Informed Choice and Its Implications for Connecticut's ABI Waiver and MFP Programs Introduction Connecticut's Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver program and the Money Follows the Person (MFP) program are designed to promote independence, self-determination, and community integration for individuals with acquired brain injuries and those transitioning from institutional to community-based care settings. Informed choice plays a critical role in ensuring the success and effectiveness of these programs. This article will explore the relationship between informed choice and Connecticut's ABI Waiver and MFP programs, discussing the challenges and strategies for promoting informed decision-making among program participants. What is informed choice, and why is it important in healthcare? What are some challenges that patients and healthcare providers face in ensuring informed choice in healthcare? How can healthcare providers promote informed choice among their patients? How do the ABI Waiver Program and the Money Follows the Person Program prioritize informed choice for individuals with disabilities? What strategies can be implemented to address cultural and linguistic barriers to informed choice in healthcare? How can individuals improve their health literacy to make more informed decisions about their healthcare? What role does shared decision-making play in promoting informed choice in healthcare? How can healthcare providers become more culturally competent and improve their communication with patients from diverse backgrounds? What are some potential outcomes of prioritizing informed choice in healthcare? How might a patient-centered approach to healthcare delivery help promote informed choice among patients? Informed Choice in the Context of ABI Waiver and MFP Programs Both the ABI Waiver and MFP programs aim to provide individuals with greater control over their lives and care plans. To achieve this, it is crucial that participants have the necessary information and understanding to make informed choices about their care and support services. This includes: Comprehensive Information: Participants should have access to detailed information about available services, providers, and support options within the programs. Clear Communication: Information should be presented in a manner that is easy to understand, taking into account participants' cognitive abilities and communication preferences. Personalized Support: Participants should receive guidance and support tailored to their unique needs and circumstances, ensuring that their choices align with their goals and preferences. Challenges to Informed Choice in ABI Waiver and MFP Programs Complexity of Services and Support Options: The range of services and support options available through the ABI Waiver and MFP programs can be overwhelming for participants. Understanding the intricacies of each option and making informed choices can be challenging. Cognitive and Communication Barriers: Individuals with acquired brain injuries may experience cognitive and communication impairments, making it difficult for them to comprehend and process complex information. Limited Resources: Both the ABI Waiver and MFP programs operate within budget constraints, which can limit the availability of support services and resources for promoting informed choice. Strategies to Enhance Informed Choice in ABI Waiver and MFP Programs Simplify Information: Information about services and support options should be presented in a clear and concise manner, using simple language and visual aids when appropriate. Provide Decision Support: Program staff, case managers, and support coordinators should work closely with participants to help them navigate the decision-making process, offering guidance and support tailored to individual needs and preferences. Collaborate with Stakeholders: Collaboration between program staff, healthcare providers, and family members is essential for ensuring that participants receive accurate, comprehensive, and timely information to make informed choices. Develop Specialized Training: Program staff and service providers should receive specialized training to effectively support individuals with cognitive and communication impairments in making informed choices. Advocate for Adequate Funding: Advocacy efforts should focus on securing sufficient funding for the ABI Waiver and MFP programs, ensuring the availability of support services and resources necessary for promoting informed choice among participants. Conclusion Informed choice is essential for the success of Connecticut's ABI Waiver and MFP programs, as it empowers participants to make decisions that align with their goals, preferences, and personal circumstances. By addressing the challenges to informed choice and implementing strategies to simplify information, provide decision support, collaborate with stakeholders, develop specialized training, and advocate for adequate funding, these programs can better support individuals with acquired brain injuries and those transitioning from institutional to community-based care settings in achieving greater independence, self-determination, and community integration. _________________ informed choice, free choice, healthcare, patient autonomy, medical ethics, information overload, medical jargon, complexity, limited time, healthcare providers, cultural barriers, linguistic barriers, patient education, shared decision-making, health literacy, culturally competent care, Connecticut, Acquired Brain Injury, ABI Waiver, Money Follows the Person, MFP program, independence, self-determination, community integration, comprehensive information, clear communication, personalized support, support services, cognitive impairments, communication impairments, budget constraints, simplify information, decision support, collaboration, stakeholders, specialized training, advocacy, adequate funding, treatment options, risks, benefits, evidence-based information, patient preferences, patient-centered approach, healthcare delivery, patient outcomes, diverse societies, language differences, cultural competence, patient values, personal circumstances, tailored materials, learning preferences, diverse backgrounds, trust, understanding, community-based care, institutional care, cognitive abilities, communication preferences, support options, support coordinators, case managers, visual aids, family members, program staff, service providers, goals, funding, accurate information, timely information, healthcare settings, modern medical ethics, decision-making process, program participants, participant needs, healthcare plans, healthcare information, healthcare decisions, healthcare system, quality of life, well-being, complexity of services, program resources, program effectiveness, program success, participant goals, participant preferences, participant circumstances Ongoing Silence! Lack of Transparency in Connecticut's Federally Funded Programs Raises Alarm Secret Directory and Practices: Concerns Rise for Brain-Injured Individuals in Connecticut Medicaid Federal Anti-Kickback Statute | Medicaid Referral Fraud | ABI RESOURCES Transparency and Accountability Concerns in CT's Federally Funded Programs for Brain Injury Care Care Managers. Do you have the right to change yours? Understanding Protecting Your Freedoms Investigating the Legality and Impact of CCC's Secret Electronic Randomization System on Federally Disability Rights Connecticut (DRCT) Team Dear Brain Injury Alliance of Connecticut ( BIAC ) Dear Governor Ned Lamont, Advocacy Request for Brain Injury Survivors Alleged Discrimination at Connecticut Community Care | Calls for Internal Investigation The Importance of Informed Choice in Achieving Free Choice in Healthcare. Informed Choice and Its Implications for Connecticut's ABI Waiver and MFP Programs Steps for Consumers to Officially Change Care Managers in MFP and ABI Waiver Programs. Enhancing Ethical Systems / Advocating for Consumer Rights and "Request to change Care Manager Form Are They Leaving People with Slower Recovery Behind? MFP and ABI Waiver Programs Freedom of Information Act Request - Connecticut ABI 1549P Consultation Services Funding. DB.42.131.Inf.

What are the primary goals and objectives of the ABI Waiver and MFP programs? Primary goals and objectives: Both the ABI Waiver and MFP programs aim to help individuals with disabilities or long-term care needs transition from institutional settings to community-based settings, promoting independence and improving their quality of life. How do these programs differ from one another, and who is eligible for each? Differences and eligibility: The ABI Waiver specifically targets individuals with acquired brain injuries, while the MFP program serves a broader population, including those with physical disabilities, mental health conditions, or developmental disabilities. Eligibility criteria differ based on the specific program and state regulations. What types of services and supports are offered through these programs? Services and supports: These programs offer a range of services and supports, such as accessible housing, personal care assistance, health care and rehabilitation services, transportation, assistive technology, employment and education opportunities, social and community integration, financial assistance, care coordination, and legal and advocacy support. How can I access these programs if I or a loved one is eligible? Accessing the programs: To access these programs, interested individuals or their caregivers should contact their state's Medicaid agency or Department of Health and Human Services for information on eligibility, application processes, and available services. What are some success stories or case studies of individuals who have benefited from the ABI Waiver and MFP programs? Success stories and case studies: Success stories and case studies can be found through state agencies, advocacy organizations, and news articles highlighting individuals who have transitioned from institutional settings to community living with the support of these programs. How do these programs address accessibility, healthcare, and other specific needs for participants? Addressing specific needs: The ABI Waiver and MFP programs tailor services and supports to individual needs, addressing accessibility, healthcare, and other specific requirements to ensure successful transitions and improved quality of life. What are the potential challenges and limitations of these programs, and how can they be improved? Challenges and limitations: Potential challenges and limitations may include funding constraints, limited availability of affordable and accessible housing, and difficulties coordinating and navigating the complex web of services and supports. How can communities and support networks better assist individuals in navigating these programs? Community and support network assistance: Communities and support networks can assist by raising awareness of these programs, advocating for improved services, providing resources and guidance, and offering social and emotional support to individuals navigating the transition process. Are there any additional resources or programs available for people with disabilities or long-term care needs that complement the ABI Waiver and MFP programs? Additional resources and programs: Additional resources and programs may include Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI), Supplemental Security Income (SSI), vocational rehabilitation services, state-specific waiver programs, and various nonprofit organizations that support individuals with disabilities. What are the long-term impacts of these programs on participants' quality of life, independence, and community integration? Long-term impacts: The long-term impacts of the ABI Waiver and MFP programs can include increased independence, improved quality of life, community integration, and greater self-sufficiency for participants, leading to more fulfilling and meaningful lives. The Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver and Money Follows the Person (MFP) programs are essential initiatives designed to support individuals with disabilities or long-term care needs in transitioning from institutional settings to community-based environments. These programs aim to enhance participants' independence and overall quality of life by offering tailored services and supports, including accessible housing, personal care assistance, healthcare, transportation, and assistive technology. Eligibility criteria for each program differ, with the ABI Waiver specifically targeting individuals with acquired brain injuries, while MFP serves a broader population. To access these programs, interested individuals should contact their state's Medicaid agency or Department of Health and Human Services. Success stories from these programs highlight the positive impact they can have on participants' lives. However, challenges and limitations may arise, such as funding constraints, housing availability, and service coordination difficulties. Communities and support networks can play a vital role in assisting individuals navigating these programs by raising awareness, advocating for improved services, and providing resources and guidance. Complementary resources and programs, including Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI), Supplemental Security Income (SSI), and vocational rehabilitation services, may also be available to support individuals with disabilities. The long-term impacts of the ABI Waiver and MFP programs can lead to increased independence, community integration, and improved quality of life for participants. "Explore the ABI Waiver and Money Follows the Person programs, designed to help individuals with disabilities transition to community living, with a focus on tailored services, accessibility, and improved quality of life." ___________________________ ABI Waiver, Money Follows the Person, long-term care, disabilities, eligibility, services, support networks, community integration, success stories, challenges, quality of life, healthcare, accessibility, case studies, resources, independence, programs, goals, objectives, participants, improvements, impact, navigation, primary, secondary, tertiary, care, Medicaid, Medicare, funding, reimbursement, waivers, aging, elderly, chronic conditions, mental health, physical disabilities, cognitive disabilities, developmental disabilities, healthcare policy, healthcare reform, social services, government programs, healthcare services, healthcare benefits, healthcare access, healthcare coverage, healthcare providers, healthcare facilities, healthcare insurance, healthcare legislation, healthcare system, healthcare costs, healthcare management, healthcare technology, healthcare professionals, healthcare workforce, healthcare administration, healthcare data, healthcare ethics, healthcare research, healthcare trends, healthcare innovation, healthcare delivery, healthcare financing, healthcare infrastructure, healthcare disparities, healthcare outcomes. DB.42.131.Inf.

In recent years, the demand for accessible housing has grown significantly due to an aging population and increased awareness about the importance of inclusivity for people with disabilities. This demand is particularly evident among individuals who benefit from the Money Follows the Person (MFP) program and the Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) waiver program. To improve their quality of life, it is crucial to provide these consumers with affordable, accessible, and safe housing options that accommodate their specific needs, such as wheelchair ramps, grab bars, and wider doorways. The Importance of Accessible Housing for MFP and ABI Waiver Program Consumers. The MFP program is a federal initiative that helps individuals transition from institutional care to community-based settings. Similarly, the ABI waiver program supports individuals with brain injuries in accessing necessary services to live independently. Both programs aim to empower participants to lead fulfilling lives in their communities. Accessible housing plays a significant role in achieving these goals, as it enables MFP and ABI waiver program consumers to maintain their independence and participate fully in their communities. Features like wheelchair ramps, grab bars, and wider doorways not only make daily tasks more manageable but also promote a sense of dignity and self-sufficiency among these individuals. Challenges in Accessible Housing Despite the clear need for accessible housing, many barriers continue to limit the availability of suitable options for MFP and ABI waiver program consumers. High costs, limited funding, and a lack of awareness among property developers contribute to a severe shortage of accessible homes. To overcome these challenges, it is essential for policymakers, housing developers, and community stakeholders to collaborate and invest in the creation and maintenance of affordable, accessible, and safe housing options for MFP and ABI waiver program consumers. Conclusion By prioritizing the development of accessible housing, we can significantly improve the lives of individuals who benefit from the MFP and ABI waiver programs. It is our responsibility to ensure that these individuals have the opportunity to lead independent, fulfilling lives in inclusive communities. Let us commit to creating a more accessible world for all, starting with the homes in which we live. ________________ accessible housing, MFP, Money Follows the Person, ABI waiver program, Acquired Brain Injury, affordable, safe, wheelchair ramps, grab bars, wider doorways, independent living, disabilities, inclusivity, community-based settings, dignity, self-sufficiency, housing developers, policymakers, community stakeholders, collaboration, investment, housing options, transition, institutional care, brain injuries, support services, housing shortage, housing costs, housing policy, housing accessibility, aging population, home modifications, disability rights, barrier-free, universal design, housing crisis, housing solutions, housing advocacy, accessible design, home adaptations, accessible homes, disabled individuals, special needs, adaptive housing, supportive housing, disability support, accessible communities, senior living, housing for disabled, accessible apartments, disability housing, accessible infrastructure, fair housing, housing assistance, accessible development, disability-friendly housing, disabled housing, housing rights, disability access, affordable housing, accessible accommodations, disability legislation, independent housing, accessible public spaces, disabled access, housing programs, disability inclusion, community living, accessible environment, housing policies, disability awareness, accessible living, housing needs, accessible construction, accessibility standards, disability services, inclusive design, accessible facilities, accessible spaces, housing market, accessible features, supportive services, accessibility compliance, accessible building, disability accommodations, housing regulations, accessible entrances, housing initiatives, housing projects, disability discrimination, accessible units, housing providers. DB.42.131.Inf.

Dear CT DSS and COU, As a provider of waiver services for the Money Follows the Person (MFP) and Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) programs, ABI resources is reaching out to request information regarding the steps consumers must take to officially change their care managers. Your guidance in this matter would be greatly appreciated, as we aim to have a clear understanding of the process. To help us have a comprehensive understanding of the procedures involved, kindly provide details on the following aspects: The necessary forms or paperwork to be completed by the consumers, if any. The appropriate channels or points of contact for consumers to submit the required documentation. The expected timeframe for processing the change request and the potential impact, if any, on the clients' current services. Any additional steps or considerations that consumers should be aware of during this process to ensure a seamless transition. We appreciate your support in providing this information, as it will allow us to better understand the process and ensure that our practices align with the proper procedures. If possible, please provide any resources or guidance materials that could be helpful in understanding and completing the process. Thank you in advance for your assistance. I look forward to receiving your response and any additional information you can provide. Sincerely, ABI Resources All the best, David Medeiros _____________________ waiver services, Money Follows the Person, Acquired Brain Injury, programs, provider, request, information, steps, consumers, change, care managers, guidance, process, understanding, procedures, aspects, forms, paperwork, channels, points of contact, documentation, timeframe, processing, request, impact, clients' services, additional steps, considerations, seamless transition, resources, clarification, email address, phone number, Organization, 4/24/2023 Ongoing Silence! Lack of Transparency in Connecticut's Federally Funded Programs Raises Alarm Secret Directory and Practices: Concerns Rise for Brain-Injured Individuals in Connecticut Medicaid Federal Anti-Kickback Statute | Medicaid Referral Fraud | ABI RESOURCES Transparency and Accountability Concerns in CT's Federally Funded Programs for Brain Injury Care Care Managers. Do you have the right to change yours? Understanding Protecting Your Freedoms Investigating the Legality and Impact of CCC's Secret Electronic Randomization System on Federally Disability Rights Connecticut (DRCT) Team Dear Brain Injury Alliance of Connecticut ( BIAC ) Dear Governor Ned Lamont, Advocacy Request for Brain Injury Survivors Alleged Discrimination at Connecticut Community Care | Calls for Internal Investigation The Importance of Informed Choice in Achieving Free Choice in Healthcare. Informed Choice and Its Implications for Connecticut's ABI Waiver and MFP Programs Steps for Consumers to Officially Change Care Managers in MFP and ABI Waiver Programs. Enhancing Ethical Systems / Advocating for Consumer Rights and "Request to change Care Manager Form Are They Leaving People with Slower Recovery Behind? MFP and ABI Waiver Programs Freedom of Information Act Request - Connecticut ABI 1549P Consultation Services Funding. DB.42.131.Inf.

ABI Resources received this correspondence from DSS COU in relation to our advocacy request letter: "Steps for Consumers to Officially Change Care Managers in MFP and ABI Waiver Programs." "David- If an individual would like to change case managers, they are permitted to do so by contacting their current case manager, access agency, or supervisor at the access agency to request such a change. The request will be granted based on case manager availability." ABI Resources is grateful for a response from DSS COU and has presented this advocacy request letter accordingly; Enhancing Ethical Systems and Advocating for Consumer Rights Dear [DSS and COU Representative], I am writing on behalf of ABI Resources to address the challenges faced by our consumers when requesting a change of care managers. We understand that various factors, such as conflicts or other concerns, may prompt consumers to consider this change. Our organization is committed to advocating for consumer rights, and we request that DSS and COU collaborate with us to improve the current system for changing care managers. Ethical Concerns in the Current Process: The current process poses several ethical concerns, including: • Fear of retaliation or negative consequences resulting from requesting a change. • Uncertainty about the process and whom to contact for assistance. • Concerns about the confidentiality of the request and potential breaches of privacy. • Anxiety over potential disruptions in care and support services during the transition. • Apprehension about establishing a new relationship with a different care manager. • Worries that the new care manager may not understand or respect their individual needs and preferences. Conflicts Arising from Case Manager Availability: The DSS COU response statement, "The request will be granted based on case manager availability," may create conflicts and not align with the best interests of the individuals served. These conflicts include: • Prioritizing agency interests over consumer needs. • Restricting consumer choice. • Inconsistency with person-centered care. • Challenging self-advocacy. • Potential for strained relationships. We request that the system be revised to align with the principles of person-centered care, consumer choice, and individual rights. Proposed Solutions: We kindly request that DSS and COU work to implement transparent, effective and ethical systems for consumer self-advocacy. These may include: • Developing easy-to-understand written materials and an online resource to document the request. Including a printable "Request to change Care Manager Form" • Designating a dedicated neutral contact person within DSS / COU and not the Care Management access agency itself. • Implementing regular training and education for care managers and relevant staff. • Establishing transparent and accessible channels of communication. • Regularly reviewing and assessing the effectiveness of the system. • Developing a clear protocol for requesting care manager changes. • Establishing a confidential reporting system. • Ensuring all parties involved in the process are trained in effective communication, conflict resolution, and ethical conduct. • Providing support and resources during the transition to a new care manager. • Encouraging ongoing feedback from consumers. Such a system would ideally offer transparency in terms of the decision-making processes, policies, and procedures that directly affect the consumers. Furthermore, it would provide them with easy access to relevant information, enabling them to make informed decisions and assert their rights and preferences. Would you please provide some information on whether DSS COU will implement such a system? If so, what is the anticipated timeline for its rollout, and what steps are being taken to ensure its successful integration? By working together, we can create a streamlined and accessible system, empowering our consumers to advocate for themselves during care manager changes. This will promote a positive and supportive relationship between consumers, care managers, and the wider service system. We look forward to collaborating with you on this important matter. Best regards, ABI Resources David Medeiros _______________________________ Enhancing Ethical Systems / Advocating for Consumer Rights and "Request to change Care Manager Form" https://www.ctbraininjury.com/post/ethical-advocating-consumer-rights-change-care-manager I am writing on behalf of ABI Resources to address the challenges faced by our consumers when requesting a change of care managers. We understand that various factors, such as conflicts or other concerns, may prompt consumers to consider this change. Our organization is committed to advocating for consumer rights, and we request that DSS and COU collaborate with us to improve the current system for changing care managers. care managers, process, consumers, self-advocacy, person-centered care, rights, conflicts, change, interests, individual, agency, availability, concerns, preferences, choice, support services, relationships, assertive, dominating personalities, confidentiality, retaliation, anxiety, transition, freedom, communication, needs, goals, planning, delivery, consumer-oriented, quality, principles, challenges, barriers, collaboration, system, revision, consumer choice, individual rights, training, education, resources, transparency, confidentiality, reporting, request, retaliation, support, regular review, accessibility, effectiveness, satisfaction, autonomy, wellbeing, assessment, improvements, concerns, feedback, implementation, assistance, service delivery, contact person, helpline, online platform, priorities, management, respect, understanding, collaboration, ethical conduct, communication channels, agency interests, consumer input, addressing concerns, continuity of care, dedicated contact, best interests, consumer concerns, care manager changes, self-advocacy process, person served. Ongoing Silence! Lack of Transparency in Connecticut's Federally Funded Programs Raises Alarm Secret Directory and Practices: Concerns Rise for Brain-Injured Individuals in Connecticut Medicaid Federal Anti-Kickback Statute | Medicaid Referral Fraud | ABI RESOURCES Transparency and Accountability Concerns in CT's Federally Funded Programs for Brain Injury Care Care Managers. Do you have the right to change yours? Understanding Protecting Your Freedoms Investigating the Legality and Impact of CCC's Secret Electronic Randomization System on Federally Disability Rights Connecticut (DRCT) Team Dear Brain Injury Alliance of Connecticut ( BIAC ) Dear Governor Ned Lamont, Advocacy Request for Brain Injury Survivors Alleged Discrimination at Connecticut Community Care | Calls for Internal Investigation The Importance of Informed Choice in Achieving Free Choice in Healthcare. Informed Choice and Its Implications for Connecticut's ABI Waiver and MFP Programs Steps for Consumers to Officially Change Care Managers in MFP and ABI Waiver Programs. Enhancing Ethical Systems / Advocating for Consumer Rights and "Request to change Care Manager Form Are They Leaving People with Slower Recovery Behind? MFP and ABI Waiver Programs Freedom of Information Act Request - Connecticut ABI 1549P Consultation Services Funding. DB.42.131.Inf.

Living with a brain injury is not easy. For individuals with brain injuries, navigating through daily life can be challenging, particularly when it comes to transportation. Brain injuries can cause a range of physical, cognitive, and behavioral impairments that can make it difficult for people to leave their homes and access essential services. One of the biggest challenges for people with brain injuries is limited mobility. Depending on the severity of the injury, a person may require a wheelchair, walker, or other mobility aids to get around. This can make it difficult or impossible for them to drive a car or walk long distances, limiting their independence and making it challenging to access necessary services. In addition to physical limitations, brain injuries can also cause cognitive impairments, making it difficult for individuals to plan and organize tasks, remember details, and navigate unfamiliar environments. This can make it challenging to figure out how to get to a destination, particularly if they are not familiar with the area. Behavioral changes, such as increased anxiety, impulsivity, or irritability, can also make it challenging for people with brain injuries to navigate public transportation systems, which can be noisy, crowded, and stressful. Furthermore, people with brain injuries are more vulnerable to accidents and falls, which can be a concern when traveling on foot or driving a car. Living in a town without public transportation can exacerbate many of these challenges. Without access to public transportation, people with brain injuries may have limited access to essential services, such as medical care, grocery stores, and employment opportunities. They may become socially isolated and feel disconnected from their community, leading to negative impacts on their mental health and well-being. Providing free transportation for people with brain injuries can be a critical resource for many aspects of their daily life. It can provide access to essential services, promote independence and socialization, facilitate employment and education, and foster community involvement. By eliminating the financial burden of transportation, free transportation can help to improve the quality of life for people with brain injuries and their families. We must work together to raise awareness of the challenges that people with brain injuries face and inspire understanding and compassion in our communities. By doing so, we can help to promote positive change and create a more inclusive and supportive society for people with brain injuries and their families. Raising awareness about the challenges faced by people with brain injuries is an important step towards creating a more inclusive and supportive society. Brain Injury Awareness Transportation Access Disability Rights Inclusion Community Support Mental Healt hAwareness Independence Socialization Advocacy Positive Change Connecticut Transportation MFP ABI Waiver Accessibility Mobility Veyo Connecticut DOT DSS DMHAS CT ABI MFP DB.42.131.Inf.

Support, without support, is no support at all! A culture of blame and lazy management is driving employees away from supported living providers. Employees that are neglected, blamed, and unsupported, hate their jobs and this directly affects the people and families they serve. To truly support people and families, we need to value and support the caregivers who work tirelessly to provide quality care. That's why ABI Resources is so sought after and trusted. ABI prioritizes employees, teams, education, and compassion, creating a positive and supportive work environment that ultimately leads to better outcomes for everyone. Working as a caregiver with ABI Resources is not just a job - it's a calling. It's an opportunity to use your skills and experience to make a real difference in the world. So if you're looking for a career that is both rewarding and fulfilling, consider joining the team at ABI Resources today. Together, we can help individuals with disabilities and other life challenges live their best lives, with dignity, independence, and respect. Home healthcare, In-home care, Caregiver, Personal care aide, Certified nursing assistant (CNA), Home health aide (HHA), Private duty nursing, Companion care, Respite care, Hospice care, Skilled nursing, Homecare agency, Homecare provider, Rehabilitation services, Elder care, Dementia care, Alzheimer's care, Palliative care, Home health nurse, Medical social worker, Connecticut home healthcare, Connecticut in-home care, Connecticut caregiver, Connecticut personal care aide, Connecticut CNA jobs, Connecticut HHA jobs, Connecticut private duty nursing, Connecticut companion care, Connecticut respite care, Connecticut hospice care, Connecticut skilled nursing, Connecticut homecare agency, Connecticut homecare provider, Connecticut rehabilitation services, Connecticut elder care, Connecticut dementia care, Connecticut Alzheimer's care, Connecticut palliative care, Connecticut home health nurse, Connecticut medical social worker, Senior care, Disability support, Life skills coach, Direct support professional (DSP), Residential counselor, Rehabilitation aide, Mental health support, Special needs care, Autism care, Live-in caregiver. MFP Money follows the person program / ABI Waiver Program. DB.42.131.Inf.

10/15/2024 Exposing Medicaid Secrets: How Connecticut's Violations Hurt Taxpayers & Vulnerable Populations Connecticut DSS Faces Scrutiny Over Concealed Provider List in Medicaid ABI Waiver Program In a recent legislative exchange, Connecticut State Representative Kathleen McCarty questioned Christine Weston, Director of the Community Options Unit (COU) within the Connecticut Department of Social Services (DSS), about the availability of the Medicaid Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program Agency Provider List. The list is not publicly accessible and COU would need to consult with DSS legal counsel—has triggered concerns about transparency and potential violations of federal Medicaid regulations. The concealment of the Provider List directly undermines federal requirements for transparency, consumer choice, and public accountability in Medicaid-funded programs. Under the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(23)), Medicaid beneficiaries are guaranteed the right to choose from any qualified provider participating in the program. By withholding the list of providers, DSS is effectively limiting beneficiaries' ability to make informed choices about their care, a clear violation of this federal statute. More than a mere bureaucratic oversight, this lack of transparency obstructs the fundamental rights of Medicaid recipients, particularly vulnerable populations like brain injury survivors who depend on specialized care. These individuals and their families rely on accessible information to choose the most appropriate care providers based on quality, expertise, and geographic location. The absence of this information not only deprives them of their legal rights but also risks funneling beneficiaries toward limited, state-favored providers, potentially compromising the quality of care they receive. This issue with the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program could indicate a systemic problem in Connecticut’s administration of federally funded programs. If the DSS is withholding information in this program, similar practices may be occurring in other state-managed, federally funded programs. With billions of taxpayer dollars flowing through Medicaid, this raises significant concerns about mismanagement, financial oversight, and the state’s broader compliance with federal transparency requirements. Beyond violating Medicaid regulations, this failure to provide access to public information also erodes trust in the integrity of state-run health services. When critical details about provider options are concealed, it creates a veil of secrecy that limits public accountability. Moreover, it raises the specter of conflicts of interest—where specific providers may be favored by state agencies for reasons unrelated to the quality of care or beneficiary needs. Such practices, if left unchecked, can lead to monopolistic conditions where certain agencies dominate the landscape, to the detriment of consumer choice and healthcare quality. Medicaid is designed to serve some of the most vulnerable populations in the country, including individuals with disabilities, low-income families, and elderly individuals requiring long-term care. The intentional withholding of vital information such as provider lists violates not only federal laws but also the ethical obligation to ensure that these populations have equal access to healthcare services. This situation calls for immediate action from federal oversight agencies, such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), to conduct a thorough audit of Connecticut’s Medicaid program administration. Federal intervention is necessary to ensure that the state complies with transparency regulations and provides Medicaid beneficiaries with the information they are entitled to by law. If these practices are found to extend to other federally funded programs, it could signal widespread non-compliance, mismanagement of federal funds, and a failure to uphold the rights of vulnerable individuals across the state. As the investigation into this issue unfolds, it is critical that the DSS take immediate steps to rectify these transparency failures. The state must make the Medicaid ABI Waiver Program Agency Provider List publicly accessible and ensure that beneficiaries’ rights to choose their providers are fully restored. Anything less would continue to jeopardize the integrity of Connecticut’s Medicaid program and the health and well-being of those it is meant to serve. In a world where transparency and accountability are becoming increasingly important, concerns are growing about the rights of brain-injured individuals in Connecticut who rely on federally funded programs for their care. Disturbing news has recently emerged regarding the Approved Provider Directory and Connecticut care management referral processes of federally funded waivers. According to Marihonor Flagg, a representative from ACR Allied Community Resources, the approved provider directory is not available for public view, citing a directive from the Department of Social Services DSS. ABI Resources states, "This lack of transparency is extremely concerning and raises questions about the quality and reliability of the information contained in the directory, as well as, past and current Care Management referral practices of federally funded services to Medicaid agency providers." Furthermore, Flagg states that "there is no link to the Provider Directory that Allied produces and maintains." ABI resources states, this adds to the confusion and uncertainty surrounding this issue. This lack of access to vital information could potentially have serious consequences for individuals and families in need of assistance from Medicaid programs. Why would a Medicaid agency provider directory list be hidden from the public? ABI Resources recently contacted the state's Department of Social Services DSS and the Community Options Unit COU in an effort to obtain clarity on these concerns. Jennifer Cavallaro, the Social Services Program Division Director for the Division of Health Services Community Options Unit; Amy Dumont, LCSW, the Social Services Program Manager; Elizabeth Orejuela, the Community Nurse Coordinator, and Michael Slitt, Staff Attorney at the Connecticut Department of Social Services, have been contacted, but as of now, a clear response has yet to be provided. ABI Resources has taken steps to address these concerns by reaching out to the federal government for assistance. Specifically, the organization has requested an investigation into management practices and has requested more detailed information about the programs, including the total number of program-approved agency providers, the entity responsible for managing and updating the approved provider directory list, information about public access to this list and Care Management referral practices of federal program agency providers. ABI Resources' requests for information have been made in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). ABI Resources remains committed to steadfast advocacy for the rights of individuals with disabilities. We are dedicated to staying informed and up-to-date on the latest developments, and we pledge to keep you informed as we receive new information. This article sheds light on the concerns surrounding the lack of transparency and accountability in Connecticut's federally funded programs. Connecticut, brain-injured individuals, , transparency, accountability, Approved Provider Directory, care management referral processes, Medicaid agency providers, lack of access, concerns, confusion, investigation, advocacy, Freedom of Information Act. Trending Ongoing Silence! Lack of Transparency in Connecticut's Federally Funded Programs Raises Alarm Secret Directory and Practices: Concerns Rise for Brain-Injured Individuals in Connecticut Medicaid Federal Anti-Kickback Statute | Medicaid Referral Fraud | ABI RESOURCES Transparency and Accountability Concerns in CT's Federally Funded Programs for Brain Injury Care Care Managers. Do you have the right to change yours? Understanding Protecting Your Freedoms Investigating the Legality and Impact of CCC's Secret Electronic Randomization System on Federally Disability Rights Connecticut (DRCT) Team Dear Brain Injury Alliance of Connecticut ( BIAC ) Dear Governor Ned Lamont, Advocacy Request for Brain Injury Survivors Alleged Discrimination at Connecticut Community Care | Calls for Internal Investigation The Importance of Informed Choice in Achieving Free Choice in Healthcare. Informed Choice and Its Implications for Connecticut's ABI Waiver and MFP Programs Steps for Consumers to Officially Change Care Managers in MFP and ABI Waiver Programs. Enhancing Ethical Systems / Advocating for Consumer Rights and "Request to change Care Manager Form Are They Leaving People with Slower Recovery Behind? MFP and ABI Waiver Programs Freedom of Information Act Request - Connecticut ABI 1549P Consultation Services Funding. DB.42.131.Inf.

The Connecticut Community Care (CCC) is a vital resource for many individuals and families in the state, providing a range of services and supports to help people live independently and with dignity. However, recent reports have raised concerns about the lack of transparency and accessibility in the answers and responses provided by CCC to the questions and concerns of the community it serves. This lack of transparency and accessibility is a cause for concern, as it undermines the trust and confidence that individuals and families have in CCC and its services. Without clear and accessible answers to their questions and concerns, individuals may feel frustrated, ignored, or even helpless and may be less likely to seek out the help and support they need. Furthermore, the lack of transparency and accessibility in CCC's responses also raises questions about accountability and governance. If CCC is not providing clear and accessible answers to questions and concerns, how can individuals and families be assured that their needs and interests are being taken into account in the decision-making processes of the organization? In order to address these concerns, it is essential that CCC take steps to improve the transparency and accessibility of its answers and responses to community questions and concerns. This may involve providing more detailed and comprehensive information, using clear and concise language, and making information more readily available through multiple channels, including online and in-person. By taking these steps, CCC can demonstrate its commitment to accountability, transparency, and accessibility and help ensure that individuals and families in Connecticut have the information and support they need to live independently and with dignity. ABI Resources contacted, Erin Kane Head of Quality and Performance Improvement for CCC Connecticut Community Care. Dear Erin, Thank you for your prompt and informative response to my inquiry about Connecticut Community Care's referral process. I appreciate the detailed explanation you provided and the clarification on the provider selection criteria. I understand that Amy Dumont from DSS will be able to address my questions regarding documentation and eligibility. I look forward to her input on these matters. In the meantime, I have some additional questions for you. Can you please elaborate on the electronic randomization process used for provider selection when a client does not indicate a preference? I am curious to learn more about how the system works to ensure a fair distribution of referrals. I have a few additional questions to help me better understand the referral system: Provider List: a. Approximately how many agency providers are currently in the Connecticut Community Care referral system? Understanding the number of providers in the system will give me a better idea of the diversity and range of options available to clients. b. Who provides Connecticut Community Care with the list of agency providers included in the referral system? Is there a specific department or organization responsible for maintaining and updating the list of providers? c. How often is the list of agency providers updated? Is there a regular schedule or is it updated on an as-needed basis? d. How may we ensure that ABI Resources is listed within the system for all areas and services? May I see how ABI Resources is listed within your system? Electronic System: a. What is the name of the electronic system used for randomizing provider selection when a client does not indicate a preference? b. Can you please elaborate on the electronic randomization process used for provider selection to ensure a fair distribution of referrals? c. Who is responsible for managing the referral system and ensuring its smooth operation? Is there a specific department or organization responsible for maintaining and updating the list of providers? d. Could you please elaborate on how the selected provider is presented to the care manager? Additionally, how is this selection subsequently presented to the client? Are there specific steps or protocols followed to ensure clients are fully informed and understand their options? Regarding the role of care managers in the process: a. What is the care manager's role in presenting agency providers, such as ABI Resources, to clients during the referral process? b. How do they ensure that clients are well-informed and make the best choice based on their needs and preferences? c. Do all care managers have access to the electronic system used for provider selection? If so, are they able to operate the system independently, or is there a specific protocol they must follow? Could you please elaborate on the level of involvement and autonomy care managers have when utilizing CCC the electronic system during the referral process? I want to take a moment to emphasize how much we value the information you have provided and will continue to provide about Connecticut Community Care's referral process. This knowledge not only helps ABI Resources better navigate and understand the system, but it also enables us to more effectively serve the brain injury population. By comprehending the intricacies of the referral process, we can work closely with care managers, adapt our services to meet clients' specific needs, and ensure that clients are presented with the most accurate and relevant information about ABI Resources. This collaborative approach is essential in empowering clients to make informed decisions about their care, which ultimately contributes to better outcomes for those affected by brain injuries. Once again, thank you for your ongoing assistance and dedication to helping us serve the brain injury community more effectively. Understanding the involvement of care managers in the process will help us better collaborate with them and support clients effectively. Your insights are greatly appreciated, I look forward to your response and any additional insights you can provide on this topic. All the best, David Medeiros Following Up on Unacknowledged Requests from CCC Connecticut Community Care, ABI Resources followed up with this email. Dear Erin, I am writing to express our deepening concerns over the lack of response to ABI Resources' inquiry regarding Connecticut Community Care's referral process. As a provider of services to the brain injury population, we are committed to ensuring that individuals with disabilities have full access and receive the care and services they need to thrive. We recognize that you and your team may be facing many challenges, and we urge you to prioritize ABI Resources' inquiry. The lack of communication is raising serious doubts about the reliability of information and responsiveness of your organization, and this is creating significant new concerns. We cannot overemphasize the importance of ensuring that Medicaid consumers of the above programs have full and complete access to ABI Resources services. We are committed to working together with you and your organization to improve the lives of individuals with disabilities. We urge you to respond to our inquiries and to work with ABI Resources to address any concerns or issues that may arise. Thank you for your attention to this matter, and we look forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely, David Medeiros Following Up on Unacknowledged Requests from CCC Connecticut Community Care, ABI Resources followed up with this email to, Julia Evans Starr, President, of CCC Connecticut Community Care. Dear Julia Evans Starr, President, I hope this email finds you well. I am writing to express our concern regarding a series of unanswered inquiries and concerns that we at ABI Resources have raised with Connecticut Community Care pertaining to Medicaid federally funded waivers. As we both strive to serve the same community, it is vital that our questions be addressed promptly to ensure the best possible support for the individuals who rely on our services. Below is a list of unacknowledged email inquiries sent to Connecticut Community Care, Head of Quality and Performance Improvement detailing inquiries and concerns which have yet to receive a response: Subject: Comprehensive Inquiry: Referral Process, Provider List, and Care Manager's Role. a. Sent: Fri 3/17/2023 5:43 AM b. Sent: Wed 3/22/2023 5:01 PM Subject: Inquiry Regarding Client's Option to Change Agency Service or Care Management Provider. MFP, ABI and PCA Waivers. a. Sent: Fri 3/17/ 2023 7:30 AM b. Sent: Wed 3/22/2023 5:00 PM Subject: Care Management Referral Process Inquiry for MFP Program and Waivers. a. Sent: Sat 3/11/2023 7:17 AM Subject: To the attention of David Medeiros CBIS. a. Sent: Wed 3/22/2023 5:02 PM b. Pertaining to the received communication from Thu 9/1/2022 12:16 PM We kindly request that these concerns be brought to the attention of the Board of Directors at the earliest opportunity, as they directly affect our mutual mission to serve the community. We believe that addressing these questions and concerns will not only strengthen our collaboration but also ensure that the individuals we serve receive the highest quality of care and support. The lack of response to our inquiries is causing growing concerns for numerous reasons, particularly in relation to the well-being of Medicaid consumers and providers. This situation not only impairs our capacity to offer optimal care to our clients, but it also casts doubt on the effectiveness of communication and collaboration between our organizations, as well as the ability of care managers to effectively provide for the Medicaid waiver brain injured population while ensuring the rights of the person served are adhered to. It is vital to address these concerns swiftly to preserve trust and nurture a positive working relationship moving forward. At ABI Resources, we are committed to partnering with your organization to develop practical solutions to the challenges faced by Medicaid consumers. By working together, we can make a meaningful difference and enhance the quality of care provided to these individuals, ultimately improving their well-being and overall experience. Please provide a timeline for when we can expect a response to the aforementioned inquiries. We appreciate your attention to this matter and look forward to a productive dialogue. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, David Medeiros ABI Resources has taken steps to address these concerns by reaching out to the federal government for assistance. Specifically, the organization has requested an investigation into management practices and has requested more detailed information about the programs, including the total number of program-approved agency providers, the entity responsible for managing and updating the approved provider directory list, information about public access to this list and Care Management referral practices of federal program agency providers. ABI Resources' requests for information have been made in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). ABI Resources remains committed to steadfast advocacy for the rights of individuals with disabilities. We are dedicated to staying informed and up-to-date on the latest developments, and we pledge to keep you informed as we receive new information. This article sheds light on the concerns surrounding the lack of transparency and accountability in Connecticut's federally funded programs. Connecticut, brain-injured individuals, transparency, accountability, Approved Provider Directory, care management referral processes, Medicaid agency providers, lack of access, concerns, confusion, investigation, advocacy, Freedom of Information Act. Trending Ongoing Silence! Lack of Transparency in Connecticut's Federally Funded Programs Raises Alarm Secret Directory and Practices: Concerns Rise for Brain-Injured Individuals in Connecticut Medicaid Federal Anti-Kickback Statute | Medicaid Referral Fraud | ABI RESOURCES Transparency and Accountability Concerns in CT's Federally Funded Programs for Brain Injury Care Care Managers. Do you have the right to change yours? Understanding Protecting Your Freedoms Investigating the Legality and Impact of CCC's Secret Electronic Randomization System on Federally Disability Rights Connecticut (DRCT) Team Dear Brain Injury Alliance of Connecticut ( BIAC ) Dear Governor Ned Lamont, Advocacy Request for Brain Injury Survivors Alleged Discrimination at Connecticut Community Care | Calls for Internal Investigation The Importance of Informed Choice in Achieving Free Choice in Healthcare. Informed Choice and Its Implications for Connecticut's ABI Waiver and MFP Programs Steps for Consumers to Officially Change Care Managers in MFP and ABI Waiver Programs. Enhancing Ethical Systems / Advocating for Consumer Rights and "Request to change Care Manager Form Are They Leaving People with Slower Recovery Behind? MFP and ABI Waiver Programs Freedom of Information Act Request - Connecticut ABI 1549P Consultation Services Funding. DB.42.131.Inf.

"ABI Resources Advocates for Transparency and Accountability in Connecticut's Federally Funded Programs" ABI Resources, a provider of quality care for brain-injured individuals, has raised concerns about the lack of transparency and accountability in Connecticut's federally funded programs. The organization has sent several inquiries to Connecticut Community Care (CCC) regarding the referral process, provider list, and care manager's role, but has yet to receive a response. As a result, ABI Resources has requested an investigation into management practices and more detailed information about the programs. The lack of access to the approved provider directory and care management referral processes has caused confusion and concern for Medicaid agency providers and brain-injured individuals. ABI Resources remains committed to advocating for the rights of individuals with disabilities and will keep the public informed as they receive new information. ABI Resources contacted, Erin Kane Head of Quality and Performance Improvement for CCC Connecticut Community Care. Hello Erin, Thank you for taking the time to read this email. As a provider of quality care for the brain-injured population, ABI Resources is deeply committed to upholding the highest standards of person-centered care and client rights. In line with this commitment, we are writing to inquire about the process involved in the event a client wishes to change an agency service provider or care management provider. We understand that clients may sometimes feel uncomfortable with their current care manager or agency service provider, or may wish to have a different care management agency provider for any reason. We would like to know if clients have the option to request and receive a different agency service provider, care manager, or care management agency provider. If so, we would like to understand the process and how the rules of person-centered care and client rights are applied in such situations. Furthermore, we would like to understand how this request is officially implemented. a.    If a client wishes to document their request, what specific form or documentation must a client complete? b.    What steps must they take to ensure that their request is successfully processed? c.    Does the client sign an official request to change agency service providers, a care manager, or care management agency? d.    Is this signed document provided to the current provider? e.    Where can clients locate these documents? f.    Is this document provided to the client by care management? and how does care management provide request forms such as these? g.    What periods for notices are implemented? h.    In the event that a client is uncomfortable with making this request directly to their care manager, agency service provider, or care management provider, how may the client do so? As a valued partner in providing quality care to the brain-injured population, we understand that some clients may request the option to change care managers, agency service providers, or care management providers. It is essential for ABI Resources to better understand this process to ensure that our clients receive the best possible person-centered care and rights of the person served. We appreciate any information you can provide us on this matter to help us better serve our mutual clients. Thank you again for your time and consideration, and we look forward to hearing from you soon. All the best, David Medeiros Dear Erin, I hope this email finds you well. As a provider of quality care for the brain-injured population, ABI Resources is dedicated to maintaining the highest standards of person-centered care and upholding client rights. In the pursuit of this commitment, we sent the email below with a detailed inquiry regarding the process for clients who wish to change their agency service provider or care management provider. Unfortunately, we have not yet received a response from you and are now increasingly concerned about the implications. Given the importance of this issue and its potential impact on the community we serve, we would like to express our concern about the lack of acknowledgment and answers to our questions. We understand that everyone has a busy schedule, however, we believe that addressing these concerns is crucial for ensuring that our clients receive the best possible care and have their rights respected. To recap, our previous email contained a series of questions aimed at understanding the process involved in changing an agency service provider or care management provider, as well as how the principles of person-centered care and client rights apply in such situations. We kindly request your assistance in providing us with information on the following topics: The process for clients who wish to change agency service providers, care managers, or care management agency providers. The required documentation and steps for clients to successfully submit and process their requests. The procedures for handling cases in which clients are uncomfortable making these requests directly to their current providers. We cannot emphasize enough the importance of addressing these concerns for the well-being of our clients and the community we serve. We understand that collaboration and open communication are essential for providing quality care, and we hope that you share our commitment to these principles. We must reiterate the importance of addressing these concerns for the well-being of our clients, our staff, and our business. We kindly request your prompt attention to this matter. Thank you again for your time and consideration. We look forward to resolving this issue together, ensuring the best possible care for our clients and a strong, collaborative relationship between our organizations. We eagerly await your response. Warm regards, David Medeiros Following Up on Unacknowledged Requests from CCC Connecticut Community Care, ABI Resources followed up with this email to, Julia Evans Starr, President, of CCC Connecticut Community Care. Dear Julia Evans Starr, President, I hope this email finds you well. I am writing to express our concern regarding a series of unanswered inquiries and concerns that we at ABI Resources have raised with Connecticut Community Care pertaining to Medicaid federally funded waivers. As we both strive to serve the same community, it is vital that our questions be addressed promptly to ensure the best possible support for the individuals who rely on our services. Below is a list of unacknowledged email inquiries sent to Connecticut Community Care, Head of Quality and Performance Improvement detailing inquiries and concerns which have yet to receive a response: Subject: Comprehensive Inquiry: Referral Process, Provider List, and Care Manager's Role. a. Sent: Fri 3/17/2023 5:43 AM b. Sent: Wed 3/22/2023 5:01 PM Subject: Inquiry Regarding Client's Option to Change Agency Service or Care Management Provider. MFP, ABI and PCA Waivers. a. Sent: Fri 3/17/ 2023 7:30 AM b. Sent: Wed 3/22/2023 5:00 PM Subject: Care Management Referral Process Inquiry for MFP Program and Waivers. a. Sent: Sat 3/11/2023 7:17 AM Subject: To the attention of David Medeiros CBIS. a. Sent: Wed 3/22/2023 5:02 PM b. Pertaining to the received communication from Thu 9/1/2022 12:16 PM We kindly request that these concerns be brought to the attention of the Board of Directors at the earliest opportunity, as they directly affect our mutual mission to serve the community. We believe that addressing these questions and concerns will not only strengthen our collaboration but also ensure that the individuals we serve receive the highest quality of care and support. The lack of response to our inquiries is causing growing concerns for numerous reasons, particularly in relation to the well-being of Medicaid consumers and providers. This situation not only impairs our capacity to offer optimal care to our clients, but it also casts doubt on the effectiveness of communication and collaboration between our organizations, as well as the ability of care managers to effectively provide for the Medicaid waiver brain injured population while ensuring the rights of the person served are adhered to. It is vital to address these concerns swiftly to preserve trust and nurture a positive working relationship moving forward. At ABI Resources, we are committed to partnering with your organization to develop practical solutions to the challenges faced by Medicaid consumers. By working together, we can make a meaningful difference and enhance the quality of care provided to these individuals, ultimately improving their well-being and overall experience. Please provide a timeline for when we can expect a response to the aforementioned inquiries. We appreciate your attention to this matter and look forward to a productive dialogue. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, David Medeiros ABI Resources has taken steps to address these concerns by reaching out to the federal government for assistance. Specifically, the organization has requested an investigation into management practices and has requested more detailed information about the programs, including the total number of program-approved agency providers, the entity responsible for managing and updating the approved provider directory list, information about public access to this list and Care Management referral practices of federal program agency providers. ABI Resources' requests for information have been made in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). ABI Resources remains committed to steadfast advocacy for the rights of individuals with disabilities. We are dedicated to staying informed and up-to-date on the latest developments, and we pledge to keep you informed as we receive new information. This article sheds light on the concerns surrounding the lack of transparency and accountability in Connecticut's federally funded programs. Connecticut, brain-injured individuals, transparency, accountability, Approved Provider Directory, care management referral processes, Medicaid agency providers, lack of access, concerns, confusion, investigation, advocacy, Freedom of Information Act. Trending Ongoing Silence! Lack of Transparency in Connecticut's Federally Funded Programs Raises Alarm Secret Directory and Practices: Concerns Rise for Brain-Injured Individuals in Connecticut Medicaid Federal Anti-Kickback Statute | Medicaid Referral Fraud | ABI RESOURCES Transparency and Accountability Concerns in CT's Federally Funded Programs for Brain Injury Care Care Managers. Do you have the right to change yours? Understanding Protecting Your Freedoms Investigating the Legality and Impact of CCC's Secret Electronic Randomization System on Federally Disability Rights Connecticut (DRCT) Team Dear Brain Injury Alliance of Connecticut ( BIAC ) Dear Governor Ned Lamont, Advocacy Request for Brain Injury Survivors Alleged Discrimination at Connecticut Community Care | Calls for Internal Investigation The Importance of Informed Choice in Achieving Free Choice in Healthcare. Informed Choice and Its Implications for Connecticut's ABI Waiver and MFP Programs Steps for Consumers to Officially Change Care Managers in MFP and ABI Waiver Programs. Enhancing Ethical Systems / Advocating for Consumer Rights and "Request to change Care Manager Form Are They Leaving People with Slower Recovery Behind? MFP and ABI Waiver Programs Freedom of Information Act Request - Connecticut ABI 1549P Consultation Services Funding. DB.42.131.Inf.

Investigating the Legality and Impact of CCC's Secret Electronic Randomization System on Federally Funded Programs Subtitle: Exploring the potential implications for Approved Agency Providers and the rights of disabled individuals Introduction: Recently, questions have emerged regarding the legality of CCC's secret electronic randomization system utilized in federally funded programs. This system, which has been operating clandestinely for an unspecified duration, could potentially impact numerous Approved Agency Providers and raise concerns about the rights of disabled individuals involved in these programs. The legality of the Secret Electronic Randomization System A comprehensive analysis of the legality of CCC's secret electronic randomization system is necessary, taking into account federal and state regulations, as well as any potential breaches of constitutional rights. Duration of the Secret System's Implementation Further investigation is required to determine the exact length of time that the secret electronic randomization system has been in place and the extent of its impact on federally funded programs. Potential Effects on Approved Agency Providers The number of Approved Agency Providers possibly affected by this clandestine system is currently unknown, necessitating a thorough examination to assess the system's impact on the delivery and quality of services provided. Implications for the Rights of Disabled Individuals It is crucial to evaluate whether the secret referral system might be infringing upon the rights of disabled persons, particularly in terms of equal access to services and protection against discrimination. Conclusion: As we continue to uncover more information about CCC's secret electronic randomization system, ABI Resources remains committed to providing unbiased, professional, and comprehensive updates on the issue. Stay tuned for further developments as we work to unravel the implications of this system on federally funded programs, Approved Agency Providers, and the rights of disabled individuals. ABI Resources has taken steps to address these concerns by reaching out to the federal government for assistance. Specifically, the organization has requested an investigation into management practices and has requested more detailed information about the programs, including the total number of program-approved agency providers, the entity responsible for managing and updating the approved provider directory list, information about public access to this list and Care Management referral practices of federal program agency providers. ABI Resources' requests for information have been made in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). ABI Resources remains committed to steadfast advocacy for the rights of individuals with disabilities. We are dedicated to staying informed and up-to-date on the latest developments, and we pledge to keep you informed as we receive new information. This article sheds light on the concerns surrounding the lack of transparency and accountability in Connecticut's federally funded programs. Connecticut, brain-injured individuals, transparency, accountability, Approved Provider Directory, care management referral processes, Medicaid agency providers, lack of access, concerns, confusion, investigation, advocacy, Freedom of Information Act. Trending Ongoing Silence! Lack of Transparency in Connecticut's Federally Funded Programs Raises Alarm Secret Directory and Practices: Concerns Rise for Brain-Injured Individuals in Connecticut Medicaid Federal Anti-Kickback Statute | Medicaid Referral Fraud | ABI RESOURCES Transparency and Accountability Concerns in CT's Federally Funded Programs for Brain Injury Care Care Managers. Do you have the right to change yours? Understanding Protecting Your Freedoms Investigating the Legality and Impact of CCC's Secret Electronic Randomization System on Federally Disability Rights Connecticut (DRCT) Team Dear Brain Injury Alliance of Connecticut ( BIAC ) Dear Governor Ned Lamont, Advocacy Request for Brain Injury Survivors Alleged Discrimination at Connecticut Community Care | Calls for Internal Investigation The Importance of Informed Choice in Achieving Free Choice in Healthcare. Informed Choice and Its Implications for Connecticut's ABI Waiver and MFP Programs Steps for Consumers to Officially Change Care Managers in MFP and ABI Waiver Programs. Enhancing Ethical Systems / Advocating for Consumer Rights and "Request to change Care Manager Form Are They Leaving People with Slower Recovery Behind? MFP and ABI Waiver Programs Freedom of Information Act Request - Connecticut ABI 1549P Consultation Services Funding. DB.42.131.Inf.

Dear Disability Rights Connecticut (DRCT) Team, I hope this message finds you well. I am reaching out to request advocacy support for a matter of utmost importance to individuals with disabilities who rely on federally funded services. Specifically, I have become aware of potential discriminatory referral practices by care management agencies that may be limiting access to service providers of Federally funded waivers, including but not limited to the MFP Money Follows the Person program and the ABI Waiver program. It is possible that financial incentives are driving this behavior, which is unacceptable. As an organization that is committed to promoting equal access to care for individuals with disabilities, I am reaching out to DRCT to request your support in investigating this matter and guiding appropriate actions. It is crucial that individuals with disabilities are not denied access to necessary resources and services. The impact of limited access to care for brain injury survivors is significant, with delayed recovery, increased health risks, reduced quality of life, financial burden, and mental health impacts all possible consequences of discriminatory referral practices. I am deeply concerned about this issue and believe that DRCT is uniquely positioned to take action and ensure that individuals with disabilities have full access to all available resources and services. Your advocacy expertise and commitment to protecting the rights of individuals with disabilities make you an invaluable ally in addressing this matter. Thank you for your dedication to promoting equality and access to necessary resources and services. I appreciate your ongoing efforts to protect the rights of individuals with disabilities. Sincerely, ABI Resources Team Member David Medeiros __________________________ As a society, we have a responsibility to ensure that every individual has access to the resources and support they need to thrive. Unfortunately, people with disabilities often face significant barriers to full participation in society, including discrimination, lack of access to essential services, and social isolation. ABI Resources is actively reaching out to disability advocacy groups throughout the nation to provide equality and support for the rights of people with disabilities. By working closely with these organizations, ABI Resources is helping to ensure that people with disabilities have access to the services and resources they need to live full, productive lives. ABI Resources is promoting disability rights by advocating for policy changes at the local, state, and federal levels. This includes supporting initiatives to increase access to affordable healthcare, expand employment opportunities for people with disabilities, and strengthen anti-discrimination laws. By working with advocacy groups and policymakers, ABI Resources is helping to build a more inclusive society that values the contributions of people with disabilities. Ultimately, the work of ABI Resources is about promoting equality and respect for people with disabilities. By reaching out to advocacy groups, providing personalized care and support services, and advocating for policy changes, ABI Resources is making a real difference in the lives of people with disabilities across the nation. We should all support these efforts to ensure that every individual has the opportunity to live a full and meaningful life, regardless of their abilities. disability rights, advocacy support, discriminatory referral practices, care management agencies, federally funded services, access to care, brain injury survivors, MFP Money Follows the Person program, ABI Waiver program, financial incentives, resources, services, equality. DB.42.131.Inf.