernan III  - Democratic, District 115 Silvana Apicella  - Republican, District 115 Treneé McGee  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 116 Raymond Collins III  - Republican, District 117 MJ Shannon  - Democratic, District 117 Frank Smith  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 118 Mark Macchio  - Republican, District 118 Kathy Kennedy  - Incumbent, Republican, District 119 Etan Hirsch  - Democratic, District 119 Laura Dancho  - Incumbent, Republican, District 120 Kaitlyn Shake  - Democratic, District 120 Joe Gresko  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 121 Rafael Irizarry  - Republican, District 121 Ben McGorty  - Incumbent, Republican, District 122 Dorothy Lerner  - Democratic, District 122 David Rutigliano  - Incumbent, Republican, District 123 Tom Tesoro  - Democratic, District 123 Andre Baker  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 124 Yoshiyahu Yisrael  - Republican, District 124 Joe Biden  – President of the United States The president holds the highest office and has significant executive power, including signing legislation, issuing executive orders, and shaping both domestic and foreign policy. Kamala Harris  – Vice President of the United States The vice president serves as the president of the Senate and has the power to cast tie-breaking votes in the Senate. Antony Blinken  – Secretary of State As the nation's top diplomat, Blinken influences U.S. foreign policy and global relations. Janet Yellen  – Secretary of the Treasury Yellen leads the Treasury Department, overseeing the U.S. economy, including financial regulation, federal spending, and monetary policy. Merrick Garland  – Attorney General Garland heads the U.S. Department of Justice and plays a crucial role in enforcing federal laws, including civil rights and criminal law. Lloyd Austin  – Secretary of Defense Austin oversees the U.S. military and is responsible for national defense policies and military operations worldwide. Xavier Becerra  – Secretary of Health and Human Services Becerra directs federal health policies and oversees key health-related agencies, including Medicare and Medicaid. Alejandro Mayorkas  – Secretary of Homeland Security Mayorkas leads efforts to safeguard the U.S. from internal and external threats, including cybersecurity, border security, and disaster response. Jerome Powell  – Chairman of the Federal Reserve Powell influences U.S. monetary policy, including interest rates and economic stability, through his leadership at the Federal Reserve. Chuck Schumer  – Senate Majority Leader Schumer sets the legislative agenda in the Senate and plays a key role in guiding bills to passage. Mitch McConnell  – Senate Minority Leader As the leader of the minority party in the Senate, McConnell influences legislative strategy and opposition. Kevin McCarthy  – Speaker of the House of Representatives The Speaker is the presiding officer of the House and influences which bills come to the floor for a vote. Hakeem Jeffries  – House Minority Leader Jeffries leads the Democratic caucus in the House and works to shape legislative priorities for his party. Nancy Pelosi  – Former Speaker of the House Although no longer Speaker, Pelosi continues to wield significant influence in the House as a senior Democratic leader. Ron Klain  – White House Chief of Staff As the president’s top advisor, Klain plays a crucial role in shaping policy and managing the executive branch. Pete Buttigieg  – Secretary of Transportation Buttigieg oversees national transportation policy, infrastructure projects, and initiatives related to sustainability and innovation. Gina Raimondo  – Secretary of Commerce Raimondo plays a key role in promoting economic growth, job creation, and regulating commerce and trade. Rochelle Walensky  – Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Walensky leads public health efforts, including managing responses to health crises like the COVID-19 pandemic. John Roberts  – Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court Roberts leads the judiciary and presides over major cases that can shape U.S. laws for generations. Lina Khan  – Chair of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Khan has significant influence over antitrust enforcement, consumer protection, and regulating large tech companies. Andover, Ansonia, Ashford, Avon, Barkhamsted, Beacon Falls, Berlin, Bethany, Bethel, Bethlehem, Bloomfield, Bolton, Bozrah, Branford, Bridgeport, Bridgewater, Bristol, Brookfield, Brooklyn, Burlington, Canaan, Canterbury, Canton, Chaplin, Cheshire, Chester, Clinton, Colchester, Colebrook, Columbia, Cornwall, Coventry, Cromwell, Danbury, Darien, Deep River, Derby, Durham, Eastford, East Granby, East Haddam, East Hampton, East Hartford, East Haven, East Lyme, Easton, East Windsor, Ellington, Enfield, Essex, Fairfield, Farmington, Franklin, Glastonbury, Goshen, Granby, Greenwich, Griswold, Groton, Guilford, Haddam, Hamden, Hampton, Hartford, Hartland, Harwinton, Hebron, Kent, Killingly, Killingworth, Lebanon, Ledyard, Lisbon, Litchfield, Lyme, Madison, Manchester, Mansfield, Marlborough, Meriden, Middlebury, Middlefield, Middletown, Milford, Monroe, Montville, Morris, Naugatuck, New Britain, New Canaan, New Fairfield, New Hartford, New Haven, Newington, New London, New Milford, Newtown, Norfolk, North Branford, North Canaan, North Haven, North Stonington, Norwalk, Norwich, Old Lyme, Old Saybrook, Orange, Oxford, Plainfield, Plainville, Plymouth, Pomfret, Portland, Preston, Prospect, Putnam, Redding, Ridgefield, Rocky Hill, Roxbury, Salem, Salisbury, Scotland, Seymour, Sharon, Shelton, Sherman, Simsbury, Somers, Southbury, Southington, South Windsor, Sprague, Stafford, Stamford, Sterling, Stonington, Stratford, Suffield, Thomaston, Thompson, Tolland, Torrington, Trumbull, Union, Vernon, Voluntown, Wallingford, Warren, Washington, Waterbury, Waterford, Watertown, Westbrook, West Hartford, West Haven, Weston, Westport, Wethersfield, Willington, Wilton, Winchester, Windham, Windsor, Windsor Locks, Wolcott, Woodbridge, Woodbury, Woodstock. Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming. "Fighting for Justice: Why Advocacy Groups and Lawyers Must Unite for Systemic Reform" "Legal Action for Change: How Lawyers and Advocates Can Tackle Government Corruption" "Advocating for Whistleblowers: The Legal Fight Against Retaliation" "The Power of Advocacy: How Lawyers Can Help Protect Vulnerable Populations" "Legal Rights Under Siege: Why Advocacy Groups Need to Take a Stand Now" "How Lawyers and Advocates Are Leading the Charge for Government Accountability" "Uncovering the Truth: The Legal Battle for Whistleblower Protections" "Advocating for Justice: The Role of Legal Experts in Combating Medicaid Fraud" "Why Advocacy Groups Are Key to Reforming the FOIA Process" "Lawyers Fighting for Transparency: The Importance of Legal Intervention in FOIA Cases" "The Legal Case for Federal Oversight: How Lawyers Can Drive Systemic Change" "Standing Up for Rights: Advocacy Groups Taking on Government Abuses" "Legal Heroes: How Lawyers Are Defending Whistleblowers and Ensuring Accountability" "Fighting for Medicaid Reform: The Role of Legal Experts in Protecting Taxpayer Funds" "Why Advocacy Groups Are Essential to Protecting Whistleblowers in Healthcare" "The Legal Fight Against Corruption: Advocacy Groups Leading the Way" "Lawyers and Advocates for Justice: How Legal Action Can Drive Systemic Reform" "Holding Government Accountable: Why Lawyers Are Crucial to Whistleblower Protections" "The Power of Legal Advocacy: How Lawyers Are Defending Transparency and Accountability" "Why Advocacy Groups and Legal Experts Must Join Forces to Fight Systemic Abuse" "The Crisis in Connecticut: How the ABI Waiver Program is Failing Thousands" "Unveiling the Truth: Whistleblowers Speak Out on Connecticut’s ABI Waiver Program" "Connecticut's Medicaid ABI Waiver: Why Federal Intervention is Urgently Needed" "How Can We Fix Connecticut’s ABI Waiver System? Your Voice Matters" "Protecting Brain Injury Survivors: It’s Time for Real Change in Connecticut" "Why Transparency and Accountability are Key to Saving Connecticut’s ABI Waiver Program" "The Untold Stories of Brain Injury Survivors in Connecticut’s Failing Medicaid System" "Whistleblowers Under Fire: Standing Up for Justice in Connecticut’s Healthcare System" "Time to Act: Urging Connecticut Leaders to Unite and Fix the ABI Waiver Crisis" "Restoring Trust in Connecticut's Healthcare: The Fight for ABI Waiver Reform" "Voices of Change: How You Can Help Fix Connecticut’s ABI Waiver Program" "Medicaid ABI Waiver Crisis: A Call for Federal Oversight and Immediate Action" "From Silence to Action: Whistleblowers Reveal the Truth About Connecticut’s ABI Waiver" "Connecticut Leaders, It’s Time to Stand Up for Brain Injury Survivors" "The Urgency of Federal Audits in Connecticut’s ABI Waiver Program" "Transparency Now: The Hidden Failures of Connecticut’s ABI Waiver System" "Whistleblower Protections: The Key to Fixing Connecticut’s Medicaid Crisis" "Rebuilding Trust: What Connecticut Must Do to Fix the ABI Waiver Program" "Connecticut’s Healthcare Crisis: Immediate Solutions for the ABI Waiver Program" "United for Change: How Connecticut Can Save Its ABI Waiver Program" "Connecticut Tax Dollars at Risk: The Hidden Costs of the ABI Waiver Program Crisis" "Where Are Your Taxes Going? The Financial Failures of Connecticut’s ABI Waiver" "Taxpayer Burden: How Mismanagement of the ABI Waiver Program Affects You" "Your Money, Your Right: Demand Transparency in Connecticut’s ABI Waiver Program" "Wasted Tax Dollars? Why Federal Oversight is Needed in Connecticut’s ABI Program" "Is Your Tax Money Being Misused? The Crisis in Connecticut’s Healthcare System" "How Connecticut's ABI Waiver Mismanagement is Costing Taxpayers Millions" "Why Every Taxpayer Should Care About Connecticut’s ABI Waiver Program" "The Fiscal Impact of Connecticut’s Failing ABI Waiver Program on Taxpayers" "Accountability for Your Tax Dollars: The Urgent Need to Fix the ABI Waiver Program" "Protecting Your Taxes: The Fight for Transparency in Connecticut’s Healthcare System" "Federal Oversight of ABI Waiver Program Could Save Connecticut Taxpayers Millions" "How Connecticut’s ABI Waiver Program is Failing Both Taxpayers and Patients" "The Hidden Taxpayer Costs Behind Connecticut’s Medicaid Mismanagement" "Demand Accountability: How the ABI Waiver Program is Misusing Your Tax Dollars" "Taxpayer Dollars at Stake: Why Whistleblower Protection Matters in Healthcare" "Save Money, Save Lives: Why Connecticut Needs ABI Waiver Reform Now" "Connecticut’s ABI Waiver Failures: A Burden on Taxpayers That Must Be Fixed" "Misuse of Medicaid Funds: The Hidden Taxpayer Costs in Connecticut’s ABI Waiver" "Fiscal Responsibility: Why Reforming the ABI Waiver Program is a Taxpayer Issue" "The Future of Medicaid: How Reform Can Save Billions for Taxpayers" "Medicaid Fraud and Waste: Why Taxpayers Should Demand Oversight" "Medicaid Funding Crisis: What It Means for Patients and Taxpayers" "Is Medicaid Serving Its Purpose? Addressing Mismanagement and Costs" "Medicaid’s Role in Healthcare: A Lifeline for Millions or a Broken System?" "Medicaid Mismanagement: How It’s Wasting Taxpayer Dollars" "The Hidden Costs of Medicaid: How Inefficiencies Affect Taxpayers" "Medicaid Reform: Why It’s Essential for America’s Healthcare Future" "How Medicaid Can Be Fixed to Ensure Quality Care and Responsible Spending" "Medicaid Fraud Costs Taxpayers Millions: What Can Be Done?" "Why Every Taxpayer Should Care About Medicaid Reform" "Medicaid’s Financial Burden on States: A Crisis Waiting to Happen" "How Medicaid Overhaul Could Improve Healthcare and Save Taxpayers Money" "Medicaid Expansion: Helping Millions or Straining the System?" "The True Cost of Medicaid Fraud and How It Impacts Taxpayers" "Is Medicaid Working for You? Examining Its Impact on Families and Communities" "Medicaid Accountability: Ensuring Taxpayer Dollars Are Spent Wisely" "How Medicaid’s Funding Issues Affect the Healthcare System" "Medicaid Spending in Crisis: What It Means for Healthcare and Taxes" "Medicaid Reform: Balancing Care Access and Fiscal Responsibility" "Exposing Systematic FOIA Abuses: How Agencies Block Public Access to Information" "The Dark Side of FOIA: Unethical Delays and Denials in Government Transparency" "When FOIA Requests Go Unanswered: The Systematic Erosion of Public Trust" "Unethical FOIA Practices: How Government Agencies Are Withholding Vital Information" "FOIA Under Fire: How Systemic Delays Are Undermining Government Accountability" "The Hidden Barriers: Unethical Tactics Agencies Use to Dodge FOIA Requests" "Transparency in Name Only: Systematic Failures of the FOIA Process" "How Government Agencies Exploit Loopholes to Deny FOIA Requests" "FOIA Reform Now: Addressing the Unethical Delays and Lack of Transparency" "The High Cost of Hidden Information: How FOIA Failures Are Harming Democracy" "Unethical Use of FOIA Exemptions: When Agencies Hide Behind the Law" "The Battle for Transparency: Systematic FOIA Failures and the Need for Reform" "Systematic Suppression: How FOIA is Being Abused to Withhold Critical Information" "Unethical FOIA Denials: How Agencies Are Avoiding Accountability" "How FOIA’s Intent is Being Undermined by Systemic Delays and Non-Compliance" "The Abuse of Power: Unethical FOIA Practices by Government Agencies" "When Transparency Becomes an Illusion: Systematic FOIA Failures" "FOIA Requests Denied: Unethical Loopholes and Systemic Obstruction" "Uncovering the Truth: How FOIA Failures Protect Corruption and Malfeasance" "A Broken System: How Unethical FOIA Practices Are Keeping Citizens in the Dark" "Protecting Whistleblowers: The Backbone of Transparency and Accountability" "Whistleblower Protections Under Fire: Why Safeguarding Truth-Tellers is Essential" "Why Every Workplace Needs Strong Whistleblower Protections Now" "Standing Up for Whistleblowers: How to Strengthen Legal Protections" "The Risks of Exposing Corruption: Why Whistleblower Protections Must Be Enforced" "Whistleblower Protections: The First Line of Defense Against Government Corruption" "Unprotected Whistleblowers: The Systemic Failures Putting Truth-Tellers at Risk" "How Weak Whistleblower Protections Undermine Justice and Transparency" "Reforming Whistleblower Laws: The Key to Ending Workplace Corruption" "Whistleblowers Face Retaliation: Why Stronger Protections Are Crucial" "Unethical Retaliation: How Weak Whistleblower Protections Are Failing Employees" "Defending the Truth: Why Whistleblower Protections Are Vital for Democracy" "From Silence to Justice: How Whistleblower Protections Safeguard Accountability" "Whistleblowers Under Siege: The Fight for Stronger Legal Safeguards" "Exposing Fraud Without Fear: The Role of Whistleblower Protections in the Workplace" "Retaliation Against Whistleblowers: How to Stop the Cycle of Fear and Silence" "How Strengthened Whistleblower Protections Can Curb Corporate Corruption" "Fighting Back: The Importance of Legal Protections for Whistleblowers" "Whistleblower Protections: The Legal Shield for Truth-Tellers" "Ending Retaliation: How Whistleblower Protections Can Empower Ethical Reporting" "Why Federal Help is Crucial to Fixing Systemic Failures in State Programs" "Federal Oversight Needed: Addressing Corruption and Mismanagement at the State Level" "How Federal Intervention Can Save Lives in Underfunded Healthcare Systems" "Calling on Washington: Why States Need Federal Help to Ensure Accountability" "Systemic Failures Demand Federal Action: How Oversight Can Bring Real Change" "How Federal Help Can Stop the Abuse of Taxpayer Dollars in Medicaid Programs" "When States Fail, Federal Intervention is Key to Restoring Justice" "The Role of the Federal Government in Protecting Vulnerable Populations" "A Call for Federal Oversight: Ending Mismanagement in State Medicaid Programs" "Bringing Accountability Through Federal Intervention: Fixing State-Level Corruption" "How Federal Help Can Reform Broken State Systems and Protect Whistleblowers" "Federal Audits and Oversight: The Key to Uncovering Waste and Fraud in State Programs" "Why Federal Help is Urgently Needed to Ensure Transparency in State Governments" "Federal Agencies Must Step In: Addressing Systemic Mismanagement in Medicaid" "The Importance of Federal Support in Fixing Healthcare Disparities Across States" "Why Federal Action is the Only Way to Bring Accountability to State-Funded Programs" "A Federal Solution for State-Level Corruption: Why Oversight is Essential" "How Federal Intervention Can End Retaliation Against Whistleblowers" "The Urgent Need for Federal Help in Fixing Medicaid's Systemic Issues" "How Federal Help Can Ensure Justice for Vulnerable Populations in State Programs"

DB.42.131.Inf. Connecticut’s Medicaid ABI Waiver Program Crisis: A Comprehensive Breakdown of the Waitlist, Its Impact on Families, and Taxpayers Republican Senator Lisa Seminara has raised serious concerns about the ongoing Medicaid ABI Waiver Program waitlist crisis, with individuals waiting for services as far back as 2019. Despite years of acknowledging this issue, no real solutions have been provided. The absence of DSS Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves from a recent critical legislative hearing has only intensified concerns about the leadership and lack of accountability within the Department of Social Services (DSS). During the hearing, Christine Weston, Director of the Community Options Unit (COU), was unable to provide accurate data regarding how many individuals are stuck on the waitlist. This points to deeper issues within DSS and raises alarms about mismanagement. Simply acknowledging the problem without implementing solutions has left families in a state of limbo, while those in power, such as Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves, have failed to address the core of the crisis. For years, Connecticut’s Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program  has provided critical services to individuals living with brain injuries. These services include rehabilitation, home care, and daily support aimed at improving the quality of life for survivors. Unfortunately, the program is now facing a growing crisis , with some individuals waiting since 2019  for care. Despite acknowledgment of the issue by Governor Ned Lamont , the Department of Social Services (DSS) , and key officials like Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves , no substantial solutions have been implemented. As the waitlist grows, so do the consequences for families  and taxpayers . The ABI Waiver Program: A Lifeline Being Denied The ABI Waiver Program is designed to allow individuals with acquired brain injuries to live more independently in their communities. It covers essential services such as: Rehabilitation therapy In-home care Behavioral support services Respite care for caregivers Case management However, the growing waitlist, which has left individuals waiting for over five years , is preventing brain injury survivors from accessing the care they need. For these individuals and their families, this isn’t just a delay—it’s a life-altering obstacle  to recovery. How This Crisis Impacts Individuals and Families For families of brain injury survivors, the long wait times  for Medicaid ABI Waiver services have a devastating impact on every aspect of their lives: Deteriorating Health : Many survivors are living with deteriorating physical and mental health due to the delay  in accessing appropriate care. Without timely rehabilitation  and support services , their conditions often worsen, leading to more frequent hospitalizations and emergency room visits. These are costly and ineffective solutions compared to the long-term care that Medicaid provides. Emotional Strain : The emotional toll of waiting for years for care is overwhelming. Uncertainty  about whether their loved one will ever receive the care they need adds significant mental stress to families. The failure of DSS to provide clear information about their position on the waitlist only deepens the feeling of being forgotten  by the system. Financial Burden on Caregivers : In the absence of Medicaid services, family members often become full-time caregivers , leading to financial strain. Many caregivers must leave their jobs to provide care, resulting in a loss of household income. This further destabilizes families, leaving them financially vulnerable while they wait indefinitely for services. How This Crisis Impacts Taxpayers While the direct impact on families is severe, taxpayers also bear the consequences of the mismanagement  of the ABI Waiver Program: Wasted Taxpayer Dollars : The delay in providing essential services through the ABI Waiver forces individuals to rely on emergency services , which are far more expensive than the long-term care they need. Taxpayer dollars are being used inefficiently, with funds directed toward short-term, crisis care  instead of preventive, cost-effective services that the waiver provides. Federal Funding at Risk : The ongoing mismanagement of the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program could jeopardize Connecticut’s compliance with federal Medicaid regulations . This risks a loss of federal funding , which would further strain the state budget and reduce available services for those in need. Increased Healthcare Costs : By delaying access to necessary care, the state is creating a system where individuals' health conditions worsen over time, leading to higher healthcare costs. Preventive care  is far more affordable than treating preventable complications that arise from lack of timely care. Taxpayers end up shouldering the costs of this inefficiency. Acknowledgment Isn’t Enough: The Need for Action For years, the ABI Waiver Program waitlist  has been acknowledged, but acknowledgment alone is insufficient. Simply recognizing the problem doesn’t resolve the issue, and families are still waiting in limbo. Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves  has not actively participated in critical discussions, raising concerns about the lack of leadership  in fixing the problem. The absence of leadership and transparency has caused a growing crisis, leaving families and taxpayers alike to suffer the consequences. A Call for Reform: Immediate Actions Required To address the ABI Waiver waitlist crisis , several reforms must be prioritized: Transparency in Waitlist Management : DSS must provide clear, accurate data  about the waitlist and regularly update families on their status. Transparency is critical to rebuilding trust between families and the agency. Reduction of Wait Times : The state must increase staffing and streamline administrative processes to ensure individuals don’t have to wait years for services. Addressing these bottlenecks  will be key to clearing the backlog. Federal Audits : Independent federal audits  are needed to ensure the program is in compliance with Medicaid regulations  and that funds are being used effectively. Audits will help identify where the system is failing and bring accountability to the program. Accountability from Leadership : Leaders such as Governor Ned Lamont  and Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves  must be held accountable for the ongoing mismanagement of the program. Concrete steps are needed to reduce the waitlist and improve service delivery. Whistleblower Protections : Strengthening whistleblower protections  will encourage staff to report instances of mismanagement or inefficiency within DSS without fear of retaliation. This will help identify and resolve issues more quickly. The Time for Action Is Now The Medicaid ABI Waiver Program waitlist crisis  is a failure of leadership, transparency, and compassion. It affects not only the brain injury survivors  who depend on these services but also their families  and Connecticut taxpayers . Real reform is needed, not just acknowledgment of the problem. At ABI Resources , we stand with the families and advocates pushing for immediate solutions . We call on Governor Ned Lamont , Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves , and the federal government  to implement the necessary changes to ensure that brain injury survivors receive the care they deserve. It’s time to ensure that Connecticut’s most vulnerable populations are no longer left behind. The time for action is now. Together, we can fix this as it is so desperately needed. The Medicaid ABI Waiver Waitlist Crisis: A Call for Transparency and Reform In Connecticut, brain injury survivors and their families have faced an ongoing crisis. For more than five years , individuals in desperate need of care have been stuck on a waitlist  for the Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program . This delay in services has far-reaching consequences, including worsening health conditions, emotional and financial strain on families, and a profound lack of accountability within the Department of Social Services (DSS). It is time for immediate reform, transparency, and federal oversight to address these critical issues. The ABI Waiver Program: A Lifeline Being Denied The ABI Waiver Program is designed to provide vital services to individuals with acquired brain injuries, including rehabilitation, home care, and support services that help survivors regain independence and live fulfilling lives. However, many people in need of these services are left on a waitlist for years, unable to access the care they desperately require. For these individuals, the wait is not just a delay—it is a life-altering obstacle to recovery. Prolonged Wait Times and Systemic Mismanagement Despite the urgency, many individuals have been waiting over five years  for critical services. Families and caregivers are left in limbo, without clear information about when—or if—their loved ones will receive the help they need. This prolonged wait is a sign of systemic mismanagement  within the DSS. During a recent legislative exchange, Christine Weston , Director of the Community Options Unit (COU) within DSS, could not provide the number of individuals on the waitlist, raising serious concerns  about the oversight and integrity of the program. Lack of Transparency The absence of clear communication is one of the most frustrating aspects for families on the waitlist. Many are not even aware of their position on the list, and the DSS has not been transparent in providing this information. This lack of accountability raises concerns that there may be efforts to discourage access  to Medicaid services, particularly for the most vulnerable populations. Senator Lisa Seminara , a Republican representing Connecticut’s 8th Senate District, has been a vocal advocate for addressing the mismanagement  of the ABI Waiver Program. During the recent hearing, Governor Ned Lamont’s administration , along with Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves  (who was notably absent from the hearing), faced scrutiny for failing to provide answers and implement necessary reforms. The Burden on Families For families waiting for services, the emotional, physical, and financial toll is immense. Without the necessary Medicaid services, family members often become full-time caregivers, leading to burnout and financial strain. Many caregivers are forced to leave their jobs to provide care, which further exacerbates financial instability. The mental exhaustion caused by uncertainty and the responsibility of caregiving creates a cycle of stress that affects entire households. Deteriorating Health for Those on the Waitlist For individuals with brain injuries, the delays in accessing care can be detrimental to their health. Without timely intervention, many patients see their conditions worsen, leading to more hospital visits and increased reliance on emergency care —a costly and inefficient alternative to long-term, proactive treatment. These emergency treatments often fail to address the underlying health issues, creating a revolving door of healthcare that does little to improve the quality of life for brain injury survivors. The Taxpayer Impact The financial inefficiencies of the ABI Waiver Program are not just a burden on families—they also affect taxpayers . Delays in services lead to more expensive emergency interventions, which are covered by Medicaid. Had these individuals received timely and appropriate care, these costly emergency services could have been avoided. This represents a misallocation of taxpayer dollars  and underscores the need for improved program management and transparency. The Risk of Losing Federal Funding The delays and mismanagement  of the ABI Waiver Program could have even broader consequences for Connecticut. Non-compliance with federal Medicaid regulations could result in the loss of federal funding , which would further strain the state’s budget and reduce services for those most in need. This would be a devastating blow to the program and the vulnerable populations it is supposed to serve. Immediate Solutions: A Call for Federal and State-Level Reform The current state of the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program is untenable. Families, advocates, and policymakers must come together to demand immediate federal oversight  and state-level reform. This situation demands action on several fronts: Transparency in Waitlist Management : DSS must provide families with clear and accurate information about their position on the waitlist. Full transparency will restore trust and allow families to plan for the future. Reduction of Wait Times : The state must address staff shortages, funding gaps, and procedural inefficiencies within the DSS that contribute to long delays in service delivery. Federal Audits : Independent federal audits are necessary to ensure compliance with Medicaid regulations and to identify areas of financial mismanagement. These audits will ensure that taxpayer dollars are being used efficiently and that services are being provided to those who need them most. Whistleblower Protections : Strengthening protections for whistleblowers within DSS will encourage more individuals to come forward with information about potential mismanagement or corruption without fear of retaliation. Accountability from Leadership : Governor Ned Lamont  and Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves  must ensure that the leadership within DSS is committed to supporting vulnerable populations and is held accountable for the program's performance. A Call for Advocacy and Action The Medicaid ABI Waiver Program is a lifeline for individuals with brain injuries, but the current mismanagement of the waitlist and services is failing those who need it most. Immediate reforms are necessary to restore trust, improve efficiency, and provide life-saving services to Connecticut’s most vulnerable populations. ABI Resources  stands with families, caregivers, and advocates in demanding the transparency, accountability, and action needed to fix this broken system. It’s time to stand together and push for the reforms that Connecticut’s brain injury survivors deserve. Outrage Now, Injustice Exposed, Public Outrage, Demand Accountability, Broken System, Fix This Now, Enough Is Enough, Unacceptable, We Deserve Better, No More Delays, Action Needed Now, Transparency Now, Justice Denied, System Failing, Urgent Reform, Accountability Now, Mismanagement Exposed, Voices Silenced, Act Now For Change, Fed Up With Injustice Hidden Medicaid Agency Provider List: Connecticut Department of Social Services / CT DSS COU CGA Exposing Medicaid Secrets: How Connecticut's Violations Hurt Taxpayers & Vulnerable Populations" CGA Connecticut DSS Faces Scrutiny Over Concealed Provider List in Medicaid ABI Waiver Program In a recent legislative exchange, Connecticut State Representative Kathleen McCarty questioned Christine Weston, Director of the Community Options Unit (COU) within the Connecticut Department of Social Services (DSS), about the availability of the Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program Agency Provider List. The list is not publicly accessible and COU would need to consult with DSS legal counsel—has triggered concerns about transparency and potential violations of federal Medicaid regulations. The concealment of the Provider List directly undermines federal requirements for transparency, consumer choice, and public accountability in Medicaid-funded programs. Under the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(23)), Medicaid beneficiaries are guaranteed the right to choose from any qualified provider participating in the program. By withholding the list of providers, DSS is effectively limiting beneficiaries' ability to make informed choices about their care, a clear violation of this federal statute. More than a mere bureaucratic oversight, this lack of transparency obstructs the fundamental rights of Medicaid recipients, particularly vulnerable populations like brain injury survivors who depend on specialized care. These individuals and their families rely on accessible information to choose the most appropriate care providers based on quality, expertise, and geographic location. The absence of this information not only deprives them of their legal rights but also risks funneling beneficiaries toward limited, state-favored providers, potentially compromising the quality of care they receive. This issue with the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program could indicate a systemic problem in Connecticut’s administration of federally funded programs. If the DSS is withholding information in this program, similar practices may be occurring in other state-managed, federally funded programs. With billions of taxpayer dollars flowing through Medicaid, this raises significant concerns about mismanagement, financial oversight, and the state’s broader compliance with federal transparency requirements. Beyond violating Medicaid regulations, this failure to provide access to public information also erodes trust in the integrity of state-run health services. When critical details about provider options are concealed, it creates a veil of secrecy that limits public accountability. Moreover, it raises the specter of conflicts of interest—where specific providers may be favored by state agencies for reasons unrelated to the quality of care or beneficiary needs. Such practices, if left unchecked, can lead to monopolistic conditions where certain agencies dominate the landscape, to the detriment of consumer choice and healthcare quality. Medicaid is designed to serve some of the most vulnerable populations in the country, including individuals with disabilities, low-income families, and elderly individuals requiring long-term care. The intentional withholding of vital information such as provider lists violates not only federal laws but also the ethical obligation to ensure that these populations have equal access to healthcare services. This situation calls for immediate action from federal oversight agencies, such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), to conduct a thorough audit of Connecticut’s Medicaid program administration. Federal intervention is necessary to ensure that the state complies with transparency regulations and provides Medicaid beneficiaries with the information they are entitled to by law. If these practices are found to extend to other federally funded programs, it could signal widespread non-compliance, mismanagement of federal funds, and a failure to uphold the rights of vulnerable individuals across the state. As the investigation into this issue unfolds, it is critical that the DSS take immediate steps to rectify these transparency failures. The state must make the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program Agency Provider List publicly accessible and ensure that beneficiaries’ rights to choose their providers are fully restored. Anything less would continue to jeopardize the integrity of Connecticut’s Medicaid program and the health and well-being of those it is meant to serve. We’re sharing an important message about systemic issues within Medicaid programs that may be impacting both vulnerable populations and every U.S. taxpayer. These challenges could have nationwide implications, affecting how federal dollars are spent and how services reach those who rely on Medicaid. This is not about assigning blame —it’s about finding solutions that ensure taxpayer dollars are used wisely and that vulnerable individuals get the care they need. By working together, we can help create a more transparent, accountable, and effective Medicaid system that benefits everyone. Key Problems and Solutions: Misuse of Taxpayer Funds Problem: Federal Medicaid funds are being inefficiently used, which can increase costs for taxpayers while reducing the quality of services for vulnerable individuals. Solution: Conduct regular audits of Medicaid spending to ensure that every dollar is used efficiently to support essential services and avoid waste or misallocation. Lack of Transparency Problem: Essential information about Medicaid services—such as provider directories and funding allocations—is not easily accessible to the public. This lack of transparency prevents people from understanding how funds are being used and how care decisions are made. Solution: Ensure greater transparency by making Medicaid-related information, including provider directories and spending reports, publicly accessible. This will allow taxpayers, caregivers, and advocates to see where resources are going and hold the system accountable. Unethical Business Practices Problem: Some providers may be engaging in conflicts of interest or kickback schemes, where services are being recommended for financial gain rather than the needs of individuals. This drives up costs and reduces the quality of care. Solution: Implement strict ethical oversight to ensure that Medicaid services are provided based on the needs of individuals, without conflicts of interest or unnecessary services that increase costs for taxpayers. Discriminatory Business Practices in Medicaid Referrals Problem: Certain providers may be favored in Medicaid referrals, limiting access to care for individuals and creating an unequal playing field for providers. This impacts the freedom of individuals to choose the care that best fits their needs. Solution: Establish a fair and transparent referral system that treats all providers equally and ensures that individuals have access to a wide range of care options, promoting both choice and competition. Impact on Disabled Workers Problem: Disabled workers involved in the Medicaid system are not always being paid fairly, which violates federal labor laws and creates further economic challenges for an already vulnerable group. Solution: Ensure compliance with federal labor laws by guaranteeing that all disabled workers are paid fairly and treated with respect, helping create a more supportive and ethical Medicaid system. Limited Consumer Choice Problem: Some individuals are limited in their ability to choose services or housing arrangements, being tied to specific providers through restrictive agreements. This reduces their freedom to select the care and services that best suit their needs. Solution: Expand consumer choice by revising policies that restrict beneficiaries to certain providers or housing options, allowing individuals more freedom to select the services and care arrangements that work best for them. FOIA Violations and Stonewalling Problem: Public records requests related to Medicaid services and spending are being blocked or delayed, limiting public oversight and reducing accountability within the system. Solution: Enforce full compliance with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to ensure that the public has access to important Medicaid information. This will allow for greater transparency and ensure that taxpayer dollars are being used properly. Unauthorized Care Management Services Problem: Some individuals are receiving services that have not been authorized or properly managed, leading to confusion and potential misuse of Medicaid funds. Solution: Ensure proper oversight and clear guidelines for care management services, preventing unauthorized services and ensuring that individuals receive only the care that is necessary and beneficial to them. Unfair Rental Agreements Linked to Medicaid Services Problem: Some beneficiaries are tied to specific housing arrangements through rental agreements that are linked to their Medicaid service providers, reducing their ability to change providers or housing without risking their care. Solution: Revise rental agreements and housing policies to ensure greater consumer freedom and allow individuals to change providers or housing arrangements without being penalized or risking their care. How These Issues Affect All of Us: These problems extend beyond any one state—they have national implications for how Medicaid funds are spent and how care is provided. Every taxpayer contributes to Medicaid, and it’s essential that these funds are used efficiently and transparently. At the same time, vulnerable populations—including individuals with disabilities and those relying on Medicaid services—deserve a system that works for them. By addressing these systemic challenges, we can ensure that taxpayer dollars are used wisely and that those who need support get access to the care and services they deserve. What You Can Do: Share this post to raise awareness and encourage others to understand how these issues might be affecting them and their communities. Support greater transparency and ethical oversight in Medicaid services by engaging with policymakers. Advocate for positive reform to ensure taxpayer dollars are used effectively and that vulnerable individuals get the care they need. Together, we can help create a Medicaid system that benefits everyone—by ensuring accountability, promoting transparency, and protecting taxpayer resources while supporting those who rely on these essential services. What Happens When You Lose Medicaid Insurance? Medicaid is essential for many families. If it’s taken away or you lose it, it can lead to serious problems for you, your family, and even your entire community. Here’s what happens: You Can’t See the Doctor When You Need To You Delay Care : You might put off going to the doctor because you can’t afford it. Small problems can turn into big ones. No More Preventive Check-ups : Without Medicaid, you might skip regular check-ups that help catch problems early. You Can’t Afford Medications Stopping Medication : People stop taking important medications (for conditions like diabetes, mental health issues, or high blood pressure) because they can’t pay for them. Getting Worse : Without those meds, your health can get worse quickly, leading to hospital visits or even life-threatening conditions. Mental Health Suffers Stopping Therapy : Mental health services, like therapy or counseling, can get too expensive, meaning people can no longer get help for anxiety, depression, or other issues. Emotional Stress : Without professional help, mental health issues can become overwhelming, leading to stress, breakdowns, and even suicidal thoughts. Risk of Homelessness Increases Losing Your Job : If your health gets worse, you may not be able to work, leading to job loss and financial problems. Can’t Pay for Housing : Medical bills pile up, and without income, you might not be able to pay rent or the mortgage, which can lead to losing your home. Families Can Be Affected : It’s not just individuals who suffer—entire families can end up in shelters or homeless because of high medical costs. Emergency Rooms Get Overcrowded Using ER as a Doctor’s Office : People without insurance often wait until they are very sick and then go to the ER, which is much more expensive than regular care. More Stress on Hospitals : Hospitals can get overwhelmed, and this affects everyone. It means longer wait times and less attention for those who really need emergency care. Crime Can Increase Desperation Leads to Survival Crimes : When people are financially desperate due to health issues, some may turn to petty crime just to survive. Substance Abuse : Losing mental health care can lead to drug or alcohol use to cope, and this often leads to trouble with the law. Homelessness and Crime Connection : When people lose their homes and can’t get help, they may be more likely to get involved in crime just to meet basic needs. Your Community Suffers Spread of Illness : Without insurance, people may not get vaccinated or treated for contagious diseases, which can make the entire community sick. Public Services Overloaded : Charities, shelters, and food banks may get overwhelmed by more people needing help, making it harder to serve everyone. Fewer Resources for Everyone : When hospitals, clinics, and public health services are stretched too thin, everyone gets worse care. Children Are Affected Missed Vaccines and Checkups : Kids without Medicaid miss important vaccines and doctor visits, putting their health and development at risk. Struggling in School : Without proper healthcare, children may fall behind in school because of untreated health problems or stress at home due to financial instability. Long-Term Poverty Medical Debt : Without Medicaid, medical bills pile up, and families can end up with huge debt, making it hard to afford basic needs like food and housing. Generational Impact : Families in debt or struggling with health issues have a harder time getting out of poverty, and this can affect future generations. Losing Medicaid isn’t just about losing insurance; it’s about losing stability in your life. Without access to healthcare, everything starts to break down—your health, your ability to work, your family’s security, and the community’s well-being. It can even lead to more crime and homelessness as people struggle just to survive. What Can You Do? Stay Informed : Know your options and stay connected to advocacy groups that support for healthcare rights. Ask for Help : Reach out to community health centers, legal aid, and nonprofits that offer support. Get Involved : Support policies that ensure everyone has access to affordable healthcare. When people lose Medicaid insurance, the effects also significantly impact taxpayers  and the overall economy. Here’s a breakdown of how this burden shifts onto taxpayers and why it's important for everyone, even those with insurance, to understand these consequences. Increased Emergency Room Costs (Taxpayer-Funded) ER Becomes the First Stop:  When people without insurance get sick or injured, they often wait until it’s serious and go to the emergency room (ER), which is far more expensive than regular doctor visits. Higher Costs Passed to Taxpayers:  ER visits are one of the most expensive ways to treat medical issues, and when uninsured patients can't pay their bills, the hospital absorbs the costs. These costs are often passed on to taxpayers  through increased funding needs for hospitals and public healthcare programs. Higher Local and State Taxes for Public Services Overloaded Public Health Systems:  Local and state governments are forced to provide more funding for free clinics, public health programs, shelters, and emergency services when there’s an increase in uninsured people. This leads to higher taxes to cover these services. Community Resources Stretched Thin:  When uninsured people need more help from publicly funded services like shelters, food banks, and healthcare clinics, these services require more taxpayer dollars to stay operational. As more people rely on these programs, the costs to taxpayers grow. Higher Insurance Premiums for Everyone Cost-Shifting in Healthcare:  Hospitals often shift the unpaid medical costs of uninsured patients onto private insurers. This drives up the overall cost of healthcare for those who do have insurance. Rising Insurance Premiums:  As healthcare providers raise prices to compensate for uninsured patients, taxpayers  who buy insurance in the private market may see their premiums go up. This makes healthcare more expensive for everyone, even those who already pay for private insurance. Increased Government Spending on Medicaid Expansion and Safety Nets Government Must Step In:  When people lose Medicaid, they still often need some form of public assistance. Governments may have to increase spending on Medicaid expansion, safety net programs, or even adjust the Medicaid qualifications to help more people. This means more public spending, which comes from taxpayer money. Taxpayer-Funded Subsidies:  In some cases, state and federal governments have to provide subsidies for health insurance, and when more people qualify due to losing Medicaid, these costs come from taxpayer funds. Higher Costs for the Criminal Justice System More People in Jail:  As explained earlier, loss of health insurance can lead to an increase in crime, especially as people turn to petty crimes for survival or get involved in substance abuse. This puts more strain on the criminal justice system, which is heavily funded by taxpayer dollars . Mental Health and Substance Abuse in Jail:  Many people end up in jail because they don’t have access to mental health or substance abuse treatment. Once in jail, taxpayers must cover the costs of healthcare, housing, and legal processing for these individuals. It’s far more expensive to treat someone in jail than it is to provide preventive care in the community. Increased Unemployment and Welfare Costs Job Loss Leads to Public Assistance Needs:  Without insurance, people’s health often deteriorates, making it hard for them to work. This can lead to job loss and more people relying on welfare programs like unemployment benefits, food stamps, and housing assistance—all of which are funded by taxpayers . Economic Downturn in Communities:  When many people lose their jobs due to poor health and medical debt, the local economy suffers. This can reduce tax revenue from income and sales taxes, while increasing the demand for public support programs. Public Health Crises Require Taxpayer Funding Spread of Diseases : When people don’t have insurance, they often skip vaccinations and preventive care, which can lead to outbreaks of preventable diseases. Taxpayers  end up footing the bill for public health campaigns, disease control efforts, and emergency healthcare interventions during these outbreaks. Community Health Declines : A sicker population puts more strain on public health resources, requiring more public health spending, which comes from local, state, and federal taxpayer funds. Increased Medical Debt Burden on the Economy Economic Instability for Families:  When families accumulate medical debt, they have less money to spend in the local economy. This reduces consumer spending and harms businesses, leading to lower tax revenue from sales taxes. Long-Term Poverty and Dependence on Government Support:  As more families fall into long-term poverty due to medical debt, they become dependent on government assistance programs. Taxpayers  must contribute more to welfare programs, public housing, and food assistance. Loss of Workforce Productivity and Tax Revenue Reduced Workforce Participation:  As people become sicker without access to healthcare, they are less able to work, leading to a reduction in workforce productivity. Lower Tax Revenues:  When fewer people are able to work due to poor health or job loss, there’s a drop in income tax revenues. This means fewer funds are available for important public services, which can lead to higher taxes for everyone else to cover the shortfall. Losing Medicaid doesn’t just hurt the people directly affected—it shifts the burden onto taxpayers  in many ways. The costs of emergency healthcare, public services, criminal justice, welfare programs, and economic downturns all end up being paid for by you , the taxpayer. By ensuring that people maintain access to Medicaid, we can prevent these problems from spiraling out of control and costing everyone more in the long run. Here are the best federal websites to report issues related to delays, denial of assistance, or mismanagement by your state: 1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Website: https://tips.oig.hhs.gov/ Purpose: HHS oversees health-related federal programs like Medicaid. If you’re facing issues with healthcare or other support services, you can report concerns directly here. Whistleblower Protection Information: HHS Whistleblower Protection Program 2. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Website: https://tips.oig.hhs.gov/?_gl=1*1t3nyl*_ga*MTg0NjgyNTgyNS4xNzI3Nzg5NTkw*_ga_W5DCJS81Y5*MTcyNzc5MDA5Ny4xLjEuMTcyNzc5MDY5NS4wLjAuMA Purpose: CMS oversees the Medicaid program and can be contacted if you're having trouble receiving Medicaid-related services. Complaint Submission: CMS Contact Form 3. Office of the Inspector General (OIG) – U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Website: https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/report-fraud/ Purpose: The OIG investigates waste, fraud, and abuse in HHS programs, including Medicaid and state-administered programs. You can report any suspected state-level mismanagement of federal funds here. Report Fraud or Abuse: OIG Hotline 4. U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Website: https://gao.gov/about/what-gao-does/fraud Purpose: GAO audits and investigates how taxpayer dollars are being spent, including state-level programs funded by federal money. You can report concerns related to mismanagement of federal funds here. Report Fraud, Waste, or Abuse: GAO FraudNet 5. U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) – Civil Rights Division Website: https://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ Purpose: If you believe you’re facing discrimination, such as being denied services because of your race, disability, or other protected categories, you can report it to the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division. Submit a Complaint: DOJ Civil Rights Online Complaint Form 6. THE WHITE HOUSE https://whitehouse.gov/contact/ REPORT MEDICAID PROBLEMS, TROUBLE GETTING MEDICAID HELP, HOW TO REPORT BAD HEALTHCARE, WHERE TO COMPLAIN ABOUT GOVERNMENT HELP, REPORT UNFAIR TREATMENT FOR MEDICAID, HELP WITH MEDICAID DELAYS, HOW TO REPORT MEDICAID FRAUD, REPORT PROBLEMS WITH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, HOW TO COMPLAIN ABOUT MEDICAID DENIAL, WHO TO CONTACT FOR HEALTHCARE ISSUES, REPORT UNFAIR MEDICAID SERVICES, WHERE TO REPORT MEDICAID ABUSE, MEDICAID SERVICE COMPLAINTS, REPORT GOVERNMENT HELP ISSUES INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON MEDICAID, PROBLEMAS PARA OBTENER AYUDA DE MEDICAID, CÓMO INFORMAR SOBRE MAL SERVICIO MÉDICO, DÓNDE QUEJARSE SOBRE AYUDA GUBERNAMENTAL, INFORMAR TRATO INJUSTO EN MEDICAID, AYUDA CON RETRASOS EN MEDICAID, CÓMO INFORMAR FRAUDE EN MEDICAID, INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON SERVICIOS DE SALUD, CÓMO QUEJARSE POR DENEGACIÓN DE MEDICAID, A QUIÉN CONTACTAR PARA PROBLEMAS MÉDICOS, INFORMAR SERVICIOS INJUSTOS DE MEDICAID, DÓNDE INFORMAR ABUSO EN MEDICAID, QUEJAS SOBRE SERVICIOS DE MEDICAID, INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON LA AYUDA GUBERNAMENTAL A Plea to Connecticut’s Leaders: Unite and Fix This Now To the trusted leaders, representatives, and officials across Connecticut's 169 towns: We stand at a crossroads. The challenges we face as a state—whether in healthcare, infrastructure, education, or systemic inequality—demand immediate, decisive action. These are not problems that can be delayed or passed on to future generations. The time to act is now, and we are depending on you. Our communities are looking to you—those in positions of power and influence—as the only ones capable of driving the changes needed. The trust we have placed in you is not just an honor; it is a responsibility. You are the voices and hands that can deliver the solutions we so desperately need. This is a moment for unity. Regardless of political affiliations, town borders, or differing opinions, we must come together. The people of Connecticut are depending on you to bridge divides  and collaborate  for the greater good. The divisions that once held back progress must be set aside in favor of a shared commitment to a brighter future. We implore you: unite  in your purpose, work across every boundary, and implement immediate solutions. Your leadership, dedication, and vision are what will make the difference. There is no room for inaction or delay. Together, you have the power to fix this—to uplift Connecticut, to strengthen our communities, and to restore faith in our future. The path forward begins now, with your decision to act. We trust in your leadership  and we stand behind you as you take these necessary steps. For the good of all people in Connecticut, for the generations to come— let’s fix this together. Connecticut State Senate: John Fonfara  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 1 Luis Delgado  - Green, District 1 Douglas McCrory  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 2 Kristin Hoffman  - Republican, District 2 Saud Anwar  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 3 Matt Siracusa  - Republican, District 3 MD Rahman  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 4 Stephen King  - Republican, District 4 Derek Slap  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 5 Kyla Zimmermann  - Republican, District 5 Rick Lopes  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 6 Tremell Collins  - Republican, District 6 John Kissel  - Incumbent, Republican, District 7 Cynthia Mangini  - Democratic, District 7 Lisa Seminara  - Incumbent, Republican, District 8 Paul Honig  - Democratic, District 8 Matthew L. Lesser  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 9 Gary Winfield  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 10 Nyrell Moore  - Republican, District 10 Martin Looney  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 11 Steve Orosco  - Republican, District 11 Christine Cohen  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 12 Paul Crisci  - Republican, District 12 Jan Hochadel  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 13 Elain Cariati  - Republican, District 13 James Maroney  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 14 Steven Johnstone  - Republican, District 14 Joan Hartley  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 15 Robert C. Sampson  - Incumbent, Republican, District 16 Christopher Robertson  - Democratic, District 16 Jorge Cabrera  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 17 Heather Somers  - Incumbent, Republican, District 18 Andrew Parrella  - Democratic, District 18 Catherine Osten  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 19 Jason Guidone  - Republican, District 19 Martha Marx  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 20 Shaun Mastroianni  - Republican, District 20 Kevin C. Kelly  - Incumbent, Republican, District 21 Chris Carrena  - Republican, District 22 Sujata Gadkar-Wilcox  - Democratic, District 22 Robert E. Halstead  - Independent, District 22 Herron Gaston  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 23 Brian Banacowski  - Republican, District 23 Julie Kushner  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 24 Michelle Coelho  - Republican, District 24 Bob Duff  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 25 Martin Tagliaferro  - Republican, District 25 Ceci Maher  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 26 Kami Evans  - Republican, District 26 Patricia Miller  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 27 Nicola Tarzia  - Republican, District 27 Tony Hwang  - Incumbent, Republican, District 28 Rob Blanchard  - Democratic, District 28 Mae Flexer  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 29 Chris Reddy  - Republican, District 29 Stephen Harding, Jr.  - Incumbent, Republican, District 30 Justin Potter  - Democratic, District 30 Henri Martin  - Incumbent, Republican, District 31 Eric Berthel  - Incumbent, Republican, District 32 Jeff Desmarais  - Democratic, District 32 Norm Needleman  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 33 Jeff Duigou  - Republican, District 33 Paul Cicarella, Jr.  - Incumbent, Republican, District 34 Brandi Mandato  - Democratic, District 34 David Bedell  - Green, District 34 Jeff Gordon  - Incumbent, Republican, District 35 Merry Garrett  - Democratic, District 35 Ryan Fazio  - Incumbent, Republican, District 36 Nick Simmons  - Democratic, District 36 Connecticut House of Representatives: Matthew Ritter  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 1 Raghib Allie-Brennan  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 2 Bradley Koltz  - Republican, District 2 Minnie Gonzalez  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 3 Julio Concepcion  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 4 Maryam Khan  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 5 James B. Sánchez  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 6 Alyssa Peterson  - Independent, District 6 Joshua Malik Hall  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 7 Tim Ackert  - Incumbent, Republican, District 8 Nancy Hammarstrom  - Democratic, District 8 Jason Rojas  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 9 Henry Genga  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 10 Chris Tierinni  - Republican, District 10 Salema Davis  - Republican, District 11 Patrick Biggins  - Democratic, District 11 Geoff Luxenberg  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 12 Robert Cormier  - Republican, District 12 Joseph Young  - Independent, District 12 Jason Doucette  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 13 Donna Meier  - Republican, District 13 Tom Delnicki  - Incumbent, Republican, District 14 Steven King Jr.  - Democratic, District 14 Marek Kozikowski  - United Community Party, District 14 Bobby Gibson  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 15 Quentin Johnson  - Republican, District 15 Melissa E. Osborne  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 16 Michael Schulitz  - Republican, District 16 Eleni Kavros DeGraw  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 17 Manju Gerber  - Republican, District 17 Jillian Gilchrest  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 18 Tammy Exum  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 19 Kate Farrar  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 20 Mike Demicco  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 21 Johnny Carrier  - Republican, District 21 Francis Rexford Cooley  - Incumbent, Republican, District 22 Rebecca Martinez  - Democratic, District 22 Devin Carney  - Incumbent, Republican, District 23 Jane Wisialowski  - Democratic, District 23 Manny Sanchez  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 24 Alden Russell  - Republican, District 24 Alfred Mayo  - Independent, District 24 Bobby Sanchez  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 25 Jamie Vaughan  - Republican, District 25 Barbara Marino  - Republican, District 26 David DeFronzo  - Democratic, District 26 Gary Turco  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 27 Stephen Ellis  - Independent, District 27 Amy Morrin Bello  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 28 William Davidson  - Republican, District 28 Kerry Szeps Wood  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 29 Ed Charamut  - Republican, District 29 Donna Veach  - Incumbent, Republican, District 30 Jill Barry  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 31 Kevin Nursick  - Republican, District 31 Christie Carpino  - Incumbent, Republican, District 32 Brandon Chafee  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 33 Christine Rebstock  - Independent, District 33 Irene Haines  - Incumbent, Republican, District 34 Richard Knotek  - Democratic, District 34 Chris Aniskovich  - Incumbent, Republican, District 35 Cinzia Lettieri  - Democratic, District 35 Kathryn Russell  - Republican, District 36 Renee Muir  - Democratic, District 36 Holly Cheeseman  - Incumbent, Republican, District 37 Nick Menapace  - Democratic, District 37 Kathleen McCarty  - Incumbent, Republican, District 38 Nick Gauthier  - Democratic, District 38 Anthony Nolan  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 39 Beloved Carter  - Republican, District 39 Christine Conley  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 40 Susan Deane-Shinbrot  - Republican, District 40 Aundré Bumgardner  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 41 Kim Healy  - Republican, District 42 Savet Constantine  - Democratic, District 42 Greg Howard  - Incumbent, Republican, District 43 Ty Lamb  - Democratic, District 43 Anne Dauphinais  - Incumbent, Republican, District 44 Samantha Derenthal  - Democratic, District 44 Brian Lanoue  - Incumbent, Republican, District 45 Kayla Thompson  - Democratic, District 45 Derell Wilson  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 46 Nick Casiano  - Republican, District 46 Doug Dubitsky  - Incumbent, Republican, District 47 Aaron Spruance  - Democratic, District 47 Mark DeCaprio  - Incumbent, Republican, District 48 Christopher Rivers  - Democratic, District 48 Lance Lusignan  - Independent, District 48 Susan Johnson  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 49 Pat Boyd  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 50 Chris Stewart  - Republican, District 51 Renee Waldron  - Democratic, District 51 Kurt Vail  - Incumbent, Republican, District 52 Ethan Werstler  - Democratic, District 52 Tammy Nuccio  - Incumbent, Republican, District 53 Ann Bonney  - Democratic, District 53 Gregory Haddad  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 54 Aaron Bowman  - Republican, District 54 Steve Weir  - Incumbent, Republican, District 55 Amanda Veneziano  - Democratic, District 55 Kevin Brown  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 56 Brian Motola  - Republican, District 56 Jaime Foster  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 57 Jennifer Dzen  - Republican, District 57 Robert Hendrickson  - Republican, District 58 John Santanella  - Democratic, District 58 Carol Hall  - Incumbent, Republican, District 59 Rick LeBorious  - Democratic, District 59 Jane Garibay  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 60 Len Walker  - Republican, District 60 Tami Zawistowski  - Incumbent, Republican, District 61 Michael Malloy  - Democratic, District 61 Mark Anderson  - Incumbent, Republican, District 62 Kim Becker  - Democratic, District 62 Jay Case  - Incumbent, Republican, District 63 Maria Horn  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 64 Barbara Breor  - Republican, District 64 Michelle Cook  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 65 Joe Canino  - Republican, District 65 Karen Reddington-Hughes  - Incumbent, Republican, District 66 Sharon Sherman  - Democratic, District 66 William Buckbee  - Incumbent, Republican, District 67 Alexandra Thomas  - Democratic, District 67 Joe Polletta  - Incumbent, Republican, District 68 Jason Buchsbaum  - Republican, District 69 Ed Edelson  - Democratic, District 69 Seth Bronko  - Incumbent, Republican, District 70 Jeff Litke  - Democratic, District 70 William Pizzuto  - Incumbent, Republican, District 71 Larry Butler  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 72 Ronald Napoli Jr.  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 73 Abigail Diaz Pizarro  - Republican, District 73 Michael DiGiovancarlo  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 74 Geraldo Reyes  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 75 John Piscopo  - Incumbent, Republican, District 76 Stephen Simonin  - Democratic, District 76 Cara Pavalock-D'Amato  - Incumbent, Republican, District 77 Mary Rydingsward  - Working Families Party, District 77 Joe Hoxha  - Incumbent, Republican, District 78 Mary Fortier  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 79 David Schrager  - Republican, District 79 Gale Mastrofrancesco  - Incumbent, Republican, District 80 Christopher Poulos  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 81 James Morelli Jr.  - Republican, District 81 Michael Quinn  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 82 Lamar Terrell  - Republican, District 82 Jonathan Fazzino  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 83 Joseph Vollano  - Republican, District 83 Hilda Santiago  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 84 Mary Mushinsky  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 85 Jerry Farrell  - Republican, District 85 Vincent Candelora  - Incumbent, Republican, District 86 Dave Yaccarino Sr.  - Incumbent, Republican, District 87 Kieran Ahern  - Democratic, District 87 Joshua Elliott  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 88 Lezlye Zupkus  - Incumbent, Republican, District 89 Craig Fishbein  - Incumbent, Republican, District 90 Rebecca Hyland  - Democratic, District 90 Laurie Sweet  - Democratic, District 91 Patricia Dillon  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 92 Morris Sumpter  - Republican, District 92 Toni Walker  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 93 Steven Winter  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 94 Juan Candelaria  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 95 Roland J. Lemar  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 96 Alphonse Paolillo  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 97 Moira Rader  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 98 Joseph Zullo  - Incumbent, Republican, District 99 Kai Juanna Belton  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 100 Nigel Macon-Wilson  - Republican, District 100 John-Michael Parker  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 101 Lisa Deane  - Republican, District 101 Robin Comey  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 102 Ray Ingraham  - Republican, District 102 Liz Linehan  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 103 Kara Rochelle  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 104 David Cassetti  - Republican, District 104 Nicole Klarides-Ditria  - Incumbent, Republican, District 105 Mitch Bolinsky  - Incumbent, Republican, District 106 Michelle Embree Ku  - Democratic, District 106 Marty Foncello  - Incumbent, Republican, District 107 Aaron Zimmer  - Democratic, District 107 Pat Callahan  - Incumbent, Republican, District 108 Anne Weisberg  - Democratic, District 108 Farley Santos  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 109 Brenda Santopolo Hefferon  - Republican, District 109 Bob Godfrey  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 110 Austin Monteiro  - Republican, District 110 Aimee Berger-Girvalo  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 111 Colette Kabasakalian  - Republican, District 111 Tony Scott  - Incumbent, Republican, District 112 Beth Cliff  - Democratic, District 112 Jason Perillo  - Incumbent, Republican, District 113 Mary Welander  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 114 William Heffernan III  - Democratic, District 115 Silvana Apicella  - Republican, District 115 Treneé McGee  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 116 Raymond Collins III  - Republican, District 117 MJ Shannon  - Democratic, District 117 Frank Smith  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 118 Mark Macchio  - Republican, District 118 Kathy Kennedy  - Incumbent, Republican, District 119 Etan Hirsch  - Democratic, District 119 Laura Dancho  - Incumbent, Republican, District 120 Kaitlyn Shake  - Democratic, District 120 Joe Gresko  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 121 Rafael Irizarry  - Republican, District 121 Ben McGorty  - Incumbent, Republican, District 122 Dorothy Lerner  - Democratic, District 122 David Rutigliano  - Incumbent, Republican, District 123 Tom Tesoro  - Democratic, District 123 Andre Baker  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 124 Yoshiyahu Yisrael  - Republican, District 124 Tom O'Dea  - Incumbent, Republican, District 125 Jason Bennett  - Democratic, District 125 Fred Gee Jr.  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 126 David Herz  - Republican, District 126 Marcus Brown  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 127 Christopher Rosario  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 128 Ramona Marquez  - Republican, District 128 Angel Gonzalez  - Independent, District 128 Steven Stafstrom  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 129 Francis Kalangala  - Republican, District 129 Antonio Felipe  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 130 Terry Sullivan  - Republican, District 130 Arnold Jensen  - Republican, District 131 Ellen Fox  - Democratic, District 131 Jennifer Leeper  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 132 Alexis Harrison  - Republican, District 132 Cristin Vahey  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 133 Chris Verras  - Republican, District 133 Sarah Keitt  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 134 Melissa Longo  - Republican, District 134 Anne Hughes  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 135 Christopher Peritore  - Republican, District 135 Jonathan Steinberg  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 136 John Bolton  - Republican, District 136 Kadeem Roberts  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 137 Pietro Rotondo  - Republican, District 137 Rachel Chaleski  - Incumbent, Republican, District 138 Kenneth Gucker  - Democratic, District 138 Kevin Ryan  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 139 Mark Adams  - Republican, District 139 Travis Simms  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 140 Enrique Santiago  - Republican, District 140 Carleton Giles  - Democratic, District 140 (Lost in Primary) Tracy Marra  - Incumbent, Republican, District 141 Sheila Quinn  - Democratic, District 141 Lucy Dathan  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 142 Tricia Massucco  - Republican, District 142 (Withdrew) Dominique Johnson  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 143 Peter Bang  - Republican, District 143 Hubert Delany  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 144 Layne Rodney  - Republican, District 144 Corey Paris  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 145 Fritz Blau  - Republican, District 145 Jim Malerba  - Republican, District 146 Eilish Collins Main  - Democratic, District 146 Matt Blumenthal  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 147 Rudy Settimi  - Republican, District 147 Olga Anastos  - Republican, District 148 Jonathan Jacobson  - Democratic, District 148 Anabel Figueroa  - Democratic, District 148 (Lost in Primary) Rachel Khanna  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 149 Tina Courpas  - Republican, District 149 Steve Meskers  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 150 Paul Cappiali  - Republican, District 150 Hector Arzeno  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 151 Tod Laudonia  - Republican, District 151 Steve Meskers  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 150 Paul Cappiali  - Republican, District 150 Hector Arzeno  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 151 Tod Laudonia  - Republican, District 151 Matt Blumenthal  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 147 Rudy Settimi  - Republican, District 147 Olga Anastos  - Republican, District 148 Jonathan Jacobson  - Democratic, District 148 Anabel Figueroa  - Democratic, District 148 (Lost in Primary) Rachel Khanna  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 149 Tina Courpas  - Republican, District 149 Corey Paris  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 145 Fritz Blau  - Republican, District 145 Hubert Delany  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 144 Layne Rodney  - Republican, District 144 Peter Bang  - Republican, District 143 Dominique Johnson  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 143 Tricia Massucco  - Republican, District 142 (Withdrew) Lucy Dathan  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 142 Sheila Quinn  - Democratic, District 141 Tracy Marra  - Incumbent, Republican, District 141 Carleton Giles  - Democratic, District 140 (Lost in Primary) Enrique Santiago  - Republican, District 140 Travis Simms  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 140 Mark Adams  - Republican, District 139 Kevin Ryan  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 139 Kenneth Gucker  - Democratic, District 138 Rachel Chaleski  - Incumbent, Republican, District 138 Pietro Rotondo  - Republican, District 137 Kadeem Roberts  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 137 John-Michael Parker  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 101 Lisa Deane  - Republican, District 101 Robin Comey  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 102 Ray Ingraham  - Republican, District 102 Liz Linehan  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 103 Kara Rochelle  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 104 David Cassetti  - Republican, District 104 Nicole Klarides-Ditria  - Incumbent, Republican, District 105 Mitch Bolinsky  - Incumbent, Republican, District 106 Michelle Embree Ku  - Democratic, District 106 Marty Foncello  - Incumbent, Republican, District 107 Aaron Zimmer  - Democratic, District 107 Pat Callahan  - Incumbent, Republican, District 108 Anne Weisberg  - Democratic, District 108 Farley Santos  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 109 Brenda Santopolo Hefferon  - Republican, District 109 Bob Godfrey  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 110 Austin Monteiro  - Republican, District 110 Aimee Berger-Girvalo  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 111 Colette Kabasakalian  - Republican, District 111 Tony Scott  - Incumbent, Republican, District 112 Beth Cliff  - Democratic, District 112 Jason Perillo  - Incumbent, Republican, District 113 Mary Welander  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 114 William Heffernan III  - Democratic, District 115 Silvana Apicella  - Republican, District 115 Treneé McGee  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 116 Raymond Collins III  - Republican, District 117 MJ Shannon  - Democratic, District 117 Frank Smith  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 118 Mark Macchio  - Republican, District 118 Kathy Kennedy  - Incumbent, Republican, District 119 Etan Hirsch  - Democratic, District 119 Laura Dancho  - Incumbent, Republican, District 120 Kaitlyn Shake  - Democratic, District 120 Joe Gresko  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 121 Rafael Irizarry  - Republican, District 121 Ben McGorty  - Incumbent, Republican, District 122 Dorothy Lerner  - Democratic, District 122 David Rutigliano  - Incumbent, Republican, District 123 Tom Tesoro  - Democratic, District 123 Andre Baker  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 124 Yoshiyahu Yisrael  - Republican, District 124 Joe Biden  – President of the United States The president holds the highest office and has significant executive power, including signing legislation, issuing executive orders, and shaping both domestic and foreign policy. Kamala Harris  – Vice President of the United States The vice president serves as the president of the Senate and has the power to cast tie-breaking votes in the Senate. Antony Blinken  – Secretary of State As the nation's top diplomat, Blinken influences U.S. foreign policy and global relations. Janet Yellen  – Secretary of the Treasury Yellen leads the Treasury Department, overseeing the U.S. economy, including financial regulation, federal spending, and monetary policy. Merrick Garland  – Attorney General Garland heads the U.S. Department of Justice and plays a crucial role in enforcing federal laws, including civil rights and criminal law. Lloyd Austin  – Secretary of Defense Austin oversees the U.S. military and is responsible for national defense policies and military operations worldwide. Xavier Becerra  – Secretary of Health and Human Services Becerra directs federal health policies and oversees key health-related agencies, including Medicare and Medicaid. Alejandro Mayorkas  – Secretary of Homeland Security Mayorkas leads efforts to safeguard the U.S. from internal and external threats, including cybersecurity, border security, and disaster response. Jerome Powell  – Chairman of the Federal Reserve Powell influences U.S. monetary policy, including interest rates and economic stability, through his leadership at the Federal Reserve. Chuck Schumer  – Senate Majority Leader Schumer sets the legislative agenda in the Senate and plays a key role in guiding bills to passage. Mitch McConnell  – Senate Minority Leader As the leader of the minority party in the Senate, McConnell influences legislative strategy and opposition. Kevin McCarthy  – Speaker of the House of Representatives The Speaker is the presiding officer of the House and influences which bills come to the floor for a vote. Hakeem Jeffries  – House Minority Leader Jeffries leads the Democratic caucus in the House and works to shape legislative priorities for his party. Nancy Pelosi  – Former Speaker of the House Although no longer Speaker, Pelosi continues to wield significant influence in the House as a senior Democratic leader. Ron Klain  – White House Chief of Staff As the president’s top advisor, Klain plays a crucial role in shaping policy and managing the executive branch. Pete Buttigieg  – Secretary of Transportation Buttigieg oversees national transportation policy, infrastructure projects, and initiatives related to sustainability and innovation. Gina Raimondo  – Secretary of Commerce Raimondo plays a key role in promoting economic growth, job creation, and regulating commerce and trade. Rochelle Walensky  – Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Walensky leads public health efforts, including managing responses to health crises like the COVID-19 pandemic. John Roberts  – Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court Roberts leads the judiciary and presides over major cases that can shape U.S. laws for generations. Lina Khan  – Chair of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Khan has significant influence over antitrust enforcement, consumer protection, and regulating large tech companies. Andover, Ansonia, Ashford, Avon, Barkhamsted, Beacon Falls, Berlin, Bethany, Bethel, Bethlehem, Bloomfield, Bolton, Bozrah, Branford, Bridgeport, Bridgewater, Bristol, Brookfield, Brooklyn, Burlington, Canaan, Canterbury, Canton, Chaplin, Cheshire, Chester, Clinton, Colchester, Colebrook, Columbia, Cornwall, Coventry, Cromwell, Danbury, Darien, Deep River, Derby, Durham, Eastford, East Granby, East Haddam, East Hampton, East Hartford, East Haven, East Lyme, Easton, East Windsor, Ellington, Enfield, Essex, Fairfield, Farmington, Franklin, Glastonbury, Goshen, Granby, Greenwich, Griswold, Groton, Guilford, Haddam, Hamden, Hampton, Hartford, Hartland, Harwinton, Hebron, Kent, Killingly, Killingworth, Lebanon, Ledyard, Lisbon, Litchfield, Lyme, Madison, Manchester, Mansfield, Marlborough, Meriden, Middlebury, Middlefield, Middletown, Milford, Monroe, Montville, Morris, Naugatuck, New Britain, New Canaan, New Fairfield, New Hartford, New Haven, Newington, New London, New Milford, Newtown, Norfolk, North Branford, North Canaan, North Haven, North Stonington, Norwalk, Norwich, Old Lyme, Old Saybrook, Orange, Oxford, Plainfield, Plainville, Plymouth, Pomfret, Portland, Preston, Prospect, Putnam, Redding, Ridgefield, Rocky Hill, Roxbury, Salem, Salisbury, Scotland, Seymour, Sharon, Shelton, Sherman, Simsbury, Somers, Southbury, Southington, South Windsor, Sprague, Stafford, Stamford, Sterling, Stonington, Stratford, Suffield, Thomaston, Thompson, Tolland, Torrington, Trumbull, Union, Vernon, Voluntown, Wallingford, Warren, Washington, Waterbury, Waterford, Watertown, Westbrook, West Hartford, West Haven, Weston, Westport, Wethersfield, Willington, Wilton, Winchester, Windham, Windsor, Windsor Locks, Wolcott, Woodbridge, Woodbury, Woodstock. Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming.

DB.42.131.Inf. Connecticut General Assembly Appropriations Committee Link What You Can Do: The Time for Solutions is Now Unfortunately, these problems within Connecticut’s Department of Social Services (DSS) and the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program have been acknowledged for years, yet little has changed. The time for acknowledgment is over—the time for real solutions is now. If we want to see actual improvements, we need to raise these issues to a higher level. One powerful way to do this is to report these ongoing failures to federal agencies that oversee healthcare, civil rights, and government accountability. By submitting concerns to federal agencies, we can ensure that the systemic issues are addressed, and that the state is held accountable for providing timely and adequate services to vulnerable populations. Below is a list of federal agencies where you can report concerns regarding Connecticut’s DSS, including the Medicaid ABI Waiver and other critical programs: At ABI Resources, we are deeply committed to supporting individuals with brain injuries, ensuring that they receive the care and services they deserve. One of the key programs designed to assist these individuals is Connecticut’s Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program. However, the program is currently facing significant challenges, leaving many families in a state of distress. In this post, we will explore the ongoing crisis with the ABI Waiver waitlist, its impact on families, and the pressing need for action. Understanding the Crisis: A 5-Year Wait for Critical Services Connecticut’s Medicaid ABI Waiver Program provides essential services to brain injury survivors, including rehabilitation and home care that support their recovery and daily living. However, families are currently facing prolonged delays in accessing these services. Shockingly, individuals who applied as far back as 2019 are still waiting for care. Despite awareness of the problem, the Department of Social Services (DSS) has struggled to provide clear answers or solutions. Advocates, including State Representative Toni E. Walker, are now demanding urgent action to address this backlog, questioning how the system has allowed such delays to persist for so long. The Human Cost of Delay The consequences of the waitlist crisis are profound. Brain injury survivors rely on timely access to services to maintain their health and independence. Without these supports, their condition often deteriorates, leading to preventable hospitalizations and further health complications. For families, the emotional and financial toll is overwhelming. Many caregivers are forced to leave their jobs to provide full-time care for their loved ones, leading to significant financial strain. Worse still, these families are left in limbo, uncertain about when—or if—they will ever receive the services their loved ones need. The Financial Burden on Taxpayers Beyond the human impact, the mismanagement of the ABI Waiver Program is a financial issue. Without access to preventive care, brain injury survivors are often forced to seek emergency services, which are much more expensive for the state. This inefficient use of resources not only wastes taxpayer dollars but also puts Connecticut at risk of losing federal Medicaid funding due to non-compliance with program requirements. Lack of Leadership and Transparency A major concern raised by advocates and families is the lack of transparency and leadership within the DSS. During a recent legislative hearing, Christine Weston , Director of the Community Options Unit, was unable to provide accurate data on how many individuals remain stuck on the waitlist. To make matters worse, Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves  was notably absent from this hearing, further fueling concerns that leadership is not prioritizing this issue. The absence of clear data and leadership only deepens the crisis. Families need transparency to understand when they can expect services, and the state needs strong leadership to ensure the program is managed effectively. Without these elements, the backlog will continue to grow, and more families will be left without the support they need. The Path Forward: Immediate Action Required The solution to this crisis requires immediate, coordinated action. Acknowledgment of the problem is not enough; we need meaningful reforms to ensure that brain injury survivors receive timely care. There are several key steps that must be taken to resolve the backlog and restore trust in the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program: Accurate Data and Transparency: DSS must provide clear, up-to-date information on the number of individuals on the waitlist and the projected timeline for receiving services. Transparency is essential for families to plan and understand their options. Leadership Accountability: Strong leadership within DSS is critical. The absence of key figures during legislative hearings raises concerns about commitment to the program’s success. Leaders must be actively engaged in addressing the backlog and finding long-term solutions. Timely Access to Services: The most urgent priority is ensuring that individuals who have been waiting since 2019 are granted access to the care they need. This includes rehabilitation, home care, and other services that are essential for maintaining health and quality of life. Federal Oversight and Compliance: Given the ongoing issues with the ABI Waiver Program, federal oversight may be necessary to ensure that taxpayer dollars are being used efficiently and that the state complies with Medicaid regulations. Audits and compliance reviews could provide a roadmap for improving program management and reducing the waitlist. Why This Matters to You At ABI Resources, we are not only advocates for those with brain injuries, but we are also a resource for families navigating complex systems. This crisis affects real people—our neighbors, friends, and loved ones. The delays in the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program are not just numbers on a report; they represent families who are struggling to provide care, survivors who are fighting for their health, and a system that is failing to meet their needs. The need for action is clear. Families deserve answers, and brain injury survivors deserve care. By working together—advocates, policymakers, and community leaders—we can ensure that the ABI Waiver Program is restored to its original purpose: providing timely, life-changing services to those who need them most. How You Can Help If you or a loved one is impacted by the Medicaid ABI Waiver waitlist crisis, or if you simply want to support the cause, there are several ways to get involved: Contact your legislators : Reach out to State Representative Toni E. Walker and other policymakers to express your concerns and advocate for immediate action. Share your story : Personal stories have the power to drive change. If your family has been affected by the ABI Waiver Program delays, consider sharing your experiences with the media or through advocacy organizations. Stay informed : Follow updates on the ABI Waiver Program and related legislative actions. Staying informed will help you understand how to best advocate for change. Contact Information for State Rep. Toni Walker: Legislative Office Building, Room 2702, Hartford, CT 06106-1591 Phone:  800-842-8267 | 860-240-8585 Email:   Toni.Walker@cga.ct.gov At ABI Resources, our mission is to ensure that all brain injury survivors receive the care and support they deserve. We are dedicated to advocating for solutions and reforms that will improve the lives of those affected by this crisis. Together, we can push for the changes that are so desperately needed. ABI Resources  – Supporting brain injury survivors, advocating for justice, and working towards a system that serves everyone. #MedicaidReform #TransparencyNow #ABIWaiver #BrainInjurySupport #FixTheWaitlist #HealthcareAccountability #FederalOversight #DSSConnecticut #LeadershipMatters Federal Agencies to Submit Concerns To: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Purpose:  Oversees Medicaid programs and ensures compliance with federal regulations. Submit a Concern: CMS Contact Form Phone:  1-800-MEDICARE (1-800-633-4227) Mail: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21244 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) - Office for Civil Rights (OCR) Purpose:  Ensures equal access to healthcare and protects civil rights in healthcare settings. Submit a Complaint: OCR Complaint Portal Phone:  1-800-368-1019 Mail: Office for Civil Rights U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 200 Independence Avenue, SW Room 509F, HHH Building Washington, D.C. 20201 U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) - Civil Rights Division Purpose:  Enforces federal statutes prohibiting discrimination in healthcare and social services. Submit a Complaint: DOJ Civil Rights Complaint Form Phone:  1-888-736-5551 Mail: U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Purpose:  Investigates government mismanagement and waste of taxpayer dollars in federal and state programs. Submit a Concern: GAO FraudNet Reporting Phone:  1-800-424-5454 Mail: Government Accountability Office 441 G Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20548 Office of Inspector General (OIG) - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Purpose:  Conducts audits and investigates fraud, waste, and abuse in Medicaid programs. Submit a Complaint: OIG Hotline Form Phone:  1-800-HHS-TIPS (1-800-447-8477) Mail: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General 330 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, D.C. 20201 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) - Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (FHEO) Purpose:  Oversees fair housing laws, which can include issues related to housing assistance for those with disabilities. Submit a Complaint: FHEO Complaint Form Phone:  1-800-669-9777 Mail: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 451 7th Street, SW Washington, D.C. 20410 Why Reporting Matters By reporting the mismanagement of Connecticut’s Medicaid ABI Waiver Program and DSS to these federal agencies, you are helping to ensure that these critical programs are properly funded, managed, and delivered. Your voice can make a difference in the lives of those who have been waiting far too long for care. Federal oversight is essential to holding state agencies accountable and ensuring that the needs of vulnerable populations are met. Take Action Now Each of these agencies has the power to investigate and enforce changes that can ensure DSS programs are run more efficiently and fairly. Please take the time to submit your concerns—whether about long waitlists, lack of services, or failure to comply with federal Medicaid requirements. With enough attention, we can ensure these programs are fixed, not just for the ABI Waiver but for all who depend on DSS services in Connecticut. The time for solutions is now. Your report can help make a lasting impact. What is the Appropriations Committee and Why Does It Matter? Think of the Appropriations Committee as the group of people in Connecticut’s government who decide where the state’s money goes. They look at how much money the state has, and then they decide which programs, like healthcare, education, and other important services, should get funding. For people with brain injuries, one of the key programs they manage is the Medicaid ABI Waiver , which provides crucial services like rehabilitation and home care. This committee, made up of representatives from across the state, reviews the state’s budget and makes sure that services people rely on are properly funded. If they don’t give enough money to a program like the ABI Waiver, people who need care end up waiting months or even years for the services that can change their lives. The decisions made by this committee directly affect real people—families, caregivers, and especially those with disabilities—who depend on state services to survive and improve their quality of life. Osten, Catherine A.  – Co-Chair Walker, Toni E.  – Member Hartley, Joan V.  – Vice Chair Nuccio, Tammy  – Vice Chair Exum, Tammy R.  – Vice Chair Anwar, Saud  – Member McCrory, Douglas  – Member Flexer, Mae  – Member Lesser, Matthew L.  – Member Kushner, Julie  – Member Winfield, Gary A.  – Member Marx, Martha  – Member Somers, Heather S.  – Member Berthel, Eric C.  – Ranking Member Zawistowski, Tami  – Ranking Member Bolinsky, Mitch  – Member Callahan, Patrick E.  – Member Candelaria, Juan R.  – Member Chaleski, Rachel  – Member Currey, Jeff  – Member Dathan, Lucy  – Member DeCaprio, Mark  – Member Delany, Hubert D.  – Member Delnicki, Tom  – Member Dillon, Patricia A.  – Member Felipe, Antonio  – Member Foncello, Martin  – Member Garibay, Jane M.  – Member Gibson, Bobby G.  – Member Gilchrest, Jillian  – Member Gonzalez, Minnie  – Member Gordon, Jeff  – Member Haddad, Gregory  – Member Hall, Joshua M.  – Member Harrison, Cindy  – Member Hoxha, Joe  – Member Johnson, Susan M.  – Member Khanna, Rachel  – Member Kennedy, Kathy  – Member McCarty, Kathleen M.  – Member Nolan, Anthony L.  – Member Porter, Robyn A.  – Member Osborne, Melissa  – Member Reyes, Geraldo C.  – Member Rosario, Christopher  – Member Rutigliano, David  – Member Ryan, Kevin  – Member Sanchez, Emmanuel  – Member Slap, Derek  – Member Simms, Travis  – Member Tercyak, Peter A.  – Member Paris, Corey P.  – Member Connecticut’s Medicaid ABI Waiver Program Crisis: A Comprehensive Breakdown of the Waitlist, Its Impact on Families, and Taxpayers Republican Senator Lisa Seminara has raised serious concerns about the ongoing Medicaid ABI Waiver Program waitlist crisis, with individuals waiting for services as far back as 2019. Despite years of acknowledging this issue, no real solutions have been provided. The absence of DSS Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves from a recent critical legislative hearing has only intensified concerns about the leadership and lack of accountability within the Department of Social Services (DSS). During the hearing, Christine Weston, Director of the Community Options Unit (COU), was unable to provide accurate data regarding how many individuals are stuck on the waitlist. This points to deeper issues within DSS and raises alarms about mismanagement. Simply acknowledging the problem without implementing solutions has left families in a state of limbo, while those in power, such as Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves, have failed to address the core of the crisis. For years, Connecticut’s Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program  has provided critical services to individuals living with brain injuries. These services include rehabilitation, home care, and daily support aimed at improving the quality of life for survivors. Unfortunately, the program is now facing a growing crisis , with some individuals waiting since 2019  for care. Despite acknowledgment of the issue by Governor Ned Lamont , the Department of Social Services (DSS) , and key officials like Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves , no substantial solutions have been implemented. As the waitlist grows, so do the consequences for families  and taxpayers . The ABI Waiver Program: A Lifeline Being Denied The ABI Waiver Program is designed to allow individuals with acquired brain injuries to live more independently in their communities. It covers essential services such as: Rehabilitation therapy In-home care Behavioral support services Respite care for caregivers Case management However, the growing waitlist, which has left individuals waiting for over five years , is preventing brain injury survivors from accessing the care they need. For these individuals and their families, this isn’t just a delay—it’s a life-altering obstacle  to recovery. How This Crisis Impacts Individuals and Families For families of brain injury survivors, the long wait times  for Medicaid ABI Waiver services have a devastating impact on every aspect of their lives: Deteriorating Health : Many survivors are living with deteriorating physical and mental health due to the delay  in accessing appropriate care. Without timely rehabilitation  and support services , their conditions often worsen, leading to more frequent hospitalizations and emergency room visits. These are costly and ineffective solutions compared to the long-term care that Medicaid provides. Emotional Strain : The emotional toll of waiting for years for care is overwhelming. Uncertainty  about whether their loved one will ever receive the care they need adds significant mental stress to families. The failure of DSS to provide clear information about their position on the waitlist only deepens the feeling of being forgotten  by the system. Financial Burden on Caregivers : In the absence of Medicaid services, family members often become full-time caregivers , leading to financial strain. Many caregivers must leave their jobs to provide care, resulting in a loss of household income. This further destabilizes families, leaving them financially vulnerable while they wait indefinitely for services. How This Crisis Impacts Taxpayers While the direct impact on families is severe, taxpayers also bear the consequences of the mismanagement  of the ABI Waiver Program: Wasted Taxpayer Dollars : The delay in providing essential services through the ABI Waiver forces individuals to rely on emergency services , which are far more expensive than the long-term care they need. Taxpayer dollars are being used inefficiently, with funds directed toward short-term, crisis care  instead of preventive, cost-effective services that the waiver provides. Federal Funding at Risk : The ongoing mismanagement of the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program could jeopardize Connecticut’s compliance with federal Medicaid regulations . This risks a loss of federal funding , which would further strain the state budget and reduce available services for those in need. Increased Healthcare Costs : By delaying access to necessary care, the state is creating a system where individuals' health conditions worsen over time, leading to higher healthcare costs. Preventive care  is far more affordable than treating preventable complications that arise from lack of timely care. Taxpayers end up shouldering the costs of this inefficiency. Acknowledgment Isn’t Enough: The Need for Action For years, the ABI Waiver Program waitlist  has been acknowledged, but acknowledgment alone is insufficient. Simply recognizing the problem doesn’t resolve the issue, and families are still waiting in limbo. Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves  has not actively participated in critical discussions, raising concerns about the lack of leadership  in fixing the problem. The absence of leadership and transparency has caused a growing crisis, leaving families and taxpayers alike to suffer the consequences. A Call for Reform: Immediate Actions Required To address the ABI Waiver waitlist crisis , several reforms must be prioritized: Transparency in Waitlist Management : DSS must provide clear, accurate data  about the waitlist and regularly update families on their status. Transparency is critical to rebuilding trust between families and the agency. Reduction of Wait Times : The state must increase staffing and streamline administrative processes to ensure individuals don’t have to wait years for services. Addressing these bottlenecks  will be key to clearing the backlog. Federal Audits : Independent federal audits  are needed to ensure the program is in compliance with Medicaid regulations  and that funds are being used effectively. Audits will help identify where the system is failing and bring accountability to the program. Accountability from Leadership : Leaders such as Governor Ned Lamont  and Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves  must be held accountable for the ongoing mismanagement of the program. Concrete steps are needed to reduce the waitlist and improve service delivery. Whistleblower Protections : Strengthening whistleblower protections  will encourage staff to report instances of mismanagement or inefficiency within DSS without fear of retaliation. This will help identify and resolve issues more quickly. The Time for Action Is Now The Medicaid ABI Waiver Program waitlist crisis  is a failure of leadership, transparency, and compassion. It affects not only the brain injury survivors  who depend on these services but also their families  and Connecticut taxpayers . Real reform is needed, not just acknowledgment of the problem. At ABI Resources , we stand with the families and advocates pushing for immediate solutions . We call on Governor Ned Lamont , Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves , and the federal government  to implement the necessary changes to ensure that brain injury survivors receive the care they deserve. It’s time to ensure that Connecticut’s most vulnerable populations are no longer left behind. The time for action is now. Together, we can fix this as it is so desperately needed. The Medicaid ABI Waiver Waitlist Crisis: A Call for Transparency and Reform In Connecticut, brain injury survivors and their families have faced an ongoing crisis. For more than five years , individuals in desperate need of care have been stuck on a waitlist  for the Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program . This delay in services has far-reaching consequences, including worsening health conditions, emotional and financial strain on families, and a profound lack of accountability within the Department of Social Services (DSS). It is time for immediate reform, transparency, and federal oversight to address these critical issues. The ABI Waiver Program: A Lifeline Being Denied The ABI Waiver Program is designed to provide vital services to individuals with acquired brain injuries, including rehabilitation, home care, and support services that help survivors regain independence and live fulfilling lives. However, many people in need of these services are left on a waitlist for years, unable to access the care they desperately require. For these individuals, the wait is not just a delay—it is a life-altering obstacle to recovery. Prolonged Wait Times and Systemic Mismanagement Despite the urgency, many individuals have been waiting over five years  for critical services. Families and caregivers are left in limbo, without clear information about when—or if—their loved ones will receive the help they need. This prolonged wait is a sign of systemic mismanagement  within the DSS. During a recent legislative exchange, Christine Weston , Director of the Community Options Unit (COU) within DSS, could not provide the number of individuals on the waitlist, raising serious concerns  about the oversight and integrity of the program. Lack of Transparency The absence of clear communication is one of the most frustrating aspects for families on the waitlist. Many are not even aware of their position on the list, and the DSS has not been transparent in providing this information. This lack of accountability raises concerns that there may be efforts to discourage access  to Medicaid services, particularly for the most vulnerable populations. Senator Lisa Seminara , a Republican representing Connecticut’s 8th Senate District, has been a vocal advocate for addressing the mismanagement  of the ABI Waiver Program. During the recent hearing, Governor Ned Lamont’s administration , along with Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves  (who was notably absent from the hearing), faced scrutiny for failing to provide answers and implement necessary reforms. The Burden on Families For families waiting for services, the emotional, physical, and financial toll is immense. Without the necessary Medicaid services, family members often become full-time caregivers, leading to burnout and financial strain. Many caregivers are forced to leave their jobs to provide care, which further exacerbates financial instability. The mental exhaustion caused by uncertainty and the responsibility of caregiving creates a cycle of stress that affects entire households. Deteriorating Health for Those on the Waitlist For individuals with brain injuries, the delays in accessing care can be detrimental to their health. Without timely intervention, many patients see their conditions worsen, leading to more hospital visits and increased reliance on emergency care —a costly and inefficient alternative to long-term, proactive treatment. These emergency treatments often fail to address the underlying health issues, creating a revolving door of healthcare that does little to improve the quality of life for brain injury survivors. The Taxpayer Impact The financial inefficiencies of the ABI Waiver Program are not just a burden on families—they also affect taxpayers . Delays in services lead to more expensive emergency interventions, which are covered by Medicaid. Had these individuals received timely and appropriate care, these costly emergency services could have been avoided. This represents a misallocation of taxpayer dollars  and underscores the need for improved program management and transparency. The Risk of Losing Federal Funding The delays and mismanagement  of the ABI Waiver Program could have even broader consequences for Connecticut. Non-compliance with federal Medicaid regulations could result in the loss of federal funding , which would further strain the state’s budget and reduce services for those most in need. This would be a devastating blow to the program and the vulnerable populations it is supposed to serve. Immediate Solutions: A Call for Federal and State-Level Reform The current state of the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program is untenable. Families, advocates, and policymakers must come together to demand immediate federal oversight  and state-level reform. This situation demands action on several fronts: Transparency in Waitlist Management : DSS must provide families with clear and accurate information about their position on the waitlist. Full transparency will restore trust and allow families to plan for the future. Reduction of Wait Times : The state must address staff shortages, funding gaps, and procedural inefficiencies within the DSS that contribute to long delays in service delivery. Federal Audits : Independent federal audits are necessary to ensure compliance with Medicaid regulations and to identify areas of financial mismanagement. These audits will ensure that taxpayer dollars are being used efficiently and that services are being provided to those who need them most. Whistleblower Protections : Strengthening protections for whistleblowers within DSS will encourage more individuals to come forward with information about potential mismanagement or corruption without fear of retaliation. Accountability from Leadership : Governor Ned Lamont  and Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves  must ensure that the leadership within DSS is committed to supporting vulnerable populations and is held accountable for the program's performance. A Call for Advocacy and Action The Medicaid ABI Waiver Program is a lifeline for individuals with brain injuries, but the current mismanagement of the waitlist and services is failing those who need it most. Immediate reforms are necessary to restore trust, improve efficiency, and provide life-saving services to Connecticut’s most vulnerable populations. ABI Resources  stands with families, caregivers, and advocates in demanding the transparency, accountability, and action needed to fix this broken system. It’s time to stand together and push for the reforms that Connecticut’s brain injury survivors deserve. Outrage Now, Injustice Exposed, Public Outrage, Demand Accountability, Broken System, Fix This Now, Enough Is Enough, Unacceptable, We Deserve Better, No More Delays, Action Needed Now, Transparency Now, Justice Denied, System Failing, Urgent Reform, Accountability Now, Mismanagement Exposed, Voices Silenced, Act Now For Change, Fed Up With Injustice Hidden Medicaid Agency Provider List: Connecticut Department of Social Services / CT DSS COU CGA Exposing Medicaid Secrets: How Connecticut's Violations Hurt Taxpayers & Vulnerable Populations" CGA Connecticut DSS Faces Scrutiny Over Concealed Provider List in Medicaid ABI Waiver Program In a recent legislative exchange, Connecticut State Representative Kathleen McCarty questioned Christine Weston, Director of the Community Options Unit (COU) within the Connecticut Department of Social Services (DSS), about the availability of the Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program Agency Provider List. The list is not publicly accessible and COU would need to consult with DSS legal counsel—has triggered concerns about transparency and potential violations of federal Medicaid regulations. The concealment of the Provider List directly undermines federal requirements for transparency, consumer choice, and public accountability in Medicaid-funded programs. Under the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(23)), Medicaid beneficiaries are guaranteed the right to choose from any qualified provider participating in the program. By withholding the list of providers, DSS is effectively limiting beneficiaries' ability to make informed choices about their care, a clear violation of this federal statute. More than a mere bureaucratic oversight, this lack of transparency obstructs the fundamental rights of Medicaid recipients, particularly vulnerable populations like brain injury survivors who depend on specialized care. These individuals and their families rely on accessible information to choose the most appropriate care providers based on quality, expertise, and geographic location. The absence of this information not only deprives them of their legal rights but also risks funneling beneficiaries toward limited, state-favored providers, potentially compromising the quality of care they receive. This issue with the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program could indicate a systemic problem in Connecticut’s administration of federally funded programs. If the DSS is withholding information in this program, similar practices may be occurring in other state-managed, federally funded programs. With billions of taxpayer dollars flowing through Medicaid, this raises significant concerns about mismanagement, financial oversight, and the state’s broader compliance with federal transparency requirements. Beyond violating Medicaid regulations, this failure to provide access to public information also erodes trust in the integrity of state-run health services. When critical details about provider options are concealed, it creates a veil of secrecy that limits public accountability. Moreover, it raises the specter of conflicts of interest—where specific providers may be favored by state agencies for reasons unrelated to the quality of care or beneficiary needs. Such practices, if left unchecked, can lead to monopolistic conditions where certain agencies dominate the landscape, to the detriment of consumer choice and healthcare quality. Medicaid is designed to serve some of the most vulnerable populations in the country, including individuals with disabilities, low-income families, and elderly individuals requiring long-term care. The intentional withholding of vital information such as provider lists violates not only federal laws but also the ethical obligation to ensure that these populations have equal access to healthcare services. This situation calls for immediate action from federal oversight agencies, such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), to conduct a thorough audit of Connecticut’s Medicaid program administration. Federal intervention is necessary to ensure that the state complies with transparency regulations and provides Medicaid beneficiaries with the information they are entitled to by law. If these practices are found to extend to other federally funded programs, it could signal widespread non-compliance, mismanagement of federal funds, and a failure to uphold the rights of vulnerable individuals across the state. As the investigation into this issue unfolds, it is critical that the DSS take immediate steps to rectify these transparency failures. The state must make the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program Agency Provider List publicly accessible and ensure that beneficiaries’ rights to choose their providers are fully restored. Anything less would continue to jeopardize the integrity of Connecticut’s Medicaid program and the health and well-being of those it is meant to serve. We’re sharing an important message about systemic issues within Medicaid programs that may be impacting both vulnerable populations and every U.S. taxpayer. These challenges could have nationwide implications, affecting how federal dollars are spent and how services reach those who rely on Medicaid. This is not about assigning blame —it’s about finding solutions that ensure taxpayer dollars are used wisely and that vulnerable individuals get the care they need. By working together, we can help create a more transparent, accountable, and effective Medicaid system that benefits everyone. Key Problems and Solutions: Misuse of Taxpayer Funds Problem: Federal Medicaid funds are being inefficiently used, which can increase costs for taxpayers while reducing the quality of services for vulnerable individuals. Solution: Conduct regular audits of Medicaid spending to ensure that every dollar is used efficiently to support essential services and avoid waste or misallocation. Lack of Transparency Problem: Essential information about Medicaid services—such as provider directories and funding allocations—is not easily accessible to the public. This lack of transparency prevents people from understanding how funds are being used and how care decisions are made. Solution: Ensure greater transparency by making Medicaid-related information, including provider directories and spending reports, publicly accessible. This will allow taxpayers, caregivers, and advocates to see where resources are going and hold the system accountable. Unethical Business Practices Problem: Some providers may be engaging in conflicts of interest or kickback schemes, where services are being recommended for financial gain rather than the needs of individuals. This drives up costs and reduces the quality of care. Solution: Implement strict ethical oversight to ensure that Medicaid services are provided based on the needs of individuals, without conflicts of interest or unnecessary services that increase costs for taxpayers. Discriminatory Business Practices in Medicaid Referrals Problem: Certain providers may be favored in Medicaid referrals, limiting access to care for individuals and creating an unequal playing field for providers. This impacts the freedom of individuals to choose the care that best fits their needs. Solution: Establish a fair and transparent referral system that treats all providers equally and ensures that individuals have access to a wide range of care options, promoting both choice and competition. Impact on Disabled Workers Problem: Disabled workers involved in the Medicaid system are not always being paid fairly, which violates federal labor laws and creates further economic challenges for an already vulnerable group. Solution: Ensure compliance with federal labor laws by guaranteeing that all disabled workers are paid fairly and treated with respect, helping create a more supportive and ethical Medicaid system. Limited Consumer Choice Problem: Some individuals are limited in their ability to choose services or housing arrangements, being tied to specific providers through restrictive agreements. This reduces their freedom to select the care and services that best suit their needs. Solution: Expand consumer choice by revising policies that restrict beneficiaries to certain providers or housing options, allowing individuals more freedom to select the services and care arrangements that work best for them. FOIA Violations and Stonewalling Problem: Public records requests related to Medicaid services and spending are being blocked or delayed, limiting public oversight and reducing accountability within the system. Solution: Enforce full compliance with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to ensure that the public has access to important Medicaid information. This will allow for greater transparency and ensure that taxpayer dollars are being used properly. Unauthorized Care Management Services Problem: Some individuals are receiving services that have not been authorized or properly managed, leading to confusion and potential misuse of Medicaid funds. Solution: Ensure proper oversight and clear guidelines for care management services, preventing unauthorized services and ensuring that individuals receive only the care that is necessary and beneficial to them. Unfair Rental Agreements Linked to Medicaid Services Problem: Some beneficiaries are tied to specific housing arrangements through rental agreements that are linked to their Medicaid service providers, reducing their ability to change providers or housing without risking their care. Solution: Revise rental agreements and housing policies to ensure greater consumer freedom and allow individuals to change providers or housing arrangements without being penalized or risking their care. How These Issues Affect All of Us: These problems extend beyond any one state—they have national implications for how Medicaid funds are spent and how care is provided. Every taxpayer contributes to Medicaid, and it’s essential that these funds are used efficiently and transparently. At the same time, vulnerable populations—including individuals with disabilities and those relying on Medicaid services—deserve a system that works for them. By addressing these systemic challenges, we can ensure that taxpayer dollars are used wisely and that those who need support get access to the care and services they deserve. What You Can Do: Share this post to raise awareness and encourage others to understand how these issues might be affecting them and their communities. Support greater transparency and ethical oversight in Medicaid services by engaging with policymakers. Advocate for positive reform to ensure taxpayer dollars are used effectively and that vulnerable individuals get the care they need. Together, we can help create a Medicaid system that benefits everyone—by ensuring accountability, promoting transparency, and protecting taxpayer resources while supporting those who rely on these essential services. What Happens When You Lose Medicaid Insurance? Medicaid is essential for many families. If it’s taken away or you lose it, it can lead to serious problems for you, your family, and even your entire community. Here’s what happens: You Can’t See the Doctor When You Need To You Delay Care : You might put off going to the doctor because you can’t afford it. Small problems can turn into big ones. No More Preventive Check-ups : Without Medicaid, you might skip regular check-ups that help catch problems early. You Can’t Afford Medications Stopping Medication : People stop taking important medications (for conditions like diabetes, mental health issues, or high blood pressure) because they can’t pay for them. Getting Worse : Without those meds, your health can get worse quickly, leading to hospital visits or even life-threatening conditions. Mental Health Suffers Stopping Therapy : Mental health services, like therapy or counseling, can get too expensive, meaning people can no longer get help for anxiety, depression, or other issues. Emotional Stress : Without professional help, mental health issues can become overwhelming, leading to stress, breakdowns, and even suicidal thoughts. Risk of Homelessness Increases Losing Your Job : If your health gets worse, you may not be able to work, leading to job loss and financial problems. Can’t Pay for Housing : Medical bills pile up, and without income, you might not be able to pay rent or the mortgage, which can lead to losing your home. Families Can Be Affected : It’s not just individuals who suffer—entire families can end up in shelters or homeless because of high medical costs. Emergency Rooms Get Overcrowded Using ER as a Doctor’s Office : People without insurance often wait until they are very sick and then go to the ER, which is much more expensive than regular care. More Stress on Hospitals : Hospitals can get overwhelmed, and this affects everyone. It means longer wait times and less attention for those who really need emergency care. Crime Can Increase Desperation Leads to Survival Crimes : When people are financially desperate due to health issues, some may turn to petty crime just to survive. Substance Abuse : Losing mental health care can lead to drug or alcohol use to cope, and this often leads to trouble with the law. Homelessness and Crime Connection : When people lose their homes and can’t get help, they may be more likely to get involved in crime just to meet basic needs. Your Community Suffers Spread of Illness : Without insurance, people may not get vaccinated or treated for contagious diseases, which can make the entire community sick. Public Services Overloaded : Charities, shelters, and food banks may get overwhelmed by more people needing help, making it harder to serve everyone. Fewer Resources for Everyone : When hospitals, clinics, and public health services are stretched too thin, everyone gets worse care. Children Are Affected Missed Vaccines and Checkups : Kids without Medicaid miss important vaccines and doctor visits, putting their health and development at risk. Struggling in School : Without proper healthcare, children may fall behind in school because of untreated health problems or stress at home due to financial instability. Long-Term Poverty Medical Debt : Without Medicaid, medical bills pile up, and families can end up with huge debt, making it hard to afford basic needs like food and housing. Generational Impact : Families in debt or struggling with health issues have a harder time getting out of poverty, and this can affect future generations. Losing Medicaid isn’t just about losing insurance; it’s about losing stability in your life. Without access to healthcare, everything starts to break down—your health, your ability to work, your family’s security, and the community’s well-being. It can even lead to more crime and homelessness as people struggle just to survive. What Can You Do? Stay Informed : Know your options and stay connected to advocacy groups that support for healthcare rights. Ask for Help : Reach out to community health centers, legal aid, and nonprofits that offer support. Get Involved : Support policies that ensure everyone has access to affordable healthcare. When people lose Medicaid insurance, the effects also significantly impact taxpayers  and the overall economy. Here’s a breakdown of how this burden shifts onto taxpayers and why it's important for everyone, even those with insurance, to understand these consequences. Increased Emergency Room Costs (Taxpayer-Funded) ER Becomes the First Stop:  When people without insurance get sick or injured, they often wait until it’s serious and go to the emergency room (ER), which is far more expensive than regular doctor visits. Higher Costs Passed to Taxpayers:  ER visits are one of the most expensive ways to treat medical issues, and when uninsured patients can't pay their bills, the hospital absorbs the costs. These costs are often passed on to taxpayers  through increased funding needs for hospitals and public healthcare programs. Higher Local and State Taxes for Public Services Overloaded Public Health Systems:  Local and state governments are forced to provide more funding for free clinics, public health programs, shelters, and emergency services when there’s an increase in uninsured people. This leads to higher taxes to cover these services. Community Resources Stretched Thin:  When uninsured people need more help from publicly funded services like shelters, food banks, and healthcare clinics, these services require more taxpayer dollars to stay operational. As more people rely on these programs, the costs to taxpayers grow. Higher Insurance Premiums for Everyone Cost-Shifting in Healthcare:  Hospitals often shift the unpaid medical costs of uninsured patients onto private insurers. This drives up the overall cost of healthcare for those who do have insurance. Rising Insurance Premiums:  As healthcare providers raise prices to compensate for uninsured patients, taxpayers  who buy insurance in the private market may see their premiums go up. This makes healthcare more expensive for everyone, even those who already pay for private insurance. Increased Government Spending on Medicaid Expansion and Safety Nets Government Must Step In:  When people lose Medicaid, they still often need some form of public assistance. Governments may have to increase spending on Medicaid expansion, safety net programs, or even adjust the Medicaid qualifications to help more people. This means more public spending, which comes from taxpayer money. Taxpayer-Funded Subsidies:  In some cases, state and federal governments have to provide subsidies for health insurance, and when more people qualify due to losing Medicaid, these costs come from taxpayer funds. Higher Costs for the Criminal Justice System More People in Jail:  As explained earlier, loss of health insurance can lead to an increase in crime, especially as people turn to petty crimes for survival or get involved in substance abuse. This puts more strain on the criminal justice system, which is heavily funded by taxpayer dollars . Mental Health and Substance Abuse in Jail:  Many people end up in jail because they don’t have access to mental health or substance abuse treatment. Once in jail, taxpayers must cover the costs of healthcare, housing, and legal processing for these individuals. It’s far more expensive to treat someone in jail than it is to provide preventive care in the community. Increased Unemployment and Welfare Costs Job Loss Leads to Public Assistance Needs:  Without insurance, people’s health often deteriorates, making it hard for them to work. This can lead to job loss and more people relying on welfare programs like unemployment benefits, food stamps, and housing assistance—all of which are funded by taxpayers . Economic Downturn in Communities:  When many people lose their jobs due to poor health and medical debt, the local economy suffers. This can reduce tax revenue from income and sales taxes, while increasing the demand for public support programs. Public Health Crises Require Taxpayer Funding Spread of Diseases : When people don’t have insurance, they often skip vaccinations and preventive care, which can lead to outbreaks of preventable diseases. Taxpayers  end up footing the bill for public health campaigns, disease control efforts, and emergency healthcare interventions during these outbreaks. Community Health Declines : A sicker population puts more strain on public health resources, requiring more public health spending, which comes from local, state, and federal taxpayer funds. Increased Medical Debt Burden on the Economy Economic Instability for Families:  When families accumulate medical debt, they have less money to spend in the local economy. This reduces consumer spending and harms businesses, leading to lower tax revenue from sales taxes. Long-Term Poverty and Dependence on Government Support:  As more families fall into long-term poverty due to medical debt, they become dependent on government assistance programs. Taxpayers  must contribute more to welfare programs, public housing, and food assistance. Loss of Workforce Productivity and Tax Revenue Reduced Workforce Participation:  As people become sicker without access to healthcare, they are less able to work, leading to a reduction in workforce productivity. Lower Tax Revenues:  When fewer people are able to work due to poor health or job loss, there’s a drop in income tax revenues. This means fewer funds are available for important public services, which can lead to higher taxes for everyone else to cover the shortfall. Losing Medicaid doesn’t just hurt the people directly affected—it shifts the burden onto taxpayers  in many ways. The costs of emergency healthcare, public services, criminal justice, welfare programs, and economic downturns all end up being paid for by you , the taxpayer. By ensuring that people maintain access to Medicaid, we can prevent these problems from spiraling out of control and costing everyone more in the long run. Here are the best federal websites to report issues related to delays, denial of assistance, or mismanagement by your state: 1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Website: https://tips.oig.hhs.gov/ Purpose: HHS oversees health-related federal programs like Medicaid. If you’re facing issues with healthcare or other support services, you can report concerns directly here. Whistleblower Protection Information: HHS Whistleblower Protection Program 2. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Website: https://tips.oig.hhs.gov/?_gl=1*1t3nyl*_ga*MTg0NjgyNTgyNS4xNzI3Nzg5NTkw*_ga_W5DCJS81Y5*MTcyNzc5MDA5Ny4xLjEuMTcyNzc5MDY5NS4wLjAuMA Purpose: CMS oversees the Medicaid program and can be contacted if you're having trouble receiving Medicaid-related services. Complaint Submission: CMS Contact Form 3. Office of the Inspector General (OIG) – U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Website: https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/report-fraud/ Purpose: The OIG investigates waste, fraud, and abuse in HHS programs, including Medicaid and state-administered programs. You can report any suspected state-level mismanagement of federal funds here. Report Fraud or Abuse: OIG Hotline 4. U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Website: https://gao.gov/about/what-gao-does/fraud Purpose: GAO audits and investigates how taxpayer dollars are being spent, including state-level programs funded by federal money. You can report concerns related to mismanagement of federal funds here. Report Fraud, Waste, or Abuse: GAO FraudNet 5. U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) – Civil Rights Division Website: https://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ Purpose: If you believe you’re facing discrimination, such as being denied services because of your race, disability, or other protected categories, you can report it to the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division. Submit a Complaint: DOJ Civil Rights Online Complaint Form 6. THE WHITE HOUSE https://whitehouse.gov/contact/ REPORT MEDICAID PROBLEMS, TROUBLE GETTING MEDICAID HELP, HOW TO REPORT BAD HEALTHCARE, WHERE TO COMPLAIN ABOUT GOVERNMENT HELP, REPORT UNFAIR TREATMENT FOR MEDICAID, HELP WITH MEDICAID DELAYS, HOW TO REPORT MEDICAID FRAUD, REPORT PROBLEMS WITH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, HOW TO COMPLAIN ABOUT MEDICAID DENIAL, WHO TO CONTACT FOR HEALTHCARE ISSUES, REPORT UNFAIR MEDICAID SERVICES, WHERE TO REPORT MEDICAID ABUSE, MEDICAID SERVICE COMPLAINTS, REPORT GOVERNMENT HELP ISSUES INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON MEDICAID, PROBLEMAS PARA OBTENER AYUDA DE MEDICAID, CÓMO INFORMAR SOBRE MAL SERVICIO MÉDICO, DÓNDE QUEJARSE SOBRE AYUDA GUBERNAMENTAL, INFORMAR TRATO INJUSTO EN MEDICAID, AYUDA CON RETRASOS EN MEDICAID, CÓMO INFORMAR FRAUDE EN MEDICAID, INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON SERVICIOS DE SALUD, CÓMO QUEJARSE POR DENEGACIÓN DE MEDICAID, A QUIÉN CONTACTAR PARA PROBLEMAS MÉDICOS, INFORMAR SERVICIOS INJUSTOS DE MEDICAID, DÓNDE INFORMAR ABUSO EN MEDICAID, QUEJAS SOBRE SERVICIOS DE MEDICAID, INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON LA AYUDA GUBERNAMENTAL A Plea to Connecticut’s Leaders: Unite and Fix This Now To the trusted leaders, representatives, and officials across Connecticut's 169 towns: We stand at a crossroads. The challenges we face as a state—whether in healthcare, infrastructure, education, or systemic inequality—demand immediate, decisive action. These are not problems that can be delayed or passed on to future generations. The time to act is now, and we are depending on you. Our communities are looking to you—those in positions of power and influence—as the only ones capable of driving the changes needed. The trust we have placed in you is not just an honor; it is a responsibility. You are the voices and hands that can deliver the solutions we so desperately need. This is a moment for unity. Regardless of political affiliations, town borders, or differing opinions, we must come together. The people of Connecticut are depending on you to bridge divides  and collaborate  for the greater good. The divisions that once held back progress must be set aside in favor of a shared commitment to a brighter future. We implore you: unite  in your purpose, work across every boundary, and implement immediate solutions. Your leadership, dedication, and vision are what will make the difference. There is no room for inaction or delay. Together, you have the power to fix this—to uplift Connecticut, to strengthen our communities, and to restore faith in our future. The path forward begins now, with your decision to act. We trust in your leadership  and we stand behind you as you take these necessary steps. For the good of all people in Connecticut, for the generations to come— let’s fix this together. Andover, Ansonia, Ashford, Avon, Barkhamsted, Beacon Falls, Berlin, Bethany, Bethel, Bethlehem, Bloomfield, Bolton, Bozrah, Branford, Bridgeport, Bridgewater, Bristol, Brookfield, Brooklyn, Burlington, Canaan, Canterbury, Canton, Chaplin, Cheshire, Chester, Clinton, Colchester, Colebrook, Columbia, Cornwall, Coventry, Cromwell, Danbury, Darien, Deep River, Derby, Durham, Eastford, East Granby, East Haddam, East Hampton, East Hartford, East Haven, East Lyme, Easton, East Windsor, Ellington, Enfield, Essex, Fairfield, Farmington, Franklin, Glastonbury, Goshen, Granby, Greenwich, Griswold, Groton, Guilford, Haddam, Hamden, Hampton, Hartford, Hartland, Harwinton, Hebron, Kent, Killingly, Killingworth, Lebanon, Ledyard, Lisbon, Litchfield, Lyme, Madison, Manchester, Mansfield, Marlborough, Meriden, Middlebury, Middlefield, Middletown, Milford, Monroe, Montville, Morris, Naugatuck, New Britain, New Canaan, New Fairfield, New Hartford, New Haven, Newington, New London, New Milford, Newtown, Norfolk, North Branford, North Canaan, North Haven, North Stonington, Norwalk, Norwich, Old Lyme, Old Saybrook, Orange, Oxford, Plainfield, Plainville, Plymouth, Pomfret, Portland, Preston, Prospect, Putnam, Redding, Ridgefield, Rocky Hill, Roxbury, Salem, Salisbury, Scotland, Seymour, Sharon, Shelton, Sherman, Simsbury, Somers, Southbury, Southington, South Windsor, Sprague, Stafford, Stamford, Sterling, Stonington, Stratford, Suffield, Thomaston, Thompson, Tolland, Torrington, Trumbull, Union, Vernon, Voluntown, Wallingford, Warren, Washington, Waterbury, Waterford, Watertown, Westbrook, West Hartford, West Haven, Weston, Westport, Wethersfield, Willington, Wilton, Winchester, Windham, Windsor, Windsor Locks, Wolcott, Woodbridge, Woodbury, Woodstock. Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming.

DB.42.131.Inf. State Rep. Tammy Nuccio Stands Up for Connecticut’s ABI Waiver Program State Representative Tammy Nuccio recently brought much-needed attention to the growing crisis within Connecticut’s Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program . With wait times for critical services now extending over five years, Nuccio’s pointed questions to the Department of Social Services (DSS) reflect the frustrations of families, advocates, and licensed clinical social workers (LCSWs) who have been pushing for solutions for years. The stakes couldn’t be higher: as delays persist, advocates are increasingly concerned about the motives behind DSS’s handling of the program and are questioning if financial interests are being prioritized over patient care. Rep. Nuccio’s bold stand provides renewed hope for a program that desperately needs reform. The Growing Waitlist and Demand for Accountability For individuals with brain injuries, the ABI Waiver Program offers essential support services that allow them to live with dignity and independence. But for thousands of Connecticut residents, the program’s long waitlist has become an insurmountable barrier to the care they need. In recent hearings, Rep. Nuccio pressed DSS and the Community Options Unit (COU) for answers: Why has the waitlist continued to grow, and why haven’t effective solutions been implemented? Rep. Nuccio’s questions resonate with the ABI community, who have watched the Connecticut General Assembly’s Appropriations Committee acknowledge these challenges for years without taking meaningful action. By bringing this issue to the forefront, she highlights a critical concern for advocates and families alike: What are the motives behind DSS’s ongoing inaction? Red Flags Raised by Licensed Clinical Social Workers (LCSWs) An especially concerning development within the Connecticut Medicaid ABI Waiver Program  is DSS’s recent attempts to adjust care management standards through proposed amendments. Traditionally, these care management roles have been filled by Licensed Clinical Social Workers (LCSWs) , whose advanced education and expertise in brain injury support, trauma, and mental health are vital to delivering high-quality care. However, DSS’s proposed amendments indicate a shift that would allow less-qualified individuals to fill these roles, a move that advocates argue could have severe consequences for the ABI community. Advocates stress that these amendments reflect an effort by DSS to reduce operational costs in a way that could prioritize financial efficiency over patient well-being. By amending requirements, DSS could enable subcontracted care management companies  to increase profits while minimizing staffing expenses. These companies, according to advocates, have already struggled to meet their contractual obligations to provide consistent, effective care, raising concerns that the proposed changes would worsen this issue. Political Strategies and Financial Incentives Advocates further argue that this push for amendments is politically motivated. DSS’s attempts to adjust standards appear to reflect a pattern of leveraging policy changes to align with financial interests—specifically those of subcontracted companies managing care. Observers believe that DSS may be relying on well-honed strategies to secure these amendments, employing tactics such as selective information sharing, minimizing transparency, and framing cost-cutting measures as necessary for “efficiency.” These tactics underscore a broader strategy in which the proposed amendments are presented as improvements or adaptations, while the underlying motivation may be political alignment with subcontracted interests . This approach allows DSS to navigate potential backlash by casting these amendments as beneficial to the broader system, even if they may diminish the quality of care received by Connecticut’s brain injury community. Community Response and Advocacy for Transparency Families and advocates are closely monitoring these developments, expressing a strong commitment to resisting any policy changes that could compromise care quality. With Rep. Tammy Nuccio’s focus on preserving high standards, advocates are hopeful that greater transparency and accountability will guide future discussions. Through advocacy, the ABI community continues to emphasize that financial incentives should never outweigh the imperative to provide skilled, compassionate care for vulnerable individuals. Rep. Nuccio’s efforts are a reminder that actions impacting public health should be transparent, accountable, and always prioritize patient well-being over political or financial considerations. For Licensed Clinical Social Workers (LCSWs) within Connecticut's Medicaid ABI Waiver Program, recent proposed amendments by the Department of Social Services (DSS) have raised concerns about job security and the future of high-quality care management roles. Historically, LCSWs have held these positions due to their specialized expertise in brain injury, trauma, and clinical care. However, DSS’s proposed amendments may allow less-qualified individuals to fill these roles, putting LCSWs at risk of losing their positions to less-experienced care managers. Why LCSWs are Concerned Shift to Cost-Cutting Over Quality : DSS’s amendments seem geared towards financial efficiency, which often translates to hiring less-expensive personnel. LCSWs, with their advanced degrees and experience, come at a higher cost, leading to concerns that these changes could phase out their roles to cut expenses. Impact on Patient Care : Many LCSWs argue that their clinical training and comprehensive understanding of brain injury make them uniquely suited to this work. Losing their positions could lead to reduced care quality, as less-experienced individuals may lack the skills necessary to manage complex cases effectively. Uncertain Future for Social Work Standards : Advocates fear that this trend, if successful, could set a precedent across other care management areas, reducing standards for social work roles in favor of financial savings. This not only risks job losses for LCSWs but could lead to a broader reduction in clinical quality across similar programs. Political and Financial Motivations : Some in the advocacy community feel that DSS’s approach is politically driven, prioritizing contractual profits for private care management companies over consistent quality care. Subcontracted companies may benefit financially from reduced standards, leading to greater concern among LCSWs that the amendments are not aligned with patient or professional interests. The potential for LCSWs to lose their roles due to these proposed amendments underscores the importance of sustained advocacy for both quality care and professional standards. LCSWs and supporters are encouraged to engage in discussions, share their expertise on the value of high-quality social work, and push back against changes that could undercut their roles and impact patient outcomes. The Absence of DSS Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves One point that resonated strongly during the hearing was the absence of DSS Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves . Appointed by Governor Ned Lamont, Commissioner Reeves holds significant responsibility in overseeing the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program, and her presence could have offered insight and accountability on these issues. Her absence only added to advocates’ frustrations and highlighted the perceived lack of prioritization within DSS for this critical program. A Grateful Community Supports Rep. Nuccio’s Stand for Change Amid these challenges, families and advocates have expressed their gratitude to Rep. Nuccio for taking a stand and pushing DSS to answer hard questions about the ABI Waiver Program’s delays and quality standards. Her leadership exemplifies the kind of advocacy that families and individuals affected by brain injuries have been waiting for. Nuccio’s actions have sparked renewed hope that DSS and the Connecticut General Assembly will address these systemic issues with urgency and integrity. In Rep. Nuccio, the ABI community has a compassionate, dedicated advocate who understands the value of qualified care and is committed to holding the program accountable.  Her work provides a crucial reminder that public officials can and should prioritize the needs of the communities they serve. How You Can Help Want to support Rep. Nuccio’s push for accountability and quality care in the ABI Waiver Program? Here’s how you can make a difference: Spread Awareness : Share this post and other information to keep these issues at the forefront. Contact Your Local Representatives : Emphasize the importance of accountability and qualified care in the ABI Waiver Program. Follow Advocacy Updates : Stay informed on actions Rep. Nuccio and advocacy groups are taking, and join them in calling for positive change. Thank you, Rep. Nuccio, for fighting for transparency, accountability, and quality standards in Connecticut’s Medicaid ABI Waiver Program.  Your leadership and compassion are inspiring, and we look forward to the changes your advocacy will help bring about. #ABIWaiver #ConnecticutMedicaid #QualityCare #RepTammyNuccio #HealthcareAdvocacy #Transparency #Accountability #BrainInjuryAwareness Connecticut General Assembly Appropriations Committee Link What You Can Do: The Time for Solutions is Now Unfortunately, these problems within Connecticut’s Department of Social Services (DSS) and the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program have been acknowledged for years, yet little has changed. The time for acknowledgment is over—the time for real solutions is now. If we want to see actual improvements, we need to raise these issues to a higher level. One powerful way to do this is to report these ongoing failures to federal agencies that oversee healthcare, civil rights, and government accountability. By submitting concerns to federal agencies, we can ensure that the systemic issues are addressed, and that the state is held accountable for providing timely and adequate services to vulnerable populations. Below is a list of federal agencies where you can report concerns regarding Connecticut’s DSS, including the Medicaid ABI Waiver and other critical programs: At ABI Resources, we are deeply committed to supporting individuals with brain injuries, ensuring that they receive the care and services they deserve. One of the key programs designed to assist these individuals is Connecticut’s Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program. However, the program is currently facing significant challenges, leaving many families in a state of distress. In this post, we will explore the ongoing crisis with the ABI Waiver waitlist, its impact on families, and the pressing need for action. Understanding the Crisis: A 5-Year Wait for Critical Services Connecticut’s Medicaid ABI Waiver Program provides essential services to brain injury survivors, including rehabilitation and home care that support their recovery and daily living. However, families are currently facing prolonged delays in accessing these services. Shockingly, individuals who applied as far back as 2019 are still waiting for care. Despite awareness of the problem, the Department of Social Services (DSS) has struggled to provide clear answers or solutions. Advocates, including State Representative Toni E. Walker, are now demanding urgent action to address this backlog, questioning how the system has allowed such delays to persist for so long. The Human Cost of Delay The consequences of the waitlist crisis are profound. Brain injury survivors rely on timely access to services to maintain their health and independence. Without these supports, their condition often deteriorates, leading to preventable hospitalizations and further health complications. For families, the emotional and financial toll is overwhelming. Many caregivers are forced to leave their jobs to provide full-time care for their loved ones, leading to significant financial strain. Worse still, these families are left in limbo, uncertain about when—or if—they will ever receive the services their loved ones need. The Financial Burden on Taxpayers Beyond the human impact, the mismanagement of the ABI Waiver Program is a financial issue. Without access to preventive care, brain injury survivors are often forced to seek emergency services, which are much more expensive for the state. This inefficient use of resources not only wastes taxpayer dollars but also puts Connecticut at risk of losing federal Medicaid funding due to non-compliance with program requirements. Lack of Leadership and Transparency A major concern raised by advocates and families is the lack of transparency and leadership within the DSS. During a recent legislative hearing, Christine Weston , Director of the Community Options Unit, was unable to provide accurate data on how many individuals remain stuck on the waitlist. To make matters worse, Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves  was notably absent from this hearing, further fueling concerns that leadership is not prioritizing this issue. The absence of clear data and leadership only deepens the crisis. Families need transparency to understand when they can expect services, and the state needs strong leadership to ensure the program is managed effectively. Without these elements, the backlog will continue to grow, and more families will be left without the support they need. The Path Forward: Immediate Action Required The solution to this crisis requires immediate, coordinated action. Acknowledgment of the problem is not enough; we need meaningful reforms to ensure that brain injury survivors receive timely care. There are several key steps that must be taken to resolve the backlog and restore trust in the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program: Accurate Data and Transparency: DSS must provide clear, up-to-date information on the number of individuals on the waitlist and the projected timeline for receiving services. Transparency is essential for families to plan and understand their options. Leadership Accountability: Strong leadership within DSS is critical. The absence of key figures during legislative hearings raises concerns about commitment to the program’s success. Leaders must be actively engaged in addressing the backlog and finding long-term solutions. Timely Access to Services: The most urgent priority is ensuring that individuals who have been waiting since 2019 are granted access to the care they need. This includes rehabilitation, home care, and other services that are essential for maintaining health and quality of life. Federal Oversight and Compliance: Given the ongoing issues with the ABI Waiver Program, federal oversight may be necessary to ensure that taxpayer dollars are being used efficiently and that the state complies with Medicaid regulations. Audits and compliance reviews could provide a roadmap for improving program management and reducing the waitlist. Why This Matters to You At ABI Resources, we are not only advocates for those with brain injuries, but we are also a resource for families navigating complex systems. This crisis affects real people—our neighbors, friends, and loved ones. The delays in the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program are not just numbers on a report; they represent families who are struggling to provide care, survivors who are fighting for their health, and a system that is failing to meet their needs. The need for action is clear. Families deserve answers, and brain injury survivors deserve care. By working together—advocates, policymakers, and community leaders—we can ensure that the ABI Waiver Program is restored to its original purpose: providing timely, life-changing services to those who need them most. How You Can Help If you or a loved one is impacted by the Medicaid ABI Waiver waitlist crisis, or if you simply want to support the cause, there are several ways to get involved: Contact your legislators : Reach out to State Representative Toni E. Walker and other policymakers to express your concerns and advocate for immediate action. Share your story : Personal stories have the power to drive change. If your family has been affected by the ABI Waiver Program delays, consider sharing your experiences with the media or through advocacy organizations. Stay informed : Follow updates on the ABI Waiver Program and related legislative actions. Staying informed will help you understand how to best advocate for change. Contact Information for State Rep. Toni Walker: Legislative Office Building, Room 2702, Hartford, CT 06106-1591 Phone:  800-842-8267 | 860-240-8585 Email:   Toni.Walker@cga.ct.gov At ABI Resources, our mission is to ensure that all brain injury survivors receive the care and support they deserve. We are dedicated to advocating for solutions and reforms that will improve the lives of those affected by this crisis. Together, we can push for the changes that are so desperately needed. ABI Resources  – Supporting brain injury survivors, advocating for justice, and working towards a system that serves everyone. #MedicaidReform #TransparencyNow #ABIWaiver #BrainInjurySupport #FixTheWaitlist #HealthcareAccountability #FederalOversight #DSSConnecticut #LeadershipMatters Federal Agencies to Submit Concerns To: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Purpose:  Oversees Medicaid programs and ensures compliance with federal regulations. Submit a Concern: CMS Contact Form Phone:  1-800-MEDICARE (1-800-633-4227) Mail: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21244 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) - Office for Civil Rights (OCR) Purpose:  Ensures equal access to healthcare and protects civil rights in healthcare settings. Submit a Complaint: OCR Complaint Portal Phone:  1-800-368-1019 Mail: Office for Civil Rights U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 200 Independence Avenue, SW Room 509F, HHH Building Washington, D.C. 20201 U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) - Civil Rights Division Purpose:  Enforces federal statutes prohibiting discrimination in healthcare and social services. Submit a Complaint: DOJ Civil Rights Complaint Form Phone:  1-888-736-5551 Mail: U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Purpose:  Investigates government mismanagement and waste of taxpayer dollars in federal and state programs. Submit a Concern: GAO FraudNet Reporting Phone:  1-800-424-5454 Mail: Government Accountability Office 441 G Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20548 Office of Inspector General (OIG) - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Purpose:  Conducts audits and investigates fraud, waste, and abuse in Medicaid programs. Submit a Complaint: OIG Hotline Form Phone:  1-800-HHS-TIPS (1-800-447-8477) Mail: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General 330 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, D.C. 20201 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) - Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (FHEO) Purpose:  Oversees fair housing laws, which can include issues related to housing assistance for those with disabilities. Submit a Complaint: FHEO Complaint Form Phone:  1-800-669-9777 Mail: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 451 7th Street, SW Washington, D.C. 20410 Why Reporting Matters By reporting the mismanagement of Connecticut’s Medicaid ABI Waiver Program and DSS to these federal agencies, you are helping to ensure that these critical programs are properly funded, managed, and delivered. Your voice can make a difference in the lives of those who have been waiting far too long for care. Federal oversight is essential to holding state agencies accountable and ensuring that the needs of vulnerable populations are met. Take Action Now Each of these agencies has the power to investigate and enforce changes that can ensure DSS programs are run more efficiently and fairly. Please take the time to submit your concerns—whether about long waitlists, lack of services, or failure to comply with federal Medicaid requirements. With enough attention, we can ensure these programs are fixed, not just for the ABI Waiver but for all who depend on DSS services in Connecticut. The time for solutions is now. Your report can help make a lasting impact. What is the Appropriations Committee and Why Does It Matter? Think of the Appropriations Committee as the group of people in Connecticut’s government who decide where the state’s money goes. They look at how much money the state has, and then they decide which programs, like healthcare, education, and other important services, should get funding. For people with brain injuries, one of the key programs they manage is the Medicaid ABI Waiver , which provides crucial services like rehabilitation and home care. This committee, made up of representatives from across the state, reviews the state’s budget and makes sure that services people rely on are properly funded. If they don’t give enough money to a program like the ABI Waiver, people who need care end up waiting months or even years for the services that can change their lives. The decisions made by this committee directly affect real people—families, caregivers, and especially those with disabilities—who depend on state services to survive and improve their quality of life. Osten, Catherine A.  – Co-Chair Walker, Toni E.  – Member Hartley, Joan V.  – Vice Chair Nuccio, Tammy  – Vice Chair Exum, Tammy R.  – Vice Chair Anwar, Saud  – Member McCrory, Douglas  – Member Flexer, Mae  – Member Lesser, Matthew L.  – Member Kushner, Julie  – Member Winfield, Gary A.  – Member Marx, Martha  – Member Somers, Heather S.  – Member Berthel, Eric C.  – Ranking Member Zawistowski, Tami  – Ranking Member Bolinsky, Mitch  – Member Callahan, Patrick E.  – Member Candelaria, Juan R.  – Member Chaleski, Rachel  – Member Currey, Jeff  – Member Dathan, Lucy  – Member DeCaprio, Mark  – Member Delany, Hubert D.  – Member Delnicki, Tom  – Member Dillon, Patricia A.  – Member Felipe, Antonio  – Member Foncello, Martin  – Member Garibay, Jane M.  – Member Gibson, Bobby G.  – Member Gilchrest, Jillian  – Member Gonzalez, Minnie  – Member Gordon, Jeff  – Member Haddad, Gregory  – Member Hall, Joshua M.  – Member Harrison, Cindy  – Member Hoxha, Joe  – Member Johnson, Susan M.  – Member Khanna, Rachel  – Member Kennedy, Kathy  – Member McCarty, Kathleen M.  – Member Nolan, Anthony L.  – Member Porter, Robyn A.  – Member Osborne, Melissa  – Member Reyes, Geraldo C.  – Member Rosario, Christopher  – Member Rutigliano, David  – Member Ryan, Kevin  – Member Sanchez, Emmanuel  – Member Slap, Derek  – Member Simms, Travis  – Member Tercyak, Peter A.  – Member Paris, Corey P.  – Member Connecticut’s Medicaid ABI Waiver Program Crisis: A Comprehensive Breakdown of the Waitlist, Its Impact on Families, and Taxpayers Republican Senator Lisa Seminara has raised serious concerns about the ongoing Medicaid ABI Waiver Program waitlist crisis, with individuals waiting for services as far back as 2019. Despite years of acknowledging this issue, no real solutions have been provided. The absence of DSS Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves from a recent critical legislative hearing has only intensified concerns about the leadership and lack of accountability within the Department of Social Services (DSS). During the hearing, Christine Weston, Director of the Community Options Unit (COU), was unable to provide accurate data regarding how many individuals are stuck on the waitlist. This points to deeper issues within DSS and raises alarms about mismanagement. Simply acknowledging the problem without implementing solutions has left families in a state of limbo, while those in power, such as Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves, have failed to address the core of the crisis. For years, Connecticut’s Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program  has provided critical services to individuals living with brain injuries. These services include rehabilitation, home care, and daily support aimed at improving the quality of life for survivors. Unfortunately, the program is now facing a growing crisis , with some individuals waiting since 2019  for care. Despite acknowledgment of the issue by Governor Ned Lamont , the Department of Social Services (DSS) , and key officials like Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves , no substantial solutions have been implemented. As the waitlist grows, so do the consequences for families  and taxpayers . The ABI Waiver Program: A Lifeline Being Denied The ABI Waiver Program is designed to allow individuals with acquired brain injuries to live more independently in their communities. It covers essential services such as: Rehabilitation therapy In-home care Behavioral support services Respite care for caregivers Case management However, the growing waitlist, which has left individuals waiting for over five years , is preventing brain injury survivors from accessing the care they need. For these individuals and their families, this isn’t just a delay—it’s a life-altering obstacle  to recovery. How This Crisis Impacts Individuals and Families For families of brain injury survivors, the long wait times  for Medicaid ABI Waiver services have a devastating impact on every aspect of their lives: Deteriorating Health : Many survivors are living with deteriorating physical and mental health due to the delay  in accessing appropriate care. Without timely rehabilitation  and support services , their conditions often worsen, leading to more frequent hospitalizations and emergency room visits. These are costly and ineffective solutions compared to the long-term care that Medicaid provides. Emotional Strain : The emotional toll of waiting for years for care is overwhelming. Uncertainty  about whether their loved one will ever receive the care they need adds significant mental stress to families. The failure of DSS to provide clear information about their position on the waitlist only deepens the feeling of being forgotten  by the system. Financial Burden on Caregivers : In the absence of Medicaid services, family members often become full-time caregivers , leading to financial strain. Many caregivers must leave their jobs to provide care, resulting in a loss of household income. This further destabilizes families, leaving them financially vulnerable while they wait indefinitely for services. How This Crisis Impacts Taxpayers While the direct impact on families is severe, taxpayers also bear the consequences of the mismanagement  of the ABI Waiver Program: Wasted Taxpayer Dollars : The delay in providing essential services through the ABI Waiver forces individuals to rely on emergency services , which are far more expensive than the long-term care they need. Taxpayer dollars are being used inefficiently, with funds directed toward short-term, crisis care  instead of preventive, cost-effective services that the waiver provides. Federal Funding at Risk : The ongoing mismanagement of the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program could jeopardize Connecticut’s compliance with federal Medicaid regulations . This risks a loss of federal funding , which would further strain the state budget and reduce available services for those in need. Increased Healthcare Costs : By delaying access to necessary care, the state is creating a system where individuals' health conditions worsen over time, leading to higher healthcare costs. Preventive care  is far more affordable than treating preventable complications that arise from lack of timely care. Taxpayers end up shouldering the costs of this inefficiency. Acknowledgment Isn’t Enough: The Need for Action For years, the ABI Waiver Program waitlist  has been acknowledged, but acknowledgment alone is insufficient. Simply recognizing the problem doesn’t resolve the issue, and families are still waiting in limbo. Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves  has not actively participated in critical discussions, raising concerns about the lack of leadership  in fixing the problem. The absence of leadership and transparency has caused a growing crisis, leaving families and taxpayers alike to suffer the consequences. A Call for Reform: Immediate Actions Required To address the ABI Waiver waitlist crisis , several reforms must be prioritized: Transparency in Waitlist Management : DSS must provide clear, accurate data  about the waitlist and regularly update families on their status. Transparency is critical to rebuilding trust between families and the agency. Reduction of Wait Times : The state must increase staffing and streamline administrative processes to ensure individuals don’t have to wait years for services. Addressing these bottlenecks  will be key to clearing the backlog. Federal Audits : Independent federal audits  are needed to ensure the program is in compliance with Medicaid regulations  and that funds are being used effectively. Audits will help identify where the system is failing and bring accountability to the program. Accountability from Leadership : Leaders such as Governor Ned Lamont  and Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves  must be held accountable for the ongoing mismanagement of the program. Concrete steps are needed to reduce the waitlist and improve service delivery. Whistleblower Protections : Strengthening whistleblower protections  will encourage staff to report instances of mismanagement or inefficiency within DSS without fear of retaliation. This will help identify and resolve issues more quickly. The Time for Action Is Now The Medicaid ABI Waiver Program waitlist crisis  is a failure of leadership, transparency, and compassion. It affects not only the brain injury survivors  who depend on these services but also their families  and Connecticut taxpayers . Real reform is needed, not just acknowledgment of the problem. At ABI Resources , we stand with the families and advocates pushing for immediate solutions . We call on Governor Ned Lamont , Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves , and the federal government  to implement the necessary changes to ensure that brain injury survivors receive the care they deserve. It’s time to ensure that Connecticut’s most vulnerable populations are no longer left behind. The time for action is now. Together, we can fix this as it is so desperately needed. The Medicaid ABI Waiver Waitlist Crisis: A Call for Transparency and Reform In Connecticut, brain injury survivors and their families have faced an ongoing crisis. For more than five years , individuals in desperate need of care have been stuck on a waitlist  for the Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program . This delay in services has far-reaching consequences, including worsening health conditions, emotional and financial strain on families, and a profound lack of accountability within the Department of Social Services (DSS). It is time for immediate reform, transparency, and federal oversight to address these critical issues. The ABI Waiver Program: A Lifeline Being Denied The ABI Waiver Program is designed to provide vital services to individuals with acquired brain injuries, including rehabilitation, home care, and support services that help survivors regain independence and live fulfilling lives. However, many people in need of these services are left on a waitlist for years, unable to access the care they desperately require. For these individuals, the wait is not just a delay—it is a life-altering obstacle to recovery. Prolonged Wait Times and Systemic Mismanagement Despite the urgency, many individuals have been waiting over five years  for critical services. Families and caregivers are left in limbo, without clear information about when—or if—their loved ones will receive the help they need. This prolonged wait is a sign of systemic mismanagement  within the DSS. During a recent legislative exchange, Christine Weston , Director of the Community Options Unit (COU) within DSS, could not provide the number of individuals on the waitlist, raising serious concerns  about the oversight and integrity of the program. Lack of Transparency The absence of clear communication is one of the most frustrating aspects for families on the waitlist. Many are not even aware of their position on the list, and the DSS has not been transparent in providing this information. This lack of accountability raises concerns that there may be efforts to discourage access  to Medicaid services, particularly for the most vulnerable populations. Senator Lisa Seminara , a Republican representing Connecticut’s 8th Senate District, has been a vocal advocate for addressing the mismanagement  of the ABI Waiver Program. During the recent hearing, Governor Ned Lamont’s administration , along with Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves  (who was notably absent from the hearing), faced scrutiny for failing to provide answers and implement necessary reforms. The Burden on Families For families waiting for services, the emotional, physical, and financial toll is immense. Without the necessary Medicaid services, family members often become full-time caregivers, leading to burnout and financial strain. Many caregivers are forced to leave their jobs to provide care, which further exacerbates financial instability. The mental exhaustion caused by uncertainty and the responsibility of caregiving creates a cycle of stress that affects entire households. Deteriorating Health for Those on the Waitlist For individuals with brain injuries, the delays in accessing care can be detrimental to their health. Without timely intervention, many patients see their conditions worsen, leading to more hospital visits and increased reliance on emergency care —a costly and inefficient alternative to long-term, proactive treatment. These emergency treatments often fail to address the underlying health issues, creating a revolving door of healthcare that does little to improve the quality of life for brain injury survivors. The Taxpayer Impact The financial inefficiencies of the ABI Waiver Program are not just a burden on families—they also affect taxpayers . Delays in services lead to more expensive emergency interventions, which are covered by Medicaid. Had these individuals received timely and appropriate care, these costly emergency services could have been avoided. This represents a misallocation of taxpayer dollars  and underscores the need for improved program management and transparency. The Risk of Losing Federal Funding The delays and mismanagement  of the ABI Waiver Program could have even broader consequences for Connecticut. Non-compliance with federal Medicaid regulations could result in the loss of federal funding , which would further strain the state’s budget and reduce services for those most in need. This would be a devastating blow to the program and the vulnerable populations it is supposed to serve. Immediate Solutions: A Call for Federal and State-Level Reform The current state of the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program is untenable. Families, advocates, and policymakers must come together to demand immediate federal oversight  and state-level reform. This situation demands action on several fronts: Transparency in Waitlist Management : DSS must provide families with clear and accurate information about their position on the waitlist. Full transparency will restore trust and allow families to plan for the future. Reduction of Wait Times : The state must address staff shortages, funding gaps, and procedural inefficiencies within the DSS that contribute to long delays in service delivery. Federal Audits : Independent federal audits are necessary to ensure compliance with Medicaid regulations and to identify areas of financial mismanagement. These audits will ensure that taxpayer dollars are being used efficiently and that services are being provided to those who need them most. Whistleblower Protections : Strengthening protections for whistleblowers within DSS will encourage more individuals to come forward with information about potential mismanagement or corruption without fear of retaliation. Accountability from Leadership : Governor Ned Lamont  and Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves  must ensure that the leadership within DSS is committed to supporting vulnerable populations and is held accountable for the program's performance. A Call for Advocacy and Action The Medicaid ABI Waiver Program is a lifeline for individuals with brain injuries, but the current mismanagement of the waitlist and services is failing those who need it most. Immediate reforms are necessary to restore trust, improve efficiency, and provide life-saving services to Connecticut’s most vulnerable populations. ABI Resources  stands with families, caregivers, and advocates in demanding the transparency, accountability, and action needed to fix this broken system. It’s time to stand together and push for the reforms that Connecticut’s brain injury survivors deserve. Outrage Now, Injustice Exposed, Public Outrage, Demand Accountability, Broken System, Fix This Now, Enough Is Enough, Unacceptable, We Deserve Better, No More Delays, Action Needed Now, Transparency Now, Justice Denied, System Failing, Urgent Reform, Accountability Now, Mismanagement Exposed, Voices Silenced, Act Now For Change, Fed Up With Injustice Hidden Medicaid Agency Provider List: Connecticut Department of Social Services / CT DSS COU CGA Exposing Medicaid Secrets: How Connecticut's Violations Hurt Taxpayers & Vulnerable Populations" CGA Connecticut DSS Faces Scrutiny Over Concealed Provider List in Medicaid ABI Waiver Program In a recent legislative exchange, Connecticut State Representative Kathleen McCarty questioned Christine Weston, Director of the Community Options Unit (COU) within the Connecticut Department of Social Services (DSS), about the availability of the Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program Agency Provider List. The list is not publicly accessible and COU would need to consult with DSS legal counsel—has triggered concerns about transparency and potential violations of federal Medicaid regulations. The concealment of the Provider List directly undermines federal requirements for transparency, consumer choice, and public accountability in Medicaid-funded programs. Under the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(23)), Medicaid beneficiaries are guaranteed the right to choose from any qualified provider participating in the program. By withholding the list of providers, DSS is effectively limiting beneficiaries' ability to make informed choices about their care, a clear violation of this federal statute. More than a mere bureaucratic oversight, this lack of transparency obstructs the fundamental rights of Medicaid recipients, particularly vulnerable populations like brain injury survivors who depend on specialized care. These individuals and their families rely on accessible information to choose the most appropriate care providers based on quality, expertise, and geographic location. The absence of this information not only deprives them of their legal rights but also risks funneling beneficiaries toward limited, state-favored providers, potentially compromising the quality of care they receive. This issue with the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program could indicate a systemic problem in Connecticut’s administration of federally funded programs. If the DSS is withholding information in this program, similar practices may be occurring in other state-managed, federally funded programs. With billions of taxpayer dollars flowing through Medicaid, this raises significant concerns about mismanagement, financial oversight, and the state’s broader compliance with federal transparency requirements. Beyond violating Medicaid regulations, this failure to provide access to public information also erodes trust in the integrity of state-run health services. When critical details about provider options are concealed, it creates a veil of secrecy that limits public accountability. Moreover, it raises the specter of conflicts of interest—where specific providers may be favored by state agencies for reasons unrelated to the quality of care or beneficiary needs. Such practices, if left unchecked, can lead to monopolistic conditions where certain agencies dominate the landscape, to the detriment of consumer choice and healthcare quality. Medicaid is designed to serve some of the most vulnerable populations in the country, including individuals with disabilities, low-income families, and elderly individuals requiring long-term care. The intentional withholding of vital information such as provider lists violates not only federal laws but also the ethical obligation to ensure that these populations have equal access to healthcare services. This situation calls for immediate action from federal oversight agencies, such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), to conduct a thorough audit of Connecticut’s Medicaid program administration. Federal intervention is necessary to ensure that the state complies with transparency regulations and provides Medicaid beneficiaries with the information they are entitled to by law. If these practices are found to extend to other federally funded programs, it could signal widespread non-compliance, mismanagement of federal funds, and a failure to uphold the rights of vulnerable individuals across the state. As the investigation into this issue unfolds, it is critical that the DSS take immediate steps to rectify these transparency failures. The state must make the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program Agency Provider List publicly accessible and ensure that beneficiaries’ rights to choose their providers are fully restored. Anything less would continue to jeopardize the integrity of Connecticut’s Medicaid program and the health and well-being of those it is meant to serve. We’re sharing an important message about systemic issues within Medicaid programs that may be impacting both vulnerable populations and every U.S. taxpayer. These challenges could have nationwide implications, affecting how federal dollars are spent and how services reach those who rely on Medicaid. This is not about assigning blame —it’s about finding solutions that ensure taxpayer dollars are used wisely and that vulnerable individuals get the care they need. By working together, we can help create a more transparent, accountable, and effective Medicaid system that benefits everyone. Key Problems and Solutions: Misuse of Taxpayer Funds Problem: Federal Medicaid funds are being inefficiently used, which can increase costs for taxpayers while reducing the quality of services for vulnerable individuals. Solution: Conduct regular audits of Medicaid spending to ensure that every dollar is used efficiently to support essential services and avoid waste or misallocation. Lack of Transparency Problem: Essential information about Medicaid services—such as provider directories and funding allocations—is not easily accessible to the public. This lack of transparency prevents people from understanding how funds are being used and how care decisions are made. Solution: Ensure greater transparency by making Medicaid-related information, including provider directories and spending reports, publicly accessible. This will allow taxpayers, caregivers, and advocates to see where resources are going and hold the system accountable. Unethical Business Practices Problem: Some providers may be engaging in conflicts of interest or kickback schemes, where services are being recommended for financial gain rather than the needs of individuals. This drives up costs and reduces the quality of care. Solution: Implement strict ethical oversight to ensure that Medicaid services are provided based on the needs of individuals, without conflicts of interest or unnecessary services that increase costs for taxpayers. Discriminatory Business Practices in Medicaid Referrals Problem: Certain providers may be favored in Medicaid referrals, limiting access to care for individuals and creating an unequal playing field for providers. This impacts the freedom of individuals to choose the care that best fits their needs. Solution: Establish a fair and transparent referral system that treats all providers equally and ensures that individuals have access to a wide range of care options, promoting both choice and competition. Impact on Disabled Workers Problem: Disabled workers involved in the Medicaid system are not always being paid fairly, which violates federal labor laws and creates further economic challenges for an already vulnerable group. Solution: Ensure compliance with federal labor laws by guaranteeing that all disabled workers are paid fairly and treated with respect, helping create a more supportive and ethical Medicaid system. Limited Consumer Choice Problem: Some individuals are limited in their ability to choose services or housing arrangements, being tied to specific providers through restrictive agreements. This reduces their freedom to select the care and services that best suit their needs. Solution: Expand consumer choice by revising policies that restrict beneficiaries to certain providers or housing options, allowing individuals more freedom to select the services and care arrangements that work best for them. FOIA Violations and Stonewalling Problem: Public records requests related to Medicaid services and spending are being blocked or delayed, limiting public oversight and reducing accountability within the system. Solution: Enforce full compliance with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to ensure that the public has access to important Medicaid information. This will allow for greater transparency and ensure that taxpayer dollars are being used properly. Unauthorized Care Management Services Problem: Some individuals are receiving services that have not been authorized or properly managed, leading to confusion and potential misuse of Medicaid funds. Solution: Ensure proper oversight and clear guidelines for care management services, preventing unauthorized services and ensuring that individuals receive only the care that is necessary and beneficial to them. Unfair Rental Agreements Linked to Medicaid Services Problem: Some beneficiaries are tied to specific housing arrangements through rental agreements that are linked to their Medicaid service providers, reducing their ability to change providers or housing without risking their care. Solution: Revise rental agreements and housing policies to ensure greater consumer freedom and allow individuals to change providers or housing arrangements without being penalized or risking their care. How These Issues Affect All of Us: These problems extend beyond any one state—they have national implications for how Medicaid funds are spent and how care is provided. Every taxpayer contributes to Medicaid, and it’s essential that these funds are used efficiently and transparently. At the same time, vulnerable populations—including individuals with disabilities and those relying on Medicaid services—deserve a system that works for them. By addressing these systemic challenges, we can ensure that taxpayer dollars are used wisely and that those who need support get access to the care and services they deserve. What You Can Do: Share this post to raise awareness and encourage others to understand how these issues might be affecting them and their communities. Support greater transparency and ethical oversight in Medicaid services by engaging with policymakers. Advocate for positive reform to ensure taxpayer dollars are used effectively and that vulnerable individuals get the care they need. Together, we can help create a Medicaid system that benefits everyone—by ensuring accountability, promoting transparency, and protecting taxpayer resources while supporting those who rely on these essential services. What Happens When You Lose Medicaid Insurance? Medicaid is essential for many families. If it’s taken away or you lose it, it can lead to serious problems for you, your family, and even your entire community. Here’s what happens: You Can’t See the Doctor When You Need To You Delay Care : You might put off going to the doctor because you can’t afford it. Small problems can turn into big ones. No More Preventive Check-ups : Without Medicaid, you might skip regular check-ups that help catch problems early. You Can’t Afford Medications Stopping Medication : People stop taking important medications (for conditions like diabetes, mental health issues, or high blood pressure) because they can’t pay for them. Getting Worse : Without those meds, your health can get worse quickly, leading to hospital visits or even life-threatening conditions. Mental Health Suffers Stopping Therapy : Mental health services, like therapy or counseling, can get too expensive, meaning people can no longer get help for anxiety, depression, or other issues. Emotional Stress : Without professional help, mental health issues can become overwhelming, leading to stress, breakdowns, and even suicidal thoughts. Risk of Homelessness Increases Losing Your Job : If your health gets worse, you may not be able to work, leading to job loss and financial problems. Can’t Pay for Housing : Medical bills pile up, and without income, you might not be able to pay rent or the mortgage, which can lead to losing your home. Families Can Be Affected : It’s not just individuals who suffer—entire families can end up in shelters or homeless because of high medical costs. Emergency Rooms Get Overcrowded Using ER as a Doctor’s Office : People without insurance often wait until they are very sick and then go to the ER, which is much more expensive than regular care. More Stress on Hospitals : Hospitals can get overwhelmed, and this affects everyone. It means longer wait times and less attention for those who really need emergency care. Crime Can Increase Desperation Leads to Survival Crimes : When people are financially desperate due to health issues, some may turn to petty crime just to survive. Substance Abuse : Losing mental health care can lead to drug or alcohol use to cope, and this often leads to trouble with the law. Homelessness and Crime Connection : When people lose their homes and can’t get help, they may be more likely to get involved in crime just to meet basic needs. Your Community Suffers Spread of Illness : Without insurance, people may not get vaccinated or treated for contagious diseases, which can make the entire community sick. Public Services Overloaded : Charities, shelters, and food banks may get overwhelmed by more people needing help, making it harder to serve everyone. Fewer Resources for Everyone : When hospitals, clinics, and public health services are stretched too thin, everyone gets worse care. Children Are Affected Missed Vaccines and Checkups : Kids without Medicaid miss important vaccines and doctor visits, putting their health and development at risk. Struggling in School : Without proper healthcare, children may fall behind in school because of untreated health problems or stress at home due to financial instability. Long-Term Poverty Medical Debt : Without Medicaid, medical bills pile up, and families can end up with huge debt, making it hard to afford basic needs like food and housing. Generational Impact : Families in debt or struggling with health issues have a harder time getting out of poverty, and this can affect future generations. Losing Medicaid isn’t just about losing insurance; it’s about losing stability in your life. Without access to healthcare, everything starts to break down—your health, your ability to work, your family’s security, and the community’s well-being. It can even lead to more crime and homelessness as people struggle just to survive. What Can You Do? Stay Informed : Know your options and stay connected to advocacy groups that support for healthcare rights. Ask for Help : Reach out to community health centers, legal aid, and nonprofits that offer support. Get Involved : Support policies that ensure everyone has access to affordable healthcare. When people lose Medicaid insurance, the effects also significantly impact taxpayers  and the overall economy. Here’s a breakdown of how this burden shifts onto taxpayers and why it's important for everyone, even those with insurance, to understand these consequences. Increased Emergency Room Costs (Taxpayer-Funded) ER Becomes the First Stop:  When people without insurance get sick or injured, they often wait until it’s serious and go to the emergency room (ER), which is far more expensive than regular doctor visits. Higher Costs Passed to Taxpayers:  ER visits are one of the most expensive ways to treat medical issues, and when uninsured patients can't pay their bills, the hospital absorbs the costs. These costs are often passed on to taxpayers  through increased funding needs for hospitals and public healthcare programs. Higher Local and State Taxes for Public Services Overloaded Public Health Systems:  Local and state governments are forced to provide more funding for free clinics, public health programs, shelters, and emergency services when there’s an increase in uninsured people. This leads to higher taxes to cover these services. Community Resources Stretched Thin:  When uninsured people need more help from publicly funded services like shelters, food banks, and healthcare clinics, these services require more taxpayer dollars to stay operational. As more people rely on these programs, the costs to taxpayers grow. Higher Insurance Premiums for Everyone Cost-Shifting in Healthcare:  Hospitals often shift the unpaid medical costs of uninsured patients onto private insurers. This drives up the overall cost of healthcare for those who do have insurance. Rising Insurance Premiums:  As healthcare providers raise prices to compensate for uninsured patients, taxpayers  who buy insurance in the private market may see their premiums go up. This makes healthcare more expensive for everyone, even those who already pay for private insurance. Increased Government Spending on Medicaid Expansion and Safety Nets Government Must Step In:  When people lose Medicaid, they still often need some form of public assistance. Governments may have to increase spending on Medicaid expansion, safety net programs, or even adjust the Medicaid qualifications to help more people. This means more public spending, which comes from taxpayer money. Taxpayer-Funded Subsidies:  In some cases, state and federal governments have to provide subsidies for health insurance, and when more people qualify due to losing Medicaid, these costs come from taxpayer funds. Higher Costs for the Criminal Justice System More People in Jail:  As explained earlier, loss of health insurance can lead to an increase in crime, especially as people turn to petty crimes for survival or get involved in substance abuse. This puts more strain on the criminal justice system, which is heavily funded by taxpayer dollars . Mental Health and Substance Abuse in Jail:  Many people end up in jail because they don’t have access to mental health or substance abuse treatment. Once in jail, taxpayers must cover the costs of healthcare, housing, and legal processing for these individuals. It’s far more expensive to treat someone in jail than it is to provide preventive care in the community. Increased Unemployment and Welfare Costs Job Loss Leads to Public Assistance Needs:  Without insurance, people’s health often deteriorates, making it hard for them to work. This can lead to job loss and more people relying on welfare programs like unemployment benefits, food stamps, and housing assistance—all of which are funded by taxpayers . Economic Downturn in Communities:  When many people lose their jobs due to poor health and medical debt, the local economy suffers. This can reduce tax revenue from income and sales taxes, while increasing the demand for public support programs. Public Health Crises Require Taxpayer Funding Spread of Diseases : When people don’t have insurance, they often skip vaccinations and preventive care, which can lead to outbreaks of preventable diseases. Taxpayers  end up footing the bill for public health campaigns, disease control efforts, and emergency healthcare interventions during these outbreaks. Community Health Declines : A sicker population puts more strain on public health resources, requiring more public health spending, which comes from local, state, and federal taxpayer funds. Increased Medical Debt Burden on the Economy Economic Instability for Families:  When families accumulate medical debt, they have less money to spend in the local economy. This reduces consumer spending and harms businesses, leading to lower tax revenue from sales taxes. Long-Term Poverty and Dependence on Government Support:  As more families fall into long-term poverty due to medical debt, they become dependent on government assistance programs. Taxpayers  must contribute more to welfare programs, public housing, and food assistance. Loss of Workforce Productivity and Tax Revenue Reduced Workforce Participation:  As people become sicker without access to healthcare, they are less able to work, leading to a reduction in workforce productivity. Lower Tax Revenues:  When fewer people are able to work due to poor health or job loss, there’s a drop in income tax revenues. This means fewer funds are available for important public services, which can lead to higher taxes for everyone else to cover the shortfall. Losing Medicaid doesn’t just hurt the people directly affected—it shifts the burden onto taxpayers  in many ways. The costs of emergency healthcare, public services, criminal justice, welfare programs, and economic downturns all end up being paid for by you , the taxpayer. By ensuring that people maintain access to Medicaid, we can prevent these problems from spiraling out of control and costing everyone more in the long run. Here are the best federal websites to report issues related to delays, denial of assistance, or mismanagement by your state: 1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Website: https://tips.oig.hhs.gov/ Purpose: HHS oversees health-related federal programs like Medicaid. If you’re facing issues with healthcare or other support services, you can report concerns directly here. Whistleblower Protection Information: HHS Whistleblower Protection Program 2. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Website: https://tips.oig.hhs.gov/?_gl=1*1t3nyl*_ga*MTg0NjgyNTgyNS4xNzI3Nzg5NTkw*_ga_W5DCJS81Y5*MTcyNzc5MDA5Ny4xLjEuMTcyNzc5MDY5NS4wLjAuMA Purpose: CMS oversees the Medicaid program and can be contacted if you're having trouble receiving Medicaid-related services. Complaint Submission: CMS Contact Form 3. Office of the Inspector General (OIG) – U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Website: https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/report-fraud/ Purpose: The OIG investigates waste, fraud, and abuse in HHS programs, including Medicaid and state-administered programs. You can report any suspected state-level mismanagement of federal funds here. Report Fraud or Abuse: OIG Hotline 4. U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Website: https://gao.gov/about/what-gao-does/fraud Purpose: GAO audits and investigates how taxpayer dollars are being spent, including state-level programs funded by federal money. You can report concerns related to mismanagement of federal funds here. Report Fraud, Waste, or Abuse: GAO FraudNet 5. U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) – Civil Rights Division Website: https://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ Purpose: If you believe you’re facing discrimination, such as being denied services because of your race, disability, or other protected categories, you can report it to the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division. Submit a Complaint: DOJ Civil Rights Online Complaint Form 6. THE WHITE HOUSE https://whitehouse.gov/contact/ REPORT MEDICAID PROBLEMS, TROUBLE GETTING MEDICAID HELP, HOW TO REPORT BAD HEALTHCARE, WHERE TO COMPLAIN ABOUT GOVERNMENT HELP, REPORT UNFAIR TREATMENT FOR MEDICAID, HELP WITH MEDICAID DELAYS, HOW TO REPORT MEDICAID FRAUD, REPORT PROBLEMS WITH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, HOW TO COMPLAIN ABOUT MEDICAID DENIAL, WHO TO CONTACT FOR HEALTHCARE ISSUES, REPORT UNFAIR MEDICAID SERVICES, WHERE TO REPORT MEDICAID ABUSE, MEDICAID SERVICE COMPLAINTS, REPORT GOVERNMENT HELP ISSUES INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON MEDICAID, PROBLEMAS PARA OBTENER AYUDA DE MEDICAID, CÓMO INFORMAR SOBRE MAL SERVICIO MÉDICO, DÓNDE QUEJARSE SOBRE AYUDA GUBERNAMENTAL, INFORMAR TRATO INJUSTO EN MEDICAID, AYUDA CON RETRASOS EN MEDICAID, CÓMO INFORMAR FRAUDE EN MEDICAID, INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON SERVICIOS DE SALUD, CÓMO QUEJARSE POR DENEGACIÓN DE MEDICAID, A QUIÉN CONTACTAR PARA PROBLEMAS MÉDICOS, INFORMAR SERVICIOS INJUSTOS DE MEDICAID, DÓNDE INFORMAR ABUSO EN MEDICAID, QUEJAS SOBRE SERVICIOS DE MEDICAID, INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON LA AYUDA GUBERNAMENTAL A Plea to Connecticut’s Leaders: Unite and Fix This Now To the trusted leaders, representatives, and officials across Connecticut's 169 towns: We stand at a crossroads. The challenges we face as a state—whether in healthcare, infrastructure, education, or systemic inequality—demand immediate, decisive action. These are not problems that can be delayed or passed on to future generations. The time to act is now, and we are depending on you. Our communities are looking to you—those in positions of power and influence—as the only ones capable of driving the changes needed. The trust we have placed in you is not just an honor; it is a responsibility. You are the voices and hands that can deliver the solutions we so desperately need. This is a moment for unity. Regardless of political affiliations, town borders, or differing opinions, we must come together. The people of Connecticut are depending on you to bridge divides  and collaborate  for the greater good. The divisions that once held back progress must be set aside in favor of a shared commitment to a brighter future. We implore you: unite  in your purpose, work across every boundary, and implement immediate solutions. Your leadership, dedication, and vision are what will make the difference. There is no room for inaction or delay. Together, you have the power to fix this—to uplift Connecticut, to strengthen our communities, and to restore faith in our future. The path forward begins now, with your decision to act. We trust in your leadership  and we stand behind you as you take these necessary steps. For the good of all people in Connecticut, for the generations to come— let’s fix this together. Andover, Ansonia, Ashford, Avon, Barkhamsted, Beacon Falls, Berlin, Bethany, Bethel, Bethlehem, Bloomfield, Bolton, Bozrah, Branford, Bridgeport, Bridgewater, Bristol, Brookfield, Brooklyn, Burlington, Canaan, Canterbury, Canton, Chaplin, Cheshire, Chester, Clinton, Colchester, Colebrook, Columbia, Cornwall, Coventry, Cromwell, Danbury, Darien, Deep River, Derby, Durham, Eastford, East Granby, East Haddam, East Hampton, East Hartford, East Haven, East Lyme, Easton, East Windsor, Ellington, Enfield, Essex, Fairfield, Farmington, Franklin, Glastonbury, Goshen, Granby, Greenwich, Griswold, Groton, Guilford, Haddam, Hamden, Hampton, Hartford, Hartland, Harwinton, Hebron, Kent, Killingly, Killingworth, Lebanon, Ledyard, Lisbon, Litchfield, Lyme, Madison, Manchester, Mansfield, Marlborough, Meriden, Middlebury, Middlefield, Middletown, Milford, Monroe, Montville, Morris, Naugatuck, New Britain, New Canaan, New Fairfield, New Hartford, New Haven, Newington, New London, New Milford, Newtown, Norfolk, North Branford, North Canaan, North Haven, North Stonington, Norwalk, Norwich, Old Lyme, Old Saybrook, Orange, Oxford, Plainfield, Plainville, Plymouth, Pomfret, Portland, Preston, Prospect, Putnam, Redding, Ridgefield, Rocky Hill, Roxbury, Salem, Salisbury, Scotland, Seymour, Sharon, Shelton, Sherman, Simsbury, Somers, Southbury, Southington, South Windsor, Sprague, Stafford, Stamford, Sterling, Stonington, Stratford, Suffield, Thomaston, Thompson, Tolland, Torrington, Trumbull, Union, Vernon, Voluntown, Wallingford, Warren, Washington, Waterbury, Waterford, Watertown, Westbrook, West Hartford, West Haven, Weston, Westport, Wethersfield, Willington, Wilton, Winchester, Windham, Windsor, Windsor Locks, Wolcott, Woodbridge, Woodbury, Woodstock. Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming.

DB.42.131.Inf. Rep. Kathleen McCarty Leads Call for Accountability, Transparency, and Quality in Connecticut’s DSS Programs Hartford, CT  — State Representative Kathleen McCarty  (R-38) is taking a stand for Connecticut’s vulnerable populations by demanding transparency, quality care, and accountability within the state’s Department of Social Services (DSS). As the Ranking Member of the Education Committee and a prominent member of both the Appropriations and Public Health Committees, Rep. McCarty is using her leadership roles to address growing concerns about DSS-managed programs, including the Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program. For years, Connecticut residents have struggled with excessive wait times, declining care standards, and a perceived lack of responsiveness from DSS leadership. In recent legislative hearings, Rep. McCarty has called on DSS Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves , Governor Ned Lamont , and Christine Weston  of the Community Options Unit to provide answers and solutions for issues that affect thousands of families, advocates, and taxpayers statewide. A Critical Issue: Wait Times and Access to Care At the heart of these challenges is the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program , designed to provide essential services to individuals with brain injuries. Unfortunately, as Rep. McCarty and her fellow advocates have highlighted, wait times for these services have now exceeded five years , leaving individuals without the critical support they need to lead independent, dignified lives. Families, advocates, and social workers are raising pressing questions: Why are Connecticut’s most vulnerable residents facing such delays? Why haven’t effective solutions been implemented to streamline the program and ensure timely access to care? For many families, these delays are not just numbers; they represent lost opportunities for rehabilitation, increased health risks, and an immense emotional toll on caregivers who often step in without adequate support. Rep. McCarty’s advocacy focuses on addressing these delays head-on, pressing DSS for a comprehensive plan to reduce wait times and uphold the standards promised by the ABI Waiver Program. Concerns from Families, Taxpayers, and Licensed Clinical Social Workers (LCSWs) A major point of contention has been DSS’s proposed amendments to the staffing standards within the ABI Waiver Program. Historically, these roles have been filled by Licensed Clinical Social Workers (LCSWs) , who possess advanced training in brain injury, trauma, and mental health. Their expertise ensures that complex cases receive the skilled, compassionate care they need. However, DSS’s recent amendments suggest replacing these highly qualified professionals with less-experienced care managers—a change that advocates believe prioritizes cost-cutting over patient care. Families and advocates argue that such a shift could compromise the quality of care and increase risks for patients. LCSWs fear that DSS’s proposals are driven by financial motives, benefiting private subcontracted care management companies at the expense of quality. These subcontracted companies, according to advocates, have struggled to meet their contractual obligations in the past, further exacerbating concerns about DSS’s proposed changes. Political and Financial Motivations: A Call for Transparency Rep. McCarty supporters have voiced concerns over whether financial motivations and political strategy are influencing DSS’s decisions. The proposed amendments are being presented by DSS as a means to improve efficiency, but many see them as a way to minimize costs by allowing subcontracted companies to increase profits through reduced staffing expenses. Advocates note that this strategy has political implications. By framing these amendments as “efficiency improvements,” DSS can potentially avoid public scrutiny and opposition, presenting the changes as beneficial to the system overall. However, Rep. McCarty’s advocacy challenges this narrative, demanding transparency and calling for DSS to disclose how these changes align with the agency’s commitment to providing high-quality, ethical care. Leadership Accountability: The Absence of DSS Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves Another factor heightening the urgency of these concerns is the perceived lack of direct accountability within DSS leadership. DSS Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves , appointed by Governor Ned Lamont , has come under criticism for her absence in recent hearings on these issues. Advocates and families argue that her presence would provide necessary insight and a commitment to address these concerns publicly. The absence of top-level leadership has left many families feeling ignored and worried that DSS is not prioritizing the needs of Connecticut’s most vulnerable residents. By holding DSS accountable and demanding that Commissioner Reeves engage directly with these issues, Rep. McCarty is advocating for a more transparent and responsible approach to managing programs that impact countless lives across the state. A Growing Community of Support for Rep. McCarty’s Advocacy Families, advocates, and taxpayers are rallying behind Rep. McCarty’s efforts, expressing gratitude for her compassionate, solutions-oriented approach. By taking on these issues, Rep. McCarty is standing up for individuals and families who feel overlooked in the healthcare system, providing them with a voice that resonates within Connecticut’s legislative arena. Her commitment to nurturing relationships and bringing diverse stakeholders together is an essential part of her strategy. Through these connections, Rep. McCarty is helping to foster unity and create a path forward that prioritizes quality care, transparency, and accountability . She exemplifies how compassionate, informed leadership can bring about real change in public policy, highlighting the power of collaboration in tackling the most complex challenges. The Road Ahead: How You Can Support the Call for Quality Care Rep. McCarty’s work emphasizes the importance of public participation and advocacy in driving positive change. For those affected by DSS programs or those who support the call for transparency and accountability, there are several ways to get involved: Share the Message : Help raise awareness about these issues by sharing this article with your community. Transparency is key to ensuring accountability. Contact Your Legislators : Reach out to local representatives and express support for Rep. McCarty’s efforts to maintain high standards in DSS programs. Follow Rep. McCarty’s Updates : Stay informed on developments in this advocacy by following Rep. McCarty on social media. Engage with her updates and share your experiences if these issues have impacted you or your family. Rep. Kathleen McCarty’s dedication to Connecticut’s most vulnerable populations is a powerful reminder that public programs should prioritize people over profit.  Her work serves as a beacon of integrity, pushing for quality care and ethical standards in the face of financial and political pressures. As families, advocates, and taxpayers join her call for accountability, there is hope that DSS programs will become more transparent, compassionate, and responsive to those they are meant to serve. Thank you, Rep. McCarty, for your leadership and advocacy.  Your efforts are creating a legacy of care and accountability that will benefit Connecticut’s communities for generations to come. State Rep. Tammy Nuccio Stands Up for Connecticut’s ABI Waiver Program State Representative Tammy Nuccio recently brought much-needed attention to the growing crisis within Connecticut’s Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program . With wait times for critical services now extending over five years, Nuccio’s pointed questions to the Department of Social Services (DSS) reflect the frustrations of families, advocates, and licensed clinical social workers (LCSWs) who have been pushing for solutions for years. The stakes couldn’t be higher: as delays persist, advocates are increasingly concerned about the motives behind DSS’s handling of the program and are questioning if financial interests are being prioritized over patient care. Rep. Nuccio’s bold stand provides renewed hope for a program that desperately needs reform. The Growing Waitlist and Demand for Accountability For individuals with brain injuries, the ABI Waiver Program offers essential support services that allow them to live with dignity and independence. But for thousands of Connecticut residents, the program’s long waitlist has become an insurmountable barrier to the care they need. In recent hearings, Rep. Nuccio pressed DSS and the Community Options Unit (COU) for answers: Why has the waitlist continued to grow, and why haven’t effective solutions been implemented? Rep. Nuccio’s questions resonate with the ABI community, who have watched the Connecticut General Assembly’s Appropriations Committee acknowledge these challenges for years without taking meaningful action. By bringing this issue to the forefront, she highlights a critical concern for advocates and families alike: What are the motives behind DSS’s ongoing inaction? Red Flags Raised by Licensed Clinical Social Workers (LCSWs) An especially concerning development within the Connecticut Medicaid ABI Waiver Program  is DSS’s recent attempts to adjust care management standards through proposed amendments. Traditionally, these care management roles have been filled by Licensed Clinical Social Workers (LCSWs) , whose advanced education and expertise in brain injury support, trauma, and mental health are vital to delivering high-quality care. However, DSS’s proposed amendments indicate a shift that would allow less-qualified individuals to fill these roles, a move that advocates argue could have severe consequences for the ABI community. Advocates stress that these amendments reflect an effort by DSS to reduce operational costs in a way that could prioritize financial efficiency over patient well-being. By amending requirements, DSS could enable subcontracted care management companies  to increase profits while minimizing staffing expenses. These companies, according to advocates, have already struggled to meet their contractual obligations to provide consistent, effective care, raising concerns that the proposed changes would worsen this issue. Political Strategies and Financial Incentives Advocates further argue that this push for amendments is politically motivated. DSS’s attempts to adjust standards appear to reflect a pattern of leveraging policy changes to align with financial interests—specifically those of subcontracted companies managing care. Observers believe that DSS may be relying on well-honed strategies to secure these amendments, employing tactics such as selective information sharing, minimizing transparency, and framing cost-cutting measures as necessary for “efficiency.” These tactics underscore a broader strategy in which the proposed amendments are presented as improvements or adaptations, while the underlying motivation may be political alignment with subcontracted interests . This approach allows DSS to navigate potential backlash by casting these amendments as beneficial to the broader system, even if they may diminish the quality of care received by Connecticut’s brain injury community. Community Response and Advocacy for Transparency Families and advocates are closely monitoring these developments, expressing a strong commitment to resisting any policy changes that could compromise care quality. With Rep. Tammy Nuccio’s focus on preserving high standards, advocates are hopeful that greater transparency and accountability will guide future discussions. Through advocacy, the ABI community continues to emphasize that financial incentives should never outweigh the imperative to provide skilled, compassionate care for vulnerable individuals. Rep. Nuccio’s efforts are a reminder that actions impacting public health should be transparent, accountable, and always prioritize patient well-being over political or financial considerations. For Licensed Clinical Social Workers (LCSWs) within Connecticut's Medicaid ABI Waiver Program, recent proposed amendments by the Department of Social Services (DSS) have raised concerns about job security and the future of high-quality care management roles. Historically, LCSWs have held these positions due to their specialized expertise in brain injury, trauma, and clinical care. However, DSS’s proposed amendments may allow less-qualified individuals to fill these roles, putting LCSWs at risk of losing their positions to less-experienced care managers. Why LCSWs are Concerned Shift to Cost-Cutting Over Quality : DSS’s amendments seem geared towards financial efficiency, which often translates to hiring less-expensive personnel. LCSWs, with their advanced degrees and experience, come at a higher cost, leading to concerns that these changes could phase out their roles to cut expenses. Impact on Patient Care : Many LCSWs argue that their clinical training and comprehensive understanding of brain injury make them uniquely suited to this work. Losing their positions could lead to reduced care quality, as less-experienced individuals may lack the skills necessary to manage complex cases effectively. Uncertain Future for Social Work Standards : Advocates fear that this trend, if successful, could set a precedent across other care management areas, reducing standards for social work roles in favor of financial savings. This not only risks job losses for LCSWs but could lead to a broader reduction in clinical quality across similar programs. Political and Financial Motivations : Some in the advocacy community feel that DSS’s approach is politically driven, prioritizing contractual profits for private care management companies over consistent quality care. Subcontracted companies may benefit financially from reduced standards, leading to greater concern among LCSWs that the amendments are not aligned with patient or professional interests. The potential for LCSWs to lose their roles due to these proposed amendments underscores the importance of sustained advocacy for both quality care and professional standards. LCSWs and supporters are encouraged to engage in discussions, share their expertise on the value of high-quality social work, and push back against changes that could undercut their roles and impact patient outcomes. The Absence of DSS Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves One point that resonated strongly during the hearing was the absence of DSS Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves . Appointed by Governor Ned Lamont, Commissioner Reeves holds significant responsibility in overseeing the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program, and her presence could have offered insight and accountability on these issues. Her absence only added to advocates’ frustrations and highlighted the perceived lack of prioritization within DSS for this critical program. A Grateful Community Supports Rep. Nuccio’s Stand for Change Amid these challenges, families and advocates have expressed their gratitude to Rep. Nuccio for taking a stand and pushing DSS to answer hard questions about the ABI Waiver Program’s delays and quality standards. Her leadership exemplifies the kind of advocacy that families and individuals affected by brain injuries have been waiting for. Nuccio’s actions have sparked renewed hope that DSS and the Connecticut General Assembly will address these systemic issues with urgency and integrity. In Rep. Nuccio, the ABI community has a compassionate, dedicated advocate who understands the value of qualified care and is committed to holding the program accountable.  Her work provides a crucial reminder that public officials can and should prioritize the needs of the communities they serve. How You Can Help Want to support Rep. Nuccio’s push for accountability and quality care in the ABI Waiver Program? Here’s how you can make a difference: Spread Awareness : Share this post and other information to keep these issues at the forefront. Contact Your Local Representatives : Emphasize the importance of accountability and qualified care in the ABI Waiver Program. Follow Advocacy Updates : Stay informed on actions Rep. Nuccio and advocacy groups are taking, and join them in calling for positive change. Thank you, Rep. Nuccio, for fighting for transparency, accountability, and quality standards in Connecticut’s Medicaid ABI Waiver Program.  Your leadership and compassion are inspiring, and we look forward to the changes your advocacy will help bring about. #ABIWaiver #ConnecticutMedicaid #QualityCare #RepTammyNuccio #HealthcareAdvocacy #Transparency #Accountability #BrainInjuryAwareness Connecticut General Assembly Appropriations Committee Link What You Can Do: The Time for Solutions is Now Unfortunately, these problems within Connecticut’s Department of Social Services (DSS) and the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program have been acknowledged for years, yet little has changed. The time for acknowledgment is over—the time for real solutions is now. If we want to see actual improvements, we need to raise these issues to a higher level. One powerful way to do this is to report these ongoing failures to federal agencies that oversee healthcare, civil rights, and government accountability. By submitting concerns to federal agencies, we can ensure that the systemic issues are addressed, and that the state is held accountable for providing timely and adequate services to vulnerable populations. Below is a list of federal agencies where you can report concerns regarding Connecticut’s DSS, including the Medicaid ABI Waiver and other critical programs: At ABI Resources, we are deeply committed to supporting individuals with brain injuries, ensuring that they receive the care and services they deserve. One of the key programs designed to assist these individuals is Connecticut’s Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program. However, the program is currently facing significant challenges, leaving many families in a state of distress. In this post, we will explore the ongoing crisis with the ABI Waiver waitlist, its impact on families, and the pressing need for action. Understanding the Crisis: A 5-Year Wait for Critical Services Connecticut’s Medicaid ABI Waiver Program provides essential services to brain injury survivors, including rehabilitation and home care that support their recovery and daily living. However, families are currently facing prolonged delays in accessing these services. Shockingly, individuals who applied as far back as 2019 are still waiting for care. Despite awareness of the problem, the Department of Social Services (DSS) has struggled to provide clear answers or solutions. Advocates, including State Representative Toni E. Walker, are now demanding urgent action to address this backlog, questioning how the system has allowed such delays to persist for so long. The Human Cost of Delay The consequences of the waitlist crisis are profound. Brain injury survivors rely on timely access to services to maintain their health and independence. Without these supports, their condition often deteriorates, leading to preventable hospitalizations and further health complications. For families, the emotional and financial toll is overwhelming. Many caregivers are forced to leave their jobs to provide full-time care for their loved ones, leading to significant financial strain. Worse still, these families are left in limbo, uncertain about when—or if—they will ever receive the services their loved ones need. The Financial Burden on Taxpayers Beyond the human impact, the mismanagement of the ABI Waiver Program is a financial issue. Without access to preventive care, brain injury survivors are often forced to seek emergency services, which are much more expensive for the state. This inefficient use of resources not only wastes taxpayer dollars but also puts Connecticut at risk of losing federal Medicaid funding due to non-compliance with program requirements. Lack of Leadership and Transparency A major concern raised by advocates and families is the lack of transparency and leadership within the DSS. During a recent legislative hearing, Christine Weston , Director of the Community Options Unit, was unable to provide accurate data on how many individuals remain stuck on the waitlist. To make matters worse, Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves  was notably absent from this hearing, further fueling concerns that leadership is not prioritizing this issue. The absence of clear data and leadership only deepens the crisis. Families need transparency to understand when they can expect services, and the state needs strong leadership to ensure the program is managed effectively. Without these elements, the backlog will continue to grow, and more families will be left without the support they need. The Path Forward: Immediate Action Required The solution to this crisis requires immediate, coordinated action. Acknowledgment of the problem is not enough; we need meaningful reforms to ensure that brain injury survivors receive timely care. There are several key steps that must be taken to resolve the backlog and restore trust in the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program: Accurate Data and Transparency: DSS must provide clear, up-to-date information on the number of individuals on the waitlist and the projected timeline for receiving services. Transparency is essential for families to plan and understand their options. Leadership Accountability: Strong leadership within DSS is critical. The absence of key figures during legislative hearings raises concerns about commitment to the program’s success. Leaders must be actively engaged in addressing the backlog and finding long-term solutions. Timely Access to Services: The most urgent priority is ensuring that individuals who have been waiting since 2019 are granted access to the care they need. This includes rehabilitation, home care, and other services that are essential for maintaining health and quality of life. Federal Oversight and Compliance: Given the ongoing issues with the ABI Waiver Program, federal oversight may be necessary to ensure that taxpayer dollars are being used efficiently and that the state complies with Medicaid regulations. Audits and compliance reviews could provide a roadmap for improving program management and reducing the waitlist. Why This Matters to You At ABI Resources, we are not only advocates for those with brain injuries, but we are also a resource for families navigating complex systems. This crisis affects real people—our neighbors, friends, and loved ones. The delays in the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program are not just numbers on a report; they represent families who are struggling to provide care, survivors who are fighting for their health, and a system that is failing to meet their needs. The need for action is clear. Families deserve answers, and brain injury survivors deserve care. By working together—advocates, policymakers, and community leaders—we can ensure that the ABI Waiver Program is restored to its original purpose: providing timely, life-changing services to those who need them most. How You Can Help If you or a loved one is impacted by the Medicaid ABI Waiver waitlist crisis, or if you simply want to support the cause, there are several ways to get involved: Contact your legislators : Reach out to State Representative Toni E. Walker and other policymakers to express your concerns and advocate for immediate action. Share your story : Personal stories have the power to drive change. If your family has been affected by the ABI Waiver Program delays, consider sharing your experiences with the media or through advocacy organizations. Stay informed : Follow updates on the ABI Waiver Program and related legislative actions. Staying informed will help you understand how to best advocate for change. Contact Information for State Rep. Toni Walker: Legislative Office Building, Room 2702, Hartford, CT 06106-1591 Phone:  800-842-8267 | 860-240-8585 Email:   Toni.Walker@cga.ct.gov At ABI Resources, our mission is to ensure that all brain injury survivors receive the care and support they deserve. We are dedicated to advocating for solutions and reforms that will improve the lives of those affected by this crisis. Together, we can push for the changes that are so desperately needed. ABI Resources  – Supporting brain injury survivors, advocating for justice, and working towards a system that serves everyone. #MedicaidReform #TransparencyNow #ABIWaiver #BrainInjurySupport #FixTheWaitlist #HealthcareAccountability #FederalOversight #DSSConnecticut #LeadershipMatters Federal Agencies to Submit Concerns To: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Purpose:  Oversees Medicaid programs and ensures compliance with federal regulations. Submit a Concern: CMS Contact Form Phone:  1-800-MEDICARE (1-800-633-4227) Mail: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21244 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) - Office for Civil Rights (OCR) Purpose:  Ensures equal access to healthcare and protects civil rights in healthcare settings. Submit a Complaint: OCR Complaint Portal Phone:  1-800-368-1019 Mail: Office for Civil Rights U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 200 Independence Avenue, SW Room 509F, HHH Building Washington, D.C. 20201 U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) - Civil Rights Division Purpose:  Enforces federal statutes prohibiting discrimination in healthcare and social services. Submit a Complaint: DOJ Civil Rights Complaint Form Phone:  1-888-736-5551 Mail: U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Purpose:  Investigates government mismanagement and waste of taxpayer dollars in federal and state programs. Submit a Concern: GAO FraudNet Reporting Phone:  1-800-424-5454 Mail: Government Accountability Office 441 G Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20548 Office of Inspector General (OIG) - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Purpose:  Conducts audits and investigates fraud, waste, and abuse in Medicaid programs. Submit a Complaint: OIG Hotline Form Phone:  1-800-HHS-TIPS (1-800-447-8477) Mail: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General 330 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, D.C. 20201 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) - Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (FHEO) Purpose:  Oversees fair housing laws, which can include issues related to housing assistance for those with disabilities. Submit a Complaint: FHEO Complaint Form Phone:  1-800-669-9777 Mail: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 451 7th Street, SW Washington, D.C. 20410 Why Reporting Matters By reporting the mismanagement of Connecticut’s Medicaid ABI Waiver Program and DSS to these federal agencies, you are helping to ensure that these critical programs are properly funded, managed, and delivered. Your voice can make a difference in the lives of those who have been waiting far too long for care. Federal oversight is essential to holding state agencies accountable and ensuring that the needs of vulnerable populations are met. Take Action Now Each of these agencies has the power to investigate and enforce changes that can ensure DSS programs are run more efficiently and fairly. Please take the time to submit your concerns—whether about long waitlists, lack of services, or failure to comply with federal Medicaid requirements. With enough attention, we can ensure these programs are fixed, not just for the ABI Waiver but for all who depend on DSS services in Connecticut. The time for solutions is now. Your report can help make a lasting impact. What is the Appropriations Committee and Why Does It Matter? Think of the Appropriations Committee as the group of people in Connecticut’s government who decide where the state’s money goes. They look at how much money the state has, and then they decide which programs, like healthcare, education, and other important services, should get funding. For people with brain injuries, one of the key programs they manage is the Medicaid ABI Waiver , which provides crucial services like rehabilitation and home care. This committee, made up of representatives from across the state, reviews the state’s budget and makes sure that services people rely on are properly funded. If they don’t give enough money to a program like the ABI Waiver, people who need care end up waiting months or even years for the services that can change their lives. The decisions made by this committee directly affect real people—families, caregivers, and especially those with disabilities—who depend on state services to survive and improve their quality of life. Osten, Catherine A.  – Co-Chair Walker, Toni E.  – Member Hartley, Joan V.  – Vice Chair Nuccio, Tammy  – Vice Chair Exum, Tammy R.  – Vice Chair Anwar, Saud  – Member McCrory, Douglas  – Member Flexer, Mae  – Member Lesser, Matthew L.  – Member Kushner, Julie  – Member Winfield, Gary A.  – Member Marx, Martha  – Member Somers, Heather S.  – Member Berthel, Eric C.  – Ranking Member Zawistowski, Tami  – Ranking Member Bolinsky, Mitch  – Member Callahan, Patrick E.  – Member Candelaria, Juan R.  – Member Chaleski, Rachel  – Member Currey, Jeff  – Member Dathan, Lucy  – Member DeCaprio, Mark  – Member Delany, Hubert D.  – Member Delnicki, Tom  – Member Dillon, Patricia A.  – Member Felipe, Antonio  – Member Foncello, Martin  – Member Garibay, Jane M.  – Member Gibson, Bobby G.  – Member Gilchrest, Jillian  – Member Gonzalez, Minnie  – Member Gordon, Jeff  – Member Haddad, Gregory  – Member Hall, Joshua M.  – Member Harrison, Cindy  – Member Hoxha, Joe  – Member Johnson, Susan M.  – Member Khanna, Rachel  – Member Kennedy, Kathy  – Member McCarty, Kathleen M.  – Member Nolan, Anthony L.  – Member Porter, Robyn A.  – Member Osborne, Melissa  – Member Reyes, Geraldo C.  – Member Rosario, Christopher  – Member Rutigliano, David  – Member Ryan, Kevin  – Member Sanchez, Emmanuel  – Member Slap, Derek  – Member Simms, Travis  – Member Tercyak, Peter A.  – Member Paris, Corey P.  – Member Connecticut’s Medicaid ABI Waiver Program Crisis: A Comprehensive Breakdown of the Waitlist, Its Impact on Families, and Taxpayers Republican Senator Lisa Seminara has raised serious concerns about the ongoing Medicaid ABI Waiver Program waitlist crisis, with individuals waiting for services as far back as 2019. Despite years of acknowledging this issue, no real solutions have been provided. The absence of DSS Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves from a recent critical legislative hearing has only intensified concerns about the leadership and lack of accountability within the Department of Social Services (DSS). During the hearing, Christine Weston, Director of the Community Options Unit (COU), was unable to provide accurate data regarding how many individuals are stuck on the waitlist. This points to deeper issues within DSS and raises alarms about mismanagement. Simply acknowledging the problem without implementing solutions has left families in a state of limbo, while those in power, such as Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves, have failed to address the core of the crisis. For years, Connecticut’s Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program  has provided critical services to individuals living with brain injuries. These services include rehabilitation, home care, and daily support aimed at improving the quality of life for survivors. Unfortunately, the program is now facing a growing crisis , with some individuals waiting since 2019  for care. Despite acknowledgment of the issue by Governor Ned Lamont , the Department of Social Services (DSS) , and key officials like Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves , no substantial solutions have been implemented. As the waitlist grows, so do the consequences for families  and taxpayers . The ABI Waiver Program: A Lifeline Being Denied The ABI Waiver Program is designed to allow individuals with acquired brain injuries to live more independently in their communities. It covers essential services such as: Rehabilitation therapy In-home care Behavioral support services Respite care for caregivers Case management However, the growing waitlist, which has left individuals waiting for over five years , is preventing brain injury survivors from accessing the care they need. For these individuals and their families, this isn’t just a delay—it’s a life-altering obstacle  to recovery. How This Crisis Impacts Individuals and Families For families of brain injury survivors, the long wait times  for Medicaid ABI Waiver services have a devastating impact on every aspect of their lives: Deteriorating Health : Many survivors are living with deteriorating physical and mental health due to the delay  in accessing appropriate care. Without timely rehabilitation  and support services , their conditions often worsen, leading to more frequent hospitalizations and emergency room visits. These are costly and ineffective solutions compared to the long-term care that Medicaid provides. Emotional Strain : The emotional toll of waiting for years for care is overwhelming. Uncertainty  about whether their loved one will ever receive the care they need adds significant mental stress to families. The failure of DSS to provide clear information about their position on the waitlist only deepens the feeling of being forgotten  by the system. Financial Burden on Caregivers : In the absence of Medicaid services, family members often become full-time caregivers , leading to financial strain. Many caregivers must leave their jobs to provide care, resulting in a loss of household income. This further destabilizes families, leaving them financially vulnerable while they wait indefinitely for services. How This Crisis Impacts Taxpayers While the direct impact on families is severe, taxpayers also bear the consequences of the mismanagement  of the ABI Waiver Program: Wasted Taxpayer Dollars : The delay in providing essential services through the ABI Waiver forces individuals to rely on emergency services , which are far more expensive than the long-term care they need. Taxpayer dollars are being used inefficiently, with funds directed toward short-term, crisis care  instead of preventive, cost-effective services that the waiver provides. Federal Funding at Risk : The ongoing mismanagement of the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program could jeopardize Connecticut’s compliance with federal Medicaid regulations . This risks a loss of federal funding , which would further strain the state budget and reduce available services for those in need. Increased Healthcare Costs : By delaying access to necessary care, the state is creating a system where individuals' health conditions worsen over time, leading to higher healthcare costs. Preventive care  is far more affordable than treating preventable complications that arise from lack of timely care. Taxpayers end up shouldering the costs of this inefficiency. Acknowledgment Isn’t Enough: The Need for Action For years, the ABI Waiver Program waitlist  has been acknowledged, but acknowledgment alone is insufficient. Simply recognizing the problem doesn’t resolve the issue, and families are still waiting in limbo. Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves  has not actively participated in critical discussions, raising concerns about the lack of leadership  in fixing the problem. The absence of leadership and transparency has caused a growing crisis, leaving families and taxpayers alike to suffer the consequences. A Call for Reform: Immediate Actions Required To address the ABI Waiver waitlist crisis , several reforms must be prioritized: Transparency in Waitlist Management : DSS must provide clear, accurate data  about the waitlist and regularly update families on their status. Transparency is critical to rebuilding trust between families and the agency. Reduction of Wait Times : The state must increase staffing and streamline administrative processes to ensure individuals don’t have to wait years for services. Addressing these bottlenecks  will be key to clearing the backlog. Federal Audits : Independent federal audits  are needed to ensure the program is in compliance with Medicaid regulations  and that funds are being used effectively. Audits will help identify where the system is failing and bring accountability to the program. Accountability from Leadership : Leaders such as Governor Ned Lamont  and Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves  must be held accountable for the ongoing mismanagement of the program. Concrete steps are needed to reduce the waitlist and improve service delivery. Whistleblower Protections : Strengthening whistleblower protections  will encourage staff to report instances of mismanagement or inefficiency within DSS without fear of retaliation. This will help identify and resolve issues more quickly. The Time for Action Is Now The Medicaid ABI Waiver Program waitlist crisis  is a failure of leadership, transparency, and compassion. It affects not only the brain injury survivors  who depend on these services but also their families  and Connecticut taxpayers . Real reform is needed, not just acknowledgment of the problem. At ABI Resources , we stand with the families and advocates pushing for immediate solutions . We call on Governor Ned Lamont , Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves , and the federal government  to implement the necessary changes to ensure that brain injury survivors receive the care they deserve. It’s time to ensure that Connecticut’s most vulnerable populations are no longer left behind. The time for action is now. Together, we can fix this as it is so desperately needed. The Medicaid ABI Waiver Waitlist Crisis: A Call for Transparency and Reform In Connecticut, brain injury survivors and their families have faced an ongoing crisis. For more than five years , individuals in desperate need of care have been stuck on a waitlist  for the Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program . This delay in services has far-reaching consequences, including worsening health conditions, emotional and financial strain on families, and a profound lack of accountability within the Department of Social Services (DSS). It is time for immediate reform, transparency, and federal oversight to address these critical issues. The ABI Waiver Program: A Lifeline Being Denied The ABI Waiver Program is designed to provide vital services to individuals with acquired brain injuries, including rehabilitation, home care, and support services that help survivors regain independence and live fulfilling lives. However, many people in need of these services are left on a waitlist for years, unable to access the care they desperately require. For these individuals, the wait is not just a delay—it is a life-altering obstacle to recovery. Prolonged Wait Times and Systemic Mismanagement Despite the urgency, many individuals have been waiting over five years  for critical services. Families and caregivers are left in limbo, without clear information about when—or if—their loved ones will receive the help they need. This prolonged wait is a sign of systemic mismanagement  within the DSS. During a recent legislative exchange, Christine Weston , Director of the Community Options Unit (COU) within DSS, could not provide the number of individuals on the waitlist, raising serious concerns  about the oversight and integrity of the program. Lack of Transparency The absence of clear communication is one of the most frustrating aspects for families on the waitlist. Many are not even aware of their position on the list, and the DSS has not been transparent in providing this information. This lack of accountability raises concerns that there may be efforts to discourage access  to Medicaid services, particularly for the most vulnerable populations. Senator Lisa Seminara , a Republican representing Connecticut’s 8th Senate District, has been a vocal advocate for addressing the mismanagement  of the ABI Waiver Program. During the recent hearing, Governor Ned Lamont’s administration , along with Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves  (who was notably absent from the hearing), faced scrutiny for failing to provide answers and implement necessary reforms. The Burden on Families For families waiting for services, the emotional, physical, and financial toll is immense. Without the necessary Medicaid services, family members often become full-time caregivers, leading to burnout and financial strain. Many caregivers are forced to leave their jobs to provide care, which further exacerbates financial instability. The mental exhaustion caused by uncertainty and the responsibility of caregiving creates a cycle of stress that affects entire households. Deteriorating Health for Those on the Waitlist For individuals with brain injuries, the delays in accessing care can be detrimental to their health. Without timely intervention, many patients see their conditions worsen, leading to more hospital visits and increased reliance on emergency care —a costly and inefficient alternative to long-term, proactive treatment. These emergency treatments often fail to address the underlying health issues, creating a revolving door of healthcare that does little to improve the quality of life for brain injury survivors. The Taxpayer Impact The financial inefficiencies of the ABI Waiver Program are not just a burden on families—they also affect taxpayers . Delays in services lead to more expensive emergency interventions, which are covered by Medicaid. Had these individuals received timely and appropriate care, these costly emergency services could have been avoided. This represents a misallocation of taxpayer dollars  and underscores the need for improved program management and transparency. The Risk of Losing Federal Funding The delays and mismanagement  of the ABI Waiver Program could have even broader consequences for Connecticut. Non-compliance with federal Medicaid regulations could result in the loss of federal funding , which would further strain the state’s budget and reduce services for those most in need. This would be a devastating blow to the program and the vulnerable populations it is supposed to serve. Immediate Solutions: A Call for Federal and State-Level Reform The current state of the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program is untenable. Families, advocates, and policymakers must come together to demand immediate federal oversight  and state-level reform. This situation demands action on several fronts: Transparency in Waitlist Management : DSS must provide families with clear and accurate information about their position on the waitlist. Full transparency will restore trust and allow families to plan for the future. Reduction of Wait Times : The state must address staff shortages, funding gaps, and procedural inefficiencies within the DSS that contribute to long delays in service delivery. Federal Audits : Independent federal audits are necessary to ensure compliance with Medicaid regulations and to identify areas of financial mismanagement. These audits will ensure that taxpayer dollars are being used efficiently and that services are being provided to those who need them most. Whistleblower Protections : Strengthening protections for whistleblowers within DSS will encourage more individuals to come forward with information about potential mismanagement or corruption without fear of retaliation. Accountability from Leadership : Governor Ned Lamont  and Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves  must ensure that the leadership within DSS is committed to supporting vulnerable populations and is held accountable for the program's performance. A Call for Advocacy and Action The Medicaid ABI Waiver Program is a lifeline for individuals with brain injuries, but the current mismanagement of the waitlist and services is failing those who need it most. Immediate reforms are necessary to restore trust, improve efficiency, and provide life-saving services to Connecticut’s most vulnerable populations. ABI Resources  stands with families, caregivers, and advocates in demanding the transparency, accountability, and action needed to fix this broken system. It’s time to stand together and push for the reforms that Connecticut’s brain injury survivors deserve. Outrage Now, Injustice Exposed, Public Outrage, Demand Accountability, Broken System, Fix This Now, Enough Is Enough, Unacceptable, We Deserve Better, No More Delays, Action Needed Now, Transparency Now, Justice Denied, System Failing, Urgent Reform, Accountability Now, Mismanagement Exposed, Voices Silenced, Act Now For Change, Fed Up With Injustice Hidden Medicaid Agency Provider List: Connecticut Department of Social Services / CT DSS COU CGA Exposing Medicaid Secrets: How Connecticut's Violations Hurt Taxpayers & Vulnerable Populations" CGA Connecticut DSS Faces Scrutiny Over Concealed Provider List in Medicaid ABI Waiver Program In a recent legislative exchange, Connecticut State Representative Kathleen McCarty questioned Christine Weston, Director of the Community Options Unit (COU) within the Connecticut Department of Social Services (DSS), about the availability of the Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program Agency Provider List. The list is not publicly accessible and COU would need to consult with DSS legal counsel—has triggered concerns about transparency and potential violations of federal Medicaid regulations. The concealment of the Provider List directly undermines federal requirements for transparency, consumer choice, and public accountability in Medicaid-funded programs. Under the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(23)), Medicaid beneficiaries are guaranteed the right to choose from any qualified provider participating in the program. By withholding the list of providers, DSS is effectively limiting beneficiaries' ability to make informed choices about their care, a clear violation of this federal statute. More than a mere bureaucratic oversight, this lack of transparency obstructs the fundamental rights of Medicaid recipients, particularly vulnerable populations like brain injury survivors who depend on specialized care. These individuals and their families rely on accessible information to choose the most appropriate care providers based on quality, expertise, and geographic location. The absence of this information not only deprives them of their legal rights but also risks funneling beneficiaries toward limited, state-favored providers, potentially compromising the quality of care they receive. This issue with the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program could indicate a systemic problem in Connecticut’s administration of federally funded programs. If the DSS is withholding information in this program, similar practices may be occurring in other state-managed, federally funded programs. With billions of taxpayer dollars flowing through Medicaid, this raises significant concerns about mismanagement, financial oversight, and the state’s broader compliance with federal transparency requirements. Beyond violating Medicaid regulations, this failure to provide access to public information also erodes trust in the integrity of state-run health services. When critical details about provider options are concealed, it creates a veil of secrecy that limits public accountability. Moreover, it raises the specter of conflicts of interest—where specific providers may be favored by state agencies for reasons unrelated to the quality of care or beneficiary needs. Such practices, if left unchecked, can lead to monopolistic conditions where certain agencies dominate the landscape, to the detriment of consumer choice and healthcare quality. Medicaid is designed to serve some of the most vulnerable populations in the country, including individuals with disabilities, low-income families, and elderly individuals requiring long-term care. The intentional withholding of vital information such as provider lists violates not only federal laws but also the ethical obligation to ensure that these populations have equal access to healthcare services. This situation calls for immediate action from federal oversight agencies, such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), to conduct a thorough audit of Connecticut’s Medicaid program administration. Federal intervention is necessary to ensure that the state complies with transparency regulations and provides Medicaid beneficiaries with the information they are entitled to by law. If these practices are found to extend to other federally funded programs, it could signal widespread non-compliance, mismanagement of federal funds, and a failure to uphold the rights of vulnerable individuals across the state. As the investigation into this issue unfolds, it is critical that the DSS take immediate steps to rectify these transparency failures. The state must make the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program Agency Provider List publicly accessible and ensure that beneficiaries’ rights to choose their providers are fully restored. Anything less would continue to jeopardize the integrity of Connecticut’s Medicaid program and the health and well-being of those it is meant to serve. We’re sharing an important message about systemic issues within Medicaid programs that may be impacting both vulnerable populations and every U.S. taxpayer. These challenges could have nationwide implications, affecting how federal dollars are spent and how services reach those who rely on Medicaid. This is not about assigning blame —it’s about finding solutions that ensure taxpayer dollars are used wisely and that vulnerable individuals get the care they need. By working together, we can help create a more transparent, accountable, and effective Medicaid system that benefits everyone. Key Problems and Solutions: Misuse of Taxpayer Funds Problem: Federal Medicaid funds are being inefficiently used, which can increase costs for taxpayers while reducing the quality of services for vulnerable individuals. Solution: Conduct regular audits of Medicaid spending to ensure that every dollar is used efficiently to support essential services and avoid waste or misallocation. Lack of Transparency Problem: Essential information about Medicaid services—such as provider directories and funding allocations—is not easily accessible to the public. This lack of transparency prevents people from understanding how funds are being used and how care decisions are made. Solution: Ensure greater transparency by making Medicaid-related information, including provider directories and spending reports, publicly accessible. This will allow taxpayers, caregivers, and advocates to see where resources are going and hold the system accountable. Unethical Business Practices Problem: Some providers may be engaging in conflicts of interest or kickback schemes, where services are being recommended for financial gain rather than the needs of individuals. This drives up costs and reduces the quality of care. Solution: Implement strict ethical oversight to ensure that Medicaid services are provided based on the needs of individuals, without conflicts of interest or unnecessary services that increase costs for taxpayers. Discriminatory Business Practices in Medicaid Referrals Problem: Certain providers may be favored in Medicaid referrals, limiting access to care for individuals and creating an unequal playing field for providers. This impacts the freedom of individuals to choose the care that best fits their needs. Solution: Establish a fair and transparent referral system that treats all providers equally and ensures that individuals have access to a wide range of care options, promoting both choice and competition. Impact on Disabled Workers Problem: Disabled workers involved in the Medicaid system are not always being paid fairly, which violates federal labor laws and creates further economic challenges for an already vulnerable group. Solution: Ensure compliance with federal labor laws by guaranteeing that all disabled workers are paid fairly and treated with respect, helping create a more supportive and ethical Medicaid system. Limited Consumer Choice Problem: Some individuals are limited in their ability to choose services or housing arrangements, being tied to specific providers through restrictive agreements. This reduces their freedom to select the care and services that best suit their needs. Solution: Expand consumer choice by revising policies that restrict beneficiaries to certain providers or housing options, allowing individuals more freedom to select the services and care arrangements that work best for them. FOIA Violations and Stonewalling Problem: Public records requests related to Medicaid services and spending are being blocked or delayed, limiting public oversight and reducing accountability within the system. Solution: Enforce full compliance with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to ensure that the public has access to important Medicaid information. This will allow for greater transparency and ensure that taxpayer dollars are being used properly. Unauthorized Care Management Services Problem: Some individuals are receiving services that have not been authorized or properly managed, leading to confusion and potential misuse of Medicaid funds. Solution: Ensure proper oversight and clear guidelines for care management services, preventing unauthorized services and ensuring that individuals receive only the care that is necessary and beneficial to them. Unfair Rental Agreements Linked to Medicaid Services Problem: Some beneficiaries are tied to specific housing arrangements through rental agreements that are linked to their Medicaid service providers, reducing their ability to change providers or housing without risking their care. Solution: Revise rental agreements and housing policies to ensure greater consumer freedom and allow individuals to change providers or housing arrangements without being penalized or risking their care. How These Issues Affect All of Us: These problems extend beyond any one state—they have national implications for how Medicaid funds are spent and how care is provided. Every taxpayer contributes to Medicaid, and it’s essential that these funds are used efficiently and transparently. At the same time, vulnerable populations—including individuals with disabilities and those relying on Medicaid services—deserve a system that works for them. By addressing these systemic challenges, we can ensure that taxpayer dollars are used wisely and that those who need support get access to the care and services they deserve. What You Can Do: Share this post to raise awareness and encourage others to understand how these issues might be affecting them and their communities. Support greater transparency and ethical oversight in Medicaid services by engaging with policymakers. Advocate for positive reform to ensure taxpayer dollars are used effectively and that vulnerable individuals get the care they need. Together, we can help create a Medicaid system that benefits everyone—by ensuring accountability, promoting transparency, and protecting taxpayer resources while supporting those who rely on these essential services. What Happens When You Lose Medicaid Insurance? Medicaid is essential for many families. If it’s taken away or you lose it, it can lead to serious problems for you, your family, and even your entire community. Here’s what happens: You Can’t See the Doctor When You Need To You Delay Care : You might put off going to the doctor because you can’t afford it. Small problems can turn into big ones. No More Preventive Check-ups : Without Medicaid, you might skip regular check-ups that help catch problems early. You Can’t Afford Medications Stopping Medication : People stop taking important medications (for conditions like diabetes, mental health issues, or high blood pressure) because they can’t pay for them. Getting Worse : Without those meds, your health can get worse quickly, leading to hospital visits or even life-threatening conditions. Mental Health Suffers Stopping Therapy : Mental health services, like therapy or counseling, can get too expensive, meaning people can no longer get help for anxiety, depression, or other issues. Emotional Stress : Without professional help, mental health issues can become overwhelming, leading to stress, breakdowns, and even suicidal thoughts. Risk of Homelessness Increases Losing Your Job : If your health gets worse, you may not be able to work, leading to job loss and financial problems. Can’t Pay for Housing : Medical bills pile up, and without income, you might not be able to pay rent or the mortgage, which can lead to losing your home. Families Can Be Affected : It’s not just individuals who suffer—entire families can end up in shelters or homeless because of high medical costs. Emergency Rooms Get Overcrowded Using ER as a Doctor’s Office : People without insurance often wait until they are very sick and then go to the ER, which is much more expensive than regular care. More Stress on Hospitals : Hospitals can get overwhelmed, and this affects everyone. It means longer wait times and less attention for those who really need emergency care. Crime Can Increase Desperation Leads to Survival Crimes : When people are financially desperate due to health issues, some may turn to petty crime just to survive. Substance Abuse : Losing mental health care can lead to drug or alcohol use to cope, and this often leads to trouble with the law. Homelessness and Crime Connection : When people lose their homes and can’t get help, they may be more likely to get involved in crime just to meet basic needs. Your Community Suffers Spread of Illness : Without insurance, people may not get vaccinated or treated for contagious diseases, which can make the entire community sick. Public Services Overloaded : Charities, shelters, and food banks may get overwhelmed by more people needing help, making it harder to serve everyone. Fewer Resources for Everyone : When hospitals, clinics, and public health services are stretched too thin, everyone gets worse care. Children Are Affected Missed Vaccines and Checkups : Kids without Medicaid miss important vaccines and doctor visits, putting their health and development at risk. Struggling in School : Without proper healthcare, children may fall behind in school because of untreated health problems or stress at home due to financial instability. Long-Term Poverty Medical Debt : Without Medicaid, medical bills pile up, and families can end up with huge debt, making it hard to afford basic needs like food and housing. Generational Impact : Families in debt or struggling with health issues have a harder time getting out of poverty, and this can affect future generations. Losing Medicaid isn’t just about losing insurance; it’s about losing stability in your life. Without access to healthcare, everything starts to break down—your health, your ability to work, your family’s security, and the community’s well-being. It can even lead to more crime and homelessness as people struggle just to survive. What Can You Do? Stay Informed : Know your options and stay connected to advocacy groups that support for healthcare rights. Ask for Help : Reach out to community health centers, legal aid, and nonprofits that offer support. Get Involved : Support policies that ensure everyone has access to affordable healthcare. When people lose Medicaid insurance, the effects also significantly impact taxpayers  and the overall economy. Here’s a breakdown of how this burden shifts onto taxpayers and why it's important for everyone, even those with insurance, to understand these consequences. Increased Emergency Room Costs (Taxpayer-Funded) ER Becomes the First Stop:  When people without insurance get sick or injured, they often wait until it’s serious and go to the emergency room (ER), which is far more expensive than regular doctor visits. Higher Costs Passed to Taxpayers:  ER visits are one of the most expensive ways to treat medical issues, and when uninsured patients can't pay their bills, the hospital absorbs the costs. These costs are often passed on to taxpayers  through increased funding needs for hospitals and public healthcare programs. Higher Local and State Taxes for Public Services Overloaded Public Health Systems:  Local and state governments are forced to provide more funding for free clinics, public health programs, shelters, and emergency services when there’s an increase in uninsured people. This leads to higher taxes to cover these services. Community Resources Stretched Thin:  When uninsured people need more help from publicly funded services like shelters, food banks, and healthcare clinics, these services require more taxpayer dollars to stay operational. As more people rely on these programs, the costs to taxpayers grow. Higher Insurance Premiums for Everyone Cost-Shifting in Healthcare:  Hospitals often shift the unpaid medical costs of uninsured patients onto private insurers. This drives up the overall cost of healthcare for those who do have insurance. Rising Insurance Premiums:  As healthcare providers raise prices to compensate for uninsured patients, taxpayers  who buy insurance in the private market may see their premiums go up. This makes healthcare more expensive for everyone, even those who already pay for private insurance. Increased Government Spending on Medicaid Expansion and Safety Nets Government Must Step In:  When people lose Medicaid, they still often need some form of public assistance. Governments may have to increase spending on Medicaid expansion, safety net programs, or even adjust the Medicaid qualifications to help more people. This means more public spending, which comes from taxpayer money. Taxpayer-Funded Subsidies:  In some cases, state and federal governments have to provide subsidies for health insurance, and when more people qualify due to losing Medicaid, these costs come from taxpayer funds. Higher Costs for the Criminal Justice System More People in Jail:  As explained earlier, loss of health insurance can lead to an increase in crime, especially as people turn to petty crimes for survival or get involved in substance abuse. This puts more strain on the criminal justice system, which is heavily funded by taxpayer dollars . Mental Health and Substance Abuse in Jail:  Many people end up in jail because they don’t have access to mental health or substance abuse treatment. Once in jail, taxpayers must cover the costs of healthcare, housing, and legal processing for these individuals. It’s far more expensive to treat someone in jail than it is to provide preventive care in the community. Increased Unemployment and Welfare Costs Job Loss Leads to Public Assistance Needs:  Without insurance, people’s health often deteriorates, making it hard for them to work. This can lead to job loss and more people relying on welfare programs like unemployment benefits, food stamps, and housing assistance—all of which are funded by taxpayers . Economic Downturn in Communities:  When many people lose their jobs due to poor health and medical debt, the local economy suffers. This can reduce tax revenue from income and sales taxes, while increasing the demand for public support programs. Public Health Crises Require Taxpayer Funding Spread of Diseases : When people don’t have insurance, they often skip vaccinations and preventive care, which can lead to outbreaks of preventable diseases. Taxpayers  end up footing the bill for public health campaigns, disease control efforts, and emergency healthcare interventions during these outbreaks. Community Health Declines : A sicker population puts more strain on public health resources, requiring more public health spending, which comes from local, state, and federal taxpayer funds. Increased Medical Debt Burden on the Economy Economic Instability for Families:  When families accumulate medical debt, they have less money to spend in the local economy. This reduces consumer spending and harms businesses, leading to lower tax revenue from sales taxes. Long-Term Poverty and Dependence on Government Support:  As more families fall into long-term poverty due to medical debt, they become dependent on government assistance programs. Taxpayers  must contribute more to welfare programs, public housing, and food assistance. Loss of Workforce Productivity and Tax Revenue Reduced Workforce Participation:  As people become sicker without access to healthcare, they are less able to work, leading to a reduction in workforce productivity. Lower Tax Revenues:  When fewer people are able to work due to poor health or job loss, there’s a drop in income tax revenues. This means fewer funds are available for important public services, which can lead to higher taxes for everyone else to cover the shortfall. Losing Medicaid doesn’t just hurt the people directly affected—it shifts the burden onto taxpayers  in many ways. The costs of emergency healthcare, public services, criminal justice, welfare programs, and economic downturns all end up being paid for by you , the taxpayer. By ensuring that people maintain access to Medicaid, we can prevent these problems from spiraling out of control and costing everyone more in the long run. Here are the best federal websites to report issues related to delays, denial of assistance, or mismanagement by your state: 1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Website: https://tips.oig.hhs.gov/ Purpose: HHS oversees health-related federal programs like Medicaid. If you’re facing issues with healthcare or other support services, you can report concerns directly here. Whistleblower Protection Information: HHS Whistleblower Protection Program 2. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Website: https://tips.oig.hhs.gov/?_gl=1*1t3nyl*_ga*MTg0NjgyNTgyNS4xNzI3Nzg5NTkw*_ga_W5DCJS81Y5*MTcyNzc5MDA5Ny4xLjEuMTcyNzc5MDY5NS4wLjAuMA Purpose: CMS oversees the Medicaid program and can be contacted if you're having trouble receiving Medicaid-related services. Complaint Submission: CMS Contact Form 3. Office of the Inspector General (OIG) – U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Website: https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/report-fraud/ Purpose: The OIG investigates waste, fraud, and abuse in HHS programs, including Medicaid and state-administered programs. You can report any suspected state-level mismanagement of federal funds here. Report Fraud or Abuse: OIG Hotline 4. U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Website: https://gao.gov/about/what-gao-does/fraud Purpose: GAO audits and investigates how taxpayer dollars are being spent, including state-level programs funded by federal money. You can report concerns related to mismanagement of federal funds here. Report Fraud, Waste, or Abuse: GAO FraudNet 5. U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) – Civil Rights Division Website: https://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ Purpose: If you believe you’re facing discrimination, such as being denied services because of your race, disability, or other protected categories, you can report it to the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division. Submit a Complaint: DOJ Civil Rights Online Complaint Form 6. THE WHITE HOUSE https://whitehouse.gov/contact/ REPORT MEDICAID PROBLEMS, TROUBLE GETTING MEDICAID HELP, HOW TO REPORT BAD HEALTHCARE, WHERE TO COMPLAIN ABOUT GOVERNMENT HELP, REPORT UNFAIR TREATMENT FOR MEDICAID, HELP WITH MEDICAID DELAYS, HOW TO REPORT MEDICAID FRAUD, REPORT PROBLEMS WITH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, HOW TO COMPLAIN ABOUT MEDICAID DENIAL, WHO TO CONTACT FOR HEALTHCARE ISSUES, REPORT UNFAIR MEDICAID SERVICES, WHERE TO REPORT MEDICAID ABUSE, MEDICAID SERVICE COMPLAINTS, REPORT GOVERNMENT HELP ISSUES INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON MEDICAID, PROBLEMAS PARA OBTENER AYUDA DE MEDICAID, CÓMO INFORMAR SOBRE MAL SERVICIO MÉDICO, DÓNDE QUEJARSE SOBRE AYUDA GUBERNAMENTAL, INFORMAR TRATO INJUSTO EN MEDICAID, AYUDA CON RETRASOS EN MEDICAID, CÓMO INFORMAR FRAUDE EN MEDICAID, INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON SERVICIOS DE SALUD, CÓMO QUEJARSE POR DENEGACIÓN DE MEDICAID, A QUIÉN CONTACTAR PARA PROBLEMAS MÉDICOS, INFORMAR SERVICIOS INJUSTOS DE MEDICAID, DÓNDE INFORMAR ABUSO EN MEDICAID, QUEJAS SOBRE SERVICIOS DE MEDICAID, INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON LA AYUDA GUBERNAMENTAL A Plea to Connecticut’s Leaders: Unite and Fix This Now To the trusted leaders, representatives, and officials across Connecticut's 169 towns: We stand at a crossroads. The challenges we face as a state—whether in healthcare, infrastructure, education, or systemic inequality—demand immediate, decisive action. These are not problems that can be delayed or passed on to future generations. The time to act is now, and we are depending on you. Our communities are looking to you—those in positions of power and influence—as the only ones capable of driving the changes needed. The trust we have placed in you is not just an honor; it is a responsibility. You are the voices and hands that can deliver the solutions we so desperately need. This is a moment for unity. Regardless of political affiliations, town borders, or differing opinions, we must come together. The people of Connecticut are depending on you to bridge divides  and collaborate  for the greater good. The divisions that once held back progress must be set aside in favor of a shared commitment to a brighter future. We implore you: unite  in your purpose, work across every boundary, and implement immediate solutions. Your leadership, dedication, and vision are what will make the difference. There is no room for inaction or delay. Together, you have the power to fix this—to uplift Connecticut, to strengthen our communities, and to restore faith in our future. The path forward begins now, with your decision to act. We trust in your leadership  and we stand behind you as you take these necessary steps. For the good of all people in Connecticut, for the generations to come— let’s fix this together. Andover, Ansonia, Ashford, Avon, Barkhamsted, Beacon Falls, Berlin, Bethany, Bethel, Bethlehem, Bloomfield, Bolton, Bozrah, Branford, Bridgeport, Bridgewater, Bristol, Brookfield, Brooklyn, Burlington, Canaan, Canterbury, Canton, Chaplin, Cheshire, Chester, Clinton, Colchester, Colebrook, Columbia, Cornwall, Coventry, Cromwell, Danbury, Darien, Deep River, Derby, Durham, Eastford, East Granby, East Haddam, East Hampton, East Hartford, East Haven, East Lyme, Easton, East Windsor, Ellington, Enfield, Essex, Fairfield, Farmington, Franklin, Glastonbury, Goshen, Granby, Greenwich, Griswold, Groton, Guilford, Haddam, Hamden, Hampton, Hartford, Hartland, Harwinton, Hebron, Kent, Killingly, Killingworth, Lebanon, Ledyard, Lisbon, Litchfield, Lyme, Madison, Manchester, Mansfield, Marlborough, Meriden, Middlebury, Middlefield, Middletown, Milford, Monroe, Montville, Morris, Naugatuck, New Britain, New Canaan, New Fairfield, New Hartford, New Haven, Newington, New London, New Milford, Newtown, Norfolk, North Branford, North Canaan, North Haven, North Stonington, Norwalk, Norwich, Old Lyme, Old Saybrook, Orange, Oxford, Plainfield, Plainville, Plymouth, Pomfret, Portland, Preston, Prospect, Putnam, Redding, Ridgefield, Rocky Hill, Roxbury, Salem, Salisbury, Scotland, Seymour, Sharon, Shelton, Sherman, Simsbury, Somers, Southbury, Southington, South Windsor, Sprague, Stafford, Stamford, Sterling, Stonington, Stratford, Suffield, Thomaston, Thompson, Tolland, Torrington, Trumbull, Union, Vernon, Voluntown, Wallingford, Warren, Washington, Waterbury, Waterford, Watertown, Westbrook, West Hartford, West Haven, Weston, Westport, Wethersfield, Willington, Wilton, Winchester, Windham, Windsor, Windsor Locks, Wolcott, Woodbridge, Woodbury, Woodstock. Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming.

DB.42.131.Inf. Advocates Outraged as Connecticut Appropriations Committee Silences Whistleblower David Medeiros on Medicaid and Vulnerable Populations Hartford, CT  — Outrage is sweeping through the advocacy community following recent events in Connecticut’s General Assembly, where Cathy Osten , the head of the Appropriations Committee , reportedly silenced human rights activist and whistleblower David Medeiros  during a public hearing. Advocates and families across the United States have expressed frustration, calling it a violation of free speech  and due process , and decrying it as an unacceptable attempt to suppress crucial information regarding the use of federal Medicaid funds  meant for vulnerable populations. David Medeiros, a vocal advocate for transparency and human rights in government programs, was scheduled to address critical issues affecting Connecticut’s Medicaid-funded services at the public hearing. These issues include long-standing delays in care, declining service quality, and potential mismanagement within the Department of Social Services (DSS)  that has left thousands of vulnerable residents without the support they need. But according to those present, Cathy Osten refused to allow Medeiros to fully present his findings, denying him and other Appropriations Committee members the opportunity to ask questions about his testimony. National and Statewide Outcry Over Free Speech Suppression Advocates are calling the incident a direct violation of whistleblower rights  and an affront to public transparency . The General Assembly was presented with these concerns in 2023, yet advocates say the issues remain largely ignored. National human rights organizations and advocates from across the country are questioning how the Connecticut General Assembly (CGA) could allow such an infringement on free speech and due process to occur, particularly in a public forum meant to discuss the welfare of vulnerable populations. “David Medeiros’ testimony was not just important—it was essential for shedding light on systemic issues within Connecticut’s Medicaid programs,” say national advocacy groups. “By silencing his voice, Cathy Osten and the CGA have shown a disregard for the public’s right to hear the truth about federal funds and how they’re being managed.” Concerns Over Missing Key Figures, Including DSS Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves Adding fuel to the outrage was the absence of DSS Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves  from the hearing. Advocates and families had hoped to gain insights into the Department’s handling of Medicaid programs, especially given widespread complaints about excessive wait times and service limitations. DSS’s lack of representation at the hearing, coupled with Commissioner Barton Reeves’ absence, has left many feeling that the agency is avoiding accountability for issues that impact Connecticut’s most vulnerable. Furthermore, advocates note that DSS representatives present at the hearing were unable to provide adequate information or updates on ongoing issues within Medicaid-funded programs. This lack of preparedness and transparency has only intensified advocates' frustrations, with many questioning whether DSS is committed to reforming its services. A History of Ignoring Systemic Issues Advocates highlight that the Connecticut General Assembly’s Appropriations Committee has been aware of these systemic issues for nearly 30 years. Despite acknowledgment of persistent challenges within DSS-managed programs, advocates argue that there has been little action to address or resolve these issues. Families, service providers, and advocates view this inaction as a failure of leadership, with Cathy Osten’s refusal to allow David Medeiros to speak only adding to the perception of a culture of suppression within the CGA. “People have waited far too long for real change,” say a national advocacy groups. “To silence someone who’s speaking on behalf of vulnerable individuals and families undermines everything that public service stands for.” Appropriations Committee Members were Denied the Right to Question Medeiros In addition to silencing Medeiros, Osten reportedly barred other members of the Appropriations Committee from questioning him, further stifling open discussion on issues central to the hearing. This move has sparked criticism from other committee members who felt that Medeiros’ insights would have been valuable for understanding the extent of issues within Medicaid-funded programs and DSS. According to sources, multiple representatives were prepared to ask Medeiros questions about his findings and recommendations for addressing the misuse of federal funds and improving services for vulnerable populations. Osten’s refusal to allow these questions has been interpreted by many as an attempt to shield DSS and the CGA from accountability. Advocates Demand Accountability and Federal Oversight The handling of the hearing has led advocates to call for federal oversight of Connecticut’s Medicaid programs. Many are urging national agencies, including the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) , to investigate potential mismanagement and ensure that federal funds are used appropriately and transparently. “It’s time for federal intervention,” stated a Connecticut-based advocate. “The people of Connecticut deserve to know how their taxpayer dollars are being spent, and the families relying on Medicaid services deserve better than years of inaction and suppression of critical information.” Public Trust at Risk The actions taken by Cathy Osten and the Connecticut General Assembly’s Appropriations Committee have raised serious concerns about transparency and accountability  within state leadership. As news of the hearing spreads, many worry that these events will erode public trust in Connecticut’s legislative processes and hinder efforts to improve Medicaid-funded services. Families, providers, and advocates are now left questioning whether their voices will ever be heard, as they continue to call on the CGA to prioritize accountability and provide meaningful solutions for the individuals and families most impacted by Connecticut’s Medicaid programs. A Call for Real Change Advocates nationwide are demanding that Connecticut’s leaders uphold the rights of whistleblowers and protect free speech in public forums, especially when discussing issues that impact vulnerable communities and federal funding. They are also calling on federal agencies to investigate Connecticut’s DSS programs and ensure that taxpayer dollars are used responsibly. The message is clear: transparency, accountability, and public trust must be at the forefront of Connecticut’s Medicaid programs, and no voice speaking out for these values should ever be silenced. We’re sharing an important message about systemic issues within Medicaid programs that may be impacting both vulnerable populations and every U.S. taxpayer. These challenges could have nationwide implications, affecting how federal dollars are spent and how services reach those who rely on Medicaid. This is not about assigning blame —it’s about finding solutions that ensure taxpayer dollars are used wisely and that vulnerable individuals get the care they need. By working together, we can help create a more transparent, accountable, and effective Medicaid system that benefits everyone. Key Problems and Solutions: Misuse of Taxpayer Funds Problem: Federal Medicaid funds are being inefficiently used, which can increase costs for taxpayers while reducing the quality of services for vulnerable individuals. Solution: Conduct regular audits of Medicaid spending to ensure that every dollar is used efficiently to support essential services and avoid waste or misallocation. Lack of Transparency Problem: Essential information about Medicaid services—such as provider directories and funding allocations—is not easily accessible to the public. This lack of transparency prevents people from understanding how funds are being used and how care decisions are made. Solution: Ensure greater transparency by making Medicaid-related information, including provider directories and spending reports, publicly accessible. This will allow taxpayers, caregivers, and advocates to see where resources are going and hold the system accountable. Unethical Business Practices Problem: Some providers may be engaging in conflicts of interest or kickback schemes, where services are being recommended for financial gain rather than the needs of individuals. This drives up costs and reduces the quality of care. Solution: Implement strict ethical oversight to ensure that Medicaid services are provided based on the needs of individuals, without conflicts of interest or unnecessary services that increase costs for taxpayers. Discriminatory Business Practices in Medicaid Referrals Problem: Certain providers may be favored in Medicaid referrals, limiting access to care for individuals and creating an unequal playing field for providers. This impacts the freedom of individuals to choose the care that best fits their needs. Solution: Establish a fair and transparent referral system that treats all providers equally and ensures that individuals have access to a wide range of care options, promoting both choice and competition. Impact on Disabled Workers Problem: Disabled workers involved in the Medicaid system are not always being paid fairly, which violates federal labor laws and creates further economic challenges for an already vulnerable group. Solution: Ensure compliance with federal labor laws by guaranteeing that all disabled workers are paid fairly and treated with respect, helping create a more supportive and ethical Medicaid system. Limited Consumer Choice Problem: Some individuals are limited in their ability to choose services or housing arrangements, being tied to specific providers through restrictive agreements. This reduces their freedom to select the care and services that best suit their needs. Solution: Expand consumer choice by revising policies that restrict beneficiaries to certain providers or housing options, allowing individuals more freedom to select the services and care arrangements that work best for them. FOIA Violations and Stonewalling Problem: Public records requests related to Medicaid services and spending are being blocked or delayed, limiting public oversight and reducing accountability within the system. Solution: Enforce full compliance with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to ensure that the public has access to important Medicaid information. This will allow for greater transparency and ensure that taxpayer dollars are being used properly. Unauthorized Care Management Services Problem: Some individuals are receiving services that have not been authorized or properly managed, leading to confusion and potential misuse of Medicaid funds. Solution: Ensure proper oversight and clear guidelines for care management services, preventing unauthorized services and ensuring that individuals receive only the care that is necessary and beneficial to them. Unfair Rental Agreements Linked to Medicaid Services Problem: Some beneficiaries are tied to specific housing arrangements through rental agreements that are linked to their Medicaid service providers, reducing their ability to change providers or housing without risking their care. Solution: Revise rental agreements and housing policies to ensure greater consumer freedom and allow individuals to change providers or housing arrangements without being penalized or risking their care. How These Issues Affect All of Us: These problems extend beyond any one state—they have national implications for how Medicaid funds are spent and how care is provided. Every taxpayer contributes to Medicaid, and it’s essential that these funds are used efficiently and transparently. At the same time, vulnerable populations—including individuals with disabilities and those relying on Medicaid services—deserve a system that works for them. By addressing these systemic challenges, we can ensure that taxpayer dollars are used wisely and that those who need support get access to the care and services they deserve. What You Can Do: Share this post to raise awareness and encourage others to understand how these issues might be affecting them and their communities. Support greater transparency and ethical oversight in Medicaid services by engaging with policymakers. Advocate for positive reform to ensure taxpayer dollars are used effectively and that vulnerable individuals get the care they need. Together, we can help create a Medicaid system that benefits everyone—by ensuring accountability, promoting transparency, and protecting taxpayer resources while supporting those who rely on these essential services. What Happens When You Lose Medicaid Insurance? Medicaid is essential for many families. If it’s taken away or you lose it, it can lead to serious problems for you, your family, and even your entire community. Here’s what happens: You Can’t See the Doctor When You Need To You Delay Care : You might put off going to the doctor because you can’t afford it. Small problems can turn into big ones. No More Preventive Check-ups : Without Medicaid, you might skip regular check-ups that help catch problems early. You Can’t Afford Medications Stopping Medication : People stop taking important medications (for conditions like diabetes, mental health issues, or high blood pressure) because they can’t pay for them. Getting Worse : Without those meds, your health can get worse quickly, leading to hospital visits or even life-threatening conditions. Mental Health Suffers Stopping Therapy : Mental health services, like therapy or counseling, can get too expensive, meaning people can no longer get help for anxiety, depression, or other issues. Emotional Stress : Without professional help, mental health issues can become overwhelming, leading to stress, breakdowns, and even suicidal thoughts. Risk of Homelessness Increases Losing Your Job : If your health gets worse, you may not be able to work, leading to job loss and financial problems. Can’t Pay for Housing : Medical bills pile up, and without income, you might not be able to pay rent or the mortgage, which can lead to losing your home. Families Can Be Affected : It’s not just individuals who suffer—entire families can end up in shelters or homeless because of high medical costs. Emergency Rooms Get Overcrowded Using ER as a Doctor’s Office : People without insurance often wait until they are very sick and then go to the ER, which is much more expensive than regular care. More Stress on Hospitals : Hospitals can get overwhelmed, and this affects everyone. It means longer wait times and less attention for those who really need emergency care. Crime Can Increase Desperation Leads to Survival Crimes : When people are financially desperate due to health issues, some may turn to petty crime just to survive. Substance Abuse : Losing mental health care can lead to drug or alcohol use to cope, and this often leads to trouble with the law. Homelessness and Crime Connection : When people lose their homes and can’t get help, they may be more likely to get involved in crime just to meet basic needs. Your Community Suffers Spread of Illness : Without insurance, people may not get vaccinated or treated for contagious diseases, which can make the entire community sick. Public Services Overloaded : Charities, shelters, and food banks may get overwhelmed by more people needing help, making it harder to serve everyone. Fewer Resources for Everyone : When hospitals, clinics, and public health services are stretched too thin, everyone gets worse care. Children Are Affected Missed Vaccines and Checkups : Kids without Medicaid miss important vaccines and doctor visits, putting their health and development at risk. Struggling in School : Without proper healthcare, children may fall behind in school because of untreated health problems or stress at home due to financial instability. Long-Term Poverty Medical Debt : Without Medicaid, medical bills pile up, and families can end up with huge debt, making it hard to afford basic needs like food and housing. Generational Impact : Families in debt or struggling with health issues have a harder time getting out of poverty, and this can affect future generations. Losing Medicaid isn’t just about losing insurance; it’s about losing stability in your life. Without access to healthcare, everything starts to break down—your health, your ability to work, your family’s security, and the community’s well-being. It can even lead to more crime and homelessness as people struggle just to survive. What Can You Do? Stay Informed : Know your options and stay connected to advocacy groups that support for healthcare rights. Ask for Help : Reach out to community health centers, legal aid, and nonprofits that offer support. Get Involved : Support policies that ensure everyone has access to affordable healthcare. When people lose Medicaid insurance, the effects also significantly impact taxpayers  and the overall economy. Here’s a breakdown of how this burden shifts onto taxpayers and why it's important for everyone, even those with insurance, to understand these consequences. Increased Emergency Room Costs (Taxpayer-Funded) ER Becomes the First Stop:  When people without insurance get sick or injured, they often wait until it’s serious and go to the emergency room (ER), which is far more expensive than regular doctor visits. Higher Costs Passed to Taxpayers:  ER visits are one of the most expensive ways to treat medical issues, and when uninsured patients can't pay their bills, the hospital absorbs the costs. These costs are often passed on to taxpayers  through increased funding needs for hospitals and public healthcare programs. Higher Local and State Taxes for Public Services Overloaded Public Health Systems:  Local and state governments are forced to provide more funding for free clinics, public health programs, shelters, and emergency services when there’s an increase in uninsured people. This leads to higher taxes to cover these services. Community Resources Stretched Thin:  When uninsured people need more help from publicly funded services like shelters, food banks, and healthcare clinics, these services require more taxpayer dollars to stay operational. As more people rely on these programs, the costs to taxpayers grow. Higher Insurance Premiums for Everyone Cost-Shifting in Healthcare:  Hospitals often shift the unpaid medical costs of uninsured patients onto private insurers. This drives up the overall cost of healthcare for those who do have insurance. Rising Insurance Premiums:  As healthcare providers raise prices to compensate for uninsured patients, taxpayers  who buy insurance in the private market may see their premiums go up. This makes healthcare more expensive for everyone, even those who already pay for private insurance. Increased Government Spending on Medicaid Expansion and Safety Nets Government Must Step In:  When people lose Medicaid, they still often need some form of public assistance. Governments may have to increase spending on Medicaid expansion, safety net programs, or even adjust the Medicaid qualifications to help more people. This means more public spending, which comes from taxpayer money. Taxpayer-Funded Subsidies:  In some cases, state and federal governments have to provide subsidies for health insurance, and when more people qualify due to losing Medicaid, these costs come from taxpayer funds. Higher Costs for the Criminal Justice System More People in Jail:  As explained earlier, loss of health insurance can lead to an increase in crime, especially as people turn to petty crimes for survival or get involved in substance abuse. This puts more strain on the criminal justice system, which is heavily funded by taxpayer dollars . Mental Health and Substance Abuse in Jail:  Many people end up in jail because they don’t have access to mental health or substance abuse treatment. Once in jail, taxpayers must cover the costs of healthcare, housing, and legal processing for these individuals. It’s far more expensive to treat someone in jail than it is to provide preventive care in the community. Increased Unemployment and Welfare Costs Job Loss Leads to Public Assistance Needs:  Without insurance, people’s health often deteriorates, making it hard for them to work. This can lead to job loss and more people relying on welfare programs like unemployment benefits, food stamps, and housing assistance—all of which are funded by taxpayers . Economic Downturn in Communities:  When many people lose their jobs due to poor health and medical debt, the local economy suffers. This can reduce tax revenue from income and sales taxes, while increasing the demand for public support programs. Public Health Crises Require Taxpayer Funding Spread of Diseases : When people don’t have insurance, they often skip vaccinations and preventive care, which can lead to outbreaks of preventable diseases. Taxpayers  end up footing the bill for public health campaigns, disease control efforts, and emergency healthcare interventions during these outbreaks. Community Health Declines : A sicker population puts more strain on public health resources, requiring more public health spending, which comes from local, state, and federal taxpayer funds. Increased Medical Debt Burden on the Economy Economic Instability for Families:  When families accumulate medical debt, they have less money to spend in the local economy. This reduces consumer spending and harms businesses, leading to lower tax revenue from sales taxes. Long-Term Poverty and Dependence on Government Support:  As more families fall into long-term poverty due to medical debt, they become dependent on government assistance programs. Taxpayers  must contribute more to welfare programs, public housing, and food assistance. Loss of Workforce Productivity and Tax Revenue Reduced Workforce Participation:  As people become sicker without access to healthcare, they are less able to work, leading to a reduction in workforce productivity. Lower Tax Revenues:  When fewer people are able to work due to poor health or job loss, there’s a drop in income tax revenues. This means fewer funds are available for important public services, which can lead to higher taxes for everyone else to cover the shortfall. Losing Medicaid doesn’t just hurt the people directly affected—it shifts the burden onto taxpayers  in many ways. The costs of emergency healthcare, public services, criminal justice, welfare programs, and economic downturns all end up being paid for by you , the taxpayer. By ensuring that people maintain access to Medicaid, we can prevent these problems from spiraling out of control and costing everyone more in the long run. Here are the best federal websites to report issues related to delays, denial of assistance, or mismanagement by your state: 1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Website: https://tips.oig.hhs.gov/ Purpose: HHS oversees health-related federal programs like Medicaid. If you’re facing issues with healthcare or other support services, you can report concerns directly here. Whistleblower Protection Information: HHS Whistleblower Protection Program 2. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Website: https://tips.oig.hhs.gov/?_gl=1*1t3nyl*_ga*MTg0NjgyNTgyNS4xNzI3Nzg5NTkw*_ga_W5DCJS81Y5*MTcyNzc5MDA5Ny4xLjEuMTcyNzc5MDY5NS4wLjAuMA Purpose: CMS oversees the Medicaid program and can be contacted if you're having trouble receiving Medicaid-related services. Complaint Submission: CMS Contact Form 3. Office of the Inspector General (OIG) – U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Website: https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/report-fraud/ Purpose: The OIG investigates waste, fraud, and abuse in HHS programs, including Medicaid and state-administered programs. You can report any suspected state-level mismanagement of federal funds here. Report Fraud or Abuse: OIG Hotline 4. U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Website: https://gao.gov/about/what-gao-does/fraud Purpose: GAO audits and investigates how taxpayer dollars are being spent, including state-level programs funded by federal money. You can report concerns related to mismanagement of federal funds here. Report Fraud, Waste, or Abuse: GAO FraudNet 5. U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) – Civil Rights Division Website: https://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ Purpose: If you believe you’re facing discrimination, such as being denied services because of your race, disability, or other protected categories, you can report it to the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division. Submit a Complaint: DOJ Civil Rights Online Complaint Form 6. THE WHITE HOUSE https://whitehouse.gov/contact/ Los mejores sitios web federales para reportar problemas relacionados con retrasos, denegación de asistencia o mala gestión por parte de tu estado: Departamento de Salud y Servicios Humanos de los EE. UU. (HHS) Sitio web: https://tips.oig.hhs.gov/ Propósito: El HHS supervisa programas federales relacionados con la salud, como Medicaid. Si tienes problemas con los servicios de salud u otros servicios de apoyo, puedes reportar tus inquietudes directamente aquí. Información sobre Protección de Denunciantes: Programa de Protección de Denunciantes del HHS. Centros de Servicios de Medicare y Medicaid (CMS) Sitio web: https://tips.oig.hhs.gov/?_gl=11t3nyl_gaMTg0NjgyNTgyNS4xNzI3Nzg5NTkw_ga_W5DCJS81Y5*MTcyNzc5MDA5Ny4xLjEuMTcyNzc5MDY5NS4wLjAuMA Propósito: CMS supervisa el programa Medicaid y puede ser contactado si tienes dificultades para recibir servicios relacionados con Medicaid. Envío de Quejas: Formulario de Contacto de CMS. Oficina del Inspector General (OIG) – Departamento de Salud y Servicios Humanos de EE. UU. Sitio web: https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/report-fraud/ Propósito: La OIG investiga el desperdicio, fraude y abuso en los programas del HHS, incluidos Medicaid y los programas administrados por los estados. Puedes reportar cualquier sospecha de mala gestión de fondos federales a nivel estatal aquí. Reportar Fraude o Abuso: Línea Directa de la OIG. Oficina de Responsabilidad Gubernamental de EE. UU. (GAO) Sitio web: https://gao.gov/about/what-gao-does/fraud Propósito: La GAO audita e investiga cómo se gastan los fondos de los contribuyentes, incluidos los programas a nivel estatal financiados con dinero federal. Puedes reportar inquietudes relacionadas con la mala gestión de fondos federales aquí. Reportar Fraude, Despilfarro o Abuso: GAO FraudNet. Departamento de Justicia de los EE. UU. (DOJ) – División de Derechos Civiles Sitio web: https://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ Propósito: Si crees que estás enfrentando discriminación, como ser denegado de servicios por tu raza, discapacidad u otras categorías protegidas, puedes reportarlo a la División de Derechos Civiles del DOJ. Presentar una Queja: Formulario de Queja en Línea de Derechos Civiles del DOJ. LA CASA BLANCA Sitio web: https://whitehouse.gov/contact/ REPORT MEDICAID PROBLEMS, TROUBLE GETTING MEDICAID HELP, HOW TO REPORT BAD HEALTHCARE, WHERE TO COMPLAIN ABOUT GOVERNMENT HELP, REPORT UNFAIR TREATMENT FOR MEDICAID, HELP WITH MEDICAID DELAYS, HOW TO REPORT MEDICAID FRAUD, REPORT PROBLEMS WITH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, HOW TO COMPLAIN ABOUT MEDICAID DENIAL, WHO TO CONTACT FOR HEALTHCARE ISSUES, REPORT UNFAIR MEDICAID SERVICES, WHERE TO REPORT MEDICAID ABUSE, MEDICAID SERVICE COMPLAINTS, REPORT GOVERNMENT HELP ISSUES INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON MEDICAID, PROBLEMAS PARA OBTENER AYUDA DE MEDICAID, CÓMO INFORMAR SOBRE MAL SERVICIO MÉDICO, DÓNDE QUEJARSE SOBRE AYUDA GUBERNAMENTAL, INFORMAR TRATO INJUSTO EN MEDICAID, AYUDA CON RETRASOS EN MEDICAID, CÓMO INFORMAR FRAUDE EN MEDICAID, INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON SERVICIOS DE SALUD, CÓMO QUEJARSE POR DENEGACIÓN DE MEDICAID, A QUIÉN CONTACTAR PARA PROBLEMAS MÉDICOS, INFORMAR SERVICIOS INJUSTOS DE MEDICAID, DÓNDE INFORMAR ABUSO EN MEDICAID, QUEJAS SOBRE SERVICIOS DE MEDICAID, INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON LA AYUDA GUBERNAMENTAL A Plea to Connecticut’s Leaders: Unite and Fix This Now To the trusted leaders, representatives, and officials across Connecticut's 169 towns: We stand at a crossroads. The challenges we face as a state—whether in healthcare, infrastructure, education, or systemic inequality—demand immediate, decisive action. These are not problems that can be delayed or passed on to future generations. The time to act is now, and we are depending on you. Our communities are looking to you—those in positions of power and influence—as the only ones capable of driving the changes needed. The trust we have placed in you is not just an honor; it is a responsibility. You are the voices and hands that can deliver the solutions we so desperately need. This is a moment for unity. Regardless of political affiliations, town borders, or differing opinions, we must come together. The people of Connecticut are depending on you to bridge divides  and collaborate  for the greater good. The divisions that once held back progress must be set aside in favor of a shared commitment to a brighter future. We implore you: unite  in your purpose, work across every boundary, and implement immediate solutions. Your leadership, dedication, and vision are what will make the difference. There is no room for inaction or delay. Together, you have the power to fix this—to uplift Connecticut, to strengthen our communities, and to restore faith in our future. The path forward begins now, with your decision to act. We trust in your leadership  and we stand behind you as you take these necessary steps. For the good of all people in Connecticut, for the generations to come— let’s fix this together. Connecticut State Senate: John Fonfara  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 1 Luis Delgado  - Green, District 1 Douglas McCrory  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 2 Kristin Hoffman  - Republican, District 2 Saud Anwar  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 3 Matt Siracusa  - Republican, District 3 MD Rahman  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 4 Stephen King  - Republican, District 4 Derek Slap  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 5 Kyla Zimmermann  - Republican, District 5 Rick Lopes  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 6 Tremell Collins  - Republican, District 6 John Kissel  - Incumbent, Republican, District 7 Cynthia Mangini  - Democratic, District 7 Lisa Seminara  - Incumbent, Republican, District 8 Paul Honig  - Democratic, District 8 Matthew L. Lesser  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 9 Gary Winfield  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 10 Nyrell Moore  - Republican, District 10 Martin Looney  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 11 Steve Orosco  - Republican, District 11 Christine Cohen  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 12 Paul Crisci  - Republican, District 12 Jan Hochadel  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 13 Elain Cariati  - Republican, District 13 James Maroney  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 14 Steven Johnstone  - Republican, District 14 Joan Hartley  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 15 Robert C. Sampson  - Incumbent, Republican, District 16 Christopher Robertson  - Democratic, District 16 Jorge Cabrera  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 17 Heather Somers  - Incumbent, Republican, District 18 Andrew Parrella  - Democratic, District 18 Catherine Osten  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 19 Jason Guidone  - Republican, District 19 Martha Marx  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 20 Shaun Mastroianni  - Republican, District 20 Kevin C. Kelly  - Incumbent, Republican, District 21 Chris Carrena  - Republican, District 22 Sujata Gadkar-Wilcox  - Democratic, District 22 Robert E. Halstead  - Independent, District 22 Herron Gaston  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 23 Brian Banacowski  - Republican, District 23 Julie Kushner  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 24 Michelle Coelho  - Republican, District 24 Bob Duff  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 25 Martin Tagliaferro  - Republican, District 25 Ceci Maher  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 26 Kami Evans  - Republican, District 26 Patricia Miller  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 27 Nicola Tarzia  - Republican, District 27 Tony Hwang  - Incumbent, Republican, District 28 Rob Blanchard  - Democratic, District 28 Mae Flexer  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 29 Chris Reddy  - Republican, District 29 Stephen Harding, Jr.  - Incumbent, Republican, District 30 Justin Potter  - Democratic, District 30 Henri Martin  - Incumbent, Republican, District 31 Eric Berthel  - Incumbent, Republican, District 32 Jeff Desmarais  - Democratic, District 32 Norm Needleman  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 33 Jeff Duigou  - Republican, District 33 Paul Cicarella, Jr.  - Incumbent, Republican, District 34 Brandi Mandato  - Democratic, District 34 David Bedell  - Green, District 34 Jeff Gordon  - Incumbent, Republican, District 35 Merry Garrett  - Democratic, District 35 Ryan Fazio  - Incumbent, Republican, District 36 Nick Simmons  - Democratic, District 36 Connecticut House of Representatives: Matthew Ritter  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 1 Raghib Allie-Brennan  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 2 Bradley Koltz  - Republican, District 2 Minnie Gonzalez  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 3 Julio Concepcion  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 4 Maryam Khan  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 5 James B. Sánchez  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 6 Alyssa Peterson  - Independent, District 6 Joshua Malik Hall  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 7 Tim Ackert  - Incumbent, Republican, District 8 Nancy Hammarstrom  - Democratic, District 8 Jason Rojas  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 9 Henry Genga  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 10 Chris Tierinni  - Republican, District 10 Salema Davis  - Republican, District 11 Patrick Biggins  - Democratic, District 11 Geoff Luxenberg  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 12 Robert Cormier  - Republican, District 12 Joseph Young  - Independent, District 12 Jason Doucette  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 13 Donna Meier  - Republican, District 13 Tom Delnicki  - Incumbent, Republican, District 14 Steven King Jr.  - Democratic, District 14 Marek Kozikowski  - United Community Party, District 14 Bobby Gibson  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 15 Quentin Johnson  - Republican, District 15 Melissa E. Osborne  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 16 Michael Schulitz  - Republican, District 16 Eleni Kavros DeGraw  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 17 Manju Gerber  - Republican, District 17 Jillian Gilchrest  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 18 Tammy Exum  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 19 Kate Farrar  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 20 Mike Demicco  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 21 Johnny Carrier  - Republican, District 21 Francis Rexford Cooley  - Incumbent, Republican, District 22 Rebecca Martinez  - Democratic, District 22 Devin Carney  - Incumbent, Republican, District 23 Jane Wisialowski  - Democratic, District 23 Manny Sanchez  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 24 Alden Russell  - Republican, District 24 Alfred Mayo  - Independent, District 24 Bobby Sanchez  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 25 Jamie Vaughan  - Republican, District 25 Barbara Marino  - Republican, District 26 David DeFronzo  - Democratic, District 26 Gary Turco  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 27 Stephen Ellis  - Independent, District 27 Amy Morrin Bello  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 28 William Davidson  - Republican, District 28 Kerry Szeps Wood  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 29 Ed Charamut  - Republican, District 29 Donna Veach  - Incumbent, Republican, District 30 Jill Barry  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 31 Kevin Nursick  - Republican, District 31 Christie Carpino  - Incumbent, Republican, District 32 Brandon Chafee  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 33 Christine Rebstock  - Independent, District 33 Irene Haines  - Incumbent, Republican, District 34 Richard Knotek  - Democratic, District 34 Chris Aniskovich  - Incumbent, Republican, District 35 Cinzia Lettieri  - Democratic, District 35 Kathryn Russell  - Republican, District 36 Renee Muir  - Democratic, District 36 Holly Cheeseman  - Incumbent, Republican, District 37 Nick Menapace  - Democratic, District 37 Kathleen McCarty  - Incumbent, Republican, District 38 Nick Gauthier  - Democratic, District 38 Anthony Nolan  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 39 Beloved Carter  - Republican, District 39 Christine Conley  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 40 Susan Deane-Shinbrot  - Republican, District 40 Aundré Bumgardner  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 41 Kim Healy  - Republican, District 42 Savet Constantine  - Democratic, District 42 Greg Howard  - Incumbent, Republican, District 43 Ty Lamb  - Democratic, District 43 Anne Dauphinais  - Incumbent, Republican, District 44 Samantha Derenthal  - Democratic, District 44 Brian Lanoue  - Incumbent, Republican, District 45 Kayla Thompson  - Democratic, District 45 Derell Wilson  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 46 Nick Casiano  - Republican, District 46 Doug Dubitsky  - Incumbent, Republican, District 47 Aaron Spruance  - Democratic, District 47 Mark DeCaprio  - Incumbent, Republican, District 48 Christopher Rivers  - Democratic, District 48 Lance Lusignan  - Independent, District 48 Susan Johnson  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 49 Pat Boyd  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 50 Chris Stewart  - Republican, District 51 Renee Waldron  - Democratic, District 51 Kurt Vail  - Incumbent, Republican, District 52 Ethan Werstler  - Democratic, District 52 Tammy Nuccio  - Incumbent, Republican, District 53 Ann Bonney  - Democratic, District 53 Gregory Haddad  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 54 Aaron Bowman  - Republican, District 54 Steve Weir  - Incumbent, Republican, District 55 Amanda Veneziano  - Democratic, District 55 Kevin Brown  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 56 Brian Motola  - Republican, District 56 Jaime Foster  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 57 Jennifer Dzen  - Republican, District 57 Robert Hendrickson  - Republican, District 58 John Santanella  - Democratic, District 58 Carol Hall  - Incumbent, Republican, District 59 Rick LeBorious  - Democratic, District 59 Jane Garibay  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 60 Len Walker  - Republican, District 60 Tami Zawistowski  - Incumbent, Republican, District 61 Michael Malloy  - Democratic, District 61 Mark Anderson  - Incumbent, Republican, District 62 Kim Becker  - Democratic, District 62 Jay Case  - Incumbent, Republican, District 63 Maria Horn  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 64 Barbara Breor  - Republican, District 64 Michelle Cook  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 65 Joe Canino  - Republican, District 65 Karen Reddington-Hughes  - Incumbent, Republican, District 66 Sharon Sherman  - Democratic, District 66 William Buckbee  - Incumbent, Republican, District 67 Alexandra Thomas  - Democratic, District 67 Joe Polletta  - Incumbent, Republican, District 68 Jason Buchsbaum  - Republican, District 69 Ed Edelson  - Democratic, District 69 Seth Bronko  - Incumbent, Republican, District 70 Jeff Litke  - Democratic, District 70 William Pizzuto  - Incumbent, Republican, District 71 Larry Butler  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 72 Ronald Napoli Jr.  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 73 Abigail Diaz Pizarro  - Republican, District 73 Michael DiGiovancarlo  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 74 Geraldo Reyes  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 75 John Piscopo  - Incumbent, Republican, District 76 Stephen Simonin  - Democratic, District 76 Cara Pavalock-D'Amato  - Incumbent, Republican, District 77 Mary Rydingsward  - Working Families Party, District 77 Joe Hoxha  - Incumbent, Republican, District 78 Mary Fortier  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 79 David Schrager  - Republican, District 79 Gale Mastrofrancesco  - Incumbent, Republican, District 80 Christopher Poulos  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 81 James Morelli Jr.  - Republican, District 81 Michael Quinn  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 82 Lamar Terrell  - Republican, District 82 Jonathan Fazzino  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 83 Joseph Vollano  - Republican, District 83 Hilda Santiago  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 84 Mary Mushinsky  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 85 Jerry Farrell  - Republican, District 85 Vincent Candelora  - Incumbent, Republican, District 86 Dave Yaccarino Sr.  - Incumbent, Republican, District 87 Kieran Ahern  - Democratic, District 87 Joshua Elliott  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 88 Lezlye Zupkus  - Incumbent, Republican, District 89 Craig Fishbein  - Incumbent, Republican, District 90 Rebecca Hyland  - Democratic, District 90 Laurie Sweet  - Democratic, District 91 Patricia Dillon  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 92 Morris Sumpter  - Republican, District 92 Toni Walker  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 93 Steven Winter  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 94 Juan Candelaria  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 95 Roland J. Lemar  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 96 Alphonse Paolillo  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 97 Moira Rader  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 98 Joseph Zullo  - Incumbent, Republican, District 99 Kai Juanna Belton  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 100 Nigel Macon-Wilson  - Republican, District 100 John-Michael Parker  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 101 Lisa Deane  - Republican, District 101 Robin Comey  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 102 Ray Ingraham  - Republican, District 102 Liz Linehan  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 103 Kara Rochelle  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 104 David Cassetti  - Republican, District 104 Nicole Klarides-Ditria  - Incumbent, Republican, District 105 Mitch Bolinsky  - Incumbent, Republican, District 106 Michelle Embree Ku  - Democratic, District 106 Marty Foncello  - Incumbent, Republican, District 107 Aaron Zimmer  - Democratic, District 107 Pat Callahan  - Incumbent, Republican, District 108 Anne Weisberg  - Democratic, District 108 Farley Santos  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 109 Brenda Santopolo Hefferon  - Republican, District 109 Bob Godfrey  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 110 Austin Monteiro  - Republican, District 110 Aimee Berger-Girvalo  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 111 Colette Kabasakalian  - Republican, District 111 Tony Scott  - Incumbent, Republican, District 112 Beth Cliff  - Democratic, District 112 Jason Perillo  - Incumbent, Republican, District 113 Mary Welander  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 114 William Heffernan III  - Democratic, District 115 Silvana Apicella  - Republican, District 115 Treneé McGee  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 116 Raymond Collins III  - Republican, District 117 MJ Shannon  - Democratic, District 117 Frank Smith  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 118 Mark Macchio  - Republican, District 118 Kathy Kennedy  - Incumbent, Republican, District 119 Etan Hirsch  - Democratic, District 119 Laura Dancho  - Incumbent, Republican, District 120 Kaitlyn Shake  - Democratic, District 120 Joe Gresko  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 121 Rafael Irizarry  - Republican, District 121 Ben McGorty  - Incumbent, Republican, District 122 Dorothy Lerner  - Democratic, District 122 David Rutigliano  - Incumbent, Republican, District 123 Tom Tesoro  - Democratic, District 123 Andre Baker  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 124 Yoshiyahu Yisrael  - Republican, District 124 Tom O'Dea  - Incumbent, Republican, District 125 Jason Bennett  - Democratic, District 125 Fred Gee Jr.  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 126 David Herz  - Republican, District 126 Marcus Brown  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 127 Christopher Rosario  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 128 Ramona Marquez  - Republican, District 128 Angel Gonzalez  - Independent, District 128 Steven Stafstrom  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 129 Francis Kalangala  - Republican, District 129 Antonio Felipe  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 130 Terry Sullivan  - Republican, District 130 Arnold Jensen  - Republican, District 131 Ellen Fox  - Democratic, District 131 Jennifer Leeper  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 132 Alexis Harrison  - Republican, District 132 Cristin Vahey  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 133 Chris Verras  - Republican, District 133 Sarah Keitt  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 134 Melissa Longo  - Republican, District 134 Anne Hughes  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 135 Christopher Peritore  - Republican, District 135 Jonathan Steinberg  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 136 John Bolton  - Republican, District 136 Kadeem Roberts  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 137 Pietro Rotondo  - Republican, District 137 Rachel Chaleski  - Incumbent, Republican, District 138 Kenneth Gucker  - Democratic, District 138 Kevin Ryan  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 139 Mark Adams  - Republican, District 139 Travis Simms  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 140 Enrique Santiago  - Republican, District 140 Carleton Giles  - Democratic, District 140 (Lost in Primary) Tracy Marra  - Incumbent, Republican, District 141 Sheila Quinn  - Democratic, District 141 Lucy Dathan  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 142 Tricia Massucco  - Republican, District 142 (Withdrew) Dominique Johnson  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 143 Peter Bang  - Republican, District 143 Hubert Delany  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 144 Layne Rodney  - Republican, District 144 Corey Paris  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 145 Fritz Blau  - Republican, District 145 Jim Malerba  - Republican, District 146 Eilish Collins Main  - Democratic, District 146 Matt Blumenthal  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 147 Rudy Settimi  - Republican, District 147 Olga Anastos  - Republican, District 148 Jonathan Jacobson  - Democratic, District 148 Anabel Figueroa  - Democratic, District 148 (Lost in Primary) Rachel Khanna  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 149 Tina Courpas  - Republican, District 149 Steve Meskers  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 150 Paul Cappiali  - Republican, District 150 Hector Arzeno  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 151 Tod Laudonia  - Republican, District 151 Steve Meskers  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 150 Paul Cappiali  - Republican, District 150 Hector Arzeno  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 151 Tod Laudonia  - Republican, District 151 Matt Blumenthal  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 147 Rudy Settimi  - Republican, District 147 Olga Anastos  - Republican, District 148 Jonathan Jacobson  - Democratic, District 148 Anabel Figueroa  - Democratic, District 148 (Lost in Primary) Rachel Khanna  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 149 Tina Courpas  - Republican, District 149 Corey Paris  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 145 Fritz Blau  - Republican, District 145 Hubert Delany  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 144 Layne Rodney  - Republican, District 144 Peter Bang  - Republican, District 143 Dominique Johnson  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 143 Tricia Massucco  - Republican, District 142 (Withdrew) Lucy Dathan  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 142 Sheila Quinn  - Democratic, District 141 Tracy Marra  - Incumbent, Republican, District 141 Carleton Giles  - Democratic, District 140 (Lost in Primary) Enrique Santiago  - Republican, District 140 Travis Simms  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 140 Mark Adams  - Republican, District 139 Kevin Ryan  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 139 Kenneth Gucker  - Democratic, District 138 Rachel Chaleski  - Incumbent, Republican, District 138 Pietro Rotondo  - Republican, District 137 Kadeem Roberts  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 137 John-Michael Parker  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 101 Lisa Deane  - Republican, District 101 Robin Comey  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 102 Ray Ingraham  - Republican, District 102 Liz Linehan  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 103 Kara Rochelle  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 104 David Cassetti  - Republican, District 104 Nicole Klarides-Ditria  - Incumbent, Republican, District 105 Mitch Bolinsky  - Incumbent, Republican, District 106 Michelle Embree Ku  - Democratic, District 106 Marty Foncello  - Incumbent, Republican, District 107 Aaron Zimmer  - Democratic, District 107 Pat Callahan  - Incumbent, Republican, District 108 Anne Weisberg  - Democratic, District 108 Farley Santos  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 109 Brenda Santopolo Hefferon  - Republican, District 109 Bob Godfrey  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 110 Austin Monteiro  - Republican, District 110 Aimee Berger-Girvalo  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 111 Colette Kabasakalian  - Republican, District 111 Tony Scott  - Incumbent, Republican, District 112 Beth Cliff  - Democratic, District 112 Jason Perillo  - Incumbent, Republican, District 113 Mary Welander  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 114 William Heffernan III  - Democratic, District 115 Silvana Apicella  - Republican, District 115 Treneé McGee  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 116 Raymond Collins III  - Republican, District 117 MJ Shannon  - Democratic, District 117 Frank Smith  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 118 Mark Macchio  - Republican, District 118 Kathy Kennedy  - Incumbent, Republican, District 119 Etan Hirsch  - Democratic, District 119 Laura Dancho  - Incumbent, Republican, District 120 Kaitlyn Shake  - Democratic, District 120 Joe Gresko  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 121 Rafael Irizarry  - Republican, District 121 Ben McGorty  - Incumbent, Republican, District 122 Dorothy Lerner  - Democratic, District 122 David Rutigliano  - Incumbent, Republican, District 123 Tom Tesoro  - Democratic, District 123 Andre Baker  - Incumbent, Democratic, District 124 Yoshiyahu Yisrael  - Republican, District 124 Joe Biden  – President of the United States The president holds the highest office and has significant executive power, including signing legislation, issuing executive orders, and shaping both domestic and foreign policy. Kamala Harris  – Vice President of the United States The vice president serves as the president of the Senate and has the power to cast tie-breaking votes in the Senate. Antony Blinken  – Secretary of State As the nation's top diplomat, Blinken influences U.S. foreign policy and global relations. Janet Yellen  – Secretary of the Treasury Yellen leads the Treasury Department, overseeing the U.S. economy, including financial regulation, federal spending, and monetary policy. Merrick Garland  – Attorney General Garland heads the U.S. Department of Justice and plays a crucial role in enforcing federal laws, including civil rights and criminal law. Lloyd Austin  – Secretary of Defense Austin oversees the U.S. military and is responsible for national defense policies and military operations worldwide. Xavier Becerra  – Secretary of Health and Human Services Becerra directs federal health policies and oversees key health-related agencies, including Medicare and Medicaid. Alejandro Mayorkas  – Secretary of Homeland Security Mayorkas leads efforts to safeguard the U.S. from internal and external threats, including cybersecurity, border security, and disaster response. Jerome Powell  – Chairman of the Federal Reserve Powell influences U.S. monetary policy, including interest rates and economic stability, through his leadership at the Federal Reserve. Chuck Schumer  – Senate Majority Leader Schumer sets the legislative agenda in the Senate and plays a key role in guiding bills to passage. Mitch McConnell  – Senate Minority Leader As the leader of the minority party in the Senate, McConnell influences legislative strategy and opposition. Kevin McCarthy  – Speaker of the House of Representatives The Speaker is the presiding officer of the House and influences which bills come to the floor for a vote. Hakeem Jeffries  – House Minority Leader Jeffries leads the Democratic caucus in the House and works to shape legislative priorities for his party. Nancy Pelosi  – Former Speaker of the House Although no longer Speaker, Pelosi continues to wield significant influence in the House as a senior Democratic leader. Ron Klain  – White House Chief of Staff As the president’s top advisor, Klain plays a crucial role in shaping policy and managing the executive branch. Pete Buttigieg  – Secretary of Transportation Buttigieg oversees national transportation policy, infrastructure projects, and initiatives related to sustainability and innovation. Gina Raimondo  – Secretary of Commerce Raimondo plays a key role in promoting economic growth, job creation, and regulating commerce and trade. Rochelle Walensky  – Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Walensky leads public health efforts, including managing responses to health crises like the COVID-19 pandemic. John Roberts  – Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court Roberts leads the judiciary and presides over major cases that can shape U.S. laws for generations. Lina Khan  – Chair of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Khan has significant influence over antitrust enforcement, consumer protection, and regulating large tech companies. Andover, Ansonia, Ashford, Avon, Barkhamsted, Beacon Falls, Berlin, Bethany, Bethel, Bethlehem, Bloomfield, Bolton, Bozrah, Branford, Bridgeport, Bridgewater, Bristol, Brookfield, Brooklyn, Burlington, Canaan, Canterbury, Canton, Chaplin, Cheshire, Chester, Clinton, Colchester, Colebrook, Columbia, Cornwall, Coventry, Cromwell, Danbury, Darien, Deep River, Derby, Durham, Eastford, East Granby, East Haddam, East Hampton, East Hartford, East Haven, East Lyme, Easton, East Windsor, Ellington, Enfield, Essex, Fairfield, Farmington, Franklin, Glastonbury, Goshen, Granby, Greenwich, Griswold, Groton, Guilford, Haddam, Hamden, Hampton, Hartford, Hartland, Harwinton, Hebron, Kent, Killingly, Killingworth, Lebanon, Ledyard, Lisbon, Litchfield, Lyme, Madison, Manchester, Mansfield, Marlborough, Meriden, Middlebury, Middlefield, Middletown, Milford, Monroe, Montville, Morris, Naugatuck, New Britain, New Canaan, New Fairfield, New Hartford, New Haven, Newington, New London, New Milford, Newtown, Norfolk, North Branford, North Canaan, North Haven, North Stonington, Norwalk, Norwich, Old Lyme, Old Saybrook, Orange, Oxford, Plainfield, Plainville, Plymouth, Pomfret, Portland, Preston, Prospect, Putnam, Redding, Ridgefield, Rocky Hill, Roxbury, Salem, Salisbury, Scotland, Seymour, Sharon, Shelton, Sherman, Simsbury, Somers, Southbury, Southington, South Windsor, Sprague, Stafford, Stamford, Sterling, Stonington, Stratford, Suffield, Thomaston, Thompson, Tolland, Torrington, Trumbull, Union, Vernon, Voluntown, Wallingford, Warren, Washington, Waterbury, Waterford, Watertown, Westbrook, West Hartford, West Haven, Weston, Westport, Wethersfield, Willington, Wilton, Winchester, Windham, Windsor, Windsor Locks, Wolcott, Woodbridge, Woodbury, Woodstock. Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming. "Fighting for Justice: Why Advocacy Groups and Lawyers Must Unite for Systemic Reform" "Legal Action for Change: How Lawyers and Advocates Can Tackle Government Corruption" "Advocating for Whistleblowers: The Legal Fight Against Retaliation" "The Power of Advocacy: How Lawyers Can Help Protect Vulnerable Populations" "Legal Rights Under Siege: Why Advocacy Groups Need to Take a Stand Now" "How Lawyers and Advocates Are Leading the Charge for Government Accountability" "Uncovering the Truth: The Legal Battle for Whistleblower Protections" "Advocating for Justice: The Role of Legal Experts in Combating Medicaid Fraud" "Why Advocacy Groups Are Key to Reforming the FOIA Process" "Lawyers Fighting for Transparency: The Importance of Legal Intervention in FOIA Cases" "The Legal Case for Federal Oversight: How Lawyers Can Drive Systemic Change" "Standing Up for Rights: Advocacy Groups Taking on Government Abuses" "Legal Heroes: How Lawyers Are Defending Whistleblowers and Ensuring Accountability" "Fighting for Medicaid Reform: The Role of Legal Experts in Protecting Taxpayer Funds" "Why Advocacy Groups Are Essential to Protecting Whistleblowers in Healthcare" "The Legal Fight Against Corruption: Advocacy Groups Leading the Way" "Lawyers and Advocates for Justice: How Legal Action Can Drive Systemic Reform" "Holding Government Accountable: Why Lawyers Are Crucial to Whistleblower Protections" "The Power of Legal Advocacy: How Lawyers Are Defending Transparency and Accountability" "Why Advocacy Groups and Legal Experts Must Join Forces to Fight Systemic Abuse" "The Crisis in Connecticut: How the ABI Waiver Program is Failing Thousands" "Unveiling the Truth: Whistleblowers Speak Out on Connecticut’s ABI Waiver Program" "Connecticut's Medicaid ABI Waiver: Why Federal Intervention is Urgently Needed" "How Can We Fix Connecticut’s ABI Waiver System? Your Voice Matters" "Protecting Brain Injury Survivors: It’s Time for Real Change in Connecticut" "Why Transparency and Accountability are Key to Saving Connecticut’s ABI Waiver Program" "The Untold Stories of Brain Injury Survivors in Connecticut’s Failing Medicaid System" "Whistleblowers Under Fire: Standing Up for Justice in Connecticut’s Healthcare System" "Time to Act: Urging Connecticut Leaders to Unite and Fix the ABI Waiver Crisis" "Restoring Trust in Connecticut's Healthcare: The Fight for ABI Waiver Reform" "Voices of Change: How You Can Help Fix Connecticut’s ABI Waiver Program" "Medicaid ABI Waiver Crisis: A Call for Federal Oversight and Immediate Action" "From Silence to Action: Whistleblowers Reveal the Truth About Connecticut’s ABI Waiver" "Connecticut Leaders, It’s Time to Stand Up for Brain Injury Survivors" "The Urgency of Federal Audits in Connecticut’s ABI Waiver Program" "Transparency Now: The Hidden Failures of Connecticut’s ABI Waiver System" "Whistleblower Protections: The Key to Fixing Connecticut’s Medicaid Crisis" "Rebuilding Trust: What Connecticut Must Do to Fix the ABI Waiver Program" "Connecticut’s Healthcare Crisis: Immediate Solutions for the ABI Waiver Program" "United for Change: How Connecticut Can Save Its ABI Waiver Program" "Connecticut Tax Dollars at Risk: The Hidden Costs of the ABI Waiver Program Crisis" "Where Are Your Taxes Going? The Financial Failures of Connecticut’s ABI Waiver" "Taxpayer Burden: How Mismanagement of the ABI Waiver Program Affects You" "Your Money, Your Right: Demand Transparency in Connecticut’s ABI Waiver Program" "Wasted Tax Dollars? Why Federal Oversight is Needed in Connecticut’s ABI Program" "Is Your Tax Money Being Misused? The Crisis in Connecticut’s Healthcare System" "How Connecticut's ABI Waiver Mismanagement is Costing Taxpayers Millions" "Why Every Taxpayer Should Care About Connecticut’s ABI Waiver Program" "The Fiscal Impact of Connecticut’s Failing ABI Waiver Program on Taxpayers" "Accountability for Your Tax Dollars: The Urgent Need to Fix the ABI Waiver Program" "Protecting Your Taxes: The Fight for Transparency in Connecticut’s Healthcare System" "Federal Oversight of ABI Waiver Program Could Save Connecticut Taxpayers Millions" "How Connecticut’s ABI Waiver Program is Failing Both Taxpayers and Patients" "The Hidden Taxpayer Costs Behind Connecticut’s Medicaid Mismanagement" "Demand Accountability: How the ABI Waiver Program is Misusing Your Tax Dollars" "Taxpayer Dollars at Stake: Why Whistleblower Protection Matters in Healthcare" "Save Money, Save Lives: Why Connecticut Needs ABI Waiver Reform Now" "Connecticut’s ABI Waiver Failures: A Burden on Taxpayers That Must Be Fixed" "Misuse of Medicaid Funds: The Hidden Taxpayer Costs in Connecticut’s ABI Waiver" "Fiscal Responsibility: Why Reforming the ABI Waiver Program is a Taxpayer Issue" "The Future of Medicaid: How Reform Can Save Billions for Taxpayers" "Medicaid Fraud and Waste: Why Taxpayers Should Demand Oversight" "Medicaid Funding Crisis: What It Means for Patients and Taxpayers" "Is Medicaid Serving Its Purpose? Addressing Mismanagement and Costs" "Medicaid’s Role in Healthcare: A Lifeline for Millions or a Broken System?" "Medicaid Mismanagement: How It’s Wasting Taxpayer Dollars" "The Hidden Costs of Medicaid: How Inefficiencies Affect Taxpayers" "Medicaid Reform: Why It’s Essential for America’s Healthcare Future" "How Medicaid Can Be Fixed to Ensure Quality Care and Responsible Spending" "Medicaid Fraud Costs Taxpayers Millions: What Can Be Done?" "Why Every Taxpayer Should Care About Medicaid Reform" "Medicaid’s Financial Burden on States: A Crisis Waiting to Happen" "How Medicaid Overhaul Could Improve Healthcare and Save Taxpayers Money" "Medicaid Expansion: Helping Millions or Straining the System?" "The True Cost of Medicaid Fraud and How It Impacts Taxpayers" "Is Medicaid Working for You? Examining Its Impact on Families and Communities" "Medicaid Accountability: Ensuring Taxpayer Dollars Are Spent Wisely" "How Medicaid’s Funding Issues Affect the Healthcare System" "Medicaid Spending in Crisis: What It Means for Healthcare and Taxes" "Medicaid Reform: Balancing Care Access and Fiscal Responsibility" "Exposing Systematic FOIA Abuses: How Agencies Block Public Access to Information" "The Dark Side of FOIA: Unethical Delays and Denials in Government Transparency" "When FOIA Requests Go Unanswered: The Systematic Erosion of Public Trust" "Unethical FOIA Practices: How Government Agencies Are Withholding Vital Information" "FOIA Under Fire: How Systemic Delays Are Undermining Government Accountability" "The Hidden Barriers: Unethical Tactics Agencies Use to Dodge FOIA Requests" "Transparency in Name Only: Systematic Failures of the FOIA Process" "How Government Agencies Exploit Loopholes to Deny FOIA Requests" "FOIA Reform Now: Addressing the Unethical Delays and Lack of Transparency" "The High Cost of Hidden Information: How FOIA Failures Are Harming Democracy" "Unethical Use of FOIA Exemptions: When Agencies Hide Behind the Law" "The Battle for Transparency: Systematic FOIA Failures and the Need for Reform" "Systematic Suppression: How FOIA is Being Abused to Withhold Critical Information" "Unethical FOIA Denials: How Agencies Are Avoiding Accountability" "How FOIA’s Intent is Being Undermined by Systemic Delays and Non-Compliance" "The Abuse of Power: Unethical FOIA Practices by Government Agencies" "When Transparency Becomes an Illusion: Systematic FOIA Failures" "FOIA Requests Denied: Unethical Loopholes and Systemic Obstruction" "Uncovering the Truth: How FOIA Failures Protect Corruption and Malfeasance" "A Broken System: How Unethical FOIA Practices Are Keeping Citizens in the Dark" "Protecting Whistleblowers: The Backbone of Transparency and Accountability" "Whistleblower Protections Under Fire: Why Safeguarding Truth-Tellers is Essential" "Why Every Workplace Needs Strong Whistleblower Protections Now" "Standing Up for Whistleblowers: How to Strengthen Legal Protections" "The Risks of Exposing Corruption: Why Whistleblower Protections Must Be Enforced" "Whistleblower Protections: The First Line of Defense Against Government Corruption" "Unprotected Whistleblowers: The Systemic Failures Putting Truth-Tellers at Risk" "How Weak Whistleblower Protections Undermine Justice and Transparency" "Reforming Whistleblower Laws: The Key to Ending Workplace Corruption" "Whistleblowers Face Retaliation: Why Stronger Protections Are Crucial" "Unethical Retaliation: How Weak Whistleblower Protections Are Failing Employees" "Defending the Truth: Why Whistleblower Protections Are Vital for Democracy" "From Silence to Justice: How Whistleblower Protections Safeguard Accountability" "Whistleblowers Under Siege: The Fight for Stronger Legal Safeguards" "Exposing Fraud Without Fear: The Role of Whistleblower Protections in the Workplace" "Retaliation Against Whistleblowers: How to Stop the Cycle of Fear and Silence" "How Strengthened Whistleblower Protections Can Curb Corporate Corruption" "Fighting Back: The Importance of Legal Protections for Whistleblowers" "Whistleblower Protections: The Legal Shield for Truth-Tellers" "Ending Retaliation: How Whistleblower Protections Can Empower Ethical Reporting" "Why Federal Help is Crucial to Fixing Systemic Failures in State Programs" "Federal Oversight Needed: Addressing Corruption and Mismanagement at the State Level" "How Federal Intervention Can Save Lives in Underfunded Healthcare Systems" "Calling on Washington: Why States Need Federal Help to Ensure Accountability" "Systemic Failures Demand Federal Action: How Oversight Can Bring Real Change" "How Federal Help Can Stop the Abuse of Taxpayer Dollars in Medicaid Programs" "When States Fail, Federal Intervention is Key to Restoring Justice" "The Role of the Federal Government in Protecting Vulnerable Populations" "A Call for Federal Oversight: Ending Mismanagement in State Medicaid Programs" "Bringing Accountability Through Federal Intervention: Fixing State-Level Corruption" "How Federal Help Can Reform Broken State Systems and Protect Whistleblowers" "Federal Audits and Oversight: The Key to Uncovering Waste and Fraud in State Programs" "Why Federal Help is Urgently Needed to Ensure Transparency in State Governments" "Federal Agencies Must Step In: Addressing Systemic Mismanagement in Medicaid" "The Importance of Federal Support in Fixing Healthcare Disparities Across States" "Why Federal Action is the Only Way to Bring Accountability to State-Funded Programs" "A Federal Solution for State-Level Corruption: Why Oversight is Essential" "How Federal Intervention Can End Retaliation Against Whistleblowers" "The Urgent Need for Federal Help in Fixing Medicaid's Systemic Issues" "How Federal Help Can Ensure Justice for Vulnerable Populations in State Programs"

DB.42.131.Inf. Here are the best federal websites to report issues related to delays, denial of assistance, or mismanagement by your state: 1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Website: https://tips.oig.hhs.gov/ Purpose: HHS oversees health-related federal programs like Medicaid. If you’re facing issues with healthcare or other support services, you can report concerns directly here. Whistleblower Protection Information: HHS Whistleblower Protection Program 2. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Website: https://tips.oig.hhs.gov/?_gl=1*1t3nyl*_ga*MTg0NjgyNTgyNS4xNzI3Nzg5NTkw*_ga_W5DCJS81Y5*MTcyNzc5MDA5Ny4xLjEuMTcyNzc5MDY5NS4wLjAuMA Purpose: CMS oversees the Medicaid program and can be contacted if you're having trouble receiving Medicaid-related services. Complaint Submission: CMS Contact Form 3. Office of the Inspector General (OIG) – U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Website: https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/report-fraud/ Purpose: The OIG investigates waste, fraud, and abuse in HHS programs, including Medicaid and state-administered programs. You can report any suspected state-level mismanagement of federal funds here. Report Fraud or Abuse: OIG Hotline 4. U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) Website: https://gao.gov/about/what-gao-does/fraud Purpose: GAO audits and investigates how taxpayer dollars are being spent, including state-level programs funded by federal money. You can report concerns related to mismanagement of federal funds here. Report Fraud, Waste, or Abuse: GAO FraudNet 5. U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) – Civil Rights Division Website: https://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ Purpose: If you believe you’re facing discrimination, such as being denied services because of your race, disability, or other protected categories, you can report it to the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division. Submit a Complaint: DOJ Civil Rights Online Complaint Form 6. THE WHITE HOUSE https://whitehouse.gov/contact/ Los mejores sitios web federales para reportar problemas relacionados con retrasos, denegación de asistencia o mala gestión por parte de tu estado: Departamento de Salud y Servicios Humanos de los EE. UU. (HHS) Sitio web: https://tips.oig.hhs.gov/ Propósito: El HHS supervisa programas federales relacionados con la salud, como Medicaid. Si tienes problemas con los servicios de salud u otros servicios de apoyo, puedes reportar tus inquietudes directamente aquí. Información sobre Protección de Denunciantes: Programa de Protección de Denunciantes del HHS. Centros de Servicios de Medicare y Medicaid (CMS) Sitio web: https://tips.oig.hhs.gov/?_gl=11t3nyl_gaMTg0NjgyNTgyNS4xNzI3Nzg5NTkw_ga_W5DCJS81Y5*MTcyNzc5MDA5Ny4xLjEuMTcyNzc5MDY5NS4wLjAuMA Propósito: CMS supervisa el programa Medicaid y puede ser contactado si tienes dificultades para recibir servicios relacionados con Medicaid. Envío de Quejas: Formulario de Contacto de CMS. Oficina del Inspector General (OIG) – Departamento de Salud y Servicios Humanos de EE. UU. Sitio web: https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/report-fraud/ Propósito: La OIG investiga el desperdicio, fraude y abuso en los programas del HHS, incluidos Medicaid y los programas administrados por los estados. Puedes reportar cualquier sospecha de mala gestión de fondos federales a nivel estatal aquí. Reportar Fraude o Abuso: Línea Directa de la OIG. Oficina de Responsabilidad Gubernamental de EE. UU. (GAO) Sitio web: https://gao.gov/about/what-gao-does/fraud Propósito: La GAO audita e investiga cómo se gastan los fondos de los contribuyentes, incluidos los programas a nivel estatal financiados con dinero federal. Puedes reportar inquietudes relacionadas con la mala gestión de fondos federales aquí. Reportar Fraude, Despilfarro o Abuso: GAO FraudNet. Departamento de Justicia de los EE. UU. (DOJ) – División de Derechos Civiles Sitio web: https://civilrights.justice.gov/report/ Propósito: Si crees que estás enfrentando discriminación, como ser denegado de servicios por tu raza, discapacidad u otras categorías protegidas, puedes reportarlo a la División de Derechos Civiles del DOJ. Presentar una Queja: Formulario de Queja en Línea de Derechos Civiles del DOJ. LA CASA BLANCA Sitio web: https://whitehouse.gov/contact/ REPORT MEDICAID PROBLEMS, TROUBLE GETTING MEDICAID HELP, HOW TO REPORT BAD HEALTHCARE, WHERE TO COMPLAIN ABOUT GOVERNMENT HELP, REPORT UNFAIR TREATMENT FOR MEDICAID, HELP WITH MEDICAID DELAYS, HOW TO REPORT MEDICAID FRAUD, REPORT PROBLEMS WITH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, HOW TO COMPLAIN ABOUT MEDICAID DENIAL, WHO TO CONTACT FOR HEALTHCARE ISSUES, REPORT UNFAIR MEDICAID SERVICES, WHERE TO REPORT MEDICAID ABUSE, MEDICAID SERVICE COMPLAINTS, REPORT GOVERNMENT HELP ISSUES INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON MEDICAID, PROBLEMAS PARA OBTENER AYUDA DE MEDICAID, CÓMO INFORMAR SOBRE MAL SERVICIO MÉDICO, DÓNDE QUEJARSE SOBRE AYUDA GUBERNAMENTAL, INFORMAR TRATO INJUSTO EN MEDICAID, AYUDA CON RETRASOS EN MEDICAID, CÓMO INFORMAR FRAUDE EN MEDICAID, INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON SERVICIOS DE SALUD, CÓMO QUEJARSE POR DENEGACIÓN DE MEDICAID, A QUIÉN CONTACTAR PARA PROBLEMAS MÉDICOS, INFORMAR SERVICIOS INJUSTOS DE MEDICAID, DÓNDE INFORMAR ABUSO EN MEDICAID, QUEJAS SOBRE SERVICIOS DE MEDICAID, INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON LA AYUDA GUBERNAMENTAL

Faith and Unconditional Love: A Heartfelt Song for Families Facing Life or Death Experiences DB.42.131.Inf. Introduction At ABI Resources, we understand the profound emotional journey that families experience when a loved one is facing a life-or-death situation. Our latest song, "Faith and Unconditional Love," captures this journey through powerful lyrics and a touching melody, offering a message of hope, support, and unwavering love. This song is a tribute to the resilience and strength that families display in the toughest times. About the Song "Faith and Unconditional Love" is more than just a song; it’s an anthem that speaks to the heart of every family member standing by a loved one in their most vulnerable moments. Inspired by the emotional experiences of families dealing with life-threatening conditions, this song emphasizes the power of faith, the beauty of unconditional love, and the profound lessons we learn through adversity. Key Themes: Faith:  The song reminds us to hold on to faith, even when faced with the darkest times. Unconditional Love:  It celebrates the pure, unwavering love that binds families together. Lessons Learned:  It reflects on the lessons of strength, hope, and perseverance that we gain through these experiences. Listen and Share We invite you to listen to "Faith and Unconditional Love" on our YouTube channel . Let this song be your anthem of hope and love. Share it with your family, friends, and anyone who might find solace in its message. How to Engage: Like, Comment, and Share:  Engage with the video on YouTube by liking, commenting, and sharing it with your network. Use Hashtags:  Use relevant hashtags such as #UnconditionalLove, #Faith, #FamilySupport, #HeartfeltSong, and #LifeOrDeath to join the conversation. Follow ABI Resources:  Stay connected with ABI Resources for more inspiring content and support. Join the Conversation We encourage you to share your own stories and experiences in the comments section of the video. Let’s create a community of support and strength where we can uplift and inspire one another through shared experiences. About ABI Resources At ABI Resources, we are dedicated to providing exceptional support and guidance for families facing the challenges of brain injury and other life-altering conditions. Our commitment to you is reflected in everything we do, from our comprehensive services to the heartfelt messages we share through our content. Our Services Include: Brain Injury Support:  Providing tailored assistance to individuals with brain injuries and their families. Disability Support:  Offering resources and guidance to help navigate the complexities of living with a disability. Advocacy:  Standing up for the rights of individuals with disabilities and ensuring they receive the support they deserve. Conclusion "Faith and Unconditional Love" is more than a song; it’s a testament to the incredible strength and love that defines our community. At ABI Resources, we believe in the power of faith and unconditional love to overcome any adversity. Together, we can spread a message of hope and love to families everywhere. Thank you for being a part of this journey. We look forward to continuing to support and inspire you through our work. Join Us We invite you to start this transformative journey with ABI Resources. Whether you are newly diagnosed or years post-injury, it’s never too late to improve your quality of life. Together, we can tackle the challenges and celebrate the victories. Your new beginning starts now. Legal Disclaimer Health Information Disclaimer for ABI Resources The content provided by ABI Resources, including all printed materials, audio content, and digital resources, is intended for informational purposes only. It is not designed to replace medical advice or to be used as a treatment plan for any illness or medical condition. ABI Resources does not engage in providing clinical services or diagnosing medical conditions. Before adopting any new health, dietary, or exercise program, it is crucial for individuals, especially those with acquired brain injuries or other special needs, to consult with a licensed healthcare professional. This is particularly important for those under the age of 18, pregnant or lactating women, and anyone suffering from chronic diseases or conditions requiring specialized medical attention. The programs and information provided by ABI Resources are generally aimed at healthy adults. If you choose to use any of the techniques or concepts shared without prior consultation with your healthcare provider, you are doing so at your own discretion. ABI Resources assumes no responsibility for your decisions or for the outcomes of your actions based upon those decisions. Should you experience any adverse effects or health concerns once you have begun a program, stop the program immediately and consult your healthcare provider without delay. By using the resources provided by ABI Resources, you acknowledge that you understand these considerations and agree to comply with the terms outlined above. This document and its contents are provided for general informational purposes only and are not intended as professional advice in any specific context. The information herein is provided "as-is" without warranty of any kind, either express or implied, including but not limited to warranties of performance, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement of intellectual property rights. Use of the information in this document does not establish a client-therapist or legal advisor-client relationship between the reader and the authors or publishers. While the guidelines and advice in this document are provided in good faith, they must be used with common sense and personal judgment. Individual situations and state laws vary and users are encouraged to consult a licensed professional for specific advice concerning their situation. No representations or warranties, either express or implied, of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials, shall be made. The publisher and its authors are not liable for any damages, including but not limited to special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, that may arise from following the advice proposed in this document. This document is not intended to be used as a basis for legal decisions or for actionable public health advice. Following the guidance in this document does not guarantee the health or improvement of your relationship. It is recommended that readers consider their personal situation and consult with their own therapist, counselor, or legal advisor before making any decisions based on the information provided herein. This document is not intended as a substitute for professional advice from a qualified practitioner, nor should it be construed as legal advice or opinion. All scenarios and examples contained in this document are entirely fictional and are for illustrative purposes only.

DB.42.131.Inf. At ABI Resources, we understand the profound journey of overcoming challenges and rising above adversity. We're thrilled to share a special piece of music inspired by this very spirit – our new song dedicated to survivors everywhere. Why This Song Matters In the world of brain injury support and disability services, we've seen firsthand the resilience and courage it takes to navigate life's toughest moments. This song is a tribute to that journey, highlighting the importance of living in the present, cherishing relationships, and maintaining an attitude of gratitude. Lyrics That Speak to the Heart Woke up today, the sun's shining bright,Got a scar, got a story, but I'm feeling alright,Been through the storm, walked through the rain,Now I'm dancing in the sunshine, free from the pain. These lyrics capture the essence of what it means to be a survivor – to embrace every moment, find strength in love and understanding, and rise above with grace. Join the Conversation We believe in the power of community and shared experiences. We invite you to listen to the song and share your thoughts. How has your journey been? What does being a survivor mean to you? Your stories inspire us and many others. Listen Now and Let Us Know What You Think! Chorus Highlight: So here's to the survivors, we're shining like stars,Embracing every moment, loving who we are,Forget the past, don't stress the future, live for today,With hearts full of gratitude, we'll find our way. Gratitude and Respect In line with our core values, this song also emphasizes the importance of gratitude and respect. Forgive those who may not understand your journey and cherish those who stand by you. Relationships are the most valuable gift we have, and this song is a celebration of that truth. Share Your Story We'd love to hear from you! Share your thoughts and experiences with us in the comments below or on our social media platforms. Let's inspire each other to live our best lives, filled with love, respect, and gratitude. Together, We Rise Thank you for being part of the ABI Resources family. Together, we can overcome any challenge and celebrate the beauty of life and love. Join Us We invite you to start this transformative journey with ABI Resources. Whether you are newly diagnosed or years post-injury, it’s never too late to improve your quality of life. Together, we can tackle the challenges and celebrate the victories. Your new beginning starts now. Legal Disclaimer Health Information Disclaimer for ABI Resources The content provided by ABI Resources, including all printed materials, audio content, and digital resources, is intended for informational purposes only. It is not designed to replace medical advice or to be used as a treatment plan for any illness or medical condition. ABI Resources does not engage in providing clinical services or diagnosing medical conditions. Before adopting any new health, dietary, or exercise program, it is crucial for individuals, especially those with acquired brain injuries or other special needs, to consult with a licensed healthcare professional. This is particularly important for those under the age of 18, pregnant or lactating women, and anyone suffering from chronic diseases or conditions requiring specialized medical attention. The programs and information provided by ABI Resources are generally aimed at healthy adults. If you choose to use any of the techniques or concepts shared without prior consultation with your healthcare provider, you are doing so at your own discretion. ABI Resources assumes no responsibility for your decisions or for the outcomes of your actions based upon those decisions. Should you experience any adverse effects or health concerns once you have begun a program, stop the program immediately and consult your healthcare provider without delay. By using the resources provided by ABI Resources, you acknowledge that you understand these considerations and agree to comply with the terms outlined above. This document and its contents are provided for general informational purposes only and are not intended as professional advice in any specific context. The information herein is provided "as-is" without warranty of any kind, either express or implied, including but not limited to warranties of performance, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement of intellectual property rights. Use of the information in this document does not establish a client-therapist or legal advisor-client relationship between the reader and the authors or publishers. While the guidelines and advice in this document are provided in good faith, they must be used with common sense and personal judgment. Individual situations and state laws vary and users are encouraged to consult a licensed professional for specific advice concerning their situation. No representations or warranties, either express or implied, of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials, shall be made. The publisher and its authors are not liable for any damages, including but not limited to special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, that may arise from following the advice proposed in this document. This document is not intended to be used as a basis for legal decisions or for actionable public health advice. Following the guidance in this document does not guarantee the health or improvement of your relationship. It is recommended that readers consider their personal situation and consult with their own therapist, counselor, or legal advisor before making any decisions based on the information provided herein. This document is not intended as a substitute for professional advice from a qualified practitioner, nor should it be construed as legal advice or opinion. All scenarios and examples contained in this document are entirely fictional and are for illustrative purposes only. At ABI Resources, we're not just changing the game; we're rewriting the rules of how disability support services connect with the heartbeat of Connecticut. Our collaboration with the Connecticut Department of Social Services DSS , Community Options , the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services DMHAS  and the visionary organizations at the Area on Aging  in Southwestern  and Western  Connecticut SWCAA   WCAAA  , ignites a powerhouse of resources and support. With Access Health , and United Services  by our side, we're creating a symphony of solutions that resonate through every community. ​ But we don't stop there. Our alliances with titans of education and healthcare like HFSC , Gaylord  , Griffin , UCONN , Yale , and Hartford Hospital are not just partnerships; they are a testament to our commitment to excellence. Together, we're pioneering a future where every individual has access to unparalleled care and support. This is where passion meets purpose. This is ABI Resources . Together, we're not just making a difference; we're setting a new standard for what it means to care.

Understanding ABI and Medicaid Waivers: A Comprehensive Guide Navigating the world of Medicaid waivers and programs can be daunting, especially for those dealing with acquired brain injuries (ABI) or traumatic brain injuries (TBI). This comprehensive guide aims to clarify the various waivers, programs, and services available in Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Tennessee, as well as provide an overview of related conditions and eligibility criteria. What is the ABI Waiver in CT? The Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver in Connecticut is a Medicaid program designed to provide home and community-based services (HCBS) to individuals with acquired brain injuries. The goal is to support these individuals in living as independently as possible, preventing the need for institutional care. What is an ABI Program? An ABI program offers specialized services and support to individuals who have sustained an acquired brain injury. These programs focus on rehabilitation, skill development, and community integration, helping participants achieve a higher quality of life and greater independence. What Qualifies for TBI? To qualify for TBI-related services, an individual must have sustained a traumatic brain injury due to an external physical force, such as a fall, motor vehicle accident, or sports injury. The injury must result in functional impairments or cognitive deficits that significantly affect the individual's ability to perform daily activities. What is the Acquired Brain Injury Service? Acquired Brain Injury Services encompass a range of supports and therapies aimed at individuals who have sustained brain injuries after birth, excluding those caused by congenital or degenerative conditions. These services include medical care, rehabilitation, vocational training, and community support to help individuals regain independence and improve their quality of life. What is an Autism Waiver in CT? The Autism Waiver in Connecticut is a Medicaid program that provides HCBS to individuals with autism spectrum disorder. This waiver offers services such as respite care, behavioral support, and community integration activities to help individuals with autism lead more fulfilling and independent lives. Are Waivers Enforceable in CT? Yes, Medicaid waivers are legally enforceable in Connecticut. These waivers are formal agreements that outline the services and supports individuals are entitled to receive. The state must adhere to these agreements to ensure eligible participants receive the care and support they need. How Does ABI Work? The ABI Waiver program works by allowing individuals with acquired brain injuries to access a range of services and supports tailored to their unique needs. Services may include case management, personal care assistance, cognitive rehabilitation, and vocational support, all aimed at enhancing independence and community integration. What is the Purpose of the ABI? The purpose of the ABI Waiver is to provide individuals with acquired brain injuries the necessary supports to live independently in their communities. By offering tailored services, the waiver aims to reduce the need for institutional care, promote rehabilitation, and improve the overall quality of life for participants. What is ABI in Simple Terms? In simple terms, Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) refers to any brain damage that occurs after birth, due to events such as accidents, strokes, or infections. Unlike congenital or degenerative brain conditions, ABI is acquired at some point after birth and can significantly impact an individual's cognitive, physical, and emotional functions. How Does CTE Work? Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE) is a progressive brain condition associated with repeated head injuries. CTE works by causing the gradual degeneration of brain tissue, including the build-up of abnormal proteins called tau. This condition can lead to symptoms such as memory loss, confusion, impaired judgment, and behavioral changes, often manifesting years after the repeated trauma. What Causes Acquired Brain Injury? Acquired Brain Injury can be caused by various factors, including: Trauma : Such as falls, car accidents, sports injuries, and assaults. Stroke : Interruptions in blood supply to the brain. Infections : Like meningitis or encephalitis. Hypoxia : Lack of oxygen to the brain, often due to drowning, choking, or cardiac arrest. Tumors : Brain tumors or cancer treatments. Toxins : Exposure to harmful substances, such as carbon monoxide poisoning. What is a Medicaid Waiver in Massachusetts? In Massachusetts, Medicaid waivers are programs that allow the state to provide home and community-based services to individuals who would otherwise require institutional care. These waivers cover a wide range of services, including personal care, respite care, case management, and specialized therapies, tailored to meet the needs of individuals with disabilities and chronic conditions. What is the Tennessee Medicaid Waiver Called? The Tennessee Medicaid Waiver is known as the CHOICES program. This waiver provides long-term services and supports to elderly individuals and adults with physical disabilities. The CHOICES program aims to help participants live independently by offering services such as personal care, home-delivered meals, and adult day care. By understanding the various waivers and programs available, individuals with brain injuries and their families can better navigate the healthcare system and access the supports they need. Whether it's the ABI Waiver in Connecticut, the CHOICES program in Tennessee, or Medicaid waivers in Massachusetts, these programs play a crucial role in enhancing the quality of life for those with disabilities. Join Us We invite you to start this transformative journey with ABI Resources. Whether you are newly diagnosed or years post-injury, it’s never too late to improve your quality of life. Together, we can tackle the challenges and celebrate the victories. Your new beginning starts now. Legal Disclaimer Health Information Disclaimer for ABI Resources The content provided by ABI Resources, including all printed materials, audio content, and digital resources, is intended for informational purposes only. It is not designed to replace medical advice or to be used as a treatment plan for any illness or medical condition. ABI Resources does not engage in providing clinical services or diagnosing medical conditions. Before adopting any new health, dietary, or exercise program, it is crucial for individuals, especially those with acquired brain injuries or other special needs, to consult with a licensed healthcare professional. This is particularly important for those under the age of 18, pregnant or lactating women, and anyone suffering from chronic diseases or conditions requiring specialized medical attention. The programs and information provided by ABI Resources are generally aimed at healthy adults. If you choose to use any of the techniques or concepts shared without prior consultation with your healthcare provider, you are doing so at your own discretion. ABI Resources assumes no responsibility for your decisions or for the outcomes of your actions based upon those decisions. Should you experience any adverse effects or health concerns once you have begun a program, stop the program immediately and consult your healthcare provider without delay. By using the resources provided by ABI Resources, you acknowledge that you understand these considerations and agree to comply with the terms outlined above. This document and its contents are provided for general informational purposes only and are not intended as professional advice in any specific context. The information herein is provided "as-is" without warranty of any kind, either express or implied, including but not limited to warranties of performance, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement of intellectual property rights. Use of the information in this document does not establish a client-therapist or legal advisor-client relationship between the reader and the authors or publishers. While the guidelines and advice in this document are provided in good faith, they must be used with common sense and personal judgment. Individual situations and state laws vary and users are encouraged to consult a licensed professional for specific advice concerning their situation. No representations or warranties, either express or implied, of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials, shall be made. The publisher and its authors are not liable for any damages, including but not limited to special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, that may arise from following the advice proposed in this document. This document is not intended to be used as a basis for legal decisions or for actionable public health advice. Following the guidance in this document does not guarantee the health or improvement of your relationship. It is recommended that readers consider their personal situation and consult with their own therapist, counselor, or legal advisor before making any decisions based on the information provided herein. This document is not intended as a substitute for professional advice from a qualified practitioner, nor should it be construed as legal advice or opinion. All scenarios and examples contained in this document are entirely fictional and are for illustrative purposes only. At ABI Resources, we're not just changing the game; we're rewriting the rules of how disability support services connect with the heartbeat of Connecticut. Our collaboration with the Connecticut Department of Social Services DSS , Community Options , the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services DMHAS  and the visionary organizations at the Area on Aging  in Southwestern  and Western  Connecticut SWCAA   WCAAA  , ignites a powerhouse of resources and support. With Access Health , and United Services  by our side, we're creating a symphony of solutions that resonate through every community. ​ But we don't stop there. Our alliances with titans of education and healthcare like HFSC , Gaylord  , Griffin , UCONN , Yale , and Hartford Hospital are not just partnerships; they are a testament to our commitment to excellence. Together, we're pioneering a future where every individual has access to unparalleled care and support. This is where passion meets purpose. This is ABI Resources . Together, we're not just making a difference; we're setting a new standard for what it means to care. DB.42.131.Inf.

DB.42.131.Inf. Protecting Consumer Rights in the ABI Waiver Program: A Collaborative Approach Navigating the world of brain injury recovery can be challenging for both survivors and their care managers. The Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program is a crucial resource, but understanding and effectively utilizing it can be daunting. At ABI Resources, we believe in working together to ensure that brain injury survivors and care managers have the tools and knowledge they need. Let's explore the vital role of care managers and how presenting a full range of agency options can protect consumer rights. Comprehensive Services Care managers play a key role in ensuring that clients have access to a broad spectrum of services tailored to their individual needs. Presenting the complete Approved Agency Provider list means clients can select from a wide array of options, allowing for a care plan that is both personalized and thorough. This approach ensures that all unique needs are met, providing the best possible support for recovery. Informed Decision-Making When clients are presented with all available agency options, they gain the ability to make well-informed decisions about their care. This transparency fosters trust and enables clients to choose providers and services that align with their preferences and needs. It's about giving individuals the information they need to take control of their care journey. Preventing Misleading Practices It's crucial to ensure that clients are aware of all their options. Limiting choices can sometimes lead to practices that might seem easier but are not in the best interest of the client. By following the full provider list, care managers maintain ethical standards and avoid any practices that could be seen as self-serving. This dedication to transparency builds trust and ensures that clients receive the best care possible. Adherence to Medicaid Guidelines The ABI Waiver Program, funded by Medicaid, has stringent guidelines designed to prevent misuse of funds and ensure services are provided by approved agencies. Compliance with these guidelines is essential, not only for legal reasons but also to guarantee that clients receive high-quality care. By adhering to these rules, care managers uphold the integrity of the program and protect against potential legal and ethical issues. Balancing Workloads Care management agencies often face the challenge of understaffing, which can lead to overworked care managers. While it might seem easier to limit provider options to reduce workload, this can compromise care quality and lead to non-compliance with Medicaid regulations. By presenting all agency options, care responsibilities are more evenly distributed across providers, enhancing overall service delivery and ensuring each client receives the attention they need. At ABI Resources, we're dedicated to supporting both brain injury survivors and the care managers who help them. By working together and following best practices, care managers play a crucial role in maintaining the ethical standards and effectiveness of the ABI Waiver Program. This collaborative approach ensures that individuals with acquired brain injuries receive the comprehensive care and support they need to improve their quality of life. Join Us We invite you to start this transformative journey with ABI Resources. Whether you are newly diagnosed or years post-injury, it’s never too late to improve your quality of life. Together, we can tackle the challenges and celebrate the victories. Your new beginning starts now. Legal Disclaimer Health Information Disclaimer for ABI Resources The content provided by ABI Resources, including all printed materials, audio content, and digital resources, is intended for informational purposes only. It is not designed to replace medical advice or to be used as a treatment plan for any illness or medical condition. ABI Resources does not engage in providing clinical services or diagnosing medical conditions. Before adopting any new health, dietary, or exercise program, it is crucial for individuals, especially those with acquired brain injuries or other special needs, to consult with a licensed healthcare professional. This is particularly important for those under the age of 18, pregnant or lactating women, and anyone suffering from chronic diseases or conditions requiring specialized medical attention. The programs and information provided by ABI Resources are generally aimed at healthy adults. If you choose to use any of the techniques or concepts shared without prior consultation with your healthcare provider, you are doing so at your own discretion. ABI Resources assumes no responsibility for your decisions or for the outcomes of your actions based upon those decisions. Should you experience any adverse effects or health concerns once you have begun a program, stop the program immediately and consult your healthcare provider without delay. By using the resources provided by ABI Resources, you acknowledge that you understand these considerations and agree to comply with the terms outlined above. This document and its contents are provided for general informational purposes only and are not intended as professional advice in any specific context. The information herein is provided "as-is" without warranty of any kind, either express or implied, including but not limited to warranties of performance, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement of intellectual property rights. Use of the information in this document does not establish a client-therapist or legal advisor-client relationship between the reader and the authors or publishers. While the guidelines and advice in this document are provided in good faith, they must be used with common sense and personal judgment. Individual situations and state laws vary and users are encouraged to consult a licensed professional for specific advice concerning their situation. No representations or warranties, either express or implied, of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials, shall be made. The publisher and its authors are not liable for any damages, including but not limited to special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, that may arise from following the advice proposed in this document. This document is not intended to be used as a basis for legal decisions or for actionable public health advice. Following the guidance in this document does not guarantee the health or improvement of your relationship. It is recommended that readers consider their personal situation and consult with their own therapist, counselor, or legal advisor before making any decisions based on the information provided herein. This document is not intended as a substitute for professional advice from a qualified practitioner, nor should it be construed as legal advice or opinion. All scenarios and examples contained in this document are entirely fictional and are for illustrative purposes only. At ABI Resources, we're not just changing the game; we're rewriting the rules of how disability support services connect with the heartbeat of Connecticut. Our collaboration with the Connecticut Department of Social Services DSS , Community Options , the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services DMHAS  and the visionary organizations at the Area on Aging  in Southwestern  and Western  Connecticut SWCAA   WCAAA  , ignites a powerhouse of resources and support. With Access Health , and United Services  by our side, we're creating a symphony of solutions that resonate through every community. ​ But we don't stop there. Our alliances with titans of education and healthcare like HFSC , Gaylord  , Griffin , UCONN , Yale , and Hartford Hospital are not just partnerships; they are a testament to our commitment to excellence. Together, we're pioneering a future where every individual has access to unparalleled care and support. This is where passion meets purpose. This is ABI Resources . Together, we're not just making a difference; we're setting a new standard for what it means to care.

DB.42.131.Inf. In today's world, the concept of freedom of choice has become increasingly important, especially when it comes to healthcare decisions. The ability to make choices that impact our health is a fundamental right that everyone should be able to exercise. With that said, the state of Connecticut is taking a significant step forward in providing its residents with more options and greater flexibility when it comes to healthcare through its CT MFP ABI Programs and Connecticut home-based supported living services. One of the key benefits of these programs is the ability to have home healthcare team meetings. These meetings can provide numerous advantages, including convenience, comfort, cost-effectiveness, personalized care, and increased communication. By having team meetings in the patient's home, they can avoid the stress and inconvenience of traveling to a healthcare facility, which can be especially important for those with mobility or transportation issues. Additionally, home healthcare meetings can be more comfortable for patients, as they can take place in a familiar and relaxing environment. Furthermore, this approach is more cost-effective as it saves on transportation costs, which can be a significant financial burden for many families. By choosing home-based supported living services, patients can receive the same level of care and support that they would receive in a healthcare facility, but in the comfort of their own home. Moreover, these services provide more personalized care as healthcare providers can assess the patient's home environment, identify potential issues that may impact their health, and address them in a timely manner. This approach also facilitates better communication between healthcare providers and patients as they can discuss progress, concerns, and goals in a more relaxed and informal setting. As a result, patients feel more comfortable and confident in their healthcare choices. Therefore, it is essential to continue to support programs like the CT MFP ABI Programs and Connecticut home-based supported living services that offer freedom of choice and flexibility in healthcare. These programs provide vital services that allow patients to receive high-quality care in the comfort of their homes. FREEDOM OF CHOICE, CTMFPIABIPROGRAMS, TEAM MEETINGS, and CONNECTICUT HOME BASED SUPPORTED LIVING, we can raise awareness of these programs and encourage others to take advantage of the benefits they offer.